Trial Outcomes & Findings for Trial of a Chikungunya Vaccine, PXVX0317 CHIKV-VLP, in Healthy Adults (NCT NCT03483961)
NCT ID: NCT03483961
Last Updated: 2023-07-03
Results Overview
To assess the induction of anti-chikungunya virus (CHIKV) neutralizing antibody geometric mean titers by different formulations and schedules, as measured at 28 days after the last injection (Day 57) for Groups 2-8.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
445 participants
Day 57 (from Day 1 vaccination), 28 days after the last injection.
2023-07-03
Participant Flow
Participants were recruited at 3 U.S. sites.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Group 1: 20 mcg/Unadjuvant (Day 1 & 29)
20 mcg CHIKV VLP/unadjuvanted (Day 1) // Placebo (Day 15) // 20 mcg CHIKV VLP/unadjuvanted (Day 29)
CHIKV VLP/unadjuvanted: Vaccine consists of virus-like particles of chikungunya virus antigens
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 2: 6 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 1 & 29)
6 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 1) // Placebo (Day 15) // 6 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29)
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 3: 10 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 1 & 29)
10 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 1) // Placebo (Day 15) // 10 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29)
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 4: 20mcg/Adjuvant(Day 1 & 29);40mcg/Adjuvant (Day 547)
20 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 1) // Placebo (Day 15) // 20 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29) // 40 mcg CHIKV (Day 547)
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 5: 6 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 15 & 29)
Placebo (Day 1) // 6 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 15) // 6 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29)
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 6: 10 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 15 & 29)
Placebo (Day 1) // 10 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 15) // 10 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29)
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 7: 20 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 15 & 29)
Placebo (Day 1) // 20 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 15) // 20 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29)
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 8: 40 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 29)
Placebo (Day 1) // Placebo (Day 15) // 40 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29)
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 9: 20 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 1 & 29)
20 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 1) // 20 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29). This group will also have plasmapheresis performed on Day 57 and Leukapheresis on Day 182
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
|
Group 10: 40 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 1)
40 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 1). This group will also have plasmapheresis performed on Day 22.
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
53
|
52
|
51
|
50
|
53
|
53
|
51
|
52
|
20
|
10
|
|
Overall Study
Exposed / Safety
|
53
|
52
|
50
|
51
|
53
|
53
|
51
|
52
|
20
|
10
|
|
Overall Study
Immunogenicity-evaluable
|
47
|
44
|
44
|
45
|
48
|
48
|
47
|
50
|
20
|
10
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
42
|
42
|
39
|
41
|
43
|
47
|
46
|
39
|
18
|
10
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
11
|
10
|
12
|
9
|
10
|
6
|
5
|
13
|
2
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Group 1: 20 mcg/Unadjuvant (Day 1 & 29)
20 mcg CHIKV VLP/unadjuvanted (Day 1) // Placebo (Day 15) // 20 mcg CHIKV VLP/unadjuvanted (Day 29)
CHIKV VLP/unadjuvanted: Vaccine consists of virus-like particles of chikungunya virus antigens
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 2: 6 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 1 & 29)
6 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 1) // Placebo (Day 15) // 6 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29)
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 3: 10 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 1 & 29)
10 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 1) // Placebo (Day 15) // 10 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29)
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 4: 20mcg/Adjuvant(Day 1 & 29);40mcg/Adjuvant (Day 547)
20 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 1) // Placebo (Day 15) // 20 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29) // 40 mcg CHIKV (Day 547)
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 5: 6 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 15 & 29)
Placebo (Day 1) // 6 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 15) // 6 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29)
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 6: 10 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 15 & 29)
Placebo (Day 1) // 10 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 15) // 10 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29)
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 7: 20 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 15 & 29)
Placebo (Day 1) // 20 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 15) // 20 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29)
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 8: 40 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 29)
Placebo (Day 1) // Placebo (Day 15) // 40 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29)
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 9: 20 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 1 & 29)
20 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 1) // 20 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29). This group will also have plasmapheresis performed on Day 57 and Leukapheresis on Day 182
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
|
Group 10: 40 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 1)
40 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 1). This group will also have plasmapheresis performed on Day 22.
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
7
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
4
|
4
|
11
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
3
|
4
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Other than AE, death, PI decision, LTFU, noncompliance, study terminated, or withdrawal of consent
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Immunogenicity-evaluable: Exposed participants as treated per protocol (no major protocol deviation or exclusion reason prior to unblinding, all doses received, no prohibited medication, and evaluable serum samples within required time frames).
