Trial Outcomes & Findings for Vaccine Responses in Tralokinumab-Treated Atopic Dermatitis - ECZTRA 5 (ECZema TRAlokinumab Trial No. 5) (NCT NCT03562377)
NCT ID: NCT03562377
Last Updated: 2025-03-11
Results Overview
The antibody response to Tdap vaccine will be assessed by measuring serum anti-tetanus IgG by an immunoassay. A positive response is defined as a 3-fold IgG increase compared to Week 12 if IgG ≤1.0 IU/mL at Week 12; or IgG ≥2.5 IU/mL if IgG \>1.0 IU/mL at Week 12.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
215 participants
Week 12 to Week 16
2025-03-11
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Tralokinumab
Participants received tralokinumab every 2 weeks for 16 weeks, and the Tdap and meningococcal vaccines at Week 12.
|
Placebo
Participants received placebo every 2 weeks for 16 weeks, and the Tdap and meningococcal vaccines at Week 12.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Treatment Period
STARTED
|
107
|
108
|
|
Treatment Period
Safety Analysis Set
|
107
|
107
|
|
Treatment Period
Per Protocol Anaysis Set
|
88
|
78
|
|
Treatment Period
Full Analysis Set
|
106
|
108
|
|
Treatment Period
COMPLETED
|
100
|
89
|
|
Treatment Period
NOT COMPLETED
|
7
|
19
|
|
Safety Follow-up Period
STARTED
|
75
|
75
|
|
Safety Follow-up Period
COMPLETED
|
16
|
18
|
|
Safety Follow-up Period
NOT COMPLETED
|
59
|
57
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Vaccine Responses in Tralokinumab-Treated Atopic Dermatitis - ECZTRA 5 (ECZema TRAlokinumab Trial No. 5)
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Tralokinumab
n=107 Participants
Participants received tralokinumab every 2 weeks for 16 weeks, and the Tdap and meningococcal vaccines at Week 12.
|
Placebo
n=108 Participants
Participants received placebo every 2 weeks for 16 weeks, and the Tdap and meningococcal vaccines at Week 12.
|
Total
n=215 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
107 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
108 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
215 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
34.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2 • n=5 Participants
|
34.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.8 • n=7 Participants
|
34.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.0 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
53 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
73 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
126 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
54 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
35 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
89 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
36 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
90 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
89 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
179 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
34 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
25 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
27 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
52 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
62 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
56 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
118 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Canada
|
34 participants
n=5 Participants
|
35 participants
n=7 Participants
|
69 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
73 participants
n=5 Participants
|
73 participants
n=7 Participants
|
146 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA)
Clear (IGA=0)
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA)
Almost clear (IGA=1)
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA)
Mild disease (IGA=2)
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA)
Moderate disease (IGA=3)
|
72 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
72 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
144 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA)
Severe disease (IGA=4)
|
34 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
36 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
70 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA)
Missing
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Eczema Area and Severity Index score
|
26.26 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.79 • n=5 Participants
|
26.75 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.23 • n=7 Participants
|
26.51 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.00 • n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 12 to Week 16Population: The per protocol analysis set was used for the primary analysis, excluding participants who did not provide vaccine response data at Week 12 (1 participant in the tralokinumab group and 2 participants in the placebo group).
The antibody response to Tdap vaccine will be assessed by measuring serum anti-tetanus IgG by an immunoassay. A positive response is defined as a 3-fold IgG increase compared to Week 12 if IgG ≤1.0 IU/mL at Week 12; or IgG ≥2.5 IU/mL if IgG \>1.0 IU/mL at Week 12.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tralokinumab
n=87 Participants
Participants received tralokinumab every 2 weeks for 16 weeks, and the Tdap and meningococcal vaccines at Week 12.
|
Placebo
n=76 Participants
Participants received placebo every 2 weeks for 16 weeks, and the Tdap and meningococcal vaccines at Week 12.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Positive Anti-tetanus Response at Week 16
|
80 Participants
|
73 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 12 to Week 16Population: The per protocol analysis set was used for the primary analysis, excluding participants who did not provide vaccine response data at Week 12 (2 participants in each treatment group).
