A Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of JCAR017 to Standard of Care in Adult Subjects With High-risk, Transplant-eligible Relapsed or Refractory Aggressive B-cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas
NCT ID: NCT03575351
Last Updated: 2025-08-03
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
184 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-10-23
2023-10-23
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This is a randomized, open-label, parallel-group, multi-center trial in adult subjects with Relapsed or refractory (R/R) aggressive Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) to compare safety and efficacy between the standard of care (SOC) strategy versus JCAR017 (also known as lisocabtagene maraleucel or liso-cel). Subjects will be randomized to either receive SOC (Arm A) or to receive JCAR017 (Arm B).
All subjects randomized to Arm A will receive Standard of care (SOC) salvage therapy (R-DHAP, RICE or R-GDP) as per physician's choice before proceeding to High dose chemotherapy (HDCT) and Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT).
Subjects from Arm A may be allowed to cross over and receive JCAR017 upon confirmation of an EFS event.
Subjects randomized to Arm B will receive Lymphodepleting (LD) chemotherapy followed by JCAR017 infusion.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Trial to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of JCAR017 in Adult Participants With Aggressive B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
NCT03484702
Autologous or Donor Stem Cell Transplantation in Treating Patients With Recurrent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (BMT CTN 0202)
NCT00096460
A Study of TAK-007 in Adults With Relapsed or Refractory (r/r) B-cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL)
NCT05020015
A Study of JNJ-90009530 in Relapsed or Refractory B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (r/r B-NHL)
NCT05784441
Testing Drug Treatments After CAR T-cell Therapy in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma
NCT05633615
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Arm A - Standard of Care (SOC)
Subjects should receive SOC (R-DHAP, R-ICE or R-GDP) followed by HDCT (BEAM) and HSCT. Standard of care regimen will be administered as per investigator decision.
Standard of Care
Standard of Care
Arm B - JCAR017
Lymphodepleting chemotherapy with intravenous (IV) fludarabine (30 mg/m2/day for 3 days) plus cyclophosphamide IV (300 mg/m2/day for 3 days) (flu/cy) concurrently followed by JCAR017 infusion.
JCAR017
JCAR017
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Standard of Care
Standard of Care
JCAR017
JCAR017
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤ 1.
3. Histologically proven diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) NOS (de novo or transformed indolent NHL), high grade B-cell lymphoma with MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements with DLBCL histology (double/triple-hit lymphoma \[DHL/THL\]), primary mediastinal (thymic) large B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL), T cell/histiocyte-rich large B-cell lymphoma (THRBCL) or follicular lymphoma grade 3B. Enough tumor material must be available for confirmation by central pathology.
4. Refractory or relapsed within 12 months from CD20 antibody and anthracycline containing first line therapy.
5. \[18F\] fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) positive lesion at screening. (Deauville score 4 or 5)
6. Adequate organ function
7. Participants must agree to use effective contraception
Exclusion Criteria
2. Subjects planned to undergo allogeneic stem cell transplantation.
3. Subjects with, primary cutaneous large B-cell lymphoma, EBV (Epstein-Barr virus) positive DLBCL, Burkitt lymphoma or transformation from chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (Richter transformation).
4. Subjects with prior history of malignancies, other than aggressive R/R NHL, unless the subject has been free of the disease for ≥ 2 years with the exception of the following noninvasive malignancies:
* Basal cell carcinoma of the skin
* Squamous cell carcinoma of the skin
* Carcinoma in situ of the cervix
* Carcinoma in situ of the breast
* Incidental histologic finding of prostate cancer (T1a or T1b using the TNM \[tumor, nodes, metastasis\] clinical staging system) or prostate cancer that is curative.
* Other completely resected stage 1 solid tumor with low risk for recurrence
5. Treatment with any prior gene therapy product.
6. Subjects who have received previous CD19-targeted therapy.
7. Subjects with active hepatitis B, or active hepatitis C are excluded. Subjects with negative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay for viral load for hepatitis B or C are permitted. Subjects positive for hepatitis B surface antigen and/or anti-hepatitis B core antibody with negative viral load are eligible and should be considered for prophylactic antiviral therapy. Subjects with a history of or active human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are excluded.
8. Subjects with uncontrolled systemic fungal, bacterial, viral or other infection (including tuberculosis) despite appropriate antibiotics or other treatment.
9. Active autoimmune disease requiring immunosuppressive therapy.
10. History of any one of the following cardiovascular conditions within the past 6 months prior to signing the ICF: Class III or IV heart failure as defined by the New York Heart Association (NYHA), cardiac angioplasty or stenting, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, or other clinically significant cardiac disease.
11. History or presence of clinically relevant central nervous system (CNS) pathology
12. Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women.
