Use of Non-Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation in Patients With Severe Obesity Undergoing Upper Endoscopy Procedures

NCT ID: NCT03529461

Last Updated: 2019-05-31

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

56 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-04-25

Study Completion Date

2018-04-18

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The study evaluated the effect of non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) to decrease the incidence of desaturation events in patients with severe obesity undergoing upper endoscopy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients being evaluated for bariatric surgery often undergo preoperative upper endoscopy. Patients with obesity are at increased risk for sedation related adverse events during endoscopy. The study evaluated the effect of non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) to decrease the incidence of desaturation in patients with severe obesity undergoing upper endoscopy. The study was a randomized controlled trial that assessed the effectiveness of NIPPV in patients undergoing upper endoscopy. Patients were randomized into experimental group NIPPV or control group. Primary endpoints were desaturation events (SpO2 \<=94%) and desaturation events requiring intervention (SpO2\<=90%). A secondary endpoint was the use of NIPPV to rescue patients who developed a clinically significant desaturation event.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Severe Obesity Hypoxia

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

severe obesity non-invasive positive pressure ventilation endoscopy hypoxia bariatric surgery sedation adverse events BMI anesthesia complications

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SEQUENTIAL

Randomized controlled trial
Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control

Intervention: nasal cannula (6L O2) + non invasive positive pressure nasal mask (not connected to machine)

Group Type OTHER

Rescue non-invasive positive pressure ventilation through nasal mask

Intervention Type DEVICE

If desaturation below 90 %, nasal cannula removed and non invasive positive pressure nasal mask connected to machine: Inspiratory pressure 12 cm H2O/Expiratory pressure 6 cm H2O which can be increased to meet a tidal volume (TV) of 300-800 mL (target is 450-500), with maximum Inspiratory pressure 18 cm H2O /Expiratory pressure 8 cm H2O on 100% FiO2.If TVs are more or less than 300 to 800 mL range, the pressure will be adjusted by 1-2 cm H2O) accordingly

Secondary rescue maneuvers

Intervention Type OTHER

If rescue non invasive positive pressure maneuver attempted (including adjustments in pressure) and O2 sat is not above 90 % within 3 min of starting non invasive positive pressure, scope removed and secondary rescue maneuver started. Secondary rescue maneuvers performed at the discretion of the anesthesiologist (chin lift, oral airway, bag mask, nasal trumpet, LMA, intubation). If sat \> 90 % with secondary rescue maneuvers, resumption of scope exam to the discretion of anesthesia. If sat does not increase \> 90 % with secondary rescue maneuvers, scope exam to be cancelled and patient care per anesthesiologist

Experimental

Intervention: Non invasive positive pressure nasal mask (connect to machine once patient is sedated)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation through nasal mask

Intervention Type DEVICE

Inspiratory pressure 12 cm H2O/Expiratory pressure 6 cm H2O which can be increased to meet a tidal volume (TV) of 300-800 mL (target is 450-500), with maximum Inspiratory pressure 18 cm H2O /Expiratory pressure 8 cm H2O on 100% FiO2.If TVs are more or less than 300 to 800 mL range, the pressure will be adjusted by 1-2 cm H2O) accordingly

Secondary rescue maneuvers

Intervention Type OTHER

If rescue non invasive positive pressure maneuver attempted (including adjustments in pressure) and O2 sat is not above 90 % within 3 min of starting non invasive positive pressure, scope removed and secondary rescue maneuver started. Secondary rescue maneuvers performed at the discretion of the anesthesiologist (chin lift, oral airway, bag mask, nasal trumpet, LMA, intubation). If sat \> 90 % with secondary rescue maneuvers, resumption of scope exam to the discretion of anesthesia. If sat does not increase \> 90 % with secondary rescue maneuvers, scope exam to be cancelled and patient care per anesthesiologist

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation through nasal mask

Inspiratory pressure 12 cm H2O/Expiratory pressure 6 cm H2O which can be increased to meet a tidal volume (TV) of 300-800 mL (target is 450-500), with maximum Inspiratory pressure 18 cm H2O /Expiratory pressure 8 cm H2O on 100% FiO2.If TVs are more or less than 300 to 800 mL range, the pressure will be adjusted by 1-2 cm H2O) accordingly

Intervention Type DEVICE

Rescue non-invasive positive pressure ventilation through nasal mask

If desaturation below 90 %, nasal cannula removed and non invasive positive pressure nasal mask connected to machine: Inspiratory pressure 12 cm H2O/Expiratory pressure 6 cm H2O which can be increased to meet a tidal volume (TV) of 300-800 mL (target is 450-500), with maximum Inspiratory pressure 18 cm H2O /Expiratory pressure 8 cm H2O on 100% FiO2.If TVs are more or less than 300 to 800 mL range, the pressure will be adjusted by 1-2 cm H2O) accordingly

Intervention Type DEVICE

Secondary rescue maneuvers

If rescue non invasive positive pressure maneuver attempted (including adjustments in pressure) and O2 sat is not above 90 % within 3 min of starting non invasive positive pressure, scope removed and secondary rescue maneuver started. Secondary rescue maneuvers performed at the discretion of the anesthesiologist (chin lift, oral airway, bag mask, nasal trumpet, LMA, intubation). If sat \> 90 % with secondary rescue maneuvers, resumption of scope exam to the discretion of anesthesia. If sat does not increase \> 90 % with secondary rescue maneuvers, scope exam to be cancelled and patient care per anesthesiologist