The antibody response to meningococcal vaccine will be assessed by measuring serum anti-meningococcal IgG by an immunoassay. A positive response is defined as at least a 3-fold increase compared to Week 12.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tralokinumab
n=86 Participants
Participants received tralokinumab every 2 weeks for 16 weeks, and the Tdap and meningococcal vaccines at Week 12.
|
Placebo
n=76 Participants
Participants received placebo every 2 weeks for 16 weeks, and the Tdap and meningococcal vaccines at Week 12.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Positive Anti-meningococcal Response at Week 16
|
74 Participants
|
64 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 16Population: The analysis of the secondary outcome measures was done for the full analysis set, i.e. all subjects who were randomised and exposed to IMP (tralokinumab/placebo). 1 subject in the tralokinumab group was randomised in error and not exposed to IMP and therefore excluded from the full analysis set.
The IGA is an instrument used in clinical trials to rate the severity of the subject's global atopic dermatitis and is based on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tralokinumab
n=106 Participants
Participants received tralokinumab every 2 weeks for 16 weeks, and the Tdap and meningococcal vaccines at Week 12.
|
Placebo
n=108 Participants
Participants received placebo every 2 weeks for 16 weeks, and the Tdap and meningococcal vaccines at Week 12.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) at Week 16
|
33 Participants
|
21 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 16Population: The analysis of the secondary outcome measures was done for the full analysis set, i.e. all participants who were randomised and exposed to IMP (tralokinumab/placebo). 1 participant in the tralokinumab group was randomised in error and not exposed to IMP and therefore excluded from the full analysis set.
The EASI is a validated measure used in clinical practice and clinical trials to assess the severity and extent of atopic dermatitis. \> The EASI is a composite index with scores ranging from 0 to 72, with higher values indicating more severe and/or more extensive condition.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tralokinumab
n=106 Participants
Participants received tralokinumab every 2 weeks for 16 weeks, and the Tdap and meningococcal vaccines at Week 12.
|
Placebo
n=108 Participants
Participants received placebo every 2 weeks for 16 weeks, and the Tdap and meningococcal vaccines at Week 12.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Participants Achieving at Least 75% Reduction in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) at Week 16.
|
52 Participants
|
39 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 16Population: The descriptive analysis was performed on the safety analysis set. The safety analysis set was defined as all participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP during the trial. Subjects who received at least 1 dose of tralokinumab were analysed in the tralokinumab group.
Overall summary of AEs during the treatment period is presented. For list of SAEs and frequent AEs by MedDRA system organ class (SOC) and preferred term (PT) during the entire trial period (including safety follow-up), see Adverse Events Overview section.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tralokinumab
n=107 Participants
Participants received tralokinumab every 2 weeks for 16 weeks, and the Tdap and meningococcal vaccines at Week 12.
|
Placebo
n=107 Participants
Participants received placebo every 2 weeks for 16 weeks, and the Tdap and meningococcal vaccines at Week 12.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of AEs.
|
112 AEs
|
133 AEs
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 16Population: All subjects in the safety analysis set were included.
ADA levels were measured using a validated bioanalytical method. Data were reported in the following categories: positive (presence of ADA at baseline and/or presence of ADA at at least 1 post-baseline assessment), perishing (presence of ADA at baseline and absence of ADA at all post-baseline assessments), negative (absence of ADA at all assessments), no post-baseline ADA assessment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tralokinumab
n=107 Participants
Participants received tralokinumab every 2 weeks for 16 weeks, and the Tdap and meningococcal vaccines at Week 12.
|
Placebo
n=107 Participants
Participants received placebo every 2 weeks for 16 weeks, and the Tdap and meningococcal vaccines at Week 12.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Presence of Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA).
