Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
500 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-02-15
2021-09-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The primary outcome is the change in symptoms based on the total GSS. Secondary outcomes will include examination of all GSS subscales. HRQoL will be assessed by the social scale of the newly developed UCLA SSc GIT 2.0 questionnaire, which has become the standard GI questionnaire in SSc trials.
RN. # 00296313
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Primary Prophylaxis for Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis
NCT04775329
Antibiotic Treatment Trial for Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth
NCT02458781
Microbiota Restoration Therapy for Recurrent Clostridium Difficile Infection
NCT02589847
Microbiota Restoration Therapy for Recurrent Clostridium Difficile Infection
NCT02299570
Faecal Microbiota Transplantation Against Chronic Diarrhea in Patients With Systemic Sclerosis
NCT06333795
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Specific Aims:
1. Determine if REBs perceive any major issues regarding the full trial.
2. Determine if the sites are consenting all eligible patients.
3. Determine the signing rate of consent.
4. Determine patient adherence to web access for questionnaires.
5. Assess the method for detecting eligible cases from web questionnaires.
6. Assess whether physician notifications are being sent out quickly after detecting eligible cases.
7. Assess the timeliness and completeness of physician receipt of notification of patient eligibility.
8. Assess physician adherence to treatment protocol:
1. how soon protocol patients are brought in to see doctor after receipt of notice.
2. does doctor record what he does accurately.
3. does he/she schedule return visits according to protocol.
4. does he/she use in office questionnaires for treat to target.
5. does he/she base decisions on these questionnaires.
6. does he/she follow algorithm sequentially.
9. For control sites,
1. Record how soon protocol patients are brought in to see doctor after receipt of notice.
2. Assess whether the doctor accurately records what he/she does.
10 international sites will be chosen from the INSYNC cohort located in Australia, Canada, the U.S., the Netherlands, Spain, Germany and Sweden. In each country one site will be randomly selected to be a protocol site and one standard care site. This selection will provide representation from English and non-English speaking centres and from an array of countries with different medical cultures.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Protocol Treatment
If a score on the GSS is \> 5, the computer will send an automatic notice to the office of the doctor and to the doctor him/herself telling them of this.
Upon receipt of the notice, the protocol doctors will be expected to make an appointment within the timeframe outline in the protocol. Upon receipt of this notice the secretaries or clerks at the site will be asked to insert a treatment sheet in the doctor's chart. This sheet will be used to assess the timeliness of the first visit after notification, about the adherence of protocol doctors to protocol treatment.
Treatment Protocol
Protocol treatment sites will be expected to see the patient within a pre-specified window of time. The doctors at that site will apply the treatment algorithm and will make decisions about response to treatment based on the algorithm and on specific patient answers to questionnaires. The treatment protocol will only be made available to IRBs, not to any site personnel before randomization. This was derived from a survey of rheumatologists in many countries and gastroenterologists, mostly in North America, who were asked multiple questions about how they would treat and follow up patients with suspected SIBO. Successful treatment is a response on GSS of no diarrhea plus a total GSS of \< 5.
Standard of Care
Standard care doctors, who will not know the details of this protocol, will decide on their own if and when to see the patient. Upon receipt of this notice the secretaries or clerks at the site will be asked to insert a treatment sheet in the doctor's chart. This sheet will be used to assess types of medications and general pattern of treatment of the standard of care doctors.
Standard of Care
Physicians randomly assigned to standard of care will also be informed of their patients who met eligibility criteria. They will not be aware of the detailed treatment protocol but will be informed of which medications are in the protocol eg antibiotics, prokinetics etc. They will be free to contact the patients at their convenience and to treat them in any way they deem suitable, preferably using these medications but at doses and frequencies according to their own wishes.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Treatment Protocol
Protocol treatment sites will be expected to see the patient within a pre-specified window of time. The doctors at that site will apply the treatment algorithm and will make decisions about response to treatment based on the algorithm and on specific patient answers to questionnaires. The treatment protocol will only be made available to IRBs, not to any site personnel before randomization. This was derived from a survey of rheumatologists in many countries and gastroenterologists, mostly in North America, who were asked multiple questions about how they would treat and follow up patients with suspected SIBO. Successful treatment is a response on GSS of no diarrhea plus a total GSS of \< 5.
Standard of Care
Physicians randomly assigned to standard of care will also be informed of their patients who met eligibility criteria. They will not be aware of the detailed treatment protocol but will be informed of which medications are in the protocol eg antibiotics, prokinetics etc. They will be free to contact the patients at their convenience and to treat them in any way they deem suitable, preferably using these medications but at doses and frequencies according to their own wishes.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Internet access
* An email address
* Adequate computer literacy in order to fill out the online questionnaires.
Exclusion Criteria
* Concomitant disease that would make it unlikely that they will survive for one year
* Use of substances known to cause diarrhea
* History of antibiotics in the 12 weeks prior to inclusion
* History of intestinal pseudo-obstruction
* Inability to complete the symptom questionnaires
* No functional level of written \& spoken languages
* Previous C. Dificile infection
* Previous gastrointestinal surgery
* Prolonged QT interval
* Pregnancy or breastfeeding
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
OTHER_GOV
Canadian Scleroderma Research Group
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Murray Baron
Dr.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
John's Hopkins
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Saint Vincent's
Melbourne, , Australia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Margaret Sampedro
Role: primary
Katherine Ellis
Role: primary
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CODIM-MBM-16-282
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.