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Weight loss surgery patients undergoing preoperative upper endoscopy
* BMI 40-60

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnant patients
* Previous weight loss surgery or stomach surgery
* BMI \> 60 and BMI \< 40
* Active smokers
* Patients with a history of recent URTI (Upper Respiratory Tract Infection) within the preceding 2 weeks
* Lung disease, COPD asthma, cystic fibrosis, sarcoidosis
* Baseline O2 saturation less than or equal to 94%
* Exclude substance abusers (active alcohol abuse, benzodiazepine abuse, and active illicit drug use)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Bristol Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Makram Gedeon, MD

Medical director of bariatric surgery program, principal investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Makram M Gedeon, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Bristol Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Bristol Hospital

Bristol, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Gross JB, Bachenberg KL, Benumof JL, Caplan RA, Connis RT, Cote CJ, Nickinovich DG, Prachand V, Ward DS, Weaver EM, Ydens L, Yu S; American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Perioperative Management. Practice guidelines for the perioperative management of patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Perioperative Management of patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Anesthesiology. 2006 May;104(5):1081-93; quiz 1117-8. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200605000-00026. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16645462 (View on PubMed)

Arakawa H, Kaise M, Sumiyama K, Saito S, Suzuki T, Tajiri H. Does pulse oximetry accurately monitor a patient's ventilation during sedated endoscopy under oxygen supplementation? Singapore Med J. 2013 Apr;54(4):212-5. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2013075.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23624448 (View on PubMed)

De Palma GD, Forestieri P. Role of endoscopy in the bariatric surgery of patients. World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jun 28;20(24):7777-84. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i24.7777.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24976715 (View on PubMed)

Flegal KM, Kruszon-Moran D, Carroll MD, Fryar CD, Ogden CL. Trends in Obesity Among Adults in the United States, 2005 to 2014. JAMA. 2016 Jun 7;315(21):2284-91. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.6458.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27272580 (View on PubMed)

Fouladpour N, Jesudoss R, Bolden N, Shaman Z, Auckley D. Perioperative Complications in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patients Undergoing Surgery: A Review of the Legal Literature. Anesth Analg. 2016 Jan;122(1):145-51. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000841.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26111263 (View on PubMed)

Gay PC. Complications of noninvasive ventilation in acute care. Respir Care. 2009 Feb;54(2):246-57; discussion 257-8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19173756 (View on PubMed)

Gomez V, Bhalla R, Heckman MG, Florit PT, Diehl NN, Rawal B, Lynch SA, Loeb DS. Routine Screening Endoscopy before Bariatric Surgery: Is It Necessary? Bariatr Surg Pract Patient Care. 2014 Dec 1;9(4):143-149. doi: 10.1089/bari.2014.0024.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25516819 (View on PubMed)

Goudra BG, Singh PM, Penugonda LC, Speck RM, Sinha AC. Significantly reduced hypoxemic events in morbidly obese patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy: Predictors and practice effect. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2014 Jan;30(1):71-7. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.125707.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24574597 (View on PubMed)

McVay T, Fang JC, Taylor L, Au A, Williams W, Presson AP, Al-Dulaimi R, Volckmann E, Ibele A. Safety Analysis of Bariatric Patients Undergoing Outpatient Upper Endoscopy with Non-Anesthesia Administered Propofol Sedation. Obes Surg. 2017 Jun;27(6):1501-1507. doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2478-4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27885537 (View on PubMed)

Opperer M, Cozowicz C, Bugada D, Mokhlesi B, Kaw R, Auckley D, Chung F, Memtsoudis SG. Does Obstructive Sleep Apnea Influence Perioperative Outcome? A Qualitative Systematic Review for the Society of Anesthesia and Sleep Medicine Task Force on Preoperative Preparation of Patients with Sleep-Disordered Breathing. Anesth Analg. 2016 May;122(5):1321-34. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001178.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27101493 (View on PubMed)

Saunders R, Erslon M, Vargo J. Modeling the costs and benefits of capnography monitoring during procedural sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy. Endosc Int Open. 2016 Mar;4(3):E340-51. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-100719.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27004254 (View on PubMed)

Slagelse C, Vilmann P, Hornslet P, Jorgensen HL, Horsted TI. The role of capnography in endoscopy patients undergoing nurse-administered propofol sedation: a randomized study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2013 Oct;48(10):1222-30. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2013.830327. Epub 2013 Sep 2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23992025 (View on PubMed)

Soto RG, Davis M, Faulkner MJ. A comparison of the incidence of hypercapnea in non-obese and morbidly obese peri-operative patients using the SenTec transcutaneous pCO(2) monitor. J Clin Monit Comput. 2014 Jun;28(3):293-8. doi: 10.1007/s10877-013-9534-6. Epub 2013 Nov 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24292821 (View on PubMed)

Wani S, Azar R, Hovis CE, Hovis RM, Cote GA, Hall M, Waldbaum L, Kushnir V, Early D, Mullady DK, Murad F, Edmundowicz SA, Jonnalagadda SS. Obesity as a risk factor for sedation-related complications during propofol-mediated sedation for advanced endoscopic procedures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Dec;74(6):1238-47. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.09.006.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22136773 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan, and Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

20170730

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id