Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study to Determine Safety and Efficacy of B244 in Subjects With Mild to Moderate Rosacea (NCT NCT03590366)
NCT ID: NCT03590366
Last Updated: 2022-09-16
Results Overview
Safety and tolerability endpoints will consist of all treatment-related adverse events reporting during the study duration.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
140 participants
Baseline to Day 84
2022-09-16
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
B244
B244 suspension (4x10E9 cells/ml) in 30ml/bottle
Subjects will apply a total of 4 pumps of IP per application to the face twice-a-day.
B244: B244 Suspension
|
Vehicle
Vehicle, 30ml/bottle
Subjects will apply a total of 4 pumps of IP per application to the face twice-a-day.
Vehicle: Vehicle suspension
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
73
|
67
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
70
|
59
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
3
|
8
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
B244
B244 suspension (4x10E9 cells/ml) in 30ml/bottle
Subjects will apply a total of 4 pumps of IP per application to the face twice-a-day.
B244: B244 Suspension
|
Vehicle
Vehicle, 30ml/bottle
Subjects will apply a total of 4 pumps of IP per application to the face twice-a-day.
Vehicle: Vehicle suspension
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
0
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
3
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
2
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Study to Determine Safety and Efficacy of B244 in Subjects With Mild to Moderate Rosacea
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
B244
n=73 Participants
B244 suspension (4x10E9 cells/ml) in 30ml/bottle
Subjects will apply a total of 4 pumps of IP per application to the face twice-a-day.
B244: B244 Suspension
|
Vehicle
n=67 Participants
Vehicle, 30ml/bottle
Subjects will apply a total of 4 pumps of IP per application to the face twice-a-day.
Vehicle: Vehicle suspension
|
Total
n=140 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
50.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.099 • n=5 Participants
|
52.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.022 • n=7 Participants
|
51.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.120 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
55 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
48 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
103 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
37 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
31 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
31 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
62 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
42 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
36 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
78 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
72 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
65 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
137 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Day 84Population: Modified Intent to Treat (mITT) Population, which included all subjects who all subjects who met all inclusion/exclusion criteria, were randomized, dispensed treatment, and had at least one post-treatment efficacy evaluation.
Safety and tolerability endpoints will consist of all treatment-related adverse events reporting during the study duration.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
B244
n=73 Participants
B244 suspension (4x10E9 cells/ml) in 30ml/bottle
Subjects will apply a total of 4 pumps of IP per application to the face twice-a-day.
B244: B244 Suspension
|
Vehicle
n=67 Participants
Vehicle, 30ml/bottle
Subjects will apply a total of 4 pumps of IP per application to the face twice-a-day.
Vehicle: Vehicle suspension
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-related Adverse Events as Assessed by CTCAE v4.0
|
5 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Day 56Population: Modified Intent to Treat (mITT) Population, which included all subjects who all subjects who met all inclusion/exclusion criteria, were randomized, dispensed treatment, and had at least one post-treatment efficacy evaluation.
IGA (Investigator's Global Assessment) was used to assess the overall diseases severity on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=clear, 1=almost clear, 2=mild disease, 3=moderate disease, and 4=severe disease). Improvement is defined as at least 1-grade change.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
B244
n=73 Participants
B244 suspension (4x10E9 cells/ml) in 30ml/bottle
Subjects will apply a total of 4 pumps of IP per application to the face twice-a-day.
B244: B244 Suspension
|
Vehicle
n=67 Participants
Vehicle, 30ml/bottle
Subjects will apply a total of 4 pumps of IP per application to the face twice-a-day.
Vehicle: Vehicle suspension
|
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of Subjects With IGA Improvement at Week 8 Relative to Baseline.
|
51 Participants
|
38 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Day 56Population: Modified Intent to Treat (mITT) Population, which included all subjects who all subjects who met all inclusion/exclusion criteria, were randomized, dispensed treatment, and had at least one post-treatment efficacy evaluation.
Clinical Erythema Assessment (CEA) was used to assess the extent of rosacea on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=clear, 1=almost clear, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe). Improvement is defined as at least 1-grade change.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
B244
n=73 Participants
B244 suspension (4x10E9 cells/ml) in 30ml/bottle
Subjects will apply a total of 4 pumps of IP per application to the face twice-a-day.
B244: B244 Suspension
|
Vehicle
n=67 Participants
Vehicle, 30ml/bottle
Subjects will apply a total of 4 pumps of IP per application to the face twice-a-day.
Vehicle: Vehicle suspension
|
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of Subjects With CEA Improvement at Week 8 Relative to Baseline.
|
49 Participants
|
38 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Day 56Population: Modified Intent to Treat (mITT) Population, which included all subjects who all subjects who met all inclusion/exclusion criteria, were randomized, dispensed treatment, and had at least one post-treatment efficacy evaluation.
IGA (Investigator's Global Assessment) was used to assess the overall diseases severity on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=clear, 1=almost clear, 2=mild disease, 3=moderate disease, and 4=severe disease). A higher grade change indicates greater improvement in disease.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
B244
n=73 Participants
B244 suspension (4x10E9 cells/ml) in 30ml/bottle
Subjects will apply a total of 4 pumps of IP per application to the face twice-a-day.