Positive
|
2 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Presence of Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA).
Perishing
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Presence of Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA).
Negative
|
103 Participants
|
97 Participants
|
|
Presence of Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA).
No post-baseline ADA assessment
|
1 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Tralokinumab
Placebo
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Tralokinumab
n=107 participants at risk
Tralokinumab
|
Placebo
n=107 participants at risk
Placebo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocarditis
|
0.00%
0/107 • AEs were collected from time of first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the ICF until completion of the clinical trial (defined as the safety follow up visit at Week 30). Non-serious AEs possibly/probably related to IMP and ongoing at the time of trial completion were followed up for 2 weeks or until final outcome, whichever came first. Serious AEs were followed up until final outcome had been established.
|
0.93%
1/107 • Number of events 1 • AEs were collected from time of first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the ICF until completion of the clinical trial (defined as the safety follow up visit at Week 30). Non-serious AEs possibly/probably related to IMP and ongoing at the time of trial completion were followed up for 2 weeks or until final outcome, whichever came first. Serious AEs were followed up until final outcome had been established.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome
|
0.93%
1/107 • Number of events 1 • AEs were collected from time of first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the ICF until completion of the clinical trial (defined as the safety follow up visit at Week 30). Non-serious AEs possibly/probably related to IMP and ongoing at the time of trial completion were followed up for 2 weeks or until final outcome, whichever came first. Serious AEs were followed up until final outcome had been established.
|
0.00%
0/107 • AEs were collected from time of first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the ICF until completion of the clinical trial (defined as the safety follow up visit at Week 30). Non-serious AEs possibly/probably related to IMP and ongoing at the time of trial completion were followed up for 2 weeks or until final outcome, whichever came first. Serious AEs were followed up until final outcome had been established.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Acute hepatic failure
|
0.93%
1/107 • Number of events 1 • AEs were collected from time of first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the ICF until completion of the clinical trial (defined as the safety follow up visit at Week 30). Non-serious AEs possibly/probably related to IMP and ongoing at the time of trial completion were followed up for 2 weeks or until final outcome, whichever came first. Serious AEs were followed up until final outcome had been established.
|
0.00%
0/107 • AEs were collected from time of first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the ICF until completion of the clinical trial (defined as the safety follow up visit at Week 30). Non-serious AEs possibly/probably related to IMP and ongoing at the time of trial completion were followed up for 2 weeks or until final outcome, whichever came first. Serious AEs were followed up until final outcome had been established.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Device related infection
|
0.93%
1/107 • Number of events 1 • AEs were collected from time of first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the ICF until completion of the clinical trial (defined as the safety follow up visit at Week 30). Non-serious AEs possibly/probably related to IMP and ongoing at the time of trial completion were followed up for 2 weeks or until final outcome, whichever came first. Serious AEs were followed up until final outcome had been established.
|
0.00%
0/107 • AEs were collected from time of first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the ICF until completion of the clinical trial (defined as the safety follow up visit at Week 30). Non-serious AEs possibly/probably related to IMP and ongoing at the time of trial completion were followed up for 2 weeks or until final outcome, whichever came first. Serious AEs were followed up until final outcome had been established.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.93%
1/107 • Number of events 1 • AEs were collected from time of first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the ICF until completion of the clinical trial (defined as the safety follow up visit at Week 30). Non-serious AEs possibly/probably related to IMP and ongoing at the time of trial completion were followed up for 2 weeks or until final outcome, whichever came first. Serious AEs were followed up until final outcome had been established.
|
0.00%
0/107 • AEs were collected from time of first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the ICF until completion of the clinical trial (defined as the safety follow up visit at Week 30). Non-serious AEs possibly/probably related to IMP and ongoing at the time of trial completion were followed up for 2 weeks or until final outcome, whichever came first. Serious AEs were followed up until final outcome had been established.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Septic shock
|
0.93%
1/107 • Number of events 1 • AEs were collected from time of first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the ICF until completion of the clinical trial (defined as the safety follow up visit at Week 30). Non-serious AEs possibly/probably related to IMP and ongoing at the time of trial completion were followed up for 2 weeks or until final outcome, whichever came first. Serious AEs were followed up until final outcome had been established.
