Effect of Location of Feeding on Glycemic Control in Critically Ill Patients (ELF)
NCT ID: NCT03566992
Last Updated: 2018-06-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
170 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-05-01
2018-09-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The investigators hypothesize that glycemic control in critically ill patients who receive enteral nutrition through postpyloric location (beyond stomach) will have better glycemic control compared to critically ill patients fed gastrically.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of the Effects of Intermittent and Continuous Enteral Feeding on Glucose-Insulin Dynamics in Critically Ill Medical Patients
NCT02853799
Glycemic Index Variation During Low-carbohydrate Enteral Formula With and Without Fructose in Critically Ill Patients
NCT03003507
The Effects of Bolus, Intermittent and Continuous Enteral Feeding on Blood Glucose and Feeding Intolerance in ICU Patients With Sepsis
NCT05812664
The DINE-Normal Proof-of-concept Study
NCT06115044
Intermittent vs Continuous Enteral Nutrition in Glycaemic Control of Diabetic ICU Patients
NCT07054476
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Randomization using computer software and a unique identification number will be assigned to every intubated patients who may need mechanical ventilation or tube feed for more than 48 hours.
Randomization will be considered incomplete and the case will be excluded if the process of assigning group, confirmation of placement of appropriate group specific tube and nutrition is not initiated within 24 hours.
If patient is randomized into group A, a bedside RN or the intensivist will place a Salem Sump gastric tube. A nutrition consult for tube feed will be obtained. Confirmation of gastric placement and not a postpyloric placement will be based on the length of the orogastric/nasogastric tube and a standard chest radiograph obtained routinely after intubation. The NG or OG tube should not be more than 65 cm in most cases to prevent it from migrating into the postpyloric location. A standard enteral tube feed formula will be initiated. Blood sugars checked via basic metabolic (at least daily) panel and point-of-care glucose tests (at least every 6 hours) will be obtained. Data collection and Salem Sump placement will be confirmed by the studying team and will not be known to the RD prescribing the nutrition.
If a patient is randomized into group B, a trained RN or RD will place the small-bore feeding feeding tube in the postpyloric position. The effort will be to assure jejunal placement, but postpyloric placement should be sufficient. If for some reason, the small-bore tube cannot be passed beyond pylorus, then sufficient length will be left in IRB the stomach and the case will be noted to have not had the postpyloric placement.
A per protocol analysis and an intention to treat analysis will be carried in the end to take into consideration cases when placement of tube in certain location could not be achieved.
If a feeding tube becomes occluded, it will be replaced with a new tube within 12 hours. If the patient had a postpyloric tube and the new tube cannot be positioned in the postpyloric location, the patient's involvement in the study will be halted (no further data collection).
A standard enteral tube feed formula will be initiated. Blood sugars checked via basic metabolic (at least daily) panel and point-of-care glucose tests (at least every 6 hours) will be obtained.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Gastric Tube Placement
Nasoenteric tube placed in the stomach.
Gastric
Placement of a nasoenteric tube
Small bowel
Nasoenteric tube placed in the small bowel.
Gastric
Placement of a nasoenteric tube
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Gastric
Placement of a nasoenteric tube
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Orders for tube feeding
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patients not being fed (such as DKA, GI bleed, obstruction, ileus, etc)
3. Pre-existing PEG/PEJ tubes
4. Surgically altered upper and middle GI tract such as partial gastrectomy, gastric bypass surgeries etc. (patients with ileostomy and colostomy may still be included if the enteral route is used for nutrition)
5. No informed consent
6. Primary attending finds medical necessity to have a specific type of tube preventing randomization
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Halyard Health
INDUSTRY
Winchester Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Padmaraj Duvvuri
Principal Investigator, Critical Care Physician
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Padmaraj Duvvuri, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Winchester Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Winchester Medical Center
Winchester, Virginia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Brett Baney, MS, RD
Role: primary
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Metheny NA, Clouse RE, Chang YH, Stewart BJ, Oliver DA, Kollef MH. Tracheobronchial aspiration of gastric contents in critically ill tube-fed patients: frequency, outcomes, and risk factors. Crit Care Med. 2006 Apr;34(4):1007-15. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000206106.65220.59.
Di Bartolomeo AE, Chapman MJ, V Zaknic A, Summers MJ, Jones KL, Nguyen NQ, Rayner CK, Horowitz M, Deane AM. Comparative effects on glucose absorption of intragastric and post-pyloric nutrient delivery in the critically ill. Crit Care. 2012 Sep 17;16(5):R167. doi: 10.1186/cc11522.
Pournaras DJ, Aasheim ET, Bueter M, Ahmed AR, Welbourn R, Olbers T, le Roux CW. Effect of bypassing the proximal gut on gut hormones involved with glycemic control and weight loss. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012 Jul-Aug;8(4):371-4. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2012.01.021. Epub 2012 Mar 3.
Luttikhold J, van Norren K, Rijna H, Buijs N, Ankersmit M, Heijboer AC, Gootjes J, Hartmann B, Holst JJ, van Loon LJ, van Leeuwen PA. Jejunal feeding is followed by a greater rise in plasma cholecystokinin, peptide YY, glucagon-like peptide 1, and glucagon-like peptide 2 concentrations compared with gastric feeding in vivo in humans: a randomized trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2016 Feb;103(2):435-43. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.115.116251. Epub 2016 Jan 13.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
WinchesterMC
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.