Cryoneurolysis for Improvements in Pain, ADL and QOL in Patients With Ankle Osteoarthritis
NCT ID: NCT03567187
Last Updated: 2024-05-16
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-07-03
2021-01-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Randomized, Study to Evaluate the Iovera° Device in Treating Pain Associated With Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT02284113
The Benefits Of Cryoablation In Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT06991231
Evaluation of the Effect of Biofiller PRP Application on Knee Osteoarthritis
NCT06946056
Regenerative Injection Therapy and Osteoarthritis
NCT01206634
Intra-articular Transplantation of Autologous Adipose Derived Stromal Vascular Faction (SVF) for Treatment of Osteoarthritis of the Knee
NCT03940950
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The secondary outcomes will be improvement in quality of life (FAOS-QoL), activities of daily living (FAOS-ADL) and Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for pain.
The tertiary outcome will be improvement in physical performance measures (40m fast-paced walking test, standing balance test).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SEQUENTIAL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Iovera
The iovera° device consists of a reusable, portable hand-piece, along with a single-patient use sterile smart Tip (cryoprobe) and disposable nitrous oxide (N2O) cartridges (cryogen). The smart tip is composed of closed-tip stainless steel needles, thereby fully enclosing the cryogen. There are 2 types of smart tips that will be utilized during this study, depending on the depth of the nerves being treated. The shorter smart tip comes in 2 variants - three X 6.9 mm or 8.9 mm, 27-gauge needles, with an attached skin warmer to prevent damage to the underlying skin. The longer smart tip also comes in 2 variants - 55 mm 22-gauge needle or a 90 mm 20G needle.
The effect is by initiation of a cooling cycle, by fully inserting the smart tip into the procedure site and activating the cryogen flow. As the gas travels through the length of the needle, an ice ball develops around the needle freezing the surrounding tissue.
iovera
The iovera° device is 510(k)-cleared (K133453 and K161835) and is used to form a precisely controlled, sub-dermal cold zone of -20 to -88.5 degrees Celsius to temporarily disrupt peripheral nerve function, ultimately blocking pain. It is not indicated for the treatment of central nervous system tissue.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
iovera
The iovera° device is 510(k)-cleared (K133453 and K161835) and is used to form a precisely controlled, sub-dermal cold zone of -20 to -88.5 degrees Celsius to temporarily disrupt peripheral nerve function, ultimately blocking pain. It is not indicated for the treatment of central nervous system tissue.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Willingness and ability to comply with the study procedures, visit schedules and ability to follow verbal and written instructions.
* Male or female over 18 years of age.
* Currently Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) Grade 2, 3 or 4 in the ankle based on X-ray (weight-bearing mortise views with 20° internal rotation) or weight-bearing CT scan of the ankles.
* Limited by unilateral ankle pain, rated on a Numerical Rating Scale for pain severity as ≥5 on most days over the last month.
* Foot and ankle outcome score (FAOS) of \< 75 in at least 1 category.
* Body mass index (BMI) ≤ 50 kg/m2
* Ambulatory
* Willingness to abstain from the use of protocol-restricted medications during the study and also willing to abstain from use of analgesics other than acetaminophen 1 week prior to beginning of the study.
* Has undergone at least one prior conservative osteoarthritis treatment (e.g. physical therapy, analgesics).
Exclusion Criteria
* Cryoglobulinemia, paroxysmal cold hemoglobinuria, Raynaud's disease, cold urticaria.
* Clinical signs or symptoms of active or recurrent infection in the index ankle joint or overlying skin.
* Intra-articular, intravenous or intramuscular corticosteroid (investigational or marketed) within 3 months of screening
* Oral corticosteroids (investigational or marketed) within 2 weeks of screening (unless on a chronic stable dose for ≥3 months prior to enrollment).
* Women who are pregnant (due to potential for the change in body mass and distribution to alter ankle symptoms over the period of follow-up).
* Any condition other than OA of the ankle joint which, in the opinion of the investigators, affects their ability to ambulate to a sufficient degree to interfere with the assessment of the safety and treatment effects of the study injection.
* Arthroscopy or open surgery of the ankle joint within 6 months of screening.
* Planned/anticipated surgery of the index ankle joint during the 6-month study period.