|
0.00%
0/107 • AEs were collected from time of first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the ICF until completion of the clinical trial (defined as the safety follow up visit at Week 30). Non-serious AEs possibly/probably related to IMP and ongoing at the time of trial completion were followed up for 2 weeks or until final outcome, whichever came first. Serious AEs were followed up until final outcome had been established.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Procedural haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/107 • AEs were collected from time of first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the ICF until completion of the clinical trial (defined as the safety follow up visit at Week 30). Non-serious AEs possibly/probably related to IMP and ongoing at the time of trial completion were followed up for 2 weeks or until final outcome, whichever came first. Serious AEs were followed up until final outcome had been established.
|
0.93%
1/107 • Number of events 1 • AEs were collected from time of first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the ICF until completion of the clinical trial (defined as the safety follow up visit at Week 30). Non-serious AEs possibly/probably related to IMP and ongoing at the time of trial completion were followed up for 2 weeks or until final outcome, whichever came first. Serious AEs were followed up until final outcome had been established.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Failure to thrive
|
0.93%
1/107 • Number of events 1 • AEs were collected from time of first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the ICF until completion of the clinical trial (defined as the safety follow up visit at Week 30). Non-serious AEs possibly/probably related to IMP and ongoing at the time of trial completion were followed up for 2 weeks or until final outcome, whichever came first. Serious AEs were followed up until final outcome had been established.
|
0.00%
0/107 • AEs were collected from time of first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the ICF until completion of the clinical trial (defined as the safety follow up visit at Week 30). Non-serious AEs possibly/probably related to IMP and ongoing at the time of trial completion were followed up for 2 weeks or until final outcome, whichever came first. Serious AEs were followed up until final outcome had been established.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Breast cancer metastatic
|
0.00%
0/107 • AEs were collected from time of first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the ICF until completion of the clinical trial (defined as the safety follow up visit at Week 30). Non-serious AEs possibly/probably related to IMP and ongoing at the time of trial completion were followed up for 2 weeks or until final outcome, whichever came first. Serious AEs were followed up until final outcome had been established.
|
0.93%
1/107 • Number of events 1 • AEs were collected from time of first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the ICF until completion of the clinical trial (defined as the safety follow up visit at Week 30). Non-serious AEs possibly/probably related to IMP and ongoing at the time of trial completion were followed up for 2 weeks or until final outcome, whichever came first. Serious AEs were followed up until final outcome had been established.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Encephalopathy
|
0.93%
1/107 • Number of events 1 • AEs were collected from time of first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the ICF until completion of the clinical trial (defined as the safety follow up visit at Week 30). Non-serious AEs possibly/probably related to IMP and ongoing at the time of trial completion were followed up for 2 weeks or until final outcome, whichever came first. Serious AEs were followed up until final outcome had been established.
|
0.00%
0/107 • AEs were collected from time of first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the ICF until completion of the clinical trial (defined as the safety follow up visit at Week 30). Non-serious AEs possibly/probably related to IMP and ongoing at the time of trial completion were followed up for 2 weeks or until final outcome, whichever came first. Serious AEs were followed up until final outcome had been established.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Status epilepticus
|
0.93%
1/107 • Number of events 1 • AEs were collected from time of first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the ICF until completion of the clinical trial (defined as the safety follow up visit at Week 30). Non-serious AEs possibly/probably related to IMP and ongoing at the time of trial completion were followed up for 2 weeks or until final outcome, whichever came first. Serious AEs were followed up until final outcome had been established.
