Trial Outcomes & Findings for mHealth Messaging to Motivate Quitline Use Quitting (NCT NCT03567993)
NCT ID: NCT03567993
Last Updated: 2024-02-14
Results Overview
7 day point prevalence cessation per self-report with additional carbon monoxide monitor verification for those who report cessation.
COMPLETED
NA
750 participants
At 6 months post-randomization
2024-02-14
Participant Flow
Recruitment occurred over a 22-month period, from November 23, 2018, through October 7, 2020.
During monthly recruitment events, study staff screened interested individuals for eligibility, consented, and enrolled eligible individuals in the study. Enrolled participants completed a baseline survey before randomization. No participants were excluded between enrollment and assignment to study arms.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Comparison
The comparison condition is designed as a minimal intervention, and allows for blinding of the patients to randomization group.
Comparison: Participants randomized to the comparison arm will receive twice-monthly abstinence assessments from the text messaging system, with no motivational feedback. Those in the comparison arm are neither offered nor encouraged to participate in the intervention.
|
Intervention
The intervention is designed to encourage and remind smokers of the availability of the Quitline services. In addition to the one-way motivational messages, the investigators will use two-way assessments. Two-way automated texting is the ability to push out a question, have the user respond with a brief, numeric or one-word answer, and based on that answer, provide immediate feedback. The goal of these brief assessments is two-fold: 1) to assess behavior (abstinence) and motivation to use services, and 2) to return feedback tailored to each individual smoker based on the answers of the user.
Intervention: Participants randomized to the intervention arm will receive:
1. Motivational Messages
2. Abstinence and Motivation to Use Services Assessments
3. Encouragement to access the Quitline
4. Encouragement to use Nicotine Replacement Therapy (NRT)
5. Provision of NRT, if requested
Intervention subjects are encouraged to access the Quitline and use NRT. However, these are not mandatory components of the intervention and subjects can choose if they would like to engage with the Quitline or use NRT.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
378
|
372
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
372
|
369
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
6
|
3
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Comparison
The comparison condition is designed as a minimal intervention, and allows for blinding of the patients to randomization group.
Comparison: Participants randomized to the comparison arm will receive twice-monthly abstinence assessments from the text messaging system, with no motivational feedback. Those in the comparison arm are neither offered nor encouraged to participate in the intervention.
|
Intervention
The intervention is designed to encourage and remind smokers of the availability of the Quitline services. In addition to the one-way motivational messages, the investigators will use two-way assessments. Two-way automated texting is the ability to push out a question, have the user respond with a brief, numeric or one-word answer, and based on that answer, provide immediate feedback. The goal of these brief assessments is two-fold: 1) to assess behavior (abstinence) and motivation to use services, and 2) to return feedback tailored to each individual smoker based on the answers of the user.
Intervention: Participants randomized to the intervention arm will receive:
1. Motivational Messages
2. Abstinence and Motivation to Use Services Assessments
3. Encouragement to access the Quitline
4. Encouragement to use Nicotine Replacement Therapy (NRT)
5. Provision of NRT, if requested
Intervention subjects are encouraged to access the Quitline and use NRT. However, these are not mandatory components of the intervention and subjects can choose if they would like to engage with the Quitline or use NRT.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
4
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
1
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
1
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
mHealth Messaging to Motivate Quitline Use Quitting
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Comparison
n=377 Participants
The comparison condition is designed as a minimal intervention, and allows for blinding of the patients to randomization group.
Comparison: Participants randomized to the comparison arm will receive twice-monthly abstinence assessments from the text messaging system, with no motivational feedback. Those in the comparison arm are neither offered nor encouraged to participate in the intervention.
|
Intervention
n=372 Participants
The intervention is designed to encourage and remind smokers of the availability of the Quitline services. In addition to the one-way motivational messages, the investigators will use two-way assessments. Two-way automated texting is the ability to push out a question, have the user respond with a brief, numeric or one-word answer, and based on that answer, provide immediate feedback. The goal of these brief assessments is two-fold: 1) to assess behavior (abstinence) and motivation to use services, and 2) to return feedback tailored to each individual smoker based on the answers of the user.
Intervention: Participants randomized to the intervention arm will receive:
1. Motivational Messages
2. Abstinence and Motivation to Use Services Assessments
3. Encouragement to access the Quitline
4. Encouragement to use Nicotine Replacement Therapy (NRT)
5. Provision of NRT, if requested
Intervention subjects are encouraged to access the Quitline and use NRT. However, these are not mandatory components of the intervention and subjects can choose if they would like to engage with the Quitline or use NRT.
|
Total
n=749 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
364 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
364 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
728 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
42.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.6 • n=5 Participants
|
42.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.5 • n=7 Participants
|
42.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.6 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
377 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
372 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
749 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
377 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
372 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
749 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
377 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
372 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
749 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Vietnam
|
377 participants
n=5 Participants
|
372 participants
n=7 Participants
|
749 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Baseline Smoking Self-Efficacy (SEQ-12) Questionnaire
|
33 Scores on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.9 • n=5 Participants
|
32 Scores on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.9 • n=7 Participants
|
32.8 Scores on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.9 • n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: At 6 months post-randomizationPopulation: The number of participants analyzed did not differ from the number of participants assigned to the arm or comparison group.
7 day point prevalence cessation per self-report with additional carbon monoxide monitor verification for those who report cessation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Comparison
n=372 Participants
The comparison condition is designed as a minimal intervention, and allows for blinding of the patients to randomization group.
