Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Single-center, Feasibility Study to Evaluate the Use and Safety of the Percutaneous Ultrasound Gastrostomy Technique (NCT NCT03575754)
NCT ID: NCT03575754
Last Updated: 2021-02-03
Results Overview
the number of enrolled subjects who have a serious, adverse event during placement of a gastrostomy tube using the PUG procedure. Adverse events were defined by the Clavien-Dindo classification system of surgical complications. For the purpose of this study, minor adverse events are defined as Grade I-II and serious adverse events as Grade III-V. See references for relevant citation.
COMPLETED
NA
25 participants
Discharge or 30 days
2021-02-03
Participant Flow
Study recruitment began Oct 2018 and concluded Apr 2020. Patients referred to Interventional Radiology for gastrostomy tube placement were approached for consent at least 24hrs pre-procedure in clinic or in hospital. When patients lacked capacity to consent, a surrogate decision maker was approached or reached remotely for telephone consent.
No pre-assignment methods were employed in this protocol
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Prospective PUG Cohort
Patients meeting all the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria and provided study consent who received the Percutaneous Ultrasound Gastrostomy (PUG) procedure
|
Matched Retrospective RIG Cohort
Patients who previously received the standard of care Radiologic Inserted Gastrostomy (RIG) procedure. A waiver of consent was provided by the Research Ethics Board for this study arm.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
25
|
25
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
25
|
25
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
A Single-center, Feasibility Study to Evaluate the Use and Safety of the Percutaneous Ultrasound Gastrostomy Technique
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Interventional
n=25 Participants
This arm utilizes the investigational device, as specified in protocol.
Percutaneous Ultrasound Gastrostomy: A balloon catheter is inserted into the stomach and used to appose tissue between anterior stomach and skin. Fluid fills the balloon, enabling ultrasound visualization. Then a guidewire is inserted, and pulled out through the mouth to create wire-to-wire (through and through) access. At that point, a gastrostomy tube is placed over it using over-the-wire (push) technique.
|
Matched Retrospective RIG Cohort
n=25 Participants
Patients who previously received the standard of care Radiologic Inserted Gastrostomy (RIG) procedure. A waiver of consent was provided by the Research Ethics Board for this study arm.
|
Total
n=50 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
13 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
12 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
27 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
64 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15 • n=93 Participants
|
66 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14 • n=4 Participants
|
65 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15 • n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
2 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
23 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
46 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
3 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
1 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
21 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Discharge or 30 daysthe number of enrolled subjects who have a serious, adverse event during placement of a gastrostomy tube using the PUG procedure. Adverse events were defined by the Clavien-Dindo classification system of surgical complications. For the purpose of this study, minor adverse events are defined as Grade I-II and serious adverse events as Grade III-V. See references for relevant citation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Prospective PUG Cohort
n=25 Participants
Patients meeting all the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria and provided study consent who received the Percutaneous Ultrasound Gastrostomy (PUG) procedure
|
Matched Retrospective RIG Cohort
n=25 Participants
Patients who previously received the standard of care Radiologic Inserted Gastrostomy (RIG) procedure. A waiver of consent was provided by the Research Ethics Board for this study arm.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Serious Device Related Adverse Events
|
1 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Discharge or 30 daysthe severity of any serious, device-related adverse event during placement of a gastrostomy tube using the PUG procedure (if applicable). Adverse events were defined by the Clavien-Dindo classification system of surgical complications. For the purpose of this study, minor adverse events are defined as Grade I-II and serious adverse events as Grade III-V. See references for relevant citation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Prospective PUG Cohort
n=25 Participants
Patients meeting all the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria and provided study consent who received the Percutaneous Ultrasound Gastrostomy (PUG) procedure
|
Matched Retrospective RIG Cohort
n=25 Participants
Patients who previously received the standard of care Radiologic Inserted Gastrostomy (RIG) procedure. A waiver of consent was provided by the Research Ethics Board for this study arm.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Severity of Serious Device Related Adverse Events
Grade IIIB: Complications requiring surgical, endoscopic or radiological intervention w anesthesia
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Severity of Serious Device Related Adverse Events
Grade IV: Life-threatening complications
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Severity of Serious Device Related Adverse Events
Grade V: Death of patient
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Severity of Serious Device Related Adverse Events
Grade IIIA: Complications requiring surgical, endoscopic or radiological intervention w/o anesthesia
|
1 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Discharge or 30 daysthe number of enrolled subjects who have successful placement of a gastrostomy tube
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Prospective PUG Cohort
n=25 Participants
Patients meeting all the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria and provided study consent who received the Percutaneous Ultrasound Gastrostomy (PUG) procedure
|
Matched Retrospective RIG Cohort
n=25 Participants
Patients who previously received the standard of care Radiologic Inserted Gastrostomy (RIG) procedure. A waiver of consent was provided by the Research Ethics Board for this study arm.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Technically Successful Gastrostomy Tube Placement
|
25 Participants
|
25 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Discharge or 30 daysPopulation: 22 of the participants in the Prospective PUG Cohort and 25 participants in the Matched Retrospective RIG Cohort were analyzed in this group as each received gastrostomy procedure within the Angiosuite. 3 participants in the Prospective PUG Cohort were excluded in this analysis as procedures were performed at the bedside on the Intensive Care Unit (ICU).