B244: B244 Suspension
|
Vehicle
n=67 Participants
Vehicle, 30ml/bottle
Subjects will apply a total of 4 pumps of IP per application to the face twice-a-day.
Vehicle: Vehicle suspension
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in IGA From Week 8 to Baseline.
Week 8 1-Grade Change
|
34 Participants
|
26 Participants
|
|
Change in IGA From Week 8 to Baseline.
Week 8 2-Grade Change
|
14 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
|
Change in IGA From Week 8 to Baseline.
Week 8 3-Grade Change
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Day 56Population: Modified Intent to Treat (mITT) Population, which included all subjects who all subjects who met all inclusion/exclusion criteria, were randomized, dispensed treatment, and had at least one post-treatment efficacy evaluation.
Clinical Erythema Assessment (CEA) was used to assess the extent of rosacea on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=clear, 1=almost clear, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe). A higher grade change indicates greater improvement in disease.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
B244
n=73 Participants
B244 suspension (4x10E9 cells/ml) in 30ml/bottle
Subjects will apply a total of 4 pumps of IP per application to the face twice-a-day.
B244: B244 Suspension
|
Vehicle
n=67 Participants
Vehicle, 30ml/bottle
Subjects will apply a total of 4 pumps of IP per application to the face twice-a-day.
Vehicle: Vehicle suspension
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in CEA From Week 8 to Baseline.
Week 8 1-Grade Change
|
34 Participants
|
27 Participants
|
|
Change in CEA From Week 8 to Baseline.
Week 8 2-Grade Change
|
14 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
|
Change in CEA From Week 8 to Baseline.
Week 8 3-Grade Change
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Day 84Population: Subjects from modified Intent to Treat (mITT) Population (all subjects who all subjects who met all inclusion/exclusion criteria, were randomized, dispensed treatment, and had at least one post-treatment efficacy evaluation) that remained in the study at each respective time point for the outcome measure.
The Skindex 16 questionnaire was assigned to subjects to examine the relationship between the subject's skin health and quality of life. Subjects scored 16 questions from 0 to 6 (0=never bothered, 6=always bothered). Total scores could range between 0 to 96, where a higher score is associated with a worse quality of life.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
B244
n=73 Participants
B244 suspension (4x10E9 cells/ml) in 30ml/bottle
Subjects will apply a total of 4 pumps of IP per application to the face twice-a-day.
B244: B244 Suspension
|
Vehicle
n=67 Participants
Vehicle, 30ml/bottle
Subjects will apply a total of 4 pumps of IP per application to the face twice-a-day.
Vehicle: Vehicle suspension
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Skindex 16 and Skindex 16 Sub Scores at Week 1, Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 From Baseline.
Change from Baseline at Week 12 (EOS)
|
-19.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.152
|
-20.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.694
|
|
Change in Skindex 16 and Skindex 16 Sub Scores at Week 1, Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 From Baseline.
Change from Baseline at Week 1
|
-8.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.584
|
-12.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.111
|
|
Change in Skindex 16 and Skindex 16 Sub Scores at Week 1, Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 From Baseline.
Change from Baseline at Week 4
|
-14.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.908
|
-18.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.418
|
|
Change in Skindex 16 and Skindex 16 Sub Scores at Week 1, Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 From Baseline.
Change from Baseline at Week 8
|
-21.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.878
|
-19.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.164
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Day 84Population: Subjects from modified Intent to Treat (mITT) Population (all subjects who all subjects who met all inclusion/exclusion criteria, were randomized, dispensed treatment, and had at least one post-treatment efficacy evaluation) that remained in the study at each respective time point for the outcome measure.
Subjects were asked to perform static ("snap-shot") evaluations of their rosacea-associated facial erythema severity using the Patient Self Assessment scale (PSA) at each study visit, and report the one integer that best describes the overall severity of their facial redness as seen in a mirror at the time of the evaluation on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=no redness, 1=very mild redness, 2=mild redness, 3=moderate redness, 4=severe redness). A higher grade change indicates greater improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
B244
n=73 Participants
B244 suspension (4x10E9 cells/ml) in 30ml/bottle
Subjects will apply a total of 4 pumps of IP per application to the face twice-a-day.
B244: B244 Suspension
|
Vehicle
n=67 Participants
Vehicle, 30ml/bottle
Subjects will apply a total of 4 pumps of IP per application to the face twice-a-day.
Vehicle: Vehicle suspension
|
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Change in PSA at Week 1, Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 From Baseline.
Week 1 · 0-Grade Change
|
49 Participants
|
44 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Change in PSA at Week 1, Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 From Baseline.
Week 1 · 1-Grade Change
|
19 Participants
|
19 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Change in PSA at Week 1, Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 From Baseline.
Week 1 · 2-Grade Change
|
5 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Change in PSA at Week 1, Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 From Baseline.
Week 1 · 3-Grade Change
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Change in PSA at Week 1, Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 From Baseline.
Week 4 · 0-Grade Change
|
29 Participants
|
23 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Change in PSA at Week 1, Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 From Baseline.