Comparison: Participants randomized to the comparison arm will receive twice-monthly abstinence assessments from the text messaging system, with no motivational feedback. Those in the comparison arm are neither offered nor encouraged to participate in the intervention.
|
Intervention
n=369 Participants
The intervention is designed to encourage and remind smokers of the availability of the Quitline services. In addition to the one-way motivational messages, the investigators will use two-way assessments. Two-way automated texting is the ability to push out a question, have the user respond with a brief, numeric or one-word answer, and based on that answer, provide immediate feedback. The goal of these brief assessments is two-fold: 1) to assess behavior (abstinence) and motivation to use services, and 2) to return feedback tailored to each individual smoker based on the answers of the user.
Intervention: Participants randomized to the intervention arm will receive:
1. Motivational Messages
2. Abstinence and Motivation to Use Services Assessments
3. Encouragement to access the Quitline
4. Encouragement to use Nicotine Replacement Therapy (NRT)
5. Provision of NRT, if requested
Intervention subjects are encouraged to access the Quitline and use NRT. However, these are not mandatory components of the intervention and subjects can choose if they would like to engage with the Quitline or use NRT.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Participant Tobacco Cessation Rate (Quit Rate) at 6 Months
|
.50 proportion of participants
|
.52 proportion of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From randomization to 6 months post-randomizationPopulation: The number of participants analyzed did not differ from the number of participants assigned to the arm or comparison group.
Study team will administer the Self Efficacy Questionnaire (SEQ-12), an 12-item questionnaire to measure self-reported confidence of current and former smokers in their ability to abstain from smoking in high-risk situations (e.g., when facing internal stimuli (e.g., feeling depressed) and external stimuli (e.g., being with smokers)). The SEQ-12 consists of 12 items; each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1=not at all sure, 2=not very sure, 3=more or less sure, 4=fairly sure, and 5=absolutely sure). SEQ-12 scores range from 12 to 60, with higher scores indicating greater self-efficacy. Individual items are summed to compute the total score. The outcome will measure the change in SEQ-12 scores from baseline to 6 months post-randomization.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Comparison
n=372 Participants
The comparison condition is designed as a minimal intervention, and allows for blinding of the patients to randomization group.
Comparison: Participants randomized to the comparison arm will receive twice-monthly abstinence assessments from the text messaging system, with no motivational feedback. Those in the comparison arm are neither offered nor encouraged to participate in the intervention.
|
Intervention
n=369 Participants
The intervention is designed to encourage and remind smokers of the availability of the Quitline services. In addition to the one-way motivational messages, the investigators will use two-way assessments. Two-way automated texting is the ability to push out a question, have the user respond with a brief, numeric or one-word answer, and based on that answer, provide immediate feedback. The goal of these brief assessments is two-fold: 1) to assess behavior (abstinence) and motivation to use services, and 2) to return feedback tailored to each individual smoker based on the answers of the user.
Intervention: Participants randomized to the intervention arm will receive:
1. Motivational Messages
2. Abstinence and Motivation to Use Services Assessments
3. Encouragement to access the Quitline
4. Encouragement to use Nicotine Replacement Therapy (NRT)
5. Provision of NRT, if requested
Intervention subjects are encouraged to access the Quitline and use NRT. However, these are not mandatory components of the intervention and subjects can choose if they would like to engage with the Quitline or use NRT.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Self-efficacy Scores Using the Self Efficacy Questionnaire (SEQ-12)
|
43 SEQ-12 scores
Standard Deviation 10.2
|
43 SEQ-12 scores
Standard Deviation 10.6
|
Adverse Events
Comparison
Intervention
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Comparison
n=378 participants at risk
The comparison condition is designed as a minimal intervention, and allows for blinding of the patients to randomization group.
Comparison: Participants randomized to the comparison arm will receive twice-monthly abstinence assessments from the text messaging system, with no motivational feedback. Those in the comparison arm are neither offered nor encouraged to participate in the intervention.
|
Intervention
n=372 participants at risk
The intervention is designed to encourage and remind smokers of the availability of the Quitline services. In addition to the one-way motivational messages, the investigators will use two-way assessments. Two-way automated texting is the ability to push out a question, have the user respond with a brief, numeric or one-word answer, and based on that answer, provide immediate feedback. The goal of these brief assessments is two-fold: 1) to assess behavior (abstinence) and motivation to use services, and 2) to return feedback tailored to each individual smoker based on the answers of the user.
Intervention: Participants randomized to the intervention arm will receive:
1. Motivational Messages
2. Abstinence and Motivation to Use Services Assessments
3. Encouragement to access the Quitline
4. Encouragement to use Nicotine Replacement Therapy (NRT)
5. Provision of NRT, if requested
Intervention subjects are encouraged to access the Quitline and use NRT. However, these are not mandatory components of the intervention and subjects can choose if they would like to engage with the Quitline or use NRT.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Death
|
0.26%
1/378 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected through study completion, an average of 6 months.
The study used the clinicaltrials.gov definition of adverse events and serious adverse events.
|
0.00%
0/372 • Adverse event data were collected through study completion, an average of 6 months.
The study used the clinicaltrials.gov definition of adverse events and serious adverse events.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Death
|
0.00%
0/378 • Adverse event data were collected through study completion, an average of 6 months.
The study used the clinicaltrials.gov definition of adverse events and serious adverse events.
|
0.27%
1/372 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected through study completion, an average of 6 months.
The study used the clinicaltrials.gov definition of adverse events and serious adverse events.
|
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place