|
0.00%
0/107 • AEs were collected from time of first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the ICF until completion of the clinical trial (defined as the safety follow up visit at Week 30). Non-serious AEs possibly/probably related to IMP and ongoing at the time of trial completion were followed up for 2 weeks or until final outcome, whichever came first. Serious AEs were followed up until final outcome had been established.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary embolism
|
0.93%
1/107 • Number of events 1 • AEs were collected from time of first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the ICF until completion of the clinical trial (defined as the safety follow up visit at Week 30). Non-serious AEs possibly/probably related to IMP and ongoing at the time of trial completion were followed up for 2 weeks or until final outcome, whichever came first. Serious AEs were followed up until final outcome had been established.
|
0.00%
0/107 • AEs were collected from time of first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the ICF until completion of the clinical trial (defined as the safety follow up visit at Week 30). Non-serious AEs possibly/probably related to IMP and ongoing at the time of trial completion were followed up for 2 weeks or until final outcome, whichever came first. Serious AEs were followed up until final outcome had been established.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory failure
|
0.93%
1/107 • Number of events 1 • AEs were collected from time of first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the ICF until completion of the clinical trial (defined as the safety follow up visit at Week 30). Non-serious AEs possibly/probably related to IMP and ongoing at the time of trial completion were followed up for 2 weeks or until final outcome, whichever came first. Serious AEs were followed up until final outcome had been established.
|
0.00%
0/107 • AEs were collected from time of first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the ICF until completion of the clinical trial (defined as the safety follow up visit at Week 30). Non-serious AEs possibly/probably related to IMP and ongoing at the time of trial completion were followed up for 2 weeks or until final outcome, whichever came first. Serious AEs were followed up until final outcome had been established.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Shock haemorrhagic
|
0.93%
1/107 • Number of events 1 • AEs were collected from time of first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the ICF until completion of the clinical trial (defined as the safety follow up visit at Week 30). Non-serious AEs possibly/probably related to IMP and ongoing at the time of trial completion were followed up for 2 weeks or until final outcome, whichever came first. Serious AEs were followed up until final outcome had been established.
|
0.00%
0/107 • AEs were collected from time of first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the ICF until completion of the clinical trial (defined as the safety follow up visit at Week 30). Non-serious AEs possibly/probably related to IMP and ongoing at the time of trial completion were followed up for 2 weeks or until final outcome, whichever came first. Serious AEs were followed up until final outcome had been established.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Tralokinumab
n=107 participants at risk
Tralokinumab
|
Placebo
n=107 participants at risk
Placebo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
0.93%
1/107 • Number of events 1 • AEs were collected from time of first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the ICF until completion of the clinical trial (defined as the safety follow up visit at Week 30). Non-serious AEs possibly/probably related to IMP and ongoing at the time of trial completion were followed up for 2 weeks or until final outcome, whichever came first. Serious AEs were followed up until final outcome had been established.
|
2.8%
3/107 • Number of events 3 • AEs were collected from time of first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the ICF until completion of the clinical trial (defined as the safety follow up visit at Week 30). Non-serious AEs possibly/probably related to IMP and ongoing at the time of trial completion were followed up for 2 weeks or until final outcome, whichever came first. Serious AEs were followed up until final outcome had been established.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
0.93%
1/107 • Number of events 1 • AEs were collected from time of first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the ICF until completion of the clinical trial (defined as the safety follow up visit at Week 30). Non-serious AEs possibly/probably related to IMP and ongoing at the time of trial completion were followed up for 2 weeks or until final outcome, whichever came first. Serious AEs were followed up until final outcome had been established.
