Trial Outcomes & Findings for To Assess the Impact of Ferric Carboxymaltose Compared With Iron Sucrose in Chinese Subjects on Correcting Iron Deficiency Anaemia (NCT NCT03591406)
NCT ID: NCT03591406
Last Updated: 2021-06-10
Results Overview
Haemoglobin (Hb)
COMPLETED
PHASE3
371 participants
From baseline at any time up to Week 8
2021-06-10
Participant Flow
Subjects who provided signed and dated informed consent were screened within 7 days prior to initial treatment administration.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Ferric Carboxymaltose (FCM)
Participants treated with FCM given by IV injection or drip infusion
Dosage Form: Injection, Sterile FCM solution as a 5% w/v iron solution in water for injection
Strength: 10 mL vials containing 500 mg iron per vial
Dosage: 500mg/week or 1000mg/week (based on subject Body Weight (BW) and Hb value at screening)
Route of administration: IV injection (undiluted solution) or drip infusion (500 mg iron diluted in 100 mL 0.9% w/v physiological saline or 1,000 mg iron diluted in 250 mL 0.9% w/v physiological saline)
Dosing schedules: baseline (Day 1) and, if required, at Day 8 and Day 15.
|
Iron Sucrose (IS)
Participants treated with IS given by IV injection or drip infusion
Dosage Form: Sterile solution for injection containing 2% w/v iron
Strength: 5 mL ampoules containing 100 mg iron per ampoule
Dosage: single doses of IS of 200mg iron based on the formula of Ganzoni: Cumulative iron deficit \[mg\] = BW \[kg\] x (target Hb- actual Hb) \[g/dL\] x 2.4 + 500 mg, up to 11 IS injections will be given
Route of administration: IV injection or drip infusion
Dosing schedules: three times a week, with an initial dose at baseline and will receive iron, as per approved label, until the subject has received the calculated iron dose.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
188
|
183
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
181
|
174
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
7
|
9
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Ferric Carboxymaltose (FCM)
Participants treated with FCM given by IV injection or drip infusion
Dosage Form: Injection, Sterile FCM solution as a 5% w/v iron solution in water for injection
Strength: 10 mL vials containing 500 mg iron per vial
Dosage: 500mg/week or 1000mg/week (based on subject Body Weight (BW) and Hb value at screening)
Route of administration: IV injection (undiluted solution) or drip infusion (500 mg iron diluted in 100 mL 0.9% w/v physiological saline or 1,000 mg iron diluted in 250 mL 0.9% w/v physiological saline)
Dosing schedules: baseline (Day 1) and, if required, at Day 8 and Day 15.
|
Iron Sucrose (IS)
Participants treated with IS given by IV injection or drip infusion
Dosage Form: Sterile solution for injection containing 2% w/v iron
Strength: 5 mL ampoules containing 100 mg iron per ampoule
Dosage: single doses of IS of 200mg iron based on the formula of Ganzoni: Cumulative iron deficit \[mg\] = BW \[kg\] x (target Hb- actual Hb) \[g/dL\] x 2.4 + 500 mg, up to 11 IS injections will be given
Route of administration: IV injection or drip infusion
Dosing schedules: three times a week, with an initial dose at baseline and will receive iron, as per approved label, until the subject has received the calculated iron dose.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
5
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
2
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
5
|
Baseline Characteristics
To Assess the Impact of Ferric Carboxymaltose Compared With Iron Sucrose in Chinese Subjects on Correcting Iron Deficiency Anaemia
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Ferric Carboxymaltose (FCM)
n=187 Participants
Participants treated with FCM given by IV injection or drip infusion
Dosage Form: Injection, Sterile FCM solution as a 5% w/v iron solution in water for injection
Strength: 10 mL vials containing 500 mg iron per vial
Dosage: 500mg/week or 1000mg/week (based on subject BW and Hb value at screening)
Route of administration: IV injection (undiluted solution) or drip infusion (500 mg iron diluted in 100 mL 0.9% w/v physiological saline or 1,000 mg iron diluted in 250 mL 0.9% w/v physiological saline)
Dosing schedules: baseline (Day 1) and, if required, at Day 8 and Day 15.
|
Iron Sucrose (IS)
n=180 Participants
Participants treated with IS given by IV injection or drip infusion
Dosage Form: Sterile solution for injection containing 2% w/v iron
Strength: 5 mL ampoules containing 100 mg iron per ampoule
Dosage: single doses of IS of 200mg iron based on the formula of Ganzoni: Cumulative iron deficit \[mg\] = BW \[kg\] x (target Hb- actual Hb) \[g/dL\] x 2.4 + 500 mg, up to 11 IS injections will be given
Route of administration: IV injection or drip infusion
Dosing schedules: three times a week, with an initial dose at baseline and will receive iron, as per approved label, until the subject has received the calculated iron dose.
