Characterisation of Human B Cell Maturation in Response to Vaccination
NCT ID: NCT03535779
Last Updated: 2018-06-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
16 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2017-03-06
2018-03-13
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
New Methods to Measure the Immune Response to Hepatitis B Vaccine
NCT01821547
Comparison of Immune Response to Booster Vaccines in Blood Transplant Patients and Healthy Volunteers
NCT00005907
Adolescents' Response to Hepatitis B Vaccine Booster Dose
NCT01341275
A Study in Adult Subjects With Chronic Hepatitis B Infection to Support the Development of Immunological Assays
NCT01098006
Immunity to Hepatitis B Vaccine
NCT03083158
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The primary objective is to characterize the number and phenotype of memory B cells induced by routine vaccination. These responses will be used as a comparison to those currently induced in HIV-1 vaccination trials.
The development of an effective HIV-1 vaccine is highly dependent on our understanding of the immune response to HIV-1 infection/vaccination. It is generally accepted that the generation of long-lived neutralising memory B cell antibody responses will be critical for an effective vaccine against HIV-1. Successful vaccines are capable of inducing long-lived B cell memory that can maintain antibodies for decades, typical examples being those induced by Hepatitis B (HBsAg) and tetanus vaccination which generates antibodies with a half-life of greater than 5 years. In contrast, current HIV-1 vaccination typically induces a short-lived B cell response with antibodies waning within a half-life of 6 months. Recent observations have shown that vaccination does not produce a homogenous population of memory B cell but rather a constellation of subsets depending on the type of vaccination.
Investigators are only beginning to understand the varying and important roles of some of these elusive subsets. Therefore understanding potential differential responses of these memory B cell subsets to successful licensed vaccines may prove critical in the creation of novel, effective vaccines to HIV-1.
The field has been energised in recent years by the identification of different memory B cell subsets. Four of these subsets can be characterised through differential expression of surface markers CD27, IgD and IgM, typically: CD27+IgD+IgM+ B cells, CD27+IgD-IgM+ B cells, CD27+IgD+IgM- B cells and CD27+IgD-IgM- IgG+/IgA+/IgE+ B cells (Mroczek ES et al, Front Immunol. 2014;5:96). Understanding how HBsAg and tetanus (as part of the Td/IPV vaccine) modulates antigen specific responses across these four memory B cell subsets will help define how Investigators understand the establishment of long-term immunological memory and may help us understand how Investigators can induce such memory responses with new HIV vaccine candidates. Data from these studies will be used to compare responses elicited by HIV vaccines in current phase I studies and determine potential defects in the maturation of vaccine induced memory.
Investigators therefore wish to obtain blood draws from individuals undergoing routine HBsAg and Td/IPV vaccination. This will allow us to isolate memory B cells circulating in the peripheral blood and characterise the different memory B cell subsets induced by effective licensed vaccines and compare responses to those induced by current HIV-1 vaccination trials, for which Investigators already have samples banked.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group 1
Healthy volunteers receiving Tetanus (Td/IVP) vaccine were enrolled onto the study for 1 month with no additional follow up visits.
Tetanus Toxoid
The Tetanus vaccine, also known as tetanus toxoid (Td/IVP), is an inactive vaccine used to prevent tetanus in the population
Group 2
Healthy volunteers receiving the Hepatitis B (HBsAg) vaccine were enrolled onto the study for 2 months with no additional follow up visits.
Hepatitis B
The Hepatitis B virus, is a double stranded DNA virus that prevents Hepatitis B in the population
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Hepatitis B
The Hepatitis B virus, is a double stranded DNA virus that prevents Hepatitis B in the population
Tetanus Toxoid
The Tetanus vaccine, also known as tetanus toxoid (Td/IVP), is an inactive vaccine used to prevent tetanus in the population
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Previously naïve to HBsAg vaccination
3. Available for the duration of the study
4. Willing and able to give written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
2. Unable to read and/or speak English to a fluency level adequate for the full comprehension of procedures required in participation and consent
3. Unlikely to comply with protocol
4. Has a condition which in the opinion of the investigator is not suitable for participation in the trial
18 Years
55 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Imperial College London
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Lucy Garvey
Consultant HIV/GU Medicine
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Dr Lucy Garvey
Paddington, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
16SM3542
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.