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Group 1: 20 mcg/Unadjuvant (Day 1 & 29)
n=53 Participants
20 mcg CHIKV VLP/unadjuvanted (Day 1) // Placebo (Day 15) // 20 mcg CHIKV VLP/unadjuvanted (Day 29)
CHIKV VLP/unadjuvanted: Vaccine consists of virus-like particles of chikungunya virus antigens
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 2: 6 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 1 & 29)
n=52 Participants
6 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 1) // Placebo (Day 15) // 6 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29)
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 3: 10 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 1 & 29)
n=51 Participants
10 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 1) // Placebo (Day 15) // 10 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29)
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 4: 20mcg/Adjuvant(Day 1 & 29);40mcg/Adjuvant (Day 547)
n=50 Participants
20 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 1) // Placebo (Day 15) // 20 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29) // 40 mcg CHIKV (Day 547)
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 5: 6 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 15 & 29)
n=53 Participants
Placebo (Day 1) // 6 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 15) // 6 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29)
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 6: 10 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 15 & 29)
n=53 Participants
Placebo (Day 1) // 10 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 15) // 10 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29)
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 7: 20 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 15 & 29)
n=51 Participants
Placebo (Day 1) // 20 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 15) // 20 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29)
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 8: 40 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 29)
n=52 Participants
Placebo (Day 1) // Placebo (Day 15) // 40 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29)
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 9: 20 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 1 & 29)
n=20 Participants
20 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 1) // 20 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29). This group will also have plasmapheresis performed on Day 57 and Leukapheresis on Day 182
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
|
Group 10: 40 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 1)
n=10 Participants
40 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 1). This group will also have plasmapheresis performed on Day 22.
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
|
Total
n=445 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
3 Participants
n=53 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=52 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=51 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=53 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=53 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=51 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=52 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=445 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
50 Participants
n=53 Participants
|
51 Participants
n=52 Participants
|
51 Participants
n=51 Participants
|
50 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
53 Participants
n=53 Participants
|
52 Participants
n=53 Participants
|
51 Participants
n=51 Participants
|
52 Participants
n=52 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
440 Participants
n=445 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=53 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=52 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=51 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=53 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=53 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=51 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=52 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=445 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
30.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.22 • n=53 Participants
|
31.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.26 • n=52 Participants
|
31.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.64 • n=51 Participants
|
33.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.53 • n=50 Participants
|
30.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.72 • n=53 Participants
|
32.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.53 • n=53 Participants
|
32.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.78 • n=51 Participants
|
31.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.82 • n=52 Participants
|
27.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.58 • n=20 Participants
|
29.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.65 • n=10 Participants
|
31.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.86 • n=445 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
30 Participants
n=53 Participants
|
30 Participants
n=52 Participants
|
37 Participants
n=51 Participants
|
32 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
38 Participants
n=53 Participants
|
29 Participants
n=53 Participants
|
27 Participants
n=51 Participants
|
26 Participants
n=52 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
259 Participants
n=445 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
23 Participants
n=53 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=52 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=51 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=53 Participants
|
24 Participants
n=53 Participants
|
24 Participants
n=51 Participants
|
26 Participants
n=52 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
186 Participants
n=445 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
3 Participants
n=53 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=52 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=51 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=53 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=53 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=51 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=52 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
35 Participants
n=445 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
50 Participants
n=53 Participants
|
48 Participants
n=52 Participants
|
47 Participants
n=51 Participants
|
47 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
49 Participants
n=53 Participants
|
45 Participants
n=53 Participants
|
49 Participants
n=51 Participants
|
48 Participants
n=52 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
410 Participants
n=445 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=53 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=52 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=51 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=53 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=53 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=51 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=52 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=445 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=53 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=52 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=51 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=53 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=53 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=51 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=52 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=445 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=53 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=52 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=51 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=53 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=53 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=51 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=52 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=445 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=53 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=52 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=51 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=53 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=53 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=51 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=52 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=445 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
10 Participants
n=53 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=52 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=51 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=53 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=53 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=51 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=52 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
104 Participants
n=445 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
43 Participants
n=53 Participants
|
40 Participants
n=52 Participants
|
36 Participants
n=51 Participants
|
35 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
36 Participants
n=53 Participants
|
40 Participants
n=53 Participants
|
34 Participants
n=51 Participants
|
41 Participants
n=52 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
320 Participants
n=445 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=53 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=52 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=51 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=53 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=53 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=51 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=52 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=445 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=53 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=52 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=51 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=50 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=53 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=53 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=51 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=52 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=445 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
53 participants
n=53 Participants
|
52 participants
n=52 Participants
|
51 participants
n=51 Participants
|
50 participants
n=50 Participants
|
53 participants
n=53 Participants
|
53 participants
n=53 Participants
|
51 participants
n=51 Participants
|
52 participants
n=52 Participants
|
20 participants
n=20 Participants
|
10 participants
n=10 Participants
|
445 participants
n=445 Participants
|
|
Day 1 predose (baseline) geometric mean anti-chikungunya luciferase neutralizing antibody titer.
|
7.5 titer
n=47 Participants • Immunogenicity-evaluable: Exposed participants as treated per protocol (no major protocol deviation or exclusion reason prior to unblinding, all doses received, no prohibited medication, and evaluable serum samples within required time frames).