|
Total
n=367 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
39.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.85 • n=5 Participants
|
38.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.70 • n=7 Participants
|
39.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.31 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
173 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
169 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
342 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
187 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
180 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
367 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
China
|
187 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
180 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
367 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Haemoglobin
|
7.74 g/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.491 • n=5 Participants
|
8.06 g/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.453 • n=7 Participants
|
7.90 g/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.479 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Serum ferritin
|
4.47 ng/ml
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.145 • n=5 Participants
|
4.93 ng/ml
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.095 • n=7 Participants
|
4.70 ng/ml
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.534 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Transferrin saturation (TSAT)
|
4.82 %
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.898 • n=5 Participants
|
4.92 %
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.912 • n=7 Participants
|
4.87 %
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.446 • n=5 Participants
|
|
High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP)
|
1.026 mg/l
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.1432 • n=5 Participants
|
1.567 mg/l
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.9817 • n=7 Participants
|
1.291 mg/l
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.4617 • n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline at any time up to Week 8Population: Per Protocol Set: participants who were randomised, received at least 1 dose of study treatment, had at least 1 baseline and post-baseline value (Hb, ferritin, TSAT), had a study drug compliance between 80% and 120% and had no major protocol violations
Haemoglobin (Hb)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ferric Carboxymaltose (FCM)
n=177 Participants
Participants treated with FCM given by IV injection or drip infusion
Dosage Form: Injection, Sterile FCM solution as a 5% w/v iron solution in water for injection
Strength: 10 mL vials containing 500 mg iron per vial
Dosage: 500mg/week or 1000mg/week (based on subject BW and Hb value at screening)
Route of administration: IV injection (undiluted solution) or drip infusion (500 mg iron diluted in 100 mL 0.9% w/v physiological saline or 1,000 mg iron diluted in 250 mL 0.9% w/v physiological saline)
Dosing schedules: baseline (Day 1) and, if required, at Day 8 and Day 15.
|
Iron Sucrose (IS)
n=178 Participants
Participants treated with IS given by IV injection or drip infusion
Dosage Form: Sterile solution for injection containing 2% w/v iron
Strength: 5 mL ampoules containing 100 mg iron per ampoule
Dosage: single doses of IS of 200mg iron based on the formula of Ganzoni: Cumulative iron deficit \[mg\] = BW \[kg\] x (target Hb- actual Hb) \[g/dL\] x 2.4 + 500 mg, up to 11 IS injections will be given
Route of administration: IV injection or drip infusion
Dosing schedules: three times a week, with an initial dose at baseline and will receive iron, as per approved label, until the subject has received the calculated iron dose.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Participants Achieving an Increase in Hb of at Least 2 g/dL at Any Time up to Week 8
|
176 Participants
|
175 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8Population: Per Protocol Set: participants who were randomised, received at least 1 dose of study treatment, had at least 1 baseline and post-baseline value (Hb, ferritin, TSAT), had a study drug compliance between 80% and 120% and had no major protocol violations
Haemoglobin (Hb)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ferric Carboxymaltose (FCM)
n=177 Participants
Participants treated with FCM given by IV injection or drip infusion
Dosage Form: Injection, Sterile FCM solution as a 5% w/v iron solution in water for injection
Strength: 10 mL vials containing 500 mg iron per vial
Dosage: 500mg/week or 1000mg/week (based on subject BW and Hb value at screening)
Route of administration: IV injection (undiluted solution) or drip infusion (500 mg iron diluted in 100 mL 0.9% w/v physiological saline or 1,000 mg iron diluted in 250 mL 0.9% w/v physiological saline)
Dosing schedules: baseline (Day 1) and, if required, at Day 8 and Day 15.
|
Iron Sucrose (IS)
n=178 Participants
Participants treated with IS given by IV injection or drip infusion
Dosage Form: Sterile solution for injection containing 2% w/v iron
Strength: 5 mL ampoules containing 100 mg iron per ampoule
Dosage: single doses of IS of 200mg iron based on the formula of Ganzoni: Cumulative iron deficit \[mg\] = BW \[kg\] x (target Hb- actual Hb) \[g/dL\] x 2.4 + 500 mg, up to 11 IS injections will be given
Route of administration: IV injection or drip infusion
Dosing schedules: three times a week, with an initial dose at baseline and will receive iron, as per approved label, until the subject has received the calculated iron dose.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Participants Achieving an Increase in Hb of at Least 2 g/dL From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8
Week 2
|
150 Participants
|
129 Participants
|
|
Participants Achieving an Increase in Hb of at Least 2 g/dL From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8
Week 4
|
164 Participants
|
167 Participants
|
|
Participants Achieving an Increase in Hb of at Least 2 g/dL From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8
Week 6
|
169 Participants
|
168 Participants
|
|
Participants Achieving an Increase in Hb of at Least 2 g/dL From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8
Week 8
|
173 Participants
|
171 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8Population: Per Protocol Set: participants who were randomised, received at least 1 dose of study treatment, had at least 1 baseline and post-baseline value (Hb, ferritin, TSAT), had a study drug compliance between 80% and 120% and had no major protocol violations
Haemoglobin (Hb)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ferric Carboxymaltose (FCM)
n=177 Participants
Participants treated with FCM given by IV injection or drip infusion
Dosage Form: Injection, Sterile FCM solution as a 5% w/v iron solution in water for injection
Strength: 10 mL vials containing 500 mg iron per vial
Dosage: 500mg/week or 1000mg/week (based on subject BW and Hb value at screening)
Route of administration: IV injection (undiluted solution) or drip infusion (500 mg iron diluted in 100 mL 0.9% w/v physiological saline or 1,000 mg iron diluted in 250 mL 0.9% w/v physiological saline)
Dosing schedules: baseline (Day 1) and, if required, at Day 8 and Day 15.