Length of angiographic suite usage in minutes
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Prospective PUG Cohort
n=22 Participants
Patients meeting all the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria and provided study consent who received the Percutaneous Ultrasound Gastrostomy (PUG) procedure
|
Matched Retrospective RIG Cohort
n=25 Participants
Patients who previously received the standard of care Radiologic Inserted Gastrostomy (RIG) procedure. A waiver of consent was provided by the Research Ethics Board for this study arm.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Length of Angiographic Suite Usage
|
68 minutes
Standard Deviation 24.5
|
39.3 minutes
Standard Deviation 15
|
Adverse Events
Prospective PUG Cohort
Matched Retrospective RIG Cohort
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Prospective PUG Cohort
n=25 participants at risk
Patients meeting all the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria and provided study consent who received the Percutaneous Ultrasound Gastrostomy (PUG) procedure
|
Matched Retrospective RIG Cohort
n=25 participants at risk
Patients who previously received the standard of care Radiologic Inserted Gastrostomy (RIG) procedure. A waiver of consent was provided by the Research Ethics Board for this study arm.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Aspiration Pneumonia
|
4.0%
1/25 • Number of events 1 • At least 48hrs post-procedure until discharge from hospital or 30 days post-procedure (whichever came sooner)
All cause adverse events observed in study participants were defined by the Clavien-Dindo classification system of surgical complications. For the purpose of this study, minor adverse events are defined as Grade I-II and major adverse events as Grade III-V.
|
0.00%
0/25 • At least 48hrs post-procedure until discharge from hospital or 30 days post-procedure (whichever came sooner)
All cause adverse events observed in study participants were defined by the Clavien-Dindo classification system of surgical complications. For the purpose of this study, minor adverse events are defined as Grade I-II and major adverse events as Grade III-V.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrostomy Tube Failure
|
0.00%
0/25 • At least 48hrs post-procedure until discharge from hospital or 30 days post-procedure (whichever came sooner)
All cause adverse events observed in study participants were defined by the Clavien-Dindo classification system of surgical complications. For the purpose of this study, minor adverse events are defined as Grade I-II and major adverse events as Grade III-V.
|
20.0%
5/25 • Number of events 5 • At least 48hrs post-procedure until discharge from hospital or 30 days post-procedure (whichever came sooner)
All cause adverse events observed in study participants were defined by the Clavien-Dindo classification system of surgical complications. For the purpose of this study, minor adverse events are defined as Grade I-II and major adverse events as Grade III-V.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal Wall Abscess
|
4.0%
1/25 • Number of events 1 • At least 48hrs post-procedure until discharge from hospital or 30 days post-procedure (whichever came sooner)
All cause adverse events observed in study participants were defined by the Clavien-Dindo classification system of surgical complications. For the purpose of this study, minor adverse events are defined as Grade I-II and major adverse events as Grade III-V.
|
0.00%
0/25 • At least 48hrs post-procedure until discharge from hospital or 30 days post-procedure (whichever came sooner)
All cause adverse events observed in study participants were defined by the Clavien-Dindo classification system of surgical complications. For the purpose of this study, minor adverse events are defined as Grade I-II and major adverse events as Grade III-V.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Prospective PUG Cohort
n=25 participants at risk
Patients meeting all the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria and provided study consent who received the Percutaneous Ultrasound Gastrostomy (PUG) procedure
|
Matched Retrospective RIG Cohort
n=25 participants at risk
Patients who previously received the standard of care Radiologic Inserted Gastrostomy (RIG) procedure. A waiver of consent was provided by the Research Ethics Board for this study arm.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Mild Aspiration
|
4.0%
1/25 • Number of events 1 • At least 48hrs post-procedure until discharge from hospital or 30 days post-procedure (whichever came sooner)
All cause adverse events observed in study participants were defined by the Clavien-Dindo classification system of surgical complications. For the purpose of this study, minor adverse events are defined as Grade I-II and major adverse events as Grade III-V.
|
8.0%
2/25 • Number of events 2 • At least 48hrs post-procedure until discharge from hospital or 30 days post-procedure (whichever came sooner)
All cause adverse events observed in study participants were defined by the Clavien-Dindo classification system of surgical complications. For the purpose of this study, minor adverse events are defined as Grade I-II and major adverse events as Grade III-V.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Local Stomal Site Infection
|
8.0%
2/25 • Number of events 2 • At least 48hrs post-procedure until discharge from hospital or 30 days post-procedure (whichever came sooner)
All cause adverse events observed in study participants were defined by the Clavien-Dindo classification system of surgical complications. For the purpose of this study, minor adverse events are defined as Grade I-II and major adverse events as Grade III-V.
|
0.00%
0/25 • At least 48hrs post-procedure until discharge from hospital or 30 days post-procedure (whichever came sooner)
All cause adverse events observed in study participants were defined by the Clavien-Dindo classification system of surgical complications. For the purpose of this study, minor adverse events are defined as Grade I-II and major adverse events as Grade III-V.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place