Trial Outcomes & Findings for Anchorsure Versus Capio for Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation (NCT NCT03565640)
NCT ID: NCT03565640
Last Updated: 2023-02-16
Results Overview
This will be assessed using the numeric rating scale (NRS). The score is 0-10, with higher scores denoting a greater degree of pain.
COMPLETED
NA
48 participants
postoperative 12 month
2023-02-16
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Capio Slim Device
Participants will be randomized to the sacrospinous ligament fixation with use of Capio Slim Device
Capio Slim Device: Participants who have been assigned to sacrospinous ligament fixation for pelvic organ prolapse will have sacrospinous ligament fixation performed with the Capio Slim Device.
|
Anchorsure Device
Participants will be randomized to the sacrospinous ligament fixation with use of Anchorsure Device
Anchorsure Device: Participants who have been assigned to sacrospinous ligament fixation for pelvic organ prolapse will have sacrospinous ligament fixation performed with the Anchorsure Device.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
23
|
24
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
22
|
21
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
3
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Anchorsure Versus Capio for Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Capio Slim Device
n=22 Participants
Participants will be randomized to the sacrospinous ligament fixation with use of Capio Slim Device
Capio Slim Device: Participants who have been assigned to sacrospinous ligament fixation for pelvic organ prolapse will have sacrospinous ligament fixation performed with the Capio Slim Device.
|
Anchorsure Device
n=21 Participants
Participants will be randomized to the sacrospinous ligament fixation with use of Anchorsure Device
Anchorsure Device: Participants who have been assigned to sacrospinous ligament fixation for pelvic organ prolapse will have sacrospinous ligament fixation performed with the Anchorsure Device.
|
Total
n=43 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
70.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.7 • n=5 Participants
|
68.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.8 • n=7 Participants
|
69.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
22 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
43 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
|
19 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
38 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Body Mass Index
|
30.1 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.4 • n=5 Participants
|
29.9 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.6 • n=7 Participants
|
30.0 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.4 • n=5 Participants
|
|
POP-Q Stage Score
|
2.7 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6 • n=5 Participants
|
2.8 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.8 • n=7 Participants
|
2.7 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7 • n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: postoperative 12 monthThis will be assessed using the numeric rating scale (NRS). The score is 0-10, with higher scores denoting a greater degree of pain.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Capio Slim Device
n=22 Participants
Participants will be randomized to the sacrospinous ligament fixation with use of Capio Slim Device
Capio Slim Device: Participants who have been assigned to sacrospinous ligament fixation for pelvic organ prolapse will have sacrospinous ligament fixation performed with the Capio Slim Device.
|
Anchorsure Device
n=21 Participants
Participants will be randomized to the sacrospinous ligament fixation with use of Anchorsure Device
Anchorsure Device: Participants who have been assigned to sacrospinous ligament fixation for pelvic organ prolapse will have sacrospinous ligament fixation performed with the Anchorsure Device.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Buttock and Posterior Thigh Pain
Sacrospinous ligament fixation site Pain compared to preop
|
-0.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.6
|
-0.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.9
|
|
Change in Buttock and Posterior Thigh Pain
Worst pain compared to preop
|
-1.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.1
|
-1.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: at 12 MONTHSThe stage is assigned as follows: 0 if there is no prolapse at all, 1 if there is prolapse but the leading point is not within 1cm of the hymen, 2 if the leading point is within 1 cm of the hymen (from 1cm within the hymen to 1cm beyond the hymen), 3 if the leading point is more than 1cm from the hymen but less than 2cm from being completely prolapsed, and 4 if the leading point is within 2cm of being complete prolapsed. Therefore higher POP-Q stages correlate to a worse degree of prolapse than lower POP-Q stages.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Capio Slim Device
n=18 Participants
Participants will be randomized to the sacrospinous ligament fixation with use of Capio Slim Device
Capio Slim Device: Participants who have been assigned to sacrospinous ligament fixation for pelvic organ prolapse will have sacrospinous ligament fixation performed with the Capio Slim Device.
|
Anchorsure Device
n=19 Participants
Participants will be randomized to the sacrospinous ligament fixation with use of Anchorsure Device
Anchorsure Device: Participants who have been assigned to sacrospinous ligament fixation for pelvic organ prolapse will have sacrospinous ligament fixation performed with the Anchorsure Device.
|
|---|---|---|
|
POP-Q Stage Score
|
0.8 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.9
|
0.9 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 12Population: These are the two study groups where patients were randomized to either have the Anchorsure or Capio Slim device used for their sacrospinous ligament fixation.
Symptomatic success was assessed by the pelvic floor disability index (PFDI-20) questionnaire. The PFDI-20 has 20 items within 3 sub-scales of symptoms (total of 20 items). Each item produces a response of 0 to 4, the average response in each sub-scale is multiplied by 25 to obtain the sub-scale score (range 0 to 100). The total score is the sum of the three sub-scale scores with a range of 0-300. Higher value for a time-point score indicates a greater degree of symptom bother. The difference in scores across the study time-points was calculated by subtracting the total score at baseline from the score at 12 months post-operation. A negative value for the difference in scores from baseline to 12 months indicates symptom improvement, where the more negative the difference in score is the greater the improvement in symptoms.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Capio Slim Device
n=22 Participants
Participants will be randomized to the sacrospinous ligament fixation with use of Capio Slim Device
Capio Slim Device: Participants who have been assigned to sacrospinous ligament fixation for pelvic organ prolapse will have sacrospinous ligament fixation performed with the Capio Slim Device.
|
Anchorsure Device
n=21 Participants
Participants will be randomized to the sacrospinous ligament fixation with use of Anchorsure Device
Anchorsure Device: Participants who have been assigned to sacrospinous ligament fixation for pelvic organ prolapse will have sacrospinous ligament fixation performed with the Anchorsure Device.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Pelvic Flore Disability Index - 20 (PFDI-20) Scores From Baseline to 12 Months
|
-66.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 64.4
|
-71.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 45.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 12Population: These are the two study groups where patients were randomized to either have the Anchorsure or Capio Slim device used for their sacrospinous ligament fixation.
Symptomatic success will be assessed by the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire - 7 (PFIQ-7). The PFIQ-7 has 7 items for each of 3 sub-scales (total of 21 items). Each item produces a response of 0 to 3, the average response in each sub-scale is multiplied by 100/3 to obtain the total scale score (range 0 to 100). The total score is the sum of the three sub-scale scores with a range of 0-300. Higher value for a time-point score indicates a greater degree of symptom bother. The difference in scores across the study time-points was calculated by subtracting the total score at baseline from the score at 12 months post-operation. A negative value for the difference in scores from baseline to 12 months indicates symptom improvement, where the more negative the difference in score is the greater the improvement in symptoms.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Capio Slim Device
n=22 Participants
Participants will be randomized to the sacrospinous ligament fixation with use of Capio Slim Device
Capio Slim Device: Participants who have been assigned to sacrospinous ligament fixation for pelvic organ prolapse will have sacrospinous ligament fixation performed with the Capio Slim Device.
|
Anchorsure Device
n=21 Participants
Participants will be randomized to the sacrospinous ligament fixation with use of Anchorsure Device
Anchorsure Device: Participants who have been assigned to sacrospinous ligament fixation for pelvic organ prolapse will have sacrospinous ligament fixation performed with the Anchorsure Device.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Symptomatic Success - PFIQ-7 Scores
|
-26.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 65.7
|
-40.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 62.4
|
Adverse Events
Capio Slim Device
Anchorsure Device
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place