BMA vs Cortisone for Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis

NCT ID: NCT03580148

Last Updated: 2022-07-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2/PHASE3

Total Enrollment

34 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-10-08

Study Completion Date

2021-11-23

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This randomized trial seeks to investigate the difference if any between cortisone injection versus bone marrow aspirate injection in the glenohumeral joint of patients with confirmed osteoarthritis. The investigators hope that results from a prospective randomized controlled pilot study on bone marrow aspirate (BMA) glenohumeral joint (GHJ) injections will provide valuable early information on an alternative treatment for GHJ osteoarthritis (OA). This novel study will also contribute clinical data to the growing pool of research around BMA in the treatment of osteoarthritis. This study has the potential to uncover a new and more effective therapy to add to the arsenal of an orthopaedic surgeon in the management of GHJ OA. This would provide improved care and treatment for those disabled by GHJ OA. Additionally, this knowledge would be applicable to a variety of medical practitioners who treat GHJ OA from the general orthopaedic surgeon to pain subspecialists.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Glenohumeral joint (GHJ) osteoarthritis (OA) is a painful, progressive and debilitating condition that impairs quality of life. Currently, the only "cure" for arthritis is total joint replacement. This is a major operation that carries with it significant risks including infection, stiffness, limited range of motion, peri-prosthetic fracture and loosening. Furthermore, there are permanent post-operative restrictions, and in young or active people there is a significant rate of early revision surgery. Therefore, the goal of early shoulder OA management is symptom control, and postponement or prevention of the need for joint replacement.

Initial management options include physical therapy, pain-control medications, and intra-articular injections. Corticosteroid injections are the most commonly utilized injectables used in GHJ OA, with previous studies reporting good, short term pain relief and clinical improvement with corticosteroid injections for shoulder OA. However, corticosteroid injections may damage the collagen matrix of tendons and ligaments around the shoulder with repeated injections. Intra-articular hyaluronic acid (HA) injections have been proposed as an alternative to corticosteroid injections, and have demonstrated a clinically significant improvement in pain and function, albeit with a limited effect size.

Bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMA) injections is a relatively recent option for the treatment of OA. BMA is a biological product that is produced through the centrifugation of the patient's own bone marrow, producing a cellular equivalent to iliac crest bone graft. This aspirate has been shown to contain, among other nucleated cells, mesenchymal stem cells (MSC's) and hematopoietic stem cells (which can directly convert to stromal MSC's).Furthermore, this minimally invasive procedure can be conducted as an outpatient procedure, saving operating room time.

Preliminary studies on intra-articular knee injections of BMA for early OA have reported statistically significant benefits in improved pain scores and function, with few adverse effects. The mechanism of action is likely through paracrine effects exerted by MSCs with the upshot being anti-inflammatory and potentially regenerative capabilities. These results are encouraging for the use of BMA in the shoulder, which is a non-weight bearing joint. Therefore, the investigators believe that the clinical improvements seen with BMA injections for knee OA will also be seen in the shoulder to an equal or greater extent.

To date there are no trials investigating injectable stem cell therapies in the shoulder. The investigators aim to conduct a randomized controlled study to test the safety and efficacy of BMA injections for the treatment of early to mid-stage GHJ OA.

1.2 Significance of Current Study

Results from a prospective randomized controlled pilot study on BMA GHJ injections will provide valuable early information on an alternative treatment for GHJ OA. This novel study will also contribute clinical data to the growing pool of research around BMA in the treatment of osteoarthritis.

This research group is proposing a randomized clinical trial prospectively comparing BMA GHJ injections versus Depo Medrol Cortisone GHJ injections. This study will include comprehensive clinical, functional and joint specific patient outcome scores.

After a comprehensive literature review, to the investigators knowledge, there are no studies on the efficacy of BMA injections for management of GHJ OA. Thus, this study will be the first to report on safety, efficacy and costs associated with BMA injections.