|
Iron Sucrose (IS)
n=178 Participants
Participants treated with IS given by IV injection or drip infusion
Dosage Form: Sterile solution for injection containing 2% w/v iron
Strength: 5 mL ampoules containing 100 mg iron per ampoule
Dosage: single doses of IS of 200mg iron based on the formula of Ganzoni: Cumulative iron deficit \[mg\] = BW \[kg\] x (target Hb- actual Hb) \[g/dL\] x 2.4 + 500 mg, up to 11 IS injections will be given
Route of administration: IV injection or drip infusion
Dosing schedules: three times a week, with an initial dose at baseline and will receive iron, as per approved label, until the subject has received the calculated iron dose.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Hb From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 6, and 8
Week 2
|
3.01 g/dL
Standard Deviation 1.135
|
2.53 g/dL
Standard Deviation 1.016
|
|
Change in Hb From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 6, and 8
Week 4
|
4.46 g/dL
Standard Deviation 1.502
|
4.08 g/dL
Standard Deviation 1.217
|
|
Change in Hb From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 6, and 8
Week 6
|
4.96 g/dL
Standard Deviation 1.435
|
4.61 g/dL
Standard Deviation 1.422
|
|
Change in Hb From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 6, and 8
Week 8
|
5.09 g/dL
Standard Deviation 1.504
|
4.87 g/dL
Standard Deviation 1.525
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8Population: Per Protocol Set: participants who were randomised, received at least 1 dose of study treatment, had at least 1 baseline and post-baseline value (Hb, ferritin, TSAT), had a study drug compliance between 80% and 120% and had no major protocol violations
Iron deficiency correction: TSAT \>= 16% and serum ferritin \>=100ng/mL (for subjects with underlying inflammatory disease) or \>14ng/mL (for subjects with no apparent underlying inflammatory disease).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ferric Carboxymaltose (FCM)
n=177 Participants
Participants treated with FCM given by IV injection or drip infusion
Dosage Form: Injection, Sterile FCM solution as a 5% w/v iron solution in water for injection
Strength: 10 mL vials containing 500 mg iron per vial
Dosage: 500mg/week or 1000mg/week (based on subject BW and Hb value at screening)
Route of administration: IV injection (undiluted solution) or drip infusion (500 mg iron diluted in 100 mL 0.9% w/v physiological saline or 1,000 mg iron diluted in 250 mL 0.9% w/v physiological saline)
Dosing schedules: baseline (Day 1) and, if required, at Day 8 and Day 15.
|
Iron Sucrose (IS)
n=178 Participants
Participants treated with IS given by IV injection or drip infusion
Dosage Form: Sterile solution for injection containing 2% w/v iron
Strength: 5 mL ampoules containing 100 mg iron per ampoule
Dosage: single doses of IS of 200mg iron based on the formula of Ganzoni: Cumulative iron deficit \[mg\] = BW \[kg\] x (target Hb- actual Hb) \[g/dL\] x 2.4 + 500 mg, up to 11 IS injections will be given
Route of administration: IV injection or drip infusion
Dosing schedules: three times a week, with an initial dose at baseline and will receive iron, as per approved label, until the subject has received the calculated iron dose.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Participants With Iron Deficiency Correction Over Time by Treatment
Week 2
|
173 Participants
|
135 Participants
|
|
Participants With Iron Deficiency Correction Over Time by Treatment
Week 4
|
165 Participants
|
168 Participants
|
|
Participants With Iron Deficiency Correction Over Time by Treatment
Week 6
|
161 Participants
|
163 Participants
|
|
Participants With Iron Deficiency Correction Over Time by Treatment
Week 8
|
162 Participants
|
154 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8Population: Per Protocol Set: participants who were randomised, received at least 1 dose of study treatment, had at least 1 baseline and post-baseline value (Hb, ferritin, TSAT), had a study drug compliance between 80% and 120% and had no major protocol violations
Transferrin saturation (TSAT)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ferric Carboxymaltose (FCM)
n=177 Participants
Participants treated with FCM given by IV injection or drip infusion
Dosage Form: Injection, Sterile FCM solution as a 5% w/v iron solution in water for injection
Strength: 10 mL vials containing 500 mg iron per vial
Dosage: 500mg/week or 1000mg/week (based on subject BW and Hb value at screening)
Route of administration: IV injection (undiluted solution) or drip infusion (500 mg iron diluted in 100 mL 0.9% w/v physiological saline or 1,000 mg iron diluted in 250 mL 0.9% w/v physiological saline)
Dosing schedules: baseline (Day 1) and, if required, at Day 8 and Day 15.
