Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation on Pain Intensity of Patients With Hip Arthroplasty

NCT ID: NCT03534999

Last Updated: 2018-05-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-10-02

Study Completion Date

2018-02-16

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Fifty patients with hip arthroplasty were purposively recruited for the study. They were allocated into two groups randomly with equal number. One group had TEN, other served as control. Pain intensity was measured every day of the treatment.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Subjects that participated were post-surgical patients with hip arthroplasty receiving treatment at Orthopedic Ward of Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospitals Complex (OAUTHC), Ile-Ife. Excluded from the study were subjects who had surgery but have infected wound, those with deep vein thrombosis, and those with thrombophlebitis post-surgery. The subjects were allocated randomly into 2 groups; one group of 25 patients was on TENS (experimental group) and the other group of 25 patients was on their normal drugs without TENS (control group). Before the start of intervention, the procedure of the intervention and the way the subject would feel during the course of the intervention was explained to the subject and the consent of the patient was obtained. The procedure was as follows:The Visual Analogue Scale and Oxford hip score was administered prior to the treatment to ascertain their pain level and hip disability before the treatment. The site of intervention (5cm away from incision site) was cleaned properly with cotton wool soaked in methylated spirit in an outward motion. Before the self-adhesive, pre gelled electrodes was placed on the cleansed sites. The TENS unit was switched on and the parameters was adjusted to the required. For this study, parameters used are: 100µs pulse duration, 100Hz frequency and an intensity comfortable for the patient for a duration of 15 minutes.

At the expiration of treatment, the electrodes were removed. The treatment was carried out twice a day for three days in addition to the normal analgesic and antibiotics drugs taken by the patient. After the last treatment session, VAS and Oxford hip score was re-administered to ascertain their pain intensity and hip disability level.

For the group with no intervention The VAS and Oxford hip score was administered on the first day of contact to ascertain pain intensity and hip disability level . The subject continued on the normal analgesics only till the third day and VAS and Oxford hip score was re-administered to ascertain their pain intensity and hip disability level.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hip Fractures

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Patients with Hip Arthroplasty, one group was on TENS other group was a control
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

TENS

This is intervention Group. Patients in this group received Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS). The VAS and Oxford hip score was administered prior to the treatment to ascertain their pain intensity and hip disability level. The site of intervention (5cm away from incision site) was cleaned properly with cotton wool soaked in methylated spirit in an outward motion. Before the self-adhesive, pre gelled electrodes was placed on the cleansed sites.The TENS unit was switched on and the parameters was adjusted to the required level. For this study, parameters used are: 100µs pulse duration, 100Hz frequency and an intensity comfortable for the patient for a duration of 15 minutes.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Experimental. This was the group that received TENS

Intervention Type DEVICE

Patients that were on TENS . They were treated twice daily for 5 days. VAS and Hip Score scale were used to assess the pain intensity and disability level

No intervention

Intervention Type OTHER

Patients in this group were on their drugs only. There was no physiotherapy intervention for the patient. VAS and Hip Score scale were used to ascertain the pain intensity and hip disability at the before the treatment and after the treatment

Control

This was the group with no intervention. Subjects were on their normal analgesic and antibiotic medication for the period of research. The VAS and Oxford hip score were administered on the first day to ascertain pain intensity and hip disability level. The subject continued on the normal analgesics only till the third day and VAS and Oxford hip score was re-administered to assess any change in the pain intensity and hip disability level.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Experimental. This was the group that received TENS

Patients that were on TENS . They were treated twice daily for 5 days. VAS and Hip Score scale were used to assess the pain intensity and disability level

Intervention Type DEVICE

No intervention

Patients in this group were on their drugs only. There was no physiotherapy intervention for the patient. VAS and Hip Score scale were used to ascertain the pain intensity and hip disability at the before the treatment and after the treatment

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

TENS Control

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Patients who recently had hip arthroplasty were recruited for this study

Exclusion Criteria

* Subjects who had surgery but have infected wounds.
* Patients who had deep vein thrombosis post-surgery.
* Patients who had thrombophlebitis post-surgery.
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

68 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Obafemi Awolowo University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Adesola Ojo Ojoawo

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Adesola O Ojoawo, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile Ife

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Obafemi Awolowo University

Ile-Ife, Osun State, Nigeria

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Nigeria

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Abu-Amer Y, Darwech I, Clohisy JC. Aseptic loosening of total joint replacements: mechanisms underlying osteolysis and potential therapies. Arthritis Res Ther. 2007;9 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S6. doi: 10.1186/ar2170.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17634145 (View on PubMed)

Ali J, Yaffe CS, Serrette C. The effect of transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation on postoperative pain and pulmonary function. Surgery. 1981 Apr;89(4):507-12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 6970995 (View on PubMed)

Almeida TF, Roizenblatt S, Tufik S. Afferent pain pathways: a neuroanatomical review. Brain Res. 2004 Mar 12;1000(1-2):40-56. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2003.10.073.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15053950 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

OJO/2018/002

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

TENS and Orthognathic Surgery
NCT05717322 UNKNOWN NA
Electrical Currents on Hypoalgesia
NCT01950728 COMPLETED NA