This innovative study has the potential to uncover a new and more effective therapy to add to the arsenal of an orthopaedic surgeon in the management of GHJ OA. This would provide improved care and treatment for people disabled by GHJ OA. Additionally, this knowledge would be applicable to a variety of medical practitioners who treat GHJ OA from the general orthopaedic surgeon to pain subspecialists.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Osteo Arthritis Shoulders

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Cortisone

Patients randomized to this arm will receive one (1) ultrasound guided injection of 80mg Depo Medrol cortisone in the glenohumeral joint of the affected shoulder. Procedure time of approximately 10 minutes

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Cortisone

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients randomized to receive this study intervention will undergo one ultrasound guided 80mg Depo Medrol GHJ injection

Bone Marrow Aspirate

Patients randomized to this arm will receive one (1) ultrasound injection of bone marrow aspirate, harvested from the posterior superior iliac spine, and injected into the glenohumeral joint of the affected shoulder. Procedure time of approximately 45 minutes

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Bone Marrow Aspirate

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Patients randomized to receive this study intervention will have, under sterile conditions and after injection of local anesthetic, 10 mls of bone marrow aspirate taken from the posterior superior iliac spine and injected under ultrasound guidance to the glenohumeral joint

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Cortisone

Patients randomized to receive this study intervention will undergo one ultrasound guided 80mg Depo Medrol GHJ injection

Intervention Type DRUG

Bone Marrow Aspirate

Patients randomized to receive this study intervention will have, under sterile conditions and after injection of local anesthetic, 10 mls of bone marrow aspirate taken from the posterior superior iliac spine and injected under ultrasound guidance to the glenohumeral joint

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

00030767 DEPO-MEDROL 80 MG/ML BMA

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Men or women above the age of 18 - 65
* Primary diagnosis of glenohumeral joint osteoarthritis (Samilson and Prieto Stage 1, 2 or 3)
* Provision of informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Prior condition (such as trauma, avascular necrosis, fracture, iatrogenic or chondrolysis) resulting in secondary osteoarthritis
* Previous surgical intervention for GHJ OA
* Previous injection of cortisone or other substance
* Inability to comply with rehabilitation or form completion
* Likely problems, in the judgement of the investigators, with maintaining follow-up (i.e. patients with no fixed address, patients not mentally competent to give consent, etc.)
* WSIB involvement
* Lawsuit involvement
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Toronto

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Women's College Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr. Tim Dwyer

Dr. Tim Dwyer, Orthopaedic Surgeon, Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Tim Dwyer, MBBS, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Women's College Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Women's College Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Levy JC, Virani NA, Frankle MA, Cuff D, Pupello DR, Hamelin JA. Young patients with shoulder chondrolysis following arthroscopic shoulder surgery treated with total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008 May-Jun;17(3):380-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.11.004. Epub 2008 Mar 7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18329295 (View on PubMed)

Brander VA, Gomberawalla A, Chambers M, Bowen M, Nuber G. Efficacy and safety of hylan G-F 20 for symptomatic glenohumeral osteoarthritis: a prospective, pilot study. PM R. 2010 Apr;2(4):259-67. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2010.02.010.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20430327 (View on PubMed)

Millett PJ, Gobezie R, Boykin RE. Shoulder osteoarthritis: diagnosis and management. Am Fam Physician. 2008 Sep 1;78(5):605-11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18788237 (View on PubMed)

Silverstein E, Leger R, Shea KP. The use of intra-articular hylan G-F 20 in the treatment of symptomatic osteoarthritis of the shoulder: a preliminary study. Am J Sports Med. 2007 Jun;35(6):979-85. doi: 10.1177/0363546507300256. Epub 2007 Mar 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17395958 (View on PubMed)

Merolla G, Sperling JW, Paladini P, Porcellini G. Efficacy of Hylan G-F 20 versus 6-methylprednisolone acetate in painful shoulder osteoarthritis: a retrospective controlled trial. Musculoskelet Surg. 2011 Dec;95(3):215-24. doi: 10.1007/s12306-011-0138-3. Epub 2011 May 13.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21567154 (View on PubMed)

van der Windt DA, Koes BW, Deville W, Boeke AJ, de Jong BA, Bouter LM. Effectiveness of corticosteroid injections versus physiotherapy for treatment of painful stiff shoulder in primary care: randomised trial. BMJ. 1998 Nov 7;317(7168):1292-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7168.1292.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9804720 (View on PubMed)

Colen S, Geervliet P, Haverkamp D, Van Den Bekerom MP. Intra-articular infiltration therapy for patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis: A systematic review of the literature. Int J Shoulder Surg. 2014 Oct;8(4):114-21. doi: 10.4103/0973-6042.145252.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25538430 (View on PubMed)

Wolfstadt JI, Cole BJ, Ogilvie-Harris DJ, Viswanathan S, Chahal J. Current concepts: the role of mesenchymal stem cells in the management of knee osteoarthritis. Sports Health. 2015 Jan;7(1):38-44. doi: 10.1177/1941738114529727.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25553211 (View on PubMed)

