Anaesthesiological Involvement in Postoperative Pain Treatment

NCT ID: NCT03496194

Last Updated: 2021-11-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

42 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-04-13

Study Completion Date

2018-06-06

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study aims to investigate the current organization and management of postoperative pain in Denmark, especially for invasive pain treatment modalities (epidural infusions, PCA and regional blocks), in a national survey covering the activities in Danish Hospitals.

This study is an electronic questionnaire survey, that aim to describe and map the foundation for future developments within, and improvement of, postoperative pain management.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Postoperative pain is one of the major challenges in postoperative care and several studies continue to demonstrate that postoperative pain is generally undertreated. A key focus for postoperative pain is to identify gold standards within procedure-specific pain treatment. However, results from single randomized trials do not per se lead to better treatment, as this requires both efforts within implementation of best evidence, quality control of efficacy, including efficacy on the individual level, and education of staff and physicians.

It has been suggested, that a way forward must include changes at the organizational level. For basic postoperative pain treatment, the major responsibility for planning and execution often rests on the surgical departments. For invasive pain treatment methods, e.g. epidural analgesia with continual infusion, patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA), patient controlled analgesia (PCA), and regional blocks, both single and continuing, this treatment is instituted at the departments of anaesthesia, but the responsibility for follow up is rarely described.

Generally, epidural analgesia is widely recommended because of superior benefits in reducing postoperative pain, pulmonal complications and surgical stress, as compared to systemic opioid treatment. However, epidural analgesia is not without complications especially not for abdominal and thoracic surgery. The accompanying unwanted motor blockade may delay recovery and recent studies question this treatment. Likewise, up to 20 % percent of patients will not receive adequate analgesia for the first 48 hours postoperative with this method. Finally, it is possible, that adverse effects and complications from epidural treatment are currently being underestimated, due to lack of routine monitoring and missing protocols.

Besides epidural analgesia, the use of Patient controlled analgesia (PCA), Patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) and regional blocks have gained ground the last decades. With these techniques it might be possible to reduce overall opioid requirements. Nevertheless, a daily evaluation of benefits and harms of such analgesic techniques may be required to justify these treatment modalities. It is suggested, that regularly monitoring of invasive analgesic methods is of great concern when it comes to optimal postoperative pain management and reduction of adverse effects.

A structured organizational approach has the potential to improve benefit and harm of postoperative pain management. A number of studies argues that in order to obtain optimal postoperative pain treatment there need to be regular monitoring, and optimization of the analgesic regimens and techniques, preferably in a clinical setting with either an Acute Pain Service (APS) or a similar setup. With the decline of the use of APS's in Denmark it seems that the organization and management around postoperative pain treatment in general, and for invasive pain treatment methods in particular, needs to be investigated. As of today, it is not known how patients with such pain treatment are monitored and taken care of after leaving the post anaesthesia care unit, and where the responsibility for this pain treatment lies

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain, Postoperative Anesthesia Epidural Analgesia Acute Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Head of Post Anaesthesia Care Unit

The chief physician of PACUs at all Danish Anaesthesia departments will receive electronic survey on postoperative pain treatment

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All departments of anesthesia with a PACU in Denmark

Exclusion Criteria

* PACUs as part of day case surgery will be excluded
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Zealand University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Laura S Kruuse, Med.Student

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Centre for Anaesthesiological research (CAR)

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Centre for Anaesthesiological Research (CAR)

Køge, , Denmark

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Apfelbaum JL, Chen C, Mehta SS, Gan TJ. Postoperative pain experience: results from a national survey suggest postoperative pain continues to be undermanaged. Anesth Analg. 2003 Aug;97(2):534-540. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000068822.10113.9E.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12873949 (View on PubMed)

Mathiesen O, Thomsen BA, Kitter B, Dahl JB, Kehlet H. Need for improved treatment of postoperative pain. Dan Med J. 2012 Apr;59(4):A4401.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22459715 (View on PubMed)

White PF, Kehlet H. Improving postoperative pain management: what are the unresolved issues? Anesthesiology. 2010 Jan;112(1):220-5. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181c6316e. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20010418 (View on PubMed)

Ready LB, Oden R, Chadwick HS, Benedetti C, Rooke GA, Caplan R, Wild LM. Development of an anesthesiology-based postoperative pain management service. Anesthesiology. 1988 Jan;68(1):100-6. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198801000-00016. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 3337359 (View on PubMed)

Nielsen PR, Christensen PA, Meyhoff CS, Werner MU. Post-operative pain treatment in Denmark from 2000 to 2009: a nationwide sequential survey on organizational aspects. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012 Jul;56(6):686-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2012.02662.x. Epub 2012 Mar 5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22385392 (View on PubMed)

Rawal N. Current issues in postoperative pain management. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2016 Mar;33(3):160-71. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000366.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26509324 (View on PubMed)

Rawal N. Epidural technique for postoperative pain: gold standard no more? Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2012 May-Jun;37(3):310-7. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e31825735c6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22531384 (View on PubMed)

Burstal R, Wegener F, Hayes C, Lantry G. Epidural analgesia: prospective audit of 1062 patients. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1998 Apr;26(2):165-72. doi: 10.1177/0310057X9802600206.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9564395 (View on PubMed)

Breivik H, Norum HM. [Regional analgesia--risks and benefits]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2010 Feb 25;130(4):392-7. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.08.0220. Norwegian.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20220867 (View on PubMed)

Golster M. Seven years of patient-controlled epidural analgesia in a Swedish hospital: a prospective survey. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2014 Nov;31(11):589-96. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000105.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24922048 (View on PubMed)

Duncan F. Prospective observational study of postoperative epidural analgesia for major abdominal surgery. J Clin Nurs. 2011 Jul;20(13-14):1870-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03752.x. Epub 2011 May 25.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21615577 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ZUH

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id