Pilot Study Evaluating the Success (= Safe Decannulation) of a Standardized Tracheotomy Weaning Procedure in Brain-injury's Patients
NCT ID: NCT03512054
Last Updated: 2020-12-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-06-20
2020-12-18
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
However, according to investigators practices, that patients who were decannulated with success can go into a secondary care residence more easily.
This research will demonstrate that all patients included can be decannulated without risk of a new recannulation in the 96 hours.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
WEANING FROM TRACHEOSTOMY
NCT05271786
Evaluation of the Effect of Conversational Hypnosis When Changing Tracheal Cannula in Adult Patients
NCT02977767
Percutaneous Tracheostomy - Systematic Comparison Among Three Methods: Prospective Study
NCT01722981
"Airway Complications in Pediatric Patients With Tracheostomies: To What Extent Can Symptoms Identified by Caregivers or Pediatricians Serve as Predictors for Airway Complications Confirmed Through Surveillance Endoscopy?"
NCT07121517
"Outcomes of Tracheostomy Done for Patients Admitted in Anesthesia Intensive Care Units of Assiut University Hospital"
NCT03431389
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Bibliographical studies indicate few recommendations as to weaning outside intensive care units. In the neurosurgery units at the University Hospital of Bordeaux, during 3 years (2014-2016), investigators have practiced 29 decannulations without recannulation, over 37 brain injury patients, with a multi-professional team (neurosurgeon, physiotherapist, nurse, caregiver…) to produce a weaning process.
From where investigators hypothesis: using a multi-professional weaning process, checking the patient's stability during the different weaning steps, can lead to decide to decannulate or not without any risk.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Experimental procedure
Standardized 5-step weaning procedure
Weaning process in 5 steps (0-4), by a multi-professional team (neurosurgeon, physiotherapist, nurse, caregiver…) Stability criteria are defined for each person, after validation pass the next step. Stability criteria degradation return to the previous step. Weaning process can take back after stability criteria renormalization.
Step 0: cuff deflate. Step 1: occlusion test. Steps 0 and 1 can assess the freedom and protect capacity airway. In failure process, we can propose a nasofibroscopy.
Step 2: Phonatory Valve. Respiratory rehabilitation/ swallowing, limiting breathing effort. The valve ought to stay 12 hours before going to the step 3.
Step 3: Plug. Finish the Respiratory rehabilitation/ swallowing. The plug ought to stay 24hours minimum before going to the step 4.
Step 4: Decannulation
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Standardized 5-step weaning procedure
Weaning process in 5 steps (0-4), by a multi-professional team (neurosurgeon, physiotherapist, nurse, caregiver…) Stability criteria are defined for each person, after validation pass the next step. Stability criteria degradation return to the previous step. Weaning process can take back after stability criteria renormalization.
Step 0: cuff deflate. Step 1: occlusion test. Steps 0 and 1 can assess the freedom and protect capacity airway. In failure process, we can propose a nasofibroscopy.
Step 2: Phonatory Valve. Respiratory rehabilitation/ swallowing, limiting breathing effort. The valve ought to stay 12 hours before going to the step 3.
Step 3: Plug. Finish the Respiratory rehabilitation/ swallowing. The plug ought to stay 24hours minimum before going to the step 4.
Step 4: Decannulation
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* brain-injury disease
* tracheotomy act while in neurosurgery or reanimation stay
* no artificial ventilation
* medical cover
* free, informed and express consent by the patient or his legal representative (no later than the day after the inclusion and before all exam necessary for the research)
Exclusion Criteria
* age \< 70 years old: body mass index (B.D.I.) \<16 kg/m² or albuminemia \<20 g/L
* age \> 70 years old: body mass index (B.D.I.) \<18 kg/m² or albuminemia \<30 g/L
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Bordeaux
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Eric FRISON, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Unité de Soutien Méthodologique à la Recherche Clinique et Epidémiologique (USMR) du CHU de Bordeaux
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CHU de Bordeaux
Bordeaux, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CHUBX 2017/31
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.