|
Iron Sucrose (IS)
n=178 Participants
Participants treated with IS given by IV injection or drip infusion
Dosage Form: Sterile solution for injection containing 2% w/v iron
Strength: 5 mL ampoules containing 100 mg iron per ampoule
Dosage: single doses of IS of 200mg iron based on the formula of Ganzoni: Cumulative iron deficit \[mg\] = BW \[kg\] x (target Hb- actual Hb) \[g/dL\] x 2.4 + 500 mg, up to 11 IS injections will be given
Route of administration: IV injection or drip infusion
Dosing schedules: three times a week, with an initial dose at baseline and will receive iron, as per approved label, until the subject has received the calculated iron dose.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in TSAT From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8
Week 2
|
30.16 Percentage of TSAT
Standard Deviation 11.741
|
25.03 Percentage of TSAT
Standard Deviation 19.474
|
|
Change in TSAT From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8
Week 4
|
28.00 Percentage of TSAT
Standard Deviation 8.528
|
25.30 Percentage of TSAT
Standard Deviation 8.453
|
|
Change in TSAT From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8
Week 6
|
25.50 Percentage of TSAT
Standard Deviation 9.097
|
23.33 Percentage of TSAT
Standard Deviation 7.868
|
|
Change in TSAT From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8
Week 8
|
25.32 Percentage of TSAT
Standard Deviation 10.793
|
20.82 Percentage of TSAT
Standard Deviation 7.618
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8Population: Per Protocol Set: participants who were randomised, received at least 1 dose of study treatment, had at least 1 baseline and post-baseline value (Hb, ferritin, TSAT), had a study drug compliance between 80% and 120% and had no major protocol violations
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ferric Carboxymaltose (FCM)
n=177 Participants
Participants treated with FCM given by IV injection or drip infusion
Dosage Form: Injection, Sterile FCM solution as a 5% w/v iron solution in water for injection
Strength: 10 mL vials containing 500 mg iron per vial
Dosage: 500mg/week or 1000mg/week (based on subject BW and Hb value at screening)
Route of administration: IV injection (undiluted solution) or drip infusion (500 mg iron diluted in 100 mL 0.9% w/v physiological saline or 1,000 mg iron diluted in 250 mL 0.9% w/v physiological saline)
Dosing schedules: baseline (Day 1) and, if required, at Day 8 and Day 15.
|
Iron Sucrose (IS)
n=178 Participants
Participants treated with IS given by IV injection or drip infusion
Dosage Form: Sterile solution for injection containing 2% w/v iron
Strength: 5 mL ampoules containing 100 mg iron per ampoule
Dosage: single doses of IS of 200mg iron based on the formula of Ganzoni: Cumulative iron deficit \[mg\] = BW \[kg\] x (target Hb- actual Hb) \[g/dL\] x 2.4 + 500 mg, up to 11 IS injections will be given
Route of administration: IV injection or drip infusion
Dosing schedules: three times a week, with an initial dose at baseline and will receive iron, as per approved label, until the subject has received the calculated iron dose.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Serum Ferritin From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8
Week 2
|
759.72 ng/ml
Standard Deviation 331.118
|
385.51 ng/ml
Standard Deviation 145.647
|
|
Change in Serum Ferritin From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8
Week 4
|
379.31 ng/ml
Standard Deviation 195.415
|
280.58 ng/ml
Standard Deviation 148.913
|
|
Change in Serum Ferritin From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8
Week 6
|
255.71 ng/ml
Standard Deviation 152.582
|
184.93 ng/ml
Standard Deviation 100.677
|
|
Change in Serum Ferritin From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8
Week 8
|
202.09 ng/ml
Standard Deviation 148.382
|
145.56 ng/ml
Standard Deviation 89.890
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8Population: Safety Set: all randomised participants who have received at least 1 dose of study medication. The participants in this group were analysed based on the treatment they received.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ferric Carboxymaltose (FCM)
n=187 Participants
Participants treated with FCM given by IV injection or drip infusion
Dosage Form: Injection, Sterile FCM solution as a 5% w/v iron solution in water for injection
Strength: 10 mL vials containing 500 mg iron per vial
Dosage: 500mg/week or 1000mg/week (based on subject BW and Hb value at screening)
Route of administration: IV injection (undiluted solution) or drip infusion (500 mg iron diluted in 100 mL 0.9% w/v physiological saline or 1,000 mg iron diluted in 250 mL 0.9% w/v physiological saline)
Dosing schedules: baseline (Day 1) and, if required, at Day 8 and Day 15.