* Any clinically significant degree of cognitive impairment or other condition, finding, or psychiatric illness at screening which, in the opinion of the investigator, could compromise patient safety or interfere with the assessment of the safety and treatment effects of the study injection.
* Skin breakdown at the ankle joint where the injection is planned to take place.
* Participated in any investigational drug or device trial within 30 days prior to screening or concurrent participation in another research study that could complicate interpretation of the findings of either study.
* Current consumption of more than 14 alcoholic drinks per week.
* Patients with diffuse pain conditions (Complex pain - diffuse or confounding pain, fibromyalgia, etc.).
* Known altered nerve anatomy or physiology (e.g. neuropathy) at the target, such as due to a congenital, traumatic or surgical cause.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Kansas Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Neil Segal, MD, MS
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Neil A Segal, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Kansas Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Kansas Medical Center
Kansas City, Kansas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ward ST, Williams PL, Purkayastha S. Intra-articular corticosteroid injections in the foot and ankle: a prospective 1-year follow-up investigation. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2008 Mar-Apr;47(2):138-44. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2007.12.007.
Valderrabano V, Horisberger M, Russell I, Dougall H, Hintermann B. Etiology of ankle osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Jul;467(7):1800-6. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0543-6. Epub 2008 Oct 2.
Repetto I, Biti B, Cerruti P, Trentini R, Felli L. Conservative Treatment of Ankle Osteoarthritis: Can Platelet-Rich Plasma Effectively Postpone Surgery? J Foot Ankle Surg. 2017 Mar-Apr;56(2):362-365. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2016.11.015.
Trescot AM. Cryoanalgesia in interventional pain management. Pain Physician. 2003 Jul;6(3):345-60.
Evans PJ, Lloyd JW, Green CJ. Cryoanalgesia: the response to alterations in freeze cycle and temperature. Br J Anaesth. 1981 Nov;53(11):1121-7. doi: 10.1093/bja/53.11.1121.
Golightly YM, Devellis RF, Nelson AE, Hannan MT, Lohmander LS, Renner JB, Jordan JM. Psychometric properties of the foot and ankle outcome score in a community-based study of adults with and without osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2014 Mar;66(3):395-403. doi: 10.1002/acr.22162.
Mani SB, Do H, Vulcano E, Hogan MV, Lyman S, Deland JT, Ellis SJ. Evaluation of the foot and ankle outcome score in patients with osteoarthritis of the ankle. Bone Joint J. 2015 May;97-B(5):662-7. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B5.33940.
Holzer N, Salvo D, Marijnissen AC, Vincken KL, Ahmad AC, Serra E, Hoffmeyer P, Stern R, Lubbeke A, Assal M. Radiographic evaluation of posttraumatic osteoarthritis of the ankle: the Kellgren-Lawrence scale is reliable and correlates with clinical symptoms. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2015 Mar;23(3):363-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2014.11.010. Epub 2014 Nov 15.
Roos EM, Brandsson S, Karlsson J. Validation of the foot and ankle outcome score for ankle ligament reconstruction. Foot Ankle Int. 2001 Oct;22(10):788-94. doi: 10.1177/107110070102201004.
Hunt KJ, Hurwit D. Use of patient-reported outcome measures in foot and ankle research. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Aug 21;95(16):e118(1-9). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01476.
Dobson F, Hinman RS, Roos EM, Abbott JH, Stratford P, Davis AM, Buchbinder R, Snyder-Mackler L, Henrotin Y, Thumboo J, Hansen P, Bennell KL. OARSI recommended performance-based tests to assess physical function in people diagnosed with hip or knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013 Aug;21(8):1042-52. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2013.05.002. Epub 2013 May 13.
McDaniel G, Renner JB, Sloane R, Kraus VB. Association of knee and ankle osteoarthritis with physical performance. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2011 Jun;19(6):634-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2011.01.016. Epub 2011 Feb 19.
Radnovich R, Scott D, Patel AT, Olson R, Dasa V, Segal N, Lane NE, Shrock K, Naranjo J, Darr K, Surowitz R, Choo J, Valadie A, Harrell R, Wei N, Metyas S. Cryoneurolysis to treat the pain and symptoms of knee osteoarthritis: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2017 Aug;25(8):1247-1256. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2017.03.006. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
STUDY00142298
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.