Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Single-center, Feasibility Study to Evaluate the Use and Safety of the Percutaneous Ultrasound Gastrostomy Technique (NCT NCT03575754)

NCT ID: NCT03575754

Last Updated: 2021-02-03

Results Overview

the number of enrolled subjects who have a serious, adverse event during placement of a gastrostomy tube using the PUG procedure. Adverse events were defined by the Clavien-Dindo classification system of surgical complications. For the purpose of this study, minor adverse events are defined as Grade I-II and serious adverse events as Grade III-V. See references for relevant citation.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

25 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Discharge or 30 days

Results posted on

2021-02-03

Participant Flow

Study recruitment began Oct 2018 and concluded Apr 2020. Patients referred to Interventional Radiology for gastrostomy tube placement were approached for consent at least 24hrs pre-procedure in clinic or in hospital. When patients lacked capacity to consent, a surrogate decision maker was approached or reached remotely for telephone consent.

No pre-assignment methods were employed in this protocol

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Prospective PUG Cohort
Patients meeting all the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria and provided study consent who received the Percutaneous Ultrasound Gastrostomy (PUG) procedure
Matched Retrospective RIG Cohort
Patients who previously received the standard of care Radiologic Inserted Gastrostomy (RIG) procedure. A waiver of consent was provided by the Research Ethics Board for this study arm.
Overall Study
STARTED
25
25
Overall Study
COMPLETED
25
25
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
0
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

A Single-center, Feasibility Study to Evaluate the Use and Safety of the Percutaneous Ultrasound Gastrostomy Technique

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Interventional
n=25 Participants
This arm utilizes the investigational device, as specified in protocol. Percutaneous Ultrasound Gastrostomy: A balloon catheter is inserted into the stomach and used to appose tissue between anterior stomach and skin. Fluid fills the balloon, enabling ultrasound visualization. Then a guidewire is inserted, and pulled out through the mouth to create wire-to-wire (through and through) access. At that point, a gastrostomy tube is placed over it using over-the-wire (push) technique.
Matched Retrospective RIG Cohort
n=25 Participants
Patients who previously received the standard of care Radiologic Inserted Gastrostomy (RIG) procedure. A waiver of consent was provided by the Research Ethics Board for this study arm.
Total
n=50 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
13 Participants
n=93 Participants
10 Participants
n=4 Participants
23 Participants
n=27 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
12 Participants
n=93 Participants
15 Participants
n=4 Participants
27 Participants
n=27 Participants
Age, Continuous
64 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15 • n=93 Participants
66 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14 • n=4 Participants
65 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15 • n=27 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants
n=93 Participants
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
4 Participants
n=27 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
23 Participants
n=93 Participants
23 Participants
n=4 Participants
46 Participants
n=27 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
3 Participants
n=93 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
3 Participants
n=27 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants
n=93 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
1 Participants
n=27 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
21 Participants
n=93 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
21 Participants
n=27 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
25 Participants
n=4 Participants
25 Participants
n=27 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Discharge or 30 days

the number of enrolled subjects who have a serious, adverse event during placement of a gastrostomy tube using the PUG procedure. Adverse events were defined by the Clavien-Dindo classification system of surgical complications. For the purpose of this study, minor adverse events are defined as Grade I-II and serious adverse events as Grade III-V. See references for relevant citation.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Prospective PUG Cohort
n=25 Participants
Patients meeting all the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria and provided study consent who received the Percutaneous Ultrasound Gastrostomy (PUG) procedure
Matched Retrospective RIG Cohort
n=25 Participants
Patients who previously received the standard of care Radiologic Inserted Gastrostomy (RIG) procedure. A waiver of consent was provided by the Research Ethics Board for this study arm.
Number of Participants With Serious Device Related Adverse Events
1 Participants
5 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Discharge or 30 days

the severity of any serious, device-related adverse event during placement of a gastrostomy tube using the PUG procedure (if applicable). Adverse events were defined by the Clavien-Dindo classification system of surgical complications. For the purpose of this study, minor adverse events are defined as Grade I-II and serious adverse events as Grade III-V. See references for relevant citation.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Prospective PUG Cohort
n=25 Participants
Patients meeting all the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria and provided study consent who received the Percutaneous Ultrasound Gastrostomy (PUG) procedure
Matched Retrospective RIG Cohort
n=25 Participants
Patients who previously received the standard of care Radiologic Inserted Gastrostomy (RIG) procedure. A waiver of consent was provided by the Research Ethics Board for this study arm.
Severity of Serious Device Related Adverse Events
Grade IIIB: Complications requiring surgical, endoscopic or radiological intervention w anesthesia
0 Participants
0 Participants
Severity of Serious Device Related Adverse Events
Grade IV: Life-threatening complications
0 Participants
0 Participants
Severity of Serious Device Related Adverse Events
Grade V: Death of patient
0 Participants
0 Participants
Severity of Serious Device Related Adverse Events
Grade IIIA: Complications requiring surgical, endoscopic or radiological intervention w/o anesthesia
1 Participants
5 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Discharge or 30 days

the number of enrolled subjects who have successful placement of a gastrostomy tube

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Prospective PUG Cohort
n=25 Participants
Patients meeting all the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria and provided study consent who received the Percutaneous Ultrasound Gastrostomy (PUG) procedure
Matched Retrospective RIG Cohort
n=25 Participants
Patients who previously received the standard of care Radiologic Inserted Gastrostomy (RIG) procedure. A waiver of consent was provided by the Research Ethics Board for this study arm.
Number of Participants With Technically Successful Gastrostomy Tube Placement
25 Participants
25 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Discharge or 30 days

Population: 22 of the participants in the Prospective PUG Cohort and 25 participants in the Matched Retrospective RIG Cohort were analyzed in this group as each received gastrostomy procedure within the Angiosuite. 3 participants in the Prospective PUG Cohort were excluded in this analysis as procedures were performed at the bedside on the Intensive Care Unit (ICU).

