Effect of Head Position on MACEI of Sevoflurane in Children With Obstructive Airway
NCT ID: NCT03522402
Last Updated: 2018-05-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
38 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-01-01
2018-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Endotracheal Intubation With Sevoflurane in Surgical Pediatric Patients
NCT02429323
50% Effective Concentration of Sevoflurane for Immobility
NCT03553446
Fentanyl and Propofol for Tracheal Intubation During Sevoflurane Induction Without Muscle Relaxants in Children
NCT02442128
Desflurane in Children With Laryngeal Mask Airway
NCT02470442
Sevoflurane and Laryngeal Reflex Responses in Pediatric Patients
NCT00665418
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
30 degree rotated lateral position
19 patients American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I or II aged 2-8 years undergoing tonsillectomy surgery were randomized to the head in 30 degree rotated lateral position. The end-tidal (ET) sevoflurane concentration used for each patient was determined using the Dixon's up-and-down method. The ratio of the end-tidal to predetermined end-tidal concentrations was maintained at 0.95-1.0 for at least 10 minutes to establish equilibration before device insertion was attempted. The first patient received a 5.0% sevoflurane concentration and the step size of increase/decrease was 0.5%.
Sevoflurane
38 patients American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I or II aged 2-8 years undergoing tonsillectomy surgery were randomized to either the patient's head in the neutral position or 30 degree rotated lateral position. The end-tidal (ET) sevoflurane concentration used for each patient was determined using the Dixon's up-and-down method. The ratio of the end-tidal to predetermined end-tidal concentrations was maintained at 0.95-1.0 for at least 10 minutes to establish equilibration before device insertion was attempted. The first patient received a 5.0% sevoflurane concentration and the step size of increase/decrease was 0.5%.
neutral position
19 patients American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I or II aged 2-8 years undergoing tonsillectomy surgery were randomized to the head in the neutral position.The end-tidal (ET) sevoflurane concentration used for each patient was determined using the Dixon's up-and-down method. The ratio of the end-tidal to predetermined end-tidal concentrations was maintained at 0.95-1.0 for at least 10 minutes to establish equilibration before device insertion was attempted. The first patient received a 5.0% sevoflurane concentration and the step size of increase/decrease was 0.5%.
Sevoflurane
38 patients American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I or II aged 2-8 years undergoing tonsillectomy surgery were randomized to either the patient's head in the neutral position or 30 degree rotated lateral position. The end-tidal (ET) sevoflurane concentration used for each patient was determined using the Dixon's up-and-down method. The ratio of the end-tidal to predetermined end-tidal concentrations was maintained at 0.95-1.0 for at least 10 minutes to establish equilibration before device insertion was attempted. The first patient received a 5.0% sevoflurane concentration and the step size of increase/decrease was 0.5%.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Sevoflurane
38 patients American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I or II aged 2-8 years undergoing tonsillectomy surgery were randomized to either the patient's head in the neutral position or 30 degree rotated lateral position. The end-tidal (ET) sevoflurane concentration used for each patient was determined using the Dixon's up-and-down method. The ratio of the end-tidal to predetermined end-tidal concentrations was maintained at 0.95-1.0 for at least 10 minutes to establish equilibration before device insertion was attempted. The first patient received a 5.0% sevoflurane concentration and the step size of increase/decrease was 0.5%.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* children aged 2-8 years
* children with obstruction airway under general anesthesia undergoing tonsillectomy surgery
* signed informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with a potentially difficult airway (Mallampati III or IV, a limited mouth opening and/or cervical spine disease)
* Patients with reactive airway disease
* Signs of upper respiratory infection
* Violate experimental scheme
* refused to participate
2 Years
8 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jingjie Li
PI
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Li Jing Jie, M.D.
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Shanghai9 Hospital
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Tanaka S, Tsuchida H, Nakabayashi K, Seki S, Namiki A. The effects of sevoflurane, isoflurane, halothane, and enflurane on hemodynamic responses during an inhaled induction of anesthesia via a mask in humans. Anesth Analg. 1996 Apr;82(4):821-6. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199604000-00025.
Yasuda N, Lockhart SH, Eger EI 2nd, Weiskopf RB, Liu J, Laster M, Taheri S, Peterson NA. Comparison of kinetics of sevoflurane and isoflurane in humans. Anesth Analg. 1991 Mar;72(3):316-24. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199103000-00007.
Wajima Z, Inoue T, Yoshikawa T, Imanaga K, Ogawa R. Changes in hemodynamic variables and catecholamine levels after rapid increase in sevoflurane or isoflurane concentration with or without nitrous oxide under endotracheal intubation. J Anesth. 2000;14(4):175-9. doi: 10.1007/s005400070001.
Goff MJ, Arain SR, Ficke DJ, Uhrich TD, Ebert TJ. Absence of bronchodilation during desflurane anesthesia: a comparison to sevoflurane and thiopental. Anesthesiology. 2000 Aug;93(2):404-8. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200008000-00018.
Helbo-Hansen S, Ravlo O, Trap-Andersen S. The influence of alfentanil on the intubating conditions after priming with vecuronium. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1988 Jan;32(1):41-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1988.tb02685.x.
Makkar JK, Ghai B, Bhardwaj N, Wig J. Minimum alveolar concentration of desflurane with fentanyl for laryngeal mask airway removal in anesthetized children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2012 Apr;22(4):335-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2011.03712.x. Epub 2011 Oct 21.
Thwaites A, Edmends S, Smith I. Inhalation induction with sevoflurane: a double-blind comparison with propofol. Br J Anaesth. 1997 Apr;78(4):356-61. doi: 10.1093/bja/78.4.356.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
The effects of premedication on inhaled induction of anesthesia with sevoflurane.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2018-15-T15
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.