Trial Outcomes & Findings for Financial Burden Assessment in Patients With Stage I-III Colon or Rectal Cancer Undergoing Treatment (NCT NCT03516942)
NCT ID: NCT03516942
Last Updated: 2025-11-12
Results Overview
The Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST) COST is an 11-item patient-reported outcome (PRO) of financial hardship that uses a 7-day time window and 5-point Likert response scale (ranging from 0, indicating not at all, to 4, very much). Higher COST scores (range, 0-44) represent better financial well-being. The primary objective is to evaluate the change in the level of self-reported financial burden from baseline (within 60 days of diagnosis) to 12 months from study registration. (12 mo - baseline)
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
565 participants
Baseline and 12 months after cancer diagnosis
2025-11-12
Participant Flow
This was a, longitudinal cohort study of financial burden in patients with colon, rectal, or rectosigmoid junction cancer. Measurements of financial burden (COST score) were collected at 5 time points over a 24-month follow-up period. Surveys were completed both by sites, to identify available clinical resources, and by participants, to assess the QoL and cost. The primary endpoint of this study was the change of the COST score from the baseline measurement to the 12-month follow-up (FU).
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Observational (questionnaire)
Patients submitted questionnaires assessing financial burden
|
|---|---|
|
T0: Baseline
NOT COMPLETED
|
13
|
|
Registration through baseline survey com
STARTED
|
565
|
|
Registration through baseline survey com
Activated Surveys
|
463
|
|
Registration through baseline survey com
COMPLETED
|
463
|
|
Registration through baseline survey com
NOT COMPLETED
|
102
|
|
T0: Baseline
STARTED
|
463
|
|
T0: Baseline
Submitted T0 baseline survey
|
450
|
|
T0: Baseline
COMPLETED
|
450
|
|
T1: 3 Months Survey
STARTED
|
450
|
|
T1: 3 Months Survey
Submitted T0 and T1 surveys
|
264
|
|
T1: 3 Months Survey
COMPLETED
|
264
|
|
T1: 3 Months Survey
NOT COMPLETED
|
186
|
|
T2: 6 Month Survey
STARTED
|
450
|
|
T2: 6 Month Survey
Completed T0 and T2 surveys
|
241
|
|
T2: 6 Month Survey
Completed T0, T1, and T2 surveys
|
203
|
|
T2: 6 Month Survey
COMPLETED
|
241
|
|
T2: 6 Month Survey
NOT COMPLETED
|
209
|
|
T3: 12 Month Survey
STARTED
|
450
|
|
T3: 12 Month Survey
Completed T0 and T3 surveys
|
207
|
|
T3: 12 Month Survey
Completed T0, T1, T2 and T3 surveys
|
151
|
|
T3: 12 Month Survey
COMPLETED
|
207
|
|
T3: 12 Month Survey
NOT COMPLETED
|
243
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Observational (questionnaire)
Patients submitted questionnaires assessing financial burden
|
|---|---|
|
Registration through baseline survey com
Withdrawal by Subject
|
36
|
|
Registration through baseline survey com
Death
|
8
|
|
Registration through baseline survey com
Could not contact patient after enrollment
|
58
|
|
T0: Baseline
LOST
|
13
|
|
T1: 3 Months Survey
Withdrawal by Subject
|
13
|
|
T1: 3 Months Survey
Death
|
10
|
|
T1: 3 Months Survey
Lost
|
163
|
|
T2: 6 Month Survey
Withdrawal by Subject
|
15
|
|
T2: 6 Month Survey
Death
|
14
|
|
T2: 6 Month Survey
Lost
|
180
|
|
T3: 12 Month Survey
Withdrawal by Subject
|
15
|
|
T3: 12 Month Survey
Death
|
19
|
|
T3: 12 Month Survey
Lost
|
209
|
Baseline Characteristics
Financial Burden Assessment in Patients With Stage I-III Colon or Rectal Cancer Undergoing Treatment
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Observational (Questionnaire)
n=450 Participants
Patients complete questionnaires to assess financial burden
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
61.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.0 • n=10 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
210 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
240 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
14 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
424 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
12 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
6 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
21 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
2 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
33 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
379 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
4 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
5 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Employment
Employed
|
214 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Employment
Retired
|
153 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Employment
Unemployed
|
77 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Employment
Not Answered
|
6 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Cancer Type
Colon Cancer
|
289 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Cancer Type
Rectal Cancer
|
140 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Cancer Type
Rectosigmoid Junction
|
21 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Cancer Stage at Enrollment
Stage l
|
68 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Cancer Stage at Enrollment
Stage lI
|
140 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Cancer Stage at Enrollment
Stage III
|
242 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Chemotherapy
Schedule Chemotherapy
|
267 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Chemotherapy
No Chemtherapy
|
183 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 months after cancer diagnosisThe Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST) COST is an 11-item patient-reported outcome (PRO) of financial hardship that uses a 7-day time window and 5-point Likert response scale (ranging from 0, indicating not at all, to 4, very much). Higher COST scores (range, 0-44) represent better financial well-being. The primary objective is to evaluate the change in the level of self-reported financial burden from baseline (within 60 days of diagnosis) to 12 months from study registration. (12 mo - baseline)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
T0: Observational (questionnaire)
n=241 Participants
Patients with complete questionnaires to assess financial burden at baseline
|
T2:Observational (questionnaire)
n=241 Participants
Patients with complete questionnaires to assess financial burden at 12 months
|
12-month questionnaire
Patient questionnaires completed at 12 months after cancer diagnosis.
|
24-month questionnaire
Patient questionnaires completed at 24 months after cancer diagnosis.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST)
|
23.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.9
|
28.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.7
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 12 monthsWill evaluate reported access and utilization of financial services (i.e. financial counselor, navigator, social workers) and its association to financial burden in the first 12 months after diagnosis of colon or rectal cancer treated with curative-intent. Will be assessed by Consumer Based Cancer Care Value Index (CCVI). For the continuous item variable, will conduct the paired t test to examine the difference if the distribution is normal. If not normally distributed, Wilcoxon signed rank test will be used. For the categorical item variable, the paired proportion test (e.g., McNemar test) will be used instead. The association between CCVI and COST measures will be evaluated using the Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficient.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 6, 12, and 24 months after cancer diagnosisChange in level of self-reported employment limitations from baseline to 6, 12 and 24 months after study registration will be assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire for a Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP). WPAI outcomes are expressed as impairment percentages, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity, i.e., worse outcomes, as follows: Questions: 1. = currently employed 2. = hours missed due to specified problem 3. = hours missed other reasons 4. = hours actually worked 5. = degree problem affected productivity while working 6. = degree problem affected regular activities Scores: Multiply scores by 100 to express in percentages. Percent work time missed due to problem: Q2/(Q2+Q4) Percent impairment while working due to problem: Q5/10 Percent overall work impairment due to problem: Q2/(Q2+Q4)+\[(1-(Q2/(Q2+Q4)))x(Q5/10)\] Percent activity impairment due to problem: Q6/10
Outcome measures
| Measure |
T0: Observational (questionnaire)
n=192 Participants
Patients with complete questionnaires to assess financial burden at baseline
|
T2:Observational (questionnaire)
n=69 Participants
Patients with complete questionnaires to assess financial burden at 12 months
|
12-month questionnaire
n=60 Participants
Patient questionnaires completed at 12 months after cancer diagnosis.
|
24-month questionnaire
n=57 Participants
Patient questionnaires completed at 24 months after cancer diagnosis.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in Level of Self-reported Employment Limitations
Work Time Missed
|
39.7 percentage of activity impaired
Standard Deviation 39.3
|
18.2 percentage of activity impaired
Standard Deviation 30.7
|
4.8 percentage of activity impaired
Standard Deviation 16.1
|
6.1 percentage of activity impaired
Standard Deviation 18.0
|
|
Change in Level of Self-reported Employment Limitations
Impairment of Activities at Work
|
20.8 percentage of activity impaired
Standard Deviation 33.4
|
28.1 percentage of activity impaired
Standard Deviation 33.0
|
14.0 percentage of activity impaired
Standard Deviation 24.6
|
14.4 percentage of activity impaired
Standard Deviation 22.3
|
|
Change in Level of Self-reported Employment Limitations
Overall Work Impairment
|
51.8 percentage of activity impaired
Standard Deviation 37.5
|
36.6 percentage of activity impaired
Standard Deviation 36.6
|
17.8 percentage of activity impaired
Standard Deviation 28.0
|
19.1 percentage of activity impaired
Standard Deviation 26.8
|
|
Change in Level of Self-reported Employment Limitations
Impairment of Activities Outside of Work
|
33.2 percentage of activity impaired
Standard Deviation 31.8
|
31.3 percentage of activity impaired
Standard Deviation 31.9
|
17.0 percentage of activity impaired
Standard Deviation 25.8
|
15.8 percentage of activity impaired
Standard Deviation 24.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 6, 12, and 24 months after cancer diagnosisChange in level of self-reported employment limitations from baseline to 6, 12 and 24 months after study registration will be assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire for a Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP). WPAI outcomes are expressed as impairment percentages, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity, i.e., worse outcomes. These outcomes were further dichotomized at 50%, such that Impairment \> 50% was considered impaired and Impairment \<=50% was not-impaired
Outcome measures
| Measure |
T0: Observational (questionnaire)
n=192 Participants
Patients with complete questionnaires to assess financial burden at baseline
|
T2:Observational (questionnaire)
n=69 Participants
Patients with complete questionnaires to assess financial burden at 12 months
|
12-month questionnaire
n=60 Participants
Patient questionnaires completed at 12 months after cancer diagnosis.
|
24-month questionnaire
n=57 Participants
Patient questionnaires completed at 24 months after cancer diagnosis.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Level of Self-reported Employment Limitations (Dichotomized)
Impairment of Activities at Work · Impaired ( score >50%)
|
139 Participants
|
47 Participants
|
51 Participants
|
49 Participants
|
|
Level of Self-reported Employment Limitations (Dichotomized)
Impairment of Activities Outside of Work · Impaired ( score >50%)
|
121 Participants
|
47 Participants
|
49 Participants
|
48 Participants
|
|
Level of Self-reported Employment Limitations (Dichotomized)
Work Time Missed · Impaired ( score <=50%)
|
68 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Level of Self-reported Employment Limitations (Dichotomized)
Work Time Missed · Impaired ( score >50%)
|
124 Participants
|
55 Participants
|
58 Participants
|
54 Participants
|
|
Level of Self-reported Employment Limitations (Dichotomized)
Impairment of Activities at Work · Impaired ( score <=50%)
|
53 Participants
|
22 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
|
Level of Self-reported Employment Limitations (Dichotomized)
Overall Work Impairment · Impaired ( score >50%)
|
93 Participants
|
40 Participants
|
49 Participants
|
47 Participants
|
|
Level of Self-reported Employment Limitations (Dichotomized)
Overall Work Impairment · Impaired ( score <=50%)
|
99 Participants
|
29 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
|
Level of Self-reported Employment Limitations (Dichotomized)
Impairment of Activities Outside of Work · Impaired ( score <=50%)
|
71 Participants
|
22 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At 24 monthsWill evaluate long term outcomes at 24 months after diagnosis for adherence to clinical follow-up guidelines. Specially, linear (or generalized linear) mixed model will be fit to study the change in the mean response over time. In case the changes in the mean response over time are not linear, the quadratic trends or non-linear trends via spline may be considered in the modeling. Interactions will be evaluated as well.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At 24 monthsWill evaluate long term outcomes at 24 months after diagnosis for financial burden. Specially, linear (or generalized linear) mixed model will be fit to study the change in the mean response over time and also the effects of cancer type, stage, treatment plan and demographics, etc. on financial burden. In case the changes in the mean response over time are not linear, the quadratic trends or non-linear trends via spline may be considered in the modeling. Interactions will be evaluated as well.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At 24 monthsWill evaluate long term outcomes at 24 months after diagnosis for employment limitations. Specially, linear (or generalized linear) mixed model will be fit to study the change in the mean response over time. In case the changes in the mean response over time are not linear, the quadratic trends or non-linear trends via spline may be considered in the modeling. Interactions will be evaluated as well.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to 12 monthsWill evaluate the change of QoL from baseline to 12 months and its association with predictors. Will be evaluated by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and12 monthsPopulation: participants who completed both the baseline and 12 month EORTC questionnaire
Financial Burden was evaluated using a single item from European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire 30 \[EORT30\]) with responses for both baseline and 12 months EORTC30 question: Has your physical condition or medical treatment caused you financial difficulties? * Not at all * A little * Quite a bit * Very much with higher values indicating greater financial difficulty (burden) Responses were dichotomized into No difficulty ("Not at All" ) and some difficulty ( "A little", "Quite a bit", or "Very much")
Outcome measures
| Measure |
T0: Observational (questionnaire)
n=91 Participants
Patients with complete questionnaires to assess financial burden at baseline
|
T2:Observational (questionnaire)
n=114 Participants
Patients with complete questionnaires to assess financial burden at 12 months
|
12-month questionnaire
Patient questionnaires completed at 12 months after cancer diagnosis.
|
24-month questionnaire
Patient questionnaires completed at 24 months after cancer diagnosis.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Changes Self-reported Financial Burden Between Baseline and 12 Month [EORTC]
No difficulty ("Not at All" ) at 12 months
|
74 Participants
|
34 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Changes Self-reported Financial Burden Between Baseline and 12 Month [EORTC]
Some Difficulty ( "A little", "Quite a bit", or "Very much") at 12 Months
|
17 Participants
|
80 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
Adverse Events
before completing any questionaire
Observational (questionnaire) baseline questionnaire
Observational (questionnaire) 3 months
Observational (questionnaire) 6 months
Observational (questionnaire) 12 months
Observational (questionnaire) 24 months
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
before completing any questionaire
n=57 participants at risk
Patients registered for participation but off study before completing any study questionnaire:
Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies Questionnaire Administration: Ancillary studies
|
Observational (questionnaire) baseline questionnaire
n=455 participants at risk
All Patients complete questionnaires over 20-60 minutes after cancer diagnosis at baseline
Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies Questionnaire Administration: Ancillary studies
|
Observational (questionnaire) 3 months
n=301 participants at risk
All Patients complete questionnaires over 20-60 minutes at 3 months after cancer diagnosis.
Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies Questionnaire Administration: Ancillary studies
|
Observational (questionnaire) 6 months
n=272 participants at risk
All Patients complete questionnaires over 20-60 minutes at 6 months after cancer diagnosis.
Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies Questionnaire Administration: Ancillary studies
|
Observational (questionnaire) 12 months
n=233 participants at risk
All Patients complete questionnaires over 20-60 minutes at 12 months after cancer diagnosis.
Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies Questionnaire Administration: Ancillary studies
|
Observational (questionnaire) 24 months
n=245 participants at risk
All Patients complete questionnaires over 20-60 minutes at 24 months after cancer diagnosis.
Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies Questionnaire Administration: Ancillary studies
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
General disorders
Death Nos
|
22.8%
13/57 • Number of events 13 • up to 24 months
This is an observational study which only collected All-Cause Mortality and Serious Adverse Events, other adverse event data was not collected
|
0.00%
0/455 • up to 24 months
This is an observational study which only collected All-Cause Mortality and Serious Adverse Events, other adverse event data was not collected
|
1.3%
4/301 • Number of events 4 • up to 24 months
This is an observational study which only collected All-Cause Mortality and Serious Adverse Events, other adverse event data was not collected
|
1.5%
4/272 • Number of events 4 • up to 24 months
This is an observational study which only collected All-Cause Mortality and Serious Adverse Events, other adverse event data was not collected
|
5.2%
12/233 • Number of events 12 • up to 24 months
This is an observational study which only collected All-Cause Mortality and Serious Adverse Events, other adverse event data was not collected
|
0.82%
2/245 • Number of events 2 • up to 24 months
This is an observational study which only collected All-Cause Mortality and Serious Adverse Events, other adverse event data was not collected
|
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: LTE60