Matsumoto T, Kawamoto A, Kuroda R, Ishikawa M, Mifune Y, Iwasaki H, Miwa M, Horii M, Hayashi S, Oyamada A, Nishimura H, Murasawa S, Doita M, Kurosaka M, Asahara T. Therapeutic potential of vasculogenesis and osteogenesis promoted by peripheral blood CD34-positive cells for functional bone healing. Am J Pathol. 2006 Oct;169(4):1440-57. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2006.060064.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17003498 (View on PubMed)

Matsumoto T, Mifune Y, Kawamoto A, Kuroda R, Shoji T, Iwasaki H, Suzuki T, Oyamada A, Horii M, Yokoyama A, Nishimura H, Lee SY, Miwa M, Doita M, Kurosaka M, Asahara T. Fracture induced mobilization and incorporation of bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells for bone healing. J Cell Physiol. 2008 Apr;215(1):234-42. doi: 10.1002/jcp.21309.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18205179 (View on PubMed)

Mifune Y, Matsumoto T, Kawamoto A, Kuroda R, Shoji T, Iwasaki H, Kwon SM, Miwa M, Kurosaka M, Asahara T. Local delivery of granulocyte colony stimulating factor-mobilized CD34-positive progenitor cells using bioscaffold for modality of unhealing bone fracture. Stem Cells. 2008 Jun;26(6):1395-405. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0820. Epub 2008 Apr 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18388308 (View on PubMed)

Tondreau T, Meuleman N, Delforge A, Dejeneffe M, Leroy R, Massy M, Mortier C, Bron D, Lagneaux L. Mesenchymal stem cells derived from CD133-positive cells in mobilized peripheral blood and cord blood: proliferation, Oct4 expression, and plasticity. Stem Cells. 2005 Sep;23(8):1105-12. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2004-0330. Epub 2005 Jun 13.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15955825 (View on PubMed)

Centeno C, Pitts J, Al-Sayegh H, Freeman M. Efficacy of autologous bone marrow concentrate for knee osteoarthritis with and without adipose graft. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:370621. doi: 10.1155/2014/370621. Epub 2014 Sep 7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25276781 (View on PubMed)

Kim JD, Lee GW, Jung GH, Kim CK, Kim T, Park JH, Cha SS, You YB. Clinical outcome of autologous bone marrow aspirates concentrate (BMAC) injection in degenerative arthritis of the knee. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014 Dec;24(8):1505-11. doi: 10.1007/s00590-013-1393-9. Epub 2014 Jan 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24398701 (View on PubMed)

Centeno CJ, Schultz JR, Cheever M, Robinson B, Freeman M, Marasco W. Safety and complications reporting on the re-implantation of culture-expanded mesenchymal stem cells using autologous platelet lysate technique. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther. 2010 Mar;5(1):81-93. doi: 10.2174/157488810790442796.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19951252 (View on PubMed)

Peeters CM, Leijs MJ, Reijman M, van Osch GJ, Bos PK. Safety of intra-articular cell-therapy with culture-expanded stem cells in humans: a systematic literature review. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013 Oct;21(10):1465-73. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2013.06.025. Epub 2013 Jul 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23831631 (View on PubMed)

Hendrich C, Franz E, Waertel G, Krebs R, Jager M. Safety of autologous bone marrow aspiration concentrate transplantation: initial experiences in 101 patients. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2009 Oct 10;1(2):e32. doi: 10.4081/or.2009.e32.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21808691 (View on PubMed)

Cole BJ, Schumacher HR Jr. Injectable corticosteroids in modern practice. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2005 Jan-Feb;13(1):37-46. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200501000-00006.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15712981 (View on PubMed)

Kumar N, Newman RJ. Complications of intra- and peri-articular steroid injections. Br J Gen Pract. 1999 Jun;49(443):465-6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10562748 (View on PubMed)

Charalambous CP, Tryfonidis M, Sadiq S, Hirst P, Paul A. Septic arthritis following intra-articular steroid injection of the knee--a survey of current practice regarding antiseptic technique used during intra-articular steroid injection of the knee. Clin Rheumatol. 2003 Dec;22(6):386-90. doi: 10.1007/s10067-003-0757-7. Epub 2003 Oct 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14677011 (View on PubMed)

Samilson RL, Prieto V. Dislocation arthropathy of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1983 Apr;65(4):456-60.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 6833319 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2015-0069-B

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Knee Injection RCT
NCT03694821 TERMINATED PHASE4