Study of Titanium-Coated PEEK Cages for Degenerative Disc Disease
NCT ID: NCT03565224
Last Updated: 2019-04-30
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
50 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2018-01-10
2018-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Clinical Outcome and Fusion Rate of 3D Printed Interbody Fusion Cages and Titanium Coated PEEK Cages
NCT05237908
Post-Market, Long-Term Follow Up of Mobi-C® Cervical Disc for One and Two Level Treatment of Cervical Disc Disease
NCT03077516
Prospective Study of Fusion Rates Using Spira-C Device for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Surgery
NCT03786432
Exploratory Study of 3D Printed Biodegradable Cervical Interbody Fusion Cage
NCT04167878
Evaluation on Efficacy of Total Artificial Disc Replacement (TDR) of Cervical Spondylosis
NCT03364816
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Currently, the titanium cage and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage are the two most common cages in clinical practice. The ideal cage should lead to a high fusion rate and prevent complications, such as subsidence and loss of correction.
Even though a titanium cage can provide long-term stabilization, increase lordosis, and increase foramina height compared with the iliac bone graft, some inferior clinical outcomes appeared in clinical practice. Loss of correction is a major complication of subsidence that may eventually affect cervical spinal function after the operation.
A modulus of elasticity close to cortical bone might contribute to advantages in stress distribution and load sharing, which can contribute to a lower subsidence rate and, thus, better clinical results, making PEEK cages more welcomed by surgeons.
It is supposed, that in the cervical fusion procedure, a porous coating of a PEEK cage will lead to favourable results. Therefore, the present study intends to show these results, in a larger patient cohort who received such a coated cervical cage.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Cespace
The patients have been operated with Cespace Titanium Coated PEEK Cage for Degenerative Disc Disease between 2014 and 2017. All patients are invited to the Hospital for Follow-Up. Depending on the date of Initial Intervention the timeframe of follow-up for the individual Patient is 1 to 4 years.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient consent not signed
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Aesculap AG
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ricardo Arregui, Dr., MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hospital MAZ Zaragoza
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital MAZ Zaragoza
Zaragoza, , Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
AAG-O-H-1702
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.