|
7.5 titer
n=44 Participants • Immunogenicity-evaluable: Exposed participants as treated per protocol (no major protocol deviation or exclusion reason prior to unblinding, all doses received, no prohibited medication, and evaluable serum samples within required time frames).
|
7.5 titer
n=44 Participants • Immunogenicity-evaluable: Exposed participants as treated per protocol (no major protocol deviation or exclusion reason prior to unblinding, all doses received, no prohibited medication, and evaluable serum samples within required time frames).
|
7.5 titer
n=45 Participants • Immunogenicity-evaluable: Exposed participants as treated per protocol (no major protocol deviation or exclusion reason prior to unblinding, all doses received, no prohibited medication, and evaluable serum samples within required time frames).
|
7.8 titer
n=48 Participants • Immunogenicity-evaluable: Exposed participants as treated per protocol (no major protocol deviation or exclusion reason prior to unblinding, all doses received, no prohibited medication, and evaluable serum samples within required time frames).
|
7.5 titer
n=48 Participants • Immunogenicity-evaluable: Exposed participants as treated per protocol (no major protocol deviation or exclusion reason prior to unblinding, all doses received, no prohibited medication, and evaluable serum samples within required time frames).
|
7.5 titer
n=47 Participants • Immunogenicity-evaluable: Exposed participants as treated per protocol (no major protocol deviation or exclusion reason prior to unblinding, all doses received, no prohibited medication, and evaluable serum samples within required time frames).
|
7.5 titer
n=50 Participants • Immunogenicity-evaluable: Exposed participants as treated per protocol (no major protocol deviation or exclusion reason prior to unblinding, all doses received, no prohibited medication, and evaluable serum samples within required time frames).
|
8.6 titer
n=20 Participants • Immunogenicity-evaluable: Exposed participants as treated per protocol (no major protocol deviation or exclusion reason prior to unblinding, all doses received, no prohibited medication, and evaluable serum samples within required time frames).
|
9.0 titer
n=10 Participants • Immunogenicity-evaluable: Exposed participants as treated per protocol (no major protocol deviation or exclusion reason prior to unblinding, all doses received, no prohibited medication, and evaluable serum samples within required time frames).
|
7.6 titer
n=403 Participants • Immunogenicity-evaluable: Exposed participants as treated per protocol (no major protocol deviation or exclusion reason prior to unblinding, all doses received, no prohibited medication, and evaluable serum samples within required time frames).
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 57 (from Day 1 vaccination), 28 days after the last injection.Population: Immunogenicity-evaluable: Exposed participants as treated per protocol (no major protocol deviation or exclusion reason prior to unblinding, all doses received, no prohibited medication, and evaluable serum samples within required time frames).
To assess the induction of anti-chikungunya virus (CHIKV) neutralizing antibody geometric mean titers by different formulations and schedules, as measured at 28 days after the last injection (Day 57) for Groups 2-8.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 1: 20 mcg/Unadjuvant (Day 1 & 29)
n=47 Participants
20 mcg CHIKV VLP/unadjuvanted (Day 1) // Placebo (Day 15) // 20 mcg CHIKV VLP/unadjuvanted (Day 29)
CHIKV VLP/unadjuvanted: Vaccine consists of virus-like particles of chikungunya virus antigens
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 2: 6 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 1 & 29)
n=44 Participants
6 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 1) // Placebo (Day 15) // 6 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29)
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 3: 10 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 1 & 29)
n=44 Participants
10 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 1) // Placebo (Day 15) // 10 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29)
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 4: 20mcg/Adjuvant(Day 1 & 29);40mcg/Adjuvant (Day 547)
n=45 Participants
20 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 1) // Placebo (Day 15) // 20 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29) // 40 mcg CHIKV (Day 547)
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 5: 6 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 15 & 29)
n=48 Participants
Placebo (Day 1) // 6 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 15) // 6 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29)
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 6: 10 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 15 & 29)
n=48 Participants
Placebo (Day 1) // 10 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 15) // 10 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29)
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 7: 20 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 15 & 29)
n=47 Participants
Placebo (Day 1) // 20 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 15) // 20 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29)
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 8: 40 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 29)
n=50 Participants
Placebo (Day 1) // Placebo (Day 15) // 40 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29)
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Anti-CHIKV Neutralizing Antibody Geometric Mean Titer 28 Days After the Last Injection for Groups 2-8.
|
2057.0 titer
Interval 1584.8 to 2670.0
|
1116.2 titer
Interval 852.5 to 1461.4
|
1465.3 titer
Interval 1119.1 to 1918.4
|
2023.8 titer
Interval 1550.5 to 2641.7
|
920.1 titer
Interval 710.9 to 1190.9
|
1206.9 titer
Interval 932.4 to 1562.2
|
1562.8 titer
Interval 1204.1 to 2028.3
|
1712.5 titer
Interval 1330.0 to 2205.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, and 57.Population: Immunogenicity-evaluable: Exposed participants as treated per protocol (no major protocol deviation or exclusion reason prior to unblinding, all doses received, no prohibited medication, and evaