Repeatability and Reproducibility of the IOLMaster 700 Vers 1.70 and Agreement With IOLMaster 700 Vers. 1.50 and Pentacam

NCT ID: NCT03518775

Last Updated: 2018-05-31

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

98 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-03-16

Study Completion Date

2018-04-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The objectives of this study are to determine the agreement of measurements between the IOLMaster 700 SW Vers. 1.70 and IOLMaster 700 SW Vers. 1.50 and Pentacam, as well as to evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of the IOLMaster 700 SW Vers 1.70.

The following parameters will be evaluated for Total Keratometry, (TK) and Posterior Corneal Surface (PCS):

* cylinder (CYL), Axis (A)
* spherical equivalent (SE)

Specific Objectives:

1. To compare the agreement of SE between IOLMaster 700 SW Vers. 1.70 and IOLMaster 700 SW Vers. 1.50 (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany)
2. To compare the agreement of Cylinder magnitude and axis between IOLMaster 700 SW Version 1.70 and Pentacam
3. To evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of the IOLMaster 700 SW Vers. 1.70 for all measurement parameters listed above

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cornea

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Normal Eyes

Eyes with best-corrected visual acuity of 20/20 or better, and lens opacities of 1.0 or less in the study eye using the LOCS III system, and no prior Laser Vision Correction.

Biometry

Intervention Type DEVICE

Measurement of Cornea

Cataract Eyes

Cataract in the study eye greater than Grade 1 using the LOCS III system for one or more: nuclear opacity, nuclear color, cortical opacity, or PSC.

Biometry

Intervention Type DEVICE

Measurement of Cornea

Post LVC Eyes

History of Laser Vision Correction (LVC)

Biometry

Intervention Type DEVICE

Measurement of Cornea

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Biometry

Measurement of Cornea

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Male or Female 22 years of age and older.
2. No history of rigid contact lens wear for at least 2 weeks. Soft lenses, if worn, should be removed at least one hour prior to the measurement.
3. Able and willing to make the required study visits.
4. Able and willing to give consent and follow study instructions.
5. Group 1: normal eyes with best-corrected visual acuity of 20/20 or better, and lens opacities of 1.0 or less in the study eye using the LOCS III system, and no prior Laser Vision Correction.
6. Group 2: cataract in the study eye greater than Grade 1 using the LOCS III system for one or more: nuclear opacity, nuclear color, cortical opacity, or PSC.
7. Group 3: history of Laser Vision Correction (LVC).

Exclusion Criteria

1. Previous intraocular surgery other than Laser Vision Correction in the study eye.
2. Previous corneal surgery other than Laser Vision Correction in the study eye.
3. Presence of any corneal or retinal abnormality on slit lamp examination in the study eye.
4. Corneal Cylinder \< 0.75D measured with a IOLMaster.
5. Active ocular infection or inflammation.
6. Poor tear film/insufficient corneal reflex.
7. Best corrected visual acuity worse than 20/200 in the study eye.
8. Physical inability to be positioned at the slit-lamp biomicroscope or study devices (e.g. torticollis, head tremor, etc.).
9. Insufficient eyelid opening or eyelashes which partially conceal alignment or keratometry reflections and prevent capture of all measurements.
10. Inability to fixate (e.g. due to nystagmus, amblyopia or ocular disease, such as macular degeneration).
11. Rigid contact lens wear during past two weeks.
12. Principal Investigator's determination that the subject is not suitable due to other medical condition (reasons to be listed on eCRFs).
Minimum Eligible Age

22 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

ClinReg Consulting Services, Inc.

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Sierra Clinical Services, LLC

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Stephen Slade, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Slade & Baker Vision

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Slade & Baker Vision

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Vogel A, Dick HB, Krummenauer F. Reproducibility of optical biometry using partial coherence interferometry : intraobserver and interobserver reliability. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001 Dec;27(12):1961-8. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(01)01214-7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11738911 (View on PubMed)

Lu MJ, Zhong WH, Liu YX, Miao HZ, Li YC, Ji MH. Sample Size for Assessing Agreement between Two Methods of Measurement by Bland-Altman Method. Int J Biostat. 2016 Nov 1;12(2):/j/ijb.2016.12.issue-2/ijb-2015-0039/ijb-2015-0039.xml. doi: 10.1515/ijb-2015-0039.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27838682 (View on PubMed)

Baumeister M, Terzi E, Ekici Y, Kohnen T. Comparison of manual and automated methods to determine horizontal corneal diameter. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004 Feb;30(2):374-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2003.06.004.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15030827 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IOLMaster 2017-01909

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id