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Celgene
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Local Institution - 129
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
Local Institution - 116
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
Local Institution - 115
San Francisco, California, United States
Local Institution - 106
Aurora, Colorado, United States
Mayo Clinic - Jacksonville
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Local Institution - 126
Tampa, Florida, United States
Local Institution - 108
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Local Institution - 107
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Local Institution - 122
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Loyola University Medical Center Cardinal Bernardin Cancer Center
Maywood, Illinois, United States
Local Institution - 102
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Local Institution - 104
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Local Institution - 120
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Local Institution - 119
Detroit, Michigan, United States
Local Institution - 112
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Local Institution - 103
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Local Institution - 100
Omaha, Nebraska, United States
Local Institution - 121
Hackensack, New Jersey, United States
Local Institution - 111
Buffalo, New York, United States
Local Institution - 117
New York, New York, United States
Local Institution - 125
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
Local Institution - 127
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
Local Institution - 101
Portland, Oregon, United States
Local Institution - 123
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Local Institution - 109
Dallas, Texas, United States
Local Institution - 124
Houston, Texas, United States
Local Institution - 114
Richmond, Virginia, United States
Local Institution - 110
Seattle, Washington, United States
Local Institution - 350
Ghent, , Belgium
Local Institution - UNK 25
Helsinki, , Finland
Local Institution - 401
Lille, , France
Local Institution - 400
Marseille, , France
Local Institution - 403
Pierre-Bénite, , France
Local Institution - 402
Villejuif, , France
Local Institution - 455
Dresden, Saxony, Germany
Local Institution - 451
Berlin, , Germany
Local Institution - 450
Cologne, , Germany
Local Institution - 452
Hamburg, , Germany
Local Institution - 453
München, , Germany
Local Institution - 454
Münster, , Germany
Local Institution - 500
Rome, , Italy
Local Institution - 501
Rozzano (MI), , Italy
Local Institution - 502
Torino, , Italy
Local Institution - 203
Osaka, Osaka-shi, Japan
Local Institution - 200
Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
Local Institution - 201
Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan
Local Institution - 202
Bunkyō City, , Japan
Local Institution - 550
Rotterdam, , Netherlands
Local Institution - 600
Barcelona, , Spain
Local Institution - 601
Madrid, , Spain
Local Institution - 650
Stockholm, , Sweden
Local Institution - 700
Bern, , Switzerland
Local Institution - 751
Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom
Local Institution - 750
London, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kamdar M, Solomon SR, Arnason J, Johnston PB, Glass B, Bachanova V, Ibrahimi S, Mielke S, Mutsaers P, Hernandez-Ilizaliturri F, Izutsu K, Morschhauser F, Lunning M, Chow VA, Montheard S, Santamaria J, Colicino S, Ogasawara K, Stepan L, Liu FF, Abramson JS. Lisocabtagene Maraleucel Versus Standard of Care for Second-Line Relapsed/Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma: 3-Year Follow-Up From the Randomized, Phase III TRANSFORM Study. J Clin Oncol. 2025 Aug 20;43(24):2671-2678. doi: 10.1200/JCO-25-00399. Epub 2025 Jul 7.
Abramson JS, Solomon SR, Arnason J, Johnston PB, Glass B, Bachanova V, Ibrahimi S, Mielke S, Mutsaers P, Hernandez-Ilizaliturri F, Izutsu K, Morschhauser F, Lunning M, Crotta A, Montheard S, Previtali A, Ogasawara K, Kamdar M. Plain language summary of the TRANSFORM study primary analysis results: liso-cell as a second treatment regimen for large B-cell lymphoma following failure of the first treatment regimen. Future Oncol. 2024;20(21):1455-1465. doi: 10.2217/fon-2023-0898. Epub 2024 Mar 28.
Saeedian M, Badaracco J, Botros A, Gitlin M, Keating SJ. Estimating the Cost per Clinical Outcome of Second-Line Liso-Cel Versus Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Transplantation-Intended Relapsed/Refractory Large B Cell Lymphoma. Transplant Cell Ther. 2023 Nov;29(11):712.e1-712.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2023.08.001. Epub 2023 Aug 5.
Abramson JS, Solomon SR, Arnason J, Johnston PB, Glass B, Bachanova V, Ibrahimi S, Mielke S, Mutsaers P, Hernandez-Ilizaliturri F, Izutsu K, Morschhauser F, Lunning M, Crotta A, Montheard S, Previtali A, Ogasawara K, Kamdar M. Lisocabtagene maraleucel as second-line therapy for large B-cell lymphoma: primary analysis of the phase 3 TRANSFORM study. Blood. 2023 Apr 6;141(14):1675-1684. doi: 10.1182/blood.2022018730.
Kamdar M, Solomon SR, Arnason J, Johnston PB, Glass B, Bachanova V, Ibrahimi S, Mielke S, Mutsaers P, Hernandez-Ilizaliturri F, Izutsu K, Morschhauser F, Lunning M, Maloney DG, Crotta A, Montheard S, Previtali A, Stepan L, Ogasawara K, Mack T, Abramson JS; TRANSFORM Investigators. Lisocabtagene maraleucel versus standard of care with salvage chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation as second-line treatment in patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma (TRANSFORM): results from an interim analysis of an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2022 Jun 18;399(10343):2294-2308. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00662-6.
Ernst M, Oeser A, Besiroglu B, Caro-Valenzuela J, Abd El Aziz M, Monsef I, Borchmann P, Estcourt LJ, Skoetz N, Goldkuhle M. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for people with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 13;9(9):CD013365. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013365.pub2.
Thiruvengadam SK, Hunter B, Varnavski A, Fakhri B, Kaplan L, Ai WZ, Pampaloni M, Huang CY, Martin T 3rd, Damon L, Andreadis CB. Ofatumumab, Etoposide, and Cytarabine Intensive Mobilization Regimen in Patients with High-risk Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Undergoing Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2021 Apr;21(4):246-256.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2020.11.005. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
BMS Clinical Trial Information
BMS Clinical Trial Patient Recruiting
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
U1111-1213-1944
Identifier Type: REGISTRY
Identifier Source: secondary_id
2018-000929-32
Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
JCAR017-BCM-003
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.