Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
37 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-09-29
2018-01-12
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The hypothesis is that when using a DLT in OLV, occluding the non-ventilated lung (NVL) lumen will reproduce the BB physiology by accelerating the second phase of lung deflation and giving a better quality of lung collapse compared to usual practice of keeping the non-ventilated lung opened to ambient air.
The main objective is to compare the speed and quality of complete lung deflation occurring during OLV with a DLT when the non-ventilated DLT lumen is occluded vs not occluded.
This randomized study will include a total of 30 patients scheduled for lung resection using video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Fifteen patients will compose the experimental group (NVL lumen occluded) and 15 other patients will be part of the control group (NVL lumen opened to ambient air).
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Clinical Comparison of Two New Bronchial Blockers vs. Double Lumen Tubes in One Lung Ventilation
NCT02983149
Lung Collapse With Bronchial Blocker
NCT01615263
IPg2 Study: Left-sided Lung Isolation
NCT02137291
A Comparison the Intubation of a Left Sided Double Lumen Tube and Uniblocker
NCT03392922
Comparisons of Novel Double-lumen Endobronchial Tube for Blind Lung Isolation Technique With Conventional Double-lumen Endobronchial Tube in Patients Undergoing One-lung Ventilation
NCT03782090
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Until recently, studies evaluating the quality of lung collapse with the use of DLT versus BB showed contradicting results and were not conclusive. However, in 2016, Bussières' research group obtained a faster lung collapse with the use of a BB with its internal channel occluded and a second period of apnea at pleural opening.
A review of the literature could not explain in details these results. In the 2000s, lung collapse during OLV was described as undergoing two distinct phases; the first phase occuring at the opening of the pleural cavity and corresponding to a quick but partial collapse secondary to the elastic recoil of the lung. The second phase, a slower one, being the reabsorption, by the vascular capillary bed, of the gas contained into the alveoli; the speed of this second phase being directly proportional to the solubility coefficient of the gas.
Since no previous studies had explanation for Bussières' unexpected results, they conducted a physiologic study to extensively determine the physiology of the non-ventilated lung (NVL) during OLV with the use of DLT and BB. Their results demonstrated that during lung isolation, while the chest is closed, there is a buildup of negative pressure in the NVL until pleural opening, when the lumen of the DLT or the internal channel of the BB are occluded. This phenomenon was observed for both lung isolation devices (BB and DLT). They also observed an absorption of ambient air through the lumen of the DLT and the internal channel of the BB when the lumen of both device was open to ambient air. These results probably explain why Bussières obtained a faster lung collapse with BB in their study. By occluding the internal channel of the BB they prevented the aspiration of ambient air in the NVL. This condition may have accelerated the absorption atelectasis of the NVL that occurs during the second phase of lung collapse by obtaining an initial lower lung volume containing a higher alveolar partial pressure of oxygen (PAO2) in the BB group.
Since these recent findings demonstrate that both lung isolation devices cause negative pressure and an aspiration of ambient air, it is possible that the occlusion of the specific lumen of the NVL of a DLT could reproduce the physiology of the lung isolation obtained with a BB with its internal channel occluded.
The hypothesis is that by withholding gas exchange between the NVL and ambient air from the beginning of OLV to the pleural opening, the resorption atelectasis will be facilitated. Consequently, lung collapse of the NVL will occur faster when clamping its specific lumen on the DLT instead of letting it communicate with ambient air like anesthesiologists usually do.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
Control group : OLV with the specific lumen of the NVL opened to ambient air. Experimental group : OLV with a clamp on the specific lumen of the NVL
BASIC_SCIENCE
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Clamping double lumen tube
Clamping the non-dependent lung's lumen of the double lumen tube during closed chest one-lung ventilation
Clamping the Double Lumen Tube
Clamping the non-dependent lung's lumen of the double lumen tube during closed chest one-lung ventilation
Not Clamping double lumen tube
Not Clamping the non-dependent lung's lumen of the double lumen tube during closed chest one-lung ventilation
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Clamping the Double Lumen Tube
Clamping the non-dependent lung's lumen of the double lumen tube during closed chest one-lung ventilation
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* More than 18 years old.
* Having read, understand and signed the consent form presented at the pre-operative evaluation
Exclusion Criteria
1. Known or anticipated difficult tracheal intubation.
2. Bronchoscopic or CT-scan findings contraindicating the insertion of a DLT.
3. Severe COPD or asthma (FEV1 \<50%).
4. Prior intrathoracic surgery (including cardiac surgeries).
5. Pleural or interstitial pathology.
6. Previous chemotherapy or thoracic radiotherapy.
7. Acute or chronic pulmonary infection.
8. Endobronchial mass.
9. Tracheostomy.
B- Post-randomisation
1. Bronchoscopic findings contraindicating the insertion of DLT.
2. VATS findings that cancel the surgery.
3. Severe desaturation (SatO2 \< 90%) during the observation period.
4. Any need to reinflate the collapse lung.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Jean Bussières
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jean Bussières
Anesthesiologist
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sabrina Pelletier, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Laval University
Jean S Bussières, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Laval University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec
Québec, Quebec, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Clayton-Smith A, Bennett K, Alston RP, Adams G, Brown G, Hawthorne T, Hu M, Sinclair A, Tan J. A Comparison of the Efficacy and Adverse Effects of Double-Lumen Endobronchial Tubes and Bronchial Blockers in Thoracic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2015 Aug;29(4):955-66. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2014.11.017. Epub 2014 Dec 2.
Campos JH, Reasoner DK, Moyers JR. Comparison of a modified double-lumen endotracheal tube with a single-lumen tube with enclosed bronchial blocker. Anesth Analg. 1996 Dec;83(6):1268-72. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199612000-00024.
Bussieres JS, Somma J, Del Castillo JL, Lemieux J, Conti M, Ugalde PA, Gagne N, Lacasse Y. Bronchial blocker versus left double-lumen endotracheal tube in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a randomized-controlled trial examining time and quality of lung deflation. Can J Anaesth. 2016 Jul;63(7):818-27. doi: 10.1007/s12630-016-0657-3. Epub 2016 May 2.
Pfitzner J, Peacock MJ, McAleer PT. Gas movement in the nonventilated lung at the onset of single-lung ventilation for video-assisted thoracoscopy. Anaesthesia. 1999 May;54(5):437-43. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.1999.00845.x.
Joyce CJ, Baker AB, Kennedy RR. Gas uptake from an unventilated area of lung: computer model of absorption atelectasis. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1993 Mar;74(3):1107-16. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1993.74.3.1107.
Bardoczky GI, Engelman E, d'Hollander A. Continuous spirometry: an aid to monitoring ventilation during operation. Br J Anaesth. 1993 Nov;71(5):747-51. doi: 10.1093/bja/71.5.747.
Bussieres JS, Slinger P. Correct positioning of double-lumen tubes. Can J Anaesth. 2012 May;59(5):431-6. doi: 10.1007/s12630-012-9689-5. Epub 2012 Mar 7. No abstract available. English, French.
Somma J, Couture EJ, Pelletier S, Provencher S, Moreault O, Lohser J, Ugalde PA, Vigneault L, Lemieux J, Somma A, Guay SE, Bussieres JS. Non-ventilated lung deflation during one-lung ventilation with a double-lumen endotracheal tube: a randomized-controlled trial of occluding the non-ventilated endobronchial lumen before pleural opening. Can J Anaesth. 2021 Jun;68(6):801-811. doi: 10.1007/s12630-021-01957-9. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
21436
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.