|
Iron Sucrose (IS)
n=180 Participants
Participants treated with IS given by IV injection or drip infusion
Dosage Form: Sterile solution for injection containing 2% w/v iron
Strength: 5 mL ampoules containing 100 mg iron per ampoule
Dosage: single doses of IS of 200mg iron based on the formula of Ganzoni: Cumulative iron deficit \[mg\] = BW \[kg\] x (target Hb- actual Hb) \[g/dL\] x 2.4 + 500 mg, up to 11 IS injections will be given
Route of administration: IV injection or drip infusion
Dosing schedules: three times a week, with an initial dose at baseline and will receive iron, as per approved label, until the subject has received the calculated iron dose.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Serum Iron From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8
Week 2
|
15.53 umol/L
Standard Deviation 7.075
|
16.23 umol/L
Standard Deviation 14.512
|
|
Change in Serum Iron From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8
Week 4
|
12.31 umol/L
Standard Deviation 4.209
|
12.39 umol/L
Standard Deviation 4.724
|
|
Change in Serum Iron From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8
Week 6
|
10.77 umol/L
Standard Deviation 4.318
|
11.27 umol/L
Standard Deviation 4.160
|
|
Change in Serum Iron From Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8
Week 8
|
10.77 umol/L
Standard Deviation 4.871
|
10.09 umol/L
Standard Deviation 4.152
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to the End of the study (week 8)Population: Safety Set: all randomised participants who have received at least 1 dose of study medication. The participants in this group were analysed based on the treatment they received.
Please note that in this section we are presenting just the overview of the adverse events experienced by the trial participant, in particular, the number of participants with at least one TEAE until end of the trial. Please refer to the detailed tables included on the Adverse Event Module for specifics
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ferric Carboxymaltose (FCM)
n=187 Participants
Participants treated with FCM given by IV injection or drip infusion
Dosage Form: Injection, Sterile FCM solution as a 5% w/v iron solution in water for injection
Strength: 10 mL vials containing 500 mg iron per vial
Dosage: 500mg/week or 1000mg/week (based on subject BW and Hb value at screening)
Route of administration: IV injection (undiluted solution) or drip infusion (500 mg iron diluted in 100 mL 0.9% w/v physiological saline or 1,000 mg iron diluted in 250 mL 0.9% w/v physiological saline)
Dosing schedules: baseline (Day 1) and, if required, at Day 8 and Day 15.
|
Iron Sucrose (IS)
n=180 Participants
Participants treated with IS given by IV injection or drip infusion
Dosage Form: Sterile solution for injection containing 2% w/v iron
Strength: 5 mL ampoules containing 100 mg iron per ampoule
Dosage: single doses of IS of 200mg iron based on the formula of Ganzoni: Cumulative iron deficit \[mg\] = BW \[kg\] x (target Hb- actual Hb) \[g/dL\] x 2.4 + 500 mg, up to 11 IS injections will be given
Route of administration: IV injection or drip infusion
Dosing schedules: three times a week, with an initial dose at baseline and will receive iron, as per approved label, until the subject has received the calculated iron dose.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Participants With Any Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)
|
124 Participants
|
101 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8Population: Safety Set: all randomised participants who have received at least 1 dose of study medication. The participants in this group were analysed based on the treatment they received.
Diastolic Blood pressure
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ferric Carboxymaltose (FCM)
n=187 Participants
Participants treated with FCM given by IV injection or drip infusion
Dosage Form: Injection, Sterile FCM solution as a 5% w/v iron solution in water for injection
Strength: 10 mL vials containing 500 mg iron per vial
Dosage: 500mg/week or 1000mg/week (based on subject BW and Hb value at screening)
Route of administration: IV injection (undiluted solution) or drip infusion (500 mg iron diluted in 100 mL 0.9% w/v physiological saline or 1,000 mg iron diluted in 250 mL 0.9% w/v physiological saline)
Dosing schedules: baseline (Day 1) and, if required, at Day 8 and Day 15.
