Clinician Decision Support Algorithm for Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy

NCT ID: NCT03514680

Last Updated: 2022-03-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

226 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-06-04

Study Completion Date

2020-03-23

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This research study is evaluating how well a decision support tool works to improve clinicians' use of recommended chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) assessment and management strategies in participants receiving chemotherapy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This research study will test a new clinician decision support tool for the assessment and management of CIPN. The algorithm is designed to help clinicians make decisions about which strategies to use for the assessment and/or management of CIPN. The investigators need to recruit participants receiving chemotherapy that is known to cause CIPN to determine how well the algorithm works to increase clinicians' use of recommended CIPN assessment and management strategies.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cancer Chemotherapy-induced Peripheral Neuropathy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

The study expect to enroll 162 patients, 60 clinicians, and 30 healthy controls for a total of 252.

81 patients will be recruited in Period 1 (usual care) and a separate 81 will be recruited in Period 2 (algorithm use). The 60 clinicians will be recruited and will participate in Periods I and II. We will use purposive sampling to recruit 30 health controls to match the age and demographic characteristics of the recruited patients. The healthy controls will receive no intervention.
Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Period I

-Consented patients will complete electronic versions of the PRO-CTCAE CIPN severity and interference items, 0 - 10 worst CIPN pain numerical rating scale, and QLQ-CIPN20 via tablet prior to their clinician visit at the outpatient oncology center at three consecutive clinic visits: baseline, visit 2, visit 3.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Period II

* Consented patients will complete the same battery of assessments from the usual care period at the baseline, visit 2, and visit 3 time points.
* Following patient completion of the screening questionnaires, study staff will provide the clinicians with a color-coded summary of the patients' responses to the screening questionnaires and the CIPN assessment and management algorithm

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CIPN Assessment and Management Algorithm

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The revised algorithm incorporates evidence-based CIPN assessment and management strategies and standardized CIPN/pain patient-reported outcomes measures. In terms of processes, trained study staff will administer the screening questionnaires (e.g., PRO-CTCAE, 0 - 10 numerical rating scale of worst CIPN pain intensity) to consented patients before their clinician visit (e.g., in the waiting room). Following patient completion of the screening questionnaires, study staff will provide the clinicians with a color-coded summary of the patients' responses to the screening questionnaires and the CIPN assessment and management algorithm. Clinicians may then use the algorithm at their discretion to guide the assessment and management of their patients' CIPN symptoms

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

CIPN Assessment and Management Algorithm

The revised algorithm incorporates evidence-based CIPN assessment and management strategies and standardized CIPN/pain patient-reported outcomes measures. In terms of processes, trained study staff will administer the screening questionnaires (e.g., PRO-CTCAE, 0 - 10 numerical rating scale of worst CIPN pain intensity) to consented patients before their clinician visit (e.g., in the waiting room). Following patient completion of the screening questionnaires, study staff will provide the clinicians with a color-coded summary of the patients' responses to the screening questionnaires and the CIPN assessment and management algorithm. Clinicians may then use the algorithm at their discretion to guide the assessment and management of their patients' CIPN symptoms

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* over 18 years of age,
* completed one infusion of neurotoxic chemotherapy for the treatment of cancer
* has at least three more planned clinic visits associated with neurotoxic chemotherapy receipt after the day of consent
* ambulatory,
* signed informed consent,
* willingness to participate in all study activities,
* speaks/reads English,
* receives care from one of the clinicians enrolled in the study.


-if they are a Medical Doctor, Physician Assistant, or Nurse Practitioner and provide care to oncology patients at one of the study sites


-if they are an adult (18+) who does not have cancer or symptoms of peripheral nerve injury from any cause and speak/read English

Exclusion Criteria

* prognosis of ≤ two months or
* documented peripheral neuropathy due to other causes (diabetes, alcohol abuse, central nervous system malignancy, vitamin B deficiency, hereditary, nerve compression injury).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Robert Knoerl, PhD, RN

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Robert Knoerl, PhD, RN

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Dana Farber Cancer Institute

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Knoerl R, Mazzola E, Mitchell SA, Hong F, Salehi E, McCleary N, Ligibel JA, Reyes K, Berry DL. Measurement properties of brief neuropathy screening items in cancer patients receiving taxanes, platinums, or proteasome inhibitors. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2021 Sep 26;5(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s41687-021-00377-z.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34568984 (View on PubMed)

Knoerl R, Mazzola E, Hong F, Salehi E, McCleary N, Ligibel J, Reyes K, Berry DL. Exploring the impact of a decision support algorithm to improve clinicians' chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy assessment and management practices: a two-phase, longitudinal study. BMC Cancer. 2021 Mar 6;21(1):236. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-07965-8.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33676431 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

18-049

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.