Length of angiographic suite usage in minutes

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Prospective PUG Cohort
n=22 Participants
Patients meeting all the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria and provided study consent who received the Percutaneous Ultrasound Gastrostomy (PUG) procedure
Matched Retrospective RIG Cohort
n=25 Participants
Patients who previously received the standard of care Radiologic Inserted Gastrostomy (RIG) procedure. A waiver of consent was provided by the Research Ethics Board for this study arm.
Length of Angiographic Suite Usage
68 minutes
Standard Deviation 24.5
39.3 minutes
Standard Deviation 15

Adverse Events

Prospective PUG Cohort

Serious events: 2 serious events
Other events: 3 other events
Deaths: 1 deaths

Matched Retrospective RIG Cohort

Serious events: 5 serious events
Other events: 2 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Prospective PUG Cohort
n=25 participants at risk
Patients meeting all the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria and provided study consent who received the Percutaneous Ultrasound Gastrostomy (PUG) procedure
Matched Retrospective RIG Cohort
n=25 participants at risk
Patients who previously received the standard of care Radiologic Inserted Gastrostomy (RIG) procedure. A waiver of consent was provided by the Research Ethics Board for this study arm.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Aspiration Pneumonia
4.0%
1/25 • Number of events 1 • At least 48hrs post-procedure until discharge from hospital or 30 days post-procedure (whichever came sooner)
All cause adverse events observed in study participants were defined by the Clavien-Dindo classification system of surgical complications. For the purpose of this study, minor adverse events are defined as Grade I-II and major adverse events as Grade III-V.
0.00%
0/25 • At least 48hrs post-procedure until discharge from hospital or 30 days post-procedure (whichever came sooner)
All cause adverse events observed in study participants were defined by the Clavien-Dindo classification system of surgical complications. For the purpose of this study, minor adverse events are defined as Grade I-II and major adverse events as Grade III-V.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrostomy Tube Failure
0.00%
0/25 • At least 48hrs post-procedure until discharge from hospital or 30 days post-procedure (whichever came sooner)
All cause adverse events observed in study participants were defined by the Clavien-Dindo classification system of surgical complications. For the purpose of this study, minor adverse events are defined as Grade I-II and major adverse events as Grade III-V.
20.0%
5/25 • Number of events 5 • At least 48hrs post-procedure until discharge from hospital or 30 days post-procedure (whichever came sooner)
All cause adverse events observed in study participants were defined by the Clavien-Dindo classification system of surgical complications. For the purpose of this study, minor adverse events are defined as Grade I-II and major adverse events as Grade III-V.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal Wall Abscess
4.0%
1/25 • Number of events 1 • At least 48hrs post-procedure until discharge from hospital or 30 days post-procedure (whichever came sooner)
All cause adverse events observed in study participants were defined by the Clavien-Dindo classification system of surgical complications. For the purpose of this study, minor adverse events are defined as Grade I-II and major adverse events as Grade III-V.
0.00%
0/25 • At least 48hrs post-procedure until discharge from hospital or 30 days post-procedure (whichever came sooner)
All cause adverse events observed in study participants were defined by the Clavien-Dindo classification system of surgical complications. For the purpose of this study, minor adverse events are defined as Grade I-II and major adverse events as Grade III-V.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Prospective PUG Cohort
n=25 participants at risk
Patients meeting all the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria and provided study consent who received the Percutaneous Ultrasound Gastrostomy (PUG) procedure
Matched Retrospective RIG Cohort
n=25 participants at risk
Patients who previously received the standard of care Radiologic Inserted Gastrostomy (RIG) procedure. A waiver of consent was provided by the Research Ethics Board for this study arm.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Mild Aspiration
4.0%
1/25 • Number of events 1 • At least 48hrs post-procedure until discharge from hospital or 30 days post-procedure (whichever came sooner)
All cause adverse events observed in study participants were defined by the Clavien-Dindo classification system of surgical complications. For the purpose of this study, minor adverse events are defined as Grade I-II and major adverse events as Grade III-V.
8.0%
2/25 • Number of events 2 • At least 48hrs post-procedure until discharge from hospital or 30 days post-procedure (whichever came sooner)
All cause adverse events observed in study participants were defined by the Clavien-Dindo classification system of surgical complications. For the purpose of this study, minor adverse events are defined as Grade I-II and major adverse events as Grade III-V.
Infections and infestations
Local Stomal Site Infection
8.0%
2/25 • Number of events 2 • At least 48hrs post-procedure until discharge from hospital or 30 days post-procedure (whichever came sooner)
All cause adverse events observed in study participants were defined by the Clavien-Dindo classification system of surgical complications. For the purpose of this study, minor adverse events are defined as Grade I-II and major adverse events as Grade III-V.
0.00%
0/25 • At least 48hrs post-procedure until discharge from hospital or 30 days post-procedure (whichever came sooner)
All cause adverse events observed in study participants were defined by the Clavien-Dindo classification system of surgical complications. For the purpose of this study, minor adverse events are defined as Grade I-II and major adverse events as Grade III-V.

Additional Information

Dr. Derek Cool

London Health Sciences Centre

Phone: 519-685-8500

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place