Impact of Smoking Information on Concerns About Radon

NCT ID: NCT03499535

Last Updated: 2019-04-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

1390 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-08-07

Study Completion Date

2016-04-22

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Despite a push for tailored messages, health communications are often aimed at, and viewed by, people with varying levels of risk. This project examined-in the context of radon risk messages-whether information relevant to high-risk individuals can have an unintended influence on lower-risk individuals. Specifically, the investigators assessed whether information about lung-cancer risk from smoking reduced concerns about lung-cancer risk from radon among nonsmokers. The investigators hypothesized that non-smokers who read a message that included smoking-relevant information would express less concern about the effects of radon exposure and less interest in testing their home compared to those who read a version in which smoking-relevant information was excluded. Two studies were conducted. Although the investigators did not exclude smokers, the focus was on participants self-identifying as nonsmokers (including never smokers and former smokers).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Despite a push for tailored messages, health communications are often aimed at, and viewed by, people with varying levels of risk. This project examined-in the context of radon risk messages-whether information relevant to high-risk individuals can have an unintended influence on lower-risk individuals. Specifically, the investigators assessed whether information about lung-cancer risk from smoking reduced concerns about lung-cancer risk from radon among nonsmokers. The investigators hypothesized that non-smokers who read a message that included smoking-relevant information would express less concern about the effects of radon exposure and less interest in testing their home compared to those who read a version in which smoking-relevant information was excluded. Two studies were conducted. Although the investigators did not exclude smokers, the focus was on participants self-identifying as nonsmokers (including never smokers and former smokers). Participants in both studies were recruited through Amazon's Mechanical Turk (MTurk). Participants viewed radon messages that varied in the information they communicated about smoking's effect on lung cancer. In Study 1, smoking information was included or excluded from messages assembled from existing radon pamphlets. In Study 2, versions of a new radon message either excluded smoking information, described smoking as a major cause of lung cancer, or also described smoking's synergistic effect with radon on lung cancer risk. After viewing a radon health message, participants completed a variety of measures. Primary measures assessed respondents' anticipated sense of concern and related reactions if they learned that they/their home had been exposed to elevated levels of radon. Other key measures included questions about participants' interest and intention to test their home for radon.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lung Neoplasms Radon Exposure Smoking Intention Risk Reduction Behavior

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

FACTORIAL

Study 1: Participants randomly assigned to one of two conditions. Study 2: Participants randomly assigned to one of three conditions.
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
Participants blinded to condition.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Study 1: Radon&Smoking Synergistic/EPA

Participants viewed radon and smoking risk information taken from the EPA's pamphlet on the dangers of radon gas exposure.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Radon & Smoking Synergistic

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants viewed health information detailing the risks of developing lung cancer from exposure to radon gas, smoking, and their synergistic effects. This intervention represents the type of information most commonly presented in radon risk communications.

EPA

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Health information modeled after the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) pamphlet on radon risk.

Study 1: Radon&Smoking Synergistic/Idaho

Participants viewed radon and smoking risk information taken from Idaho's Department of Health and Human Welfare's pamphlet on the dangers of radon gas exposure.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Radon & Smoking Synergistic

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants viewed health information detailing the risks of developing lung cancer from exposure to radon gas, smoking, and their synergistic effects. This intervention represents the type of information most commonly presented in radon risk communications.

Idaho

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Health information modeled after the Idaho Department of Health and Human Welfare's pamphlet on radon risk.

Study 1: Radon Only / EPA

Participants viewed only radon risk information taken from the EPA's pamphlet on the dangers of radon gas exposure.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Radon Only

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants viewed health information detailing the risks of developing lung cancer from radon exposure. No information about the risks for developing lung cancer associated with smoking or its synergistic effect with radon exposure are included.

EPA

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Health information modeled after the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) pamphlet on radon risk.

Study 1: Radon Only / Idaho

Participants viewed only radon risk information taken from Idaho's Department of Health and Human Welfare's pamphlet on the dangers of radon gas exposure.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Radon Only

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants viewed health information detailing the risks of developing lung cancer from radon exposure. No information about the risks for developing lung cancer associated with smoking or its synergistic effect with radon exposure are included.

Idaho

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Health information modeled after the Idaho Department of Health and Human Welfare's pamphlet on radon risk.

Study 2: Radon Only

Participants viewed a radon-only message that focused only on the effect of radon on lung-cancer risk.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Radon Only

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants viewed health information detailing the risks of developing lung cancer from radon exposure. No information about the risks for developing lung cancer associated with smoking or its synergistic effect with radon exposure are included.

Study 2: Radon and Smoking Isolated

Participants viewed a radon-and-smoking-isolated message that covered the individual effects of radon and of smoking on lung cancer, but without mentioning their synergistic effect.

Group Type OTHER

Radon and Smoking Isolated

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants viewed health information detailing the risks of developing lung cancer from radon exposure and smoking. No information describing the synergistic effects of smoking and radon exposure on lung cancer risk are included.

Study 2: Radon & Smoking Synergistic

Participants viewed a radon-and-smoking-synergistic message that covered the individual effects of radon and of smoking but that also included information about their synergistic effect.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Radon & Smoking Synergistic

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants viewed health information detailing the risks of developing lung cancer from exposure to radon gas, smoking, and their synergistic effects. This intervention represents the type of information most commonly presented in radon risk communications.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Radon & Smoking Synergistic

Participants viewed health information detailing the risks of developing lung cancer from exposure to radon gas, smoking, and their synergistic effects. This intervention represents the type of information most commonly presented in radon risk communications.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Radon Only

Participants viewed health information detailing the risks of developing lung cancer from radon exposure. No information about the risks for developing lung cancer associated with smoking or its synergistic effect with radon exposure are included.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Radon and Smoking Isolated

Participants viewed health information detailing the risks of developing lung cancer from radon exposure and smoking. No information describing the synergistic effects of smoking and radon exposure on lung cancer risk are included.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

EPA

Health information modeled after the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) pamphlet on radon risk.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Idaho

Health information modeled after the Idaho Department of Health and Human Welfare's pamphlet on radon risk.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Live within the US
* Have an Amazon Mechanical Turk account (website where online study was posted)

Exclusion Criteria

* None
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Paul Windschitl

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Paul Windschitl

Professor

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

201507727

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Motivating Change in Aging Smokers
NCT05194917 COMPLETED NA