|
Iron Sucrose (IS)
n=180 Participants
Participants treated with IS given by IV injection or drip infusion
Dosage Form: Sterile solution for injection containing 2% w/v iron
Strength: 5 mL ampoules containing 100 mg iron per ampoule
Dosage: single doses of IS of 200mg iron based on the formula of Ganzoni: Cumulative iron deficit \[mg\] = BW \[kg\] x (target Hb- actual Hb) \[g/dL\] x 2.4 + 500 mg, up to 11 IS injections will be given
Route of administration: IV injection or drip infusion
Dosing schedules: three times a week, with an initial dose at baseline and will receive iron, as per approved label, until the subject has received the calculated iron dose.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Blood Pressure at Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8
Baseline
|
69.8 mmHg
Standard Deviation 7.91
|
71.9 mmHg
Standard Deviation 8.85
|
|
Blood Pressure at Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8
Week 2
|
71.0 mmHg
Standard Deviation 8.33
|
72.6 mmHg
Standard Deviation 8.79
|
|
Blood Pressure at Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8
Week 4
|
72.1 mmHg
Standard Deviation 7.60
|
73.8 mmHg
Standard Deviation 9.57
|
|
Blood Pressure at Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8
Week 6
|
71.6 mmHg
Standard Deviation 8.18
|
74.3 mmHg
Standard Deviation 9.24
|
|
Blood Pressure at Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8
Week 8
|
72.4 mmHg
Standard Deviation 8.09
|
74.1 mmHg
Standard Deviation 9.77
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and week 8Population: Safety Set: all randomised participants who have received at least 1 dose of study medication. The participants in this group were analysed based on the treatment they received.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ferric Carboxymaltose (FCM)
n=187 Participants
Participants treated with FCM given by IV injection or drip infusion
Dosage Form: Injection, Sterile FCM solution as a 5% w/v iron solution in water for injection
Strength: 10 mL vials containing 500 mg iron per vial
Dosage: 500mg/week or 1000mg/week (based on subject BW and Hb value at screening)
Route of administration: IV injection (undiluted solution) or drip infusion (500 mg iron diluted in 100 mL 0.9% w/v physiological saline or 1,000 mg iron diluted in 250 mL 0.9% w/v physiological saline)
Dosing schedules: baseline (Day 1) and, if required, at Day 8 and Day 15.
|
Iron Sucrose (IS)
n=180 Participants
Participants treated with IS given by IV injection or drip infusion
Dosage Form: Sterile solution for injection containing 2% w/v iron
Strength: 5 mL ampoules containing 100 mg iron per ampoule
Dosage: single doses of IS of 200mg iron based on the formula of Ganzoni: Cumulative iron deficit \[mg\] = BW \[kg\] x (target Hb- actual Hb) \[g/dL\] x 2.4 + 500 mg, up to 11 IS injections will be given
Route of administration: IV injection or drip infusion
Dosing schedules: three times a week, with an initial dose at baseline and will receive iron, as per approved label, until the subject has received the calculated iron dose.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Body Weight at Baseline and Week 8
Baseline
|
59.76 kg
Standard Deviation 9.384
|
60.40 kg
Standard Deviation 9.354
|
|
Body Weight at Baseline and Week 8
Week 8
|
59.73 kg
Standard Deviation 9.316
|
60.64 kg
Standard Deviation 9.372
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8Population: Safety Set: all randomised participants who have received at least 1 dose of study medication. The participants in this group were analysed based on the treatment they received.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ferric Carboxymaltose (FCM)
n=187 Participants
Participants treated with FCM given by IV injection or drip infusion
Dosage Form: Injection, Sterile FCM solution as a 5% w/v iron solution in water for injection
Strength: 10 mL vials containing 500 mg iron per vial
Dosage: 500mg/week or 1000mg/week (based on subject BW and Hb value at screening)
Route of administration: IV injection (undiluted solution) or drip infusion (500 mg iron diluted in 100 mL 0.9% w/v physiological saline or 1,000 mg iron diluted in 250 mL 0.9% w/v physiological saline)
Dosing schedules: baseline (Day 1) and, if required, at Day 8 and Day 15.