|
2.8%
3/107 • Number of events 3 • AEs were collected from time of first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the ICF until completion of the clinical trial (defined as the safety follow up visit at Week 30). Non-serious AEs possibly/probably related to IMP and ongoing at the time of trial completion were followed up for 2 weeks or until final outcome, whichever came first. Serious AEs were followed up until final outcome had been established.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Seasonal allergy
|
2.8%
3/107 • Number of events 4 • AEs were collected from time of first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the ICF until completion of the clinical trial (defined as the safety follow up visit at Week 30). Non-serious AEs possibly/probably related to IMP and ongoing at the time of trial completion were followed up for 2 weeks or until final outcome, whichever came first. Serious AEs were followed up until final outcome had been established.
|
0.00%
0/107 • AEs were collected from time of first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the ICF until completion of the clinical trial (defined as the safety follow up visit at Week 30). Non-serious AEs possibly/probably related to IMP and ongoing at the time of trial completion were followed up for 2 weeks or until final outcome, whichever came first. Serious AEs were followed up until final outcome had been established.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
1.9%
2/107 • Number of events 2 • AEs were collected from time of first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the ICF until completion of the clinical trial (defined as the safety follow up visit at Week 30). Non-serious AEs possibly/probably related to IMP and ongoing at the time of trial completion were followed up for 2 weeks or until final outcome, whichever came first. Serious AEs were followed up until final outcome had been established.
|
4.7%
5/107 • Number of events 7 • AEs were collected from time of first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the ICF until completion of the clinical trial (defined as the safety follow up visit at Week 30). Non-serious AEs possibly/probably related to IMP and ongoing at the time of trial completion were followed up for 2 weeks or until final outcome, whichever came first. Serious AEs were followed up until final outcome had been established.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral upper respiratory tract infection
|
9.3%
10/107 • Number of events 10 • AEs were collected from time of first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the ICF until completion of the clinical trial (defined as the safety follow up visit at Week 30). Non-serious AEs possibly/probably related to IMP and ongoing at the time of trial completion were followed up for 2 weeks or until final outcome, whichever came first. Serious AEs were followed up until final outcome had been established.
|
2.8%
3/107 • Number of events 4 • AEs were collected from time of first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the ICF until completion of the clinical trial (defined as the safety follow up visit at Week 30). Non-serious AEs possibly/probably related to IMP and ongoing at the time of trial completion were followed up for 2 weeks or until final outcome, whichever came first. Serious AEs were followed up until final outcome had been established.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
2.8%
3/107 • Number of events 3 • AEs were collected from time of first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the ICF until completion of the clinical trial (defined as the safety follow up visit at Week 30). Non-serious AEs possibly/probably related to IMP and ongoing at the time of trial completion were followed up for 2 weeks or until final outcome, whichever came first. Serious AEs were followed up until final outcome had been established.
|
1.9%
2/107 • Number of events 2 • AEs were collected from time of first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the ICF until completion of the clinical trial (defined as the safety follow up visit at Week 30). Non-serious AEs possibly/probably related to IMP and ongoing at the time of trial completion were followed up for 2 weeks or until final outcome, whichever came first. Serious AEs were followed up until final outcome had been established.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis atopic
|
11.2%
12/107 • Number of events 14 • AEs were collected from time of first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the ICF until completion of the clinical trial (defined as the safety follow up visit at Week 30). Non-serious AEs possibly/probably related to IMP and ongoing at the time of trial completion were followed up for 2 weeks or until final outcome, whichever came first. Serious AEs were followed up until final outcome had been established.
|
12.1%
13/107 • Number of events 21 • AEs were collected from time of first trial-related activity after the subject had signed the ICF until completion of the clinical trial (defined as the safety follow up visit at Week 30). Non-serious AEs possibly/probably related to IMP and ongoing at the time of trial completion were followed up for 2 weeks or until final outcome, whichever came first. Serious AEs were followed up until final outcome had been established.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee LEO Pharma A/S seeks publication of all phase 3 clinical trials in peer-reviewed journals within 18 months after completion or termination of the clinical trial, regardless of whether the findings are positive or negative. If no publication is submitted by LEO Pharma A/S within these 18 months, the investigator has the right to publish the results from the clinical trial generated by him/herself.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER