Trial Outcomes & Findings for Evaluation of a Simulation Based Workshop in an Anesthesia Residency Program (NCT NCT03545984)
NCT ID: NCT03545984
Last Updated: 2019-08-06
Results Overview
The composite score is a continuous outcome varies between 0 and 16; 0 being the worst possible score and 16 the best possible score. Composite score received by a resident from a supervising anesthesiologist; validated scoring system based on Anesthetist's Nontechnical Skills (ANTS) Global Rating Scale. The hierarchical ANTS scoring system consists at the highest level of four basic skill categories, namely task management, team working, situation awareness, and decision making. These skill categories are further divided up into 16 skill elements and then each "element" is scored 0-1 and then all elements are summed for a total score of 0-16. The decision to report outcome in categories (Score 14-16, Score 11-13, Score 10 and below) instead of numeric contentious outcome was data driven and not represent any specified performance categories(i.e., "best performance", "good performance", "poor performance").
COMPLETED
NA
48 participants
just after first CSF drainage catheter insertion and during 4-week vascular rotation; at least by the end of 4-week rotation
2019-08-06
Participant Flow
Several residents who were randomized were unable to complete the study because they did not participate in the management of patients undergoing open or endovascular aortic surgery that required CSF drainage catheter insertion during their rotation..
This educational randomized trial was conducted on residents and they were enrolled and randomized in two study groups (arms) corresponding to two educational methods. Patients were not considered enrolled in this study.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Simulation-based Training
The simulation-based training during the first week of rotation involves step-by-step instructions on insertion of the CSF drainage catheter including aseptic technique, position of patient (lateral vs. sitting), site of insertion. The simulation training is done on a mannequin to simulate actual conditions. We plan to use a simulation model, which is basically a torso with the ability to palpate the back and spinous processes and use the epidural needle with loss of resistance technique with haptic feedback. The trainees would be able to actually perform the procedure on the manikin.
Simulation-based learning: Simulation-based teaching involves using done on a mannequin to simulate actual conditions
|
Problem Based Learning
The residents allocated to the non-simulation group (problem based learning) receives standard educational teaching in the form of a problem based learning discussion during the first week of rotation.
interactive problem based learning: Standard teaching (problem based learning discussion) during cardiac/vascular rotation
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
24
|
24
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
13
|
15
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
11
|
9
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Simulation-based Training
The simulation-based training during the first week of rotation involves step-by-step instructions on insertion of the CSF drainage catheter including aseptic technique, position of patient (lateral vs. sitting), site of insertion. The simulation training is done on a mannequin to simulate actual conditions. We plan to use a simulation model, which is basically a torso with the ability to palpate the back and spinous processes and use the epidural needle with loss of resistance technique with haptic feedback. The trainees would be able to actually perform the procedure on the manikin.
Simulation-based learning: Simulation-based teaching involves using done on a mannequin to simulate actual conditions
|
Problem Based Learning
The residents allocated to the non-simulation group (problem based learning) receives standard educational teaching in the form of a problem based learning discussion during the first week of rotation.
interactive problem based learning: Standard teaching (problem based learning discussion) during cardiac/vascular rotation
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
CSF cases not present during rotation
|
11
|
9
|
Baseline Characteristics
Evaluation of a Simulation Based Workshop in an Anesthesia Residency Program
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Simulation-based Training
n=13 Participants
The simulation-based training during the first week of rotation involves step-by-step instructions on insertion of the CSF drainage catheter including aseptic technique, position of patient (lateral vs. sitting), site of insertion. The simulation training is done on a mannequin to simulate actual conditions. We plan to use a simulation model, which is basically a torso with the ability to palpate the back and spinous processes and use the epidural needle with loss of resistance technique with haptic feedback. The trainees would be able to actually perform the procedure on the manikin.
Simulation-based learning: Simulation-based teaching involves using done on a mannequin to simulate actual conditions
|
Problem Based Learning
n=15 Participants
The residents allocated to the non-simulation group (problem based learning) receives standard educational teaching in the form of a problem based learning discussion during the first week of rotation.
interactive problem based learning: Standard teaching (problem based learning discussion) during cardiac/vascular rotation
|
Total
n=28 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
NA years
STANDARD_DEVIATION NA • n=5 Participants
|
NA years
STANDARD_DEVIATION NA • n=7 Participants
|
NA years
STANDARD_DEVIATION NA • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
NA Participants
n=5 Participants
|
NA Participants
n=7 Participants
|
NA Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
NA Participants
n=5 Participants
|
NA Participants
n=7 Participants
|
NA Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
NA Participants
n=5 Participants
|
NA Participants
n=7 Participants
|
NA Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
NA Participants
n=5 Participants
|
NA Participants
n=7 Participants
|
NA Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
NA Participants
n=5 Participants
|
NA Participants
n=7 Participants
|
NA Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Months of training as CA3
|
6.8 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.0 • n=5 Participants
|
6.3 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.4 • n=7 Participants
|
6.5 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.2 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Spinal Drain Placed in the past
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: just after first CSF drainage catheter insertion and during 4-week vascular rotation; at least by the end of 4-week rotationThe composite score is a continuous outcome varies between 0 and 16; 0 being the worst possible score and 16 the best possible score. Composite score received by a resident from a supervising anesthesiologist; validated scoring system based on Anesthetist's Nontechnical Skills (ANTS) Global Rating Scale. The hierarchical ANTS scoring system consists at the highest level of four basic skill categories, namely task management, team working, situation awareness, and decision making. These skill categories are further divided up into 16 skill elements and then each "element" is scored 0-1 and then all elements are summed for a total score of 0-16. The decision to report outcome in categories (Score 14-16, Score 11-13, Score 10 and below) instead of numeric contentious outcome was data driven and not represent any specified performance categories(i.e., "best performance", "good performance", "poor performance").
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Simulation-based Training
n=13 Participants
The simulation-based training during the first week of rotation involves step-by-step instructions on insertion of the CSF drainage catheter including aseptic technique, position of patient (lateral vs. sitting), site of insertion. The simulation training is done on a mannequin to simulate actual conditions. We plan to use a simulation model, which is basically a torso with the ability to palpate the back and spinous processes and use the epidural needle with loss of resistance technique with haptic feedback. The trainees would be able to actually perform the procedure on the manikin.
Simulation-based learning: Simulation-based teaching involves using done on a mannequin to simulate actual conditions
|
Problem Based Learning
n=15 Participants
The residents allocated to the non-simulation group (problem based learning) receives standard educational teaching in the form of a problem based learning discussion during the first week of rotation.
interactive problem based learning: Standard teaching (problem based learning discussion) during cardiac/vascular rotation
|
|---|---|---|
|
Composite Staff Evaluation Score (Anesthetist's Nontechnical Skills Global Rating Scale)
Score 14-16
|
10 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
|
Composite Staff Evaluation Score (Anesthetist's Nontechnical Skills Global Rating Scale)
Score 11-13
|
2 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Composite Staff Evaluation Score (Anesthetist's Nontechnical Skills Global Rating Scale)
Score 10 and below
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Simulation-based Training
Problem Based Learning
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Simulation-based Training
n=13 participants at risk
The simulation-based training during the first week of rotation involves step-by-step instructions on insertion of the CSF drainage catheter including aseptic technique, position of patient (lateral vs. sitting), site of insertion. The simulation training is done on a mannequin to simulate actual conditions. We plan to use a simulation model, which is basically a torso with the ability to palpate the back and spinous processes and use the epidural needle with loss of resistance technique with haptic feedback. The trainees would be able to actually perform the procedure on the manikin.
Simulation-based learning: Simulation-based teaching involves using done on a mannequin to simulate actual conditions
|
Problem Based Learning
n=15 participants at risk
The residents allocated to the non-simulation group (problem based learning) receives standard educational teaching in the form of a problem based learning discussion during the first week of rotation.
interactive problem based learning: Standard teaching (problem based learning discussion) during cardiac/vascular rotation
|
|---|---|---|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Bloody tinged CSF drainage in the postop period
|
7.7%
1/13 • Till patients' hospital discharge, an average of 3 days
Adverse events collected during this study included complications occurring due to the placement of CSF drainage catheters. Adverse events might occur during or after CSF placement procedure and were recorded for residents (study subject) who performed the procedure; next, adverse events were summarized by two study groups.
|
13.3%
2/15 • Till patients' hospital discharge, an average of 3 days
Adverse events collected during this study included complications occurring due to the placement of CSF drainage catheters. Adverse events might occur during or after CSF placement procedure and were recorded for residents (study subject) who performed the procedure; next, adverse events were summarized by two study groups.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Bloody tap during CSF catheter insertion
|
15.4%
2/13 • Till patients' hospital discharge, an average of 3 days
Adverse events collected during this study included complications occurring due to the placement of CSF drainage catheters. Adverse events might occur during or after CSF placement procedure and were recorded for residents (study subject) who performed the procedure; next, adverse events were summarized by two study groups.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Till patients' hospital discharge, an average of 3 days
Adverse events collected during this study included complications occurring due to the placement of CSF drainage catheters. Adverse events might occur during or after CSF placement procedure and were recorded for residents (study subject) who performed the procedure; next, adverse events were summarized by two study groups.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Spinal cord ischemia/new postoperative neurological deficits
|
7.7%
1/13 • Till patients' hospital discharge, an average of 3 days
Adverse events collected during this study included complications occurring due to the placement of CSF drainage catheters. Adverse events might occur during or after CSF placement procedure and were recorded for residents (study subject) who performed the procedure; next, adverse events were summarized by two study groups.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Till patients' hospital discharge, an average of 3 days
Adverse events collected during this study included complications occurring due to the placement of CSF drainage catheters. Adverse events might occur during or after CSF placement procedure and were recorded for residents (study subject) who performed the procedure; next, adverse events were summarized by two study groups.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Postoperative CNS infection/meningitis
|
0.00%
0/13 • Till patients' hospital discharge, an average of 3 days
Adverse events collected during this study included complications occurring due to the placement of CSF drainage catheters. Adverse events might occur during or after CSF placement procedure and were recorded for residents (study subject) who performed the procedure; next, adverse events were summarized by two study groups.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Till patients' hospital discharge, an average of 3 days
Adverse events collected during this study included complications occurring due to the placement of CSF drainage catheters. Adverse events might occur during or after CSF placement procedure and were recorded for residents (study subject) who performed the procedure; next, adverse events were summarized by two study groups.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place