|
Iron Sucrose (IS)
n=180 Participants
Participants treated with IS given by IV injection or drip infusion
Dosage Form: Sterile solution for injection containing 2% w/v iron
Strength: 5 mL ampoules containing 100 mg iron per ampoule
Dosage: single doses of IS of 200mg iron based on the formula of Ganzoni: Cumulative iron deficit \[mg\] = BW \[kg\] x (target Hb- actual Hb) \[g/dL\] x 2.4 + 500 mg, up to 11 IS injections will be given
Route of administration: IV injection or drip infusion
Dosing schedules: three times a week, with an initial dose at baseline and will receive iron, as per approved label, until the subject has received the calculated iron dose.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Heart Rate at Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8
Baseline
|
81.4 beats/min
Standard Deviation 8.85
|
82.2 beats/min
Standard Deviation 9.94
|
|
Heart Rate at Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8
Week 2
|
76.3 beats/min
Standard Deviation 9.80
|
76.5 beats/min
Standard Deviation 8.83
|
|
Heart Rate at Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8
Week 4
|
75.5 beats/min
Standard Deviation 10.71
|
76.6 beats/min
Standard Deviation 10.79
|
|
Heart Rate at Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8
Week 6
|
76.0 beats/min
Standard Deviation 8.98
|
77.2 beats/min
Standard Deviation 10.04
|
|
Heart Rate at Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8
Week 8
|
75.8 beats/min
Standard Deviation 10.33
|
77.5 beats/min
Standard Deviation 10.94
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8Population: Safety Set: all randomised participants who have received at least 1 dose of study medication. The participants in this group were analysed based on the treatment they received.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ferric Carboxymaltose (FCM)
n=187 Participants
Participants treated with FCM given by IV injection or drip infusion
Dosage Form: Injection, Sterile FCM solution as a 5% w/v iron solution in water for injection
Strength: 10 mL vials containing 500 mg iron per vial
Dosage: 500mg/week or 1000mg/week (based on subject BW and Hb value at screening)
Route of administration: IV injection (undiluted solution) or drip infusion (500 mg iron diluted in 100 mL 0.9% w/v physiological saline or 1,000 mg iron diluted in 250 mL 0.9% w/v physiological saline)
Dosing schedules: baseline (Day 1) and, if required, at Day 8 and Day 15.
|
Iron Sucrose (IS)
n=180 Participants
Participants treated with IS given by IV injection or drip infusion
Dosage Form: Sterile solution for injection containing 2% w/v iron
Strength: 5 mL ampoules containing 100 mg iron per ampoule
Dosage: single doses of IS of 200mg iron based on the formula of Ganzoni: Cumulative iron deficit \[mg\] = BW \[kg\] x (target Hb- actual Hb) \[g/dL\] x 2.4 + 500 mg, up to 11 IS injections will be given
Route of administration: IV injection or drip infusion
Dosing schedules: three times a week, with an initial dose at baseline and will receive iron, as per approved label, until the subject has received the calculated iron dose.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Body Temperature at Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8
Baseline
|
36.94 ºC
Standard Deviation 0.292
|
36.45 ºC
Standard Deviation 0.325
|
|
Body Temperature at Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8
Week 2
|
36.48 ºC
Standard Deviation 0.269
|
36.44 ºC
Standard Deviation 0.288
|
|
Body Temperature at Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8
Week 4
|
36.49 ºC
Standard Deviation 0.269
|
36.40 ºC
Standard Deviation 0.268
|
|
Body Temperature at Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8
Week 6
|
36.47 ºC
Standard Deviation 0.259
|
36.41 ºC
Standard Deviation 0.260
|
|
Body Temperature at Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8
Week 8
|
36.48 ºC
Standard Deviation 0.269
|
36.46 ºC
Standard Deviation 0.257
|
Adverse Events
Ferric Carboxymaltose (FCM)
Iron Sucrose (IS)
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Ferric Carboxymaltose (FCM)
n=187 participants at risk
Participants treated with FCM given by IV injection or drip infusion
Dosage Form: Injection, Sterile FCM solution as a 5% w/v iron solution in water for injection
Strength: 10 mL vials containing 500 mg iron per vial
Dosage: 500mg/week or 1000mg/week (based on subject BW and Hb value at screening)
Route of administration: IV injection (undiluted solution) or drip infusion (500 mg iron diluted in 100 mL 0.9% w/v physiological saline or 1,000 mg iron diluted in 250 mL 0.9% w/v physiological saline)
Dosing schedules: baseline (Day 1) and, if required, at Day 8 and Day 15.
|
Iron Sucrose (IS)
n=180 participants at risk
Participants treated with IS given by IV injection or drip infusion
Dosage Form: Sterile solution for injection containing 2% w/v iron
Strength: 5 mL ampoules containing 100 mg iron per ampoule
Dosage: single doses of IS of 200mg iron based on the formula of Ganzoni: Cumulative iron deficit \[mg\] = BW \[kg\] x (target Hb- actual Hb) \[g/dL\] x 2.4 + 500 mg, up to 11 IS injections will be given
Route of administration: IV injection or drip infusion
Dosing schedules: three times a week, with an initial dose at baseline and will receive iron, as per approved label, until the subject has received the calculated iron dose.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Adenocarcinoma of colon
|
0.53%
1/187 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
0.00%
0/180 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Colon cancer
|
0.53%
1/187 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
0.00%
0/180 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Gastric cancer
|
0.53%
1/187 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
0.00%
0/180 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Crohn's disease
|
0.53%
1/187 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
1.1%
2/180 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
0.53%
1/187 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
0.00%
0/180 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal adhesions
|
0.00%
0/187 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
0.56%
1/180 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Uterine polyp
|
0.53%
1/187 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
0.00%
0/180 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Menorrhagia
|
0.00%
0/187 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
1.1%
2/180 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Adenomyosis
|
0.00%
0/187 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
0.56%
1/180 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Pelvic adhesions
|
0.00%
0/187 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
0.56%
1/180 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Anaphylactic reaction
|
0.53%
1/187 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
0.00%
0/180 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Anaphylactic shock
|
0.00%
0/187 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
0.56%
1/180 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Anal abscess
|
0.53%
1/187 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
0.00%
0/180 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
0.00%
0/187 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
0.56%
1/180 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis acute
|
0.53%
1/187 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
0.00%
0/180 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Abortion induced
|
0.53%
1/187 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
0.00%
0/180 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
0.00%
0/187 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
0.56%
1/180 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Ferric Carboxymaltose (FCM)
n=187 participants at risk
Participants treated with FCM given by IV injection or drip infusion
Dosage Form: Injection, Sterile FCM solution as a 5% w/v iron solution in water for injection
Strength: 10 mL vials containing 500 mg iron per vial
Dosage: 500mg/week or 1000mg/week (based on subject BW and Hb value at screening)
Route of administration: IV injection (undiluted solution) or drip infusion (500 mg iron diluted in 100 mL 0.9% w/v physiological saline or 1,000 mg iron diluted in 250 mL 0.9% w/v physiological saline)
Dosing schedules: baseline (Day 1) and, if required, at Day 8 and Day 15.
|
Iron Sucrose (IS)
n=180 participants at risk
Participants treated with IS given by IV injection or drip infusion
Dosage Form: Sterile solution for injection containing 2% w/v iron
Strength: 5 mL ampoules containing 100 mg iron per ampoule
Dosage: single doses of IS of 200mg iron based on the formula of Ganzoni: Cumulative iron deficit \[mg\] = BW \[kg\] x (target Hb- actual Hb) \[g/dL\] x 2.4 + 500 mg, up to 11 IS injections will be given
Route of administration: IV injection or drip infusion
Dosing schedules: three times a week, with an initial dose at baseline and will receive iron, as per approved label, until the subject has received the calculated iron dose.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Investigations
Urine phosphorus decreased
|
7.5%
14/187 • Number of events 18 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
7.8%
14/180 • Number of events 16 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
|
Investigations
Blood phosphorus decreased
|
7.0%
13/187 • Number of events 13 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
0.56%
1/180 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
5.9%
11/187 • Number of events 14 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
2.8%
5/180 • Number of events 6 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
|
Investigations
White blood cells urine positive
|
3.7%
7/187 • Number of events 7 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
4.4%
8/180 • Number of events 8 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
|
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
|
3.7%
7/187 • Number of events 7 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
2.2%
4/180 • Number of events 4 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
|
Investigations
Gamma-glutamyl transferase increased
|
3.2%
6/187 • Number of events 6 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
3.3%
6/180 • Number of events 6 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
|
Investigations
Hepatic enzyme increased
|
3.2%
6/187 • Number of events 7 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
1.7%
3/180 • Number of events 3 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
|
Investigations
Red blood cells urine positive
|
2.1%
4/187 • Number of events 4 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
0.56%
1/180 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
8.0%
15/187 • Number of events 17 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
7.2%
13/180 • Number of events 13 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
3.2%
6/187 • Number of events 6 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
3.9%
7/180 • Number of events 7 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypophosphataemia
|
10.2%
19/187 • Number of events 20 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
2.8%
5/180 • Number of events 5 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
2.7%
5/187 • Number of events 6 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
1.1%
2/180 • Number of events 3 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
2.1%
4/187 • Number of events 4 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
0.00%
0/180 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Crohn's disease
|
1.1%
2/187 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
2.2%
4/180 • Number of events 4 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
6.4%
12/187 • Number of events 12 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
1.7%
3/180 • Number of events 3 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatic function abnormal
|
7.0%
13/187 • Number of events 16 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
5.0%
9/180 • Number of events 12 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
2.1%
4/187 • Number of events 4 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
0.56%
1/180 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Urticaria
|
2.1%
4/187 • Number of events 4 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
0.00%
0/180 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Menorrhagia
|
1.1%
2/187 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
3.3%
6/180 • Number of events 6 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
2.1%
4/187 • Number of events 4 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
0.00%
0/180 • From Baseline until the End of the Study (8 weeks)
All AEs either observed by the Investigator/collaborators, or reported by the subject spontaneously, or in response to a direct question, were noted in the AE section of the case report form/source document. In order to avoid bias in eliciting AEs, subjects were asked a non-leading question, such as "How are you feeling?" A non-leading question was used as well for changes in their health or concomitant medication usage since their last visit. This information was collected at all study visits.
|
Additional Information
VIT-IRON-2011-004 Clinical Study Team
Vifor (International) Inc.
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place