Week 4 · 1-Grade Change
|
36 Participants
|
30 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Change in PSA at Week 1, Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 From Baseline.
Week 4 · 2-Grade Change
|
5 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Change in PSA at Week 1, Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 From Baseline.
Week 4 · 3-Grade Change
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Change in PSA at Week 1, Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 From Baseline.
Week 8 · 0-Grade Change
|
23 Participants
|
21 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Change in PSA at Week 1, Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 From Baseline.
Week 8 · 2-Grade Change
|
14 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Change in PSA at Week 1, Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 From Baseline.
Week 8 · 3-Grade Change
|
3 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Change in PSA at Week 1, Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 From Baseline.
Week 12 (EOS) · 0-Grade Change
|
23 Participants
|
22 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Change in PSA at Week 1, Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 From Baseline.
Week 12 (EOS) · 1-Grade Change
|
29 Participants
|
21 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Change in PSA at Week 1, Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 From Baseline.
Week 12 (EOS) · 2-Grade Change
|
15 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Change in PSA at Week 1, Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 From Baseline.
Week 8 · 1-Grade Change
|
31 Participants
|
24 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Subjects With Change in PSA at Week 1, Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 From Baseline.
Week 12 (EOS) · 3-Grade Change
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
Adverse Events
B244
Vehicle
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
B244
n=73 participants at risk
B244 suspension (4x10E9 cells/ml) in 30ml/bottle
Subjects will apply a total of 4 pumps of IP per application to the face twice-a-day.
B244: B244 Suspension
|
Vehicle
n=67 participants at risk
Vehicle, 30ml/bottle
Subjects will apply a total of 4 pumps of IP per application to the face twice-a-day.
Vehicle: Vehicle suspension
|
|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Hordeolum
|
2.7%
2/73 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
0.00%
0/67 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
2.7%
2/73 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
0.00%
0/67 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral upper respiratory tract infection
|
1.4%
1/73 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
1.5%
1/67 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Acute sinusitis
|
0.00%
0/73 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
1.5%
1/67 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Eye infection
|
0.00%
0/73 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
1.5%
1/67 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
0.00%
0/73 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
1.5%
1/67 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Oral herpes
|
0.00%
0/73 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
1.5%
1/67 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
|
0.00%
0/73 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
1.5%
1/67 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
1.4%
1/73 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
0.00%
0/67 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
4.1%
3/73 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
0.00%
0/67 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
2.7%
2/73 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
1.5%
1/67 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Erythema
|
1.4%
1/73 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
1.5%
1/67 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Acne
|
1.4%
1/73 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
0.00%
0/67 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dry skin
|
0.00%
0/73 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
1.5%
1/67 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin discolouration
|
1.4%
1/73 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
0.00%
0/67 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
|
General disorders
Application site pain
|
1.4%
1/73 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
4.5%
3/67 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
|
General disorders
Application site dryness
|
1.4%
1/73 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
3.0%
2/67 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
|
General disorders
Application site pruritus
|
0.00%
0/73 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
3.0%
2/67 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
|
General disorders
Application site erythema
|
0.00%
0/73 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
1.5%
1/67 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
|
General disorders
Application site plaque
|
1.4%
1/73 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
0.00%
0/67 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
|
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
|
0.00%
0/73 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
1.5%
1/67 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
2.7%
2/73 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
1.5%
1/67 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Paraesthesia
|
0.00%
0/73 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
1.5%
1/67 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Sciatica
|
1.4%
1/73 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
0.00%
0/67 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Breath odour
|
1.4%
1/73 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
0.00%
0/67 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
0.00%
0/73 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
1.5%
1/67 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Dermatitis contact
|
1.4%
1/73 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
0.00%
0/67 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Seasonal allergy
|
0.00%
0/73 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
1.5%
1/67 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Lacrimation increased
|
1.4%
1/73 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
0.00%
0/67 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
|
1.4%
1/73 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
0.00%
0/67 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Limb injury
|
1.4%
1/73 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
0.00%
0/67 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
1.4%
1/73 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
0.00%
0/67 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
|
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
|
1.4%
1/73 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
0.00%
0/67 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Rotator cuff syndrome
|
1.4%
1/73 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
0.00%
0/67 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Dysuria
|
1.4%
1/73 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
0.00%
0/67 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
|
1.4%
1/73 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
0.00%
0/67 • Baseline to Week 12.
Beginning with the Screening visit and through the end of study or early termination (ET) visit, the PI and study personnel reviewed each subject's clinical evaluation findings and queried the subject directly regarding AEs. Subjects were to be followed for AEs until 30 days post study conclusion or until the PI determined the AEs were stable, whichever was later. PIs monitored each subject for clinical evidence of adverse events on a routine basis throughout the study.
|
Additional Information
Hyun Kim, Vice President Clinical Operations
AOBiome Therapeutics
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Sponsor shall have 60 days to review the papers. Sponsor shall have the right to require Institution/Principal Investigator, as applicable, to remove specifically identified confidential information and/or delay the proposed publication or presentation for an additional 90 days to enable Sponsor to seek patent protections.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER