Trial Outcomes & Findings for mHealth Messaging to Motivate Quitline Use Quitting (NCT NCT03567993)

NCT ID: NCT03567993

Last Updated: 2024-02-14

Results Overview

7 day point prevalence cessation per self-report with additional carbon monoxide monitor verification for those who report cessation.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

750 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

At 6 months post-randomization

Results posted on

2024-02-14

Participant Flow

Recruitment occurred over a 22-month period, from November 23, 2018, through October 7, 2020.

During monthly recruitment events, study staff screened interested individuals for eligibility, consented, and enrolled eligible individuals in the study. Enrolled participants completed a baseline survey before randomization. No participants were excluded between enrollment and assignment to study arms.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Comparison
The comparison condition is designed as a minimal intervention, and allows for blinding of the patients to randomization group. Comparison: Participants randomized to the comparison arm will receive twice-monthly abstinence assessments from the text messaging system, with no motivational feedback. Those in the comparison arm are neither offered nor encouraged to participate in the intervention.
Intervention
The intervention is designed to encourage and remind smokers of the availability of the Quitline services. In addition to the one-way motivational messages, the investigators will use two-way assessments. Two-way automated texting is the ability to push out a question, have the user respond with a brief, numeric or one-word answer, and based on that answer, provide immediate feedback. The goal of these brief assessments is two-fold: 1) to assess behavior (abstinence) and motivation to use services, and 2) to return feedback tailored to each individual smoker based on the answers of the user. Intervention: Participants randomized to the intervention arm will receive: 1. Motivational Messages 2. Abstinence and Motivation to Use Services Assessments 3. Encouragement to access the Quitline 4. Encouragement to use Nicotine Replacement Therapy (NRT) 5. Provision of NRT, if requested Intervention subjects are encouraged to access the Quitline and use NRT. However, these are not mandatory components of the intervention and subjects can choose if they would like to engage with the Quitline or use NRT.
Overall Study
STARTED
378
372
Overall Study
COMPLETED
372
369
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
6
3

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Comparison
The comparison condition is designed as a minimal intervention, and allows for blinding of the patients to randomization group. Comparison: Participants randomized to the comparison arm will receive twice-monthly abstinence assessments from the text messaging system, with no motivational feedback. Those in the comparison arm are neither offered nor encouraged to participate in the intervention.
Intervention
The intervention is designed to encourage and remind smokers of the availability of the Quitline services. In addition to the one-way motivational messages, the investigators will use two-way assessments. Two-way automated texting is the ability to push out a question, have the user respond with a brief, numeric or one-word answer, and based on that answer, provide immediate feedback. The goal of these brief assessments is two-fold: 1) to assess behavior (abstinence) and motivation to use services, and 2) to return feedback tailored to each individual smoker based on the answers of the user. Intervention: Participants randomized to the intervention arm will receive: 1. Motivational Messages 2. Abstinence and Motivation to Use Services Assessments 3. Encouragement to access the Quitline 4. Encouragement to use Nicotine Replacement Therapy (NRT) 5. Provision of NRT, if requested Intervention subjects are encouraged to access the Quitline and use NRT. However, these are not mandatory components of the intervention and subjects can choose if they would like to engage with the Quitline or use NRT.
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
4
2
Overall Study
Death
1
1
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
1
0

Baseline Characteristics

mHealth Messaging to Motivate Quitline Use Quitting

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Comparison
n=377 Participants
The comparison condition is designed as a minimal intervention, and allows for blinding of the patients to randomization group. Comparison: Participants randomized to the comparison arm will receive twice-monthly abstinence assessments from the text messaging system, with no motivational feedback. Those in the comparison arm are neither offered nor encouraged to participate in the intervention.
Intervention
n=372 Participants
The intervention is designed to encourage and remind smokers of the availability of the Quitline services. In addition to the one-way motivational messages, the investigators will use two-way assessments. Two-way automated texting is the ability to push out a question, have the user respond with a brief, numeric or one-word answer, and based on that answer, provide immediate feedback. The goal of these brief assessments is two-fold: 1) to assess behavior (abstinence) and motivation to use services, and 2) to return feedback tailored to each individual smoker based on the answers of the user. Intervention: Participants randomized to the intervention arm will receive: 1. Motivational Messages 2. Abstinence and Motivation to Use Services Assessments 3. Encouragement to access the Quitline 4. Encouragement to use Nicotine Replacement Therapy (NRT) 5. Provision of NRT, if requested Intervention subjects are encouraged to access the Quitline and use NRT. However, these are not mandatory components of the intervention and subjects can choose if they would like to engage with the Quitline or use NRT.
Total
n=749 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
364 Participants
n=5 Participants
364 Participants
n=7 Participants
728 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
8 Participants
n=7 Participants
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Continuous
42.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.6 • n=5 Participants
42.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.5 • n=7 Participants
42.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.6 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
377 Participants
n=5 Participants
372 Participants
n=7 Participants
749 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
377 Participants
n=5 Participants
372 Participants
n=7 Participants
749 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
377 Participants
n=5 Participants
372 Participants
n=7 Participants
749 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Vietnam
377 participants
n=5 Participants
372 participants
n=7 Participants
749 participants
n=5 Participants
Baseline Smoking Self-Efficacy (SEQ-12) Questionnaire
33 Scores on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.9 • n=5 Participants
32 Scores on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.9 • n=7 Participants
32.8 Scores on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.9 • n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: At 6 months post-randomization

Population: The number of participants analyzed did not differ from the number of participants assigned to the arm or comparison group.

