Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
16 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-03-23
2023-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Thirty children (ages 10 - 18) will spend 12 months in the study. All will receive usual care and basic printed information about healthy lifestyles. In addition, 15 will receive a coaching intervention for the first six months. Pre-defined success criteria will assess the feasibility of trial processes.
Acceptability of trial participation and impact of coaching will be explored qualitatively. Health indicators and psychosocial outcomes will be assessed four times, at the start of the trial, immediately post-intervention and at three and six months post-intervention.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Virtual Peer Health Coaching for Adolescents With Disabilities
NCT05587634
Examining the Role of Executive Functioning in Family-Based Intensive Health Behavior and Lifestyle Treatment
NCT06969235
Acceptance-based Care for Child Eating and Physical Activity Treatment
NCT03368716
The Impact of Family Financial Support on Child Health
NCT02770144
Healthy Kids & Families: Overcoming Social, Environmental and Family Barriers to Childhood Obesity Prevention
NCT03028233
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
A new intervention paradigm that produces sustainable results without undue burden (on families or services) is therefore urgently required to address the health promotion needs of CWPD. The investigators propose that a strengths-based coaching approach may meet all of these requirements. Solution-Focused Coaching in Pediatric Rehabilitation (SFC-Peds) has been recommended as a coaching model for children with disabilities, for its strong theoretical basis and ability to be customized to children and families' resources, environmental settings, child age and developmental stage. Taking a strengths-based approach (such as SFC-Peds) is a departure from usual rehabilitation research and practice, which has largely been problem-focused (i.e. what a child can't do). A strengths-based approach can result in hope, motivation and action.
Given that the investigators will be the first to use SFC-Peds to promote healthy habits with CWPD, a feasibility and acceptability study is essential. Evidence of feasibility is a critical prerequisite for a RCT, especially for complex interventions that have multiple interacting components and/or target multiple behaviours (such as SFC-Peds). Feasibility studies rigorously examine the processes (e.g. recruitment and retention), resources (e.g. personnel, time required to complete measures), management (e.g. coordination of research personnel, quality of data entry) and science (e.g. appropriate methodology and outcomes) of the intended RCT. It is also critical to evaluate the acceptability of interventions for the target population (e.g. satisfaction with duration, intensity, level of interest, perceived impact), as well as those allocated to the control arm (e.g. acceptability of not receiving coaching, perceived burden of assessments). Examining all of these issues before the efficacy trial begins increases the likelihood of success. Feasibility studies such as the one the investigators are proposing help ensure that resources are invested in efficacy trials likely to generate clinically meaningful results and therefore have maximum impact on health care knowledge and outcomes.
Primary objective: To evaluate the feasibility (study design, methods, processes) and acceptability (family/child/clinician satisfaction, perceived usefulness) of conducting a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a novel, brief, coaching intervention, solution-focused coaching in pediatric rehabilitation (SFC-Peds) for improving and sustaining physical activity (PA) and dietary habits in children with physical disabilities (CWPD).
Secondary objective: To determine the responsiveness of selected outcome measures to SFC-Peds coaching over 12 months.
Principal research question: "Is an efficacy trial to evaluate a 6 month SFC-Peds intervention to improve PA and dietary habits feasible to implement and acceptable to CWPD and families?"
Physical, environmental and psychosocial restrictions mean that children with physical disabilities (CWPD) are adopting worrying physical activity (PA) and dietary habits. Despite this, the investigators currently have limited evidence to inform interventions that may enhance lifelong health in CWPD. The investigators suggest that a paradigm shift is needed, one that moves beyond traditional prescriptive programs to a strengths-based approach where intervention strategies enable new health habits to be integrated seamlessly into children and families' everyday lifestyles for long-term sustainability.
Research such as our proposed study will ensure that this potentially transformative approach is rigorously examined and used in an evidence-based manner. As little is known about effective and acceptable behaviour change interventions for CWPD, this study's findings will make significant contributions to the field: i) Greater understanding of ecologically valid interventions that have the potential to enhance the long term health of CWPD; ii) Insight into how 2 different rehabilitation populations respond to SFC-Peds; and iii) Data on the responsiveness of outcome measures to a SFC-Peds intervention. These insights will enable us to design acceptable, feasible and rigorous interventions that will result in robust data for informing both research and clinical practice.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Solution-Focused Coaching Group
Half of the participants (n=15) will be assigned a coach and receive coaching 8 times for up to 1 hour over 6 months. The first session will take place in the home and subsequent session will take place online using an online meeting tool.
Solution-Focused Coaching in Pediatric Rehabilitation
A coaching model for children with disabilities, with a strong theoretical basis, and ability to be customized to children and families' resources, environmental settings, child age and developmental stage
Control Group
Half of the participants (n=15) will not be receiving coaching
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Solution-Focused Coaching in Pediatric Rehabilitation
A coaching model for children with disabilities, with a strong theoretical basis, and ability to be customized to children and families' resources, environmental settings, child age and developmental stage
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Diagnosis of SB or CP
* Has physical capability to execute independent body movement with or without device
* Cognitively able and willing to set PA or dietary goals
* Can communicate in English and respond to questions requiring some reflection and insight
* Home internet connection
* Lives within 2 hours driving distance from Toronto up to London, Ontario OR willing to travel to either HB or TVCC for first in-person coaching session if randomized into coaching group
* Primary caregiver to a study participant
* Can communicate in English and respond to questions requiring some reflection and insight
Exclusion Criteria
* Medical condition severely restricting diet
* Underweight (less than fifth percentile)
* Receiving specialist dietetic services
10 Years
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Laval University
OTHER
Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Amy McPherson, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Thames Valley Children's Centre
London, Ontario, Canada
Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
McPherson AC, Biddiss E, Chen L, Church PT, de Groot JF, Keenan S, King G, Lui T, Maltais DB, Merette C, Moffet H, Moola F, Schwellnus H. Children and Teens in Charge of their Health (CATCH): A protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial of solution-focused coaching to foster healthy lifestyles in childhood disability. BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 4;9(3):e025119. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025119.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CATCH-17-752
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.