7 day point prevalence cessation per self-report with additional carbon monoxide monitor verification for those who report cessation.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Comparison
n=372 Participants
The comparison condition is designed as a minimal intervention, and allows for blinding of the patients to randomization group. Comparison: Participants randomized to the comparison arm will receive twice-monthly abstinence assessments from the text messaging system, with no motivational feedback. Those in the comparison arm are neither offered nor encouraged to participate in the intervention.
Intervention
n=369 Participants
The intervention is designed to encourage and remind smokers of the availability of the Quitline services. In addition to the one-way motivational messages, the investigators will use two-way assessments. Two-way automated texting is the ability to push out a question, have the user respond with a brief, numeric or one-word answer, and based on that answer, provide immediate feedback. The goal of these brief assessments is two-fold: 1) to assess behavior (abstinence) and motivation to use services, and 2) to return feedback tailored to each individual smoker based on the answers of the user. Intervention: Participants randomized to the intervention arm will receive: 1. Motivational Messages 2. Abstinence and Motivation to Use Services Assessments 3. Encouragement to access the Quitline 4. Encouragement to use Nicotine Replacement Therapy (NRT) 5. Provision of NRT, if requested Intervention subjects are encouraged to access the Quitline and use NRT. However, these are not mandatory components of the intervention and subjects can choose if they would like to engage with the Quitline or use NRT.
Participant Tobacco Cessation Rate (Quit Rate) at 6 Months
.50 proportion of participants
.52 proportion of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From randomization to 6 months post-randomization

Population: The number of participants analyzed did not differ from the number of participants assigned to the arm or comparison group.

Study team will administer the Self Efficacy Questionnaire (SEQ-12), an 12-item questionnaire to measure self-reported confidence of current and former smokers in their ability to abstain from smoking in high-risk situations (e.g., when facing internal stimuli (e.g., feeling depressed) and external stimuli (e.g., being with smokers)). The SEQ-12 consists of 12 items; each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1=not at all sure, 2=not very sure, 3=more or less sure, 4=fairly sure, and 5=absolutely sure). SEQ-12 scores range from 12 to 60, with higher scores indicating greater self-efficacy. Individual items are summed to compute the total score. The outcome will measure the change in SEQ-12 scores from baseline to 6 months post-randomization.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Comparison
n=372 Participants
The comparison condition is designed as a minimal intervention, and allows for blinding of the patients to randomization group. Comparison: Participants randomized to the comparison arm will receive twice-monthly abstinence assessments from the text messaging system, with no motivational feedback. Those in the comparison arm are neither offered nor encouraged to participate in the intervention.
Intervention
n=369 Participants
The intervention is designed to encourage and remind smokers of the availability of the Quitline services. In addition to the one-way motivational messages, the investigators will use two-way assessments. Two-way automated texting is the ability to push out a question, have the user respond with a brief, numeric or one-word answer, and based on that answer, provide immediate feedback. The goal of these brief assessments is two-fold: 1) to assess behavior (abstinence) and motivation to use services, and 2) to return feedback tailored to each individual smoker based on the answers of the user. Intervention: Participants randomized to the intervention arm will receive: 1. Motivational Messages 2. Abstinence and Motivation to Use Services Assessments 3. Encouragement to access the Quitline 4. Encouragement to use Nicotine Replacement Therapy (NRT) 5. Provision of NRT, if requested Intervention subjects are encouraged to access the Quitline and use NRT. However, these are not mandatory components of the intervention and subjects can choose if they would like to engage with the Quitline or use NRT.
Change in Self-efficacy Scores Using the Self Efficacy Questionnaire (SEQ-12)
43 SEQ-12 scores
Standard Deviation 10.2
43 SEQ-12 scores
Standard Deviation 10.6

Adverse Events

Comparison

Serious events: 1 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 1 deaths

Intervention

Serious events: 1 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 1 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Comparison
n=378 participants at risk
The comparison condition is designed as a minimal intervention, and allows for blinding of the patients to randomization group. Comparison: Participants randomized to the comparison arm will receive twice-monthly abstinence assessments from the text messaging system, with no motivational feedback. Those in the comparison arm are neither offered nor encouraged to participate in the intervention.
Intervention
n=372 participants at risk
The intervention is designed to encourage and remind smokers of the availability of the Quitline services. In addition to the one-way motivational messages, the investigators will use two-way assessments. Two-way automated texting is the ability to push out a question, have the user respond with a brief, numeric or one-word answer, and based on that answer, provide immediate feedback. The goal of these brief assessments is two-fold: 1) to assess behavior (abstinence) and motivation to use services, and 2) to return feedback tailored to each individual smoker based on the answers of the user. Intervention: Participants randomized to the intervention arm will receive: 1. Motivational Messages 2. Abstinence and Motivation to Use Services Assessments 3. Encouragement to access the Quitline 4. Encouragement to use Nicotine Replacement Therapy (NRT) 5. Provision of NRT, if requested Intervention subjects are encouraged to access the Quitline and use NRT. However, these are not mandatory components of the intervention and subjects can choose if they would like to engage with the Quitline or use NRT.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Death
0.26%
1/378 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected through study completion, an average of 6 months.
The study used the clinicaltrials.gov definition of adverse events and serious adverse events.
0.00%
0/372 • Adverse event data were collected through study completion, an average of 6 months.
The study used the clinicaltrials.gov definition of adverse events and serious adverse events.
Cardiac disorders
Death
0.00%
0/378 • Adverse event data were collected through study completion, an average of 6 months.
The study used the clinicaltrials.gov definition of adverse events and serious adverse events.
0.27%
1/372 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected through study completion, an average of 6 months.
The study used the clinicaltrials.gov definition of adverse events and serious adverse events.

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Dr. Rajani Sadasivam

UMass Chan Medical School

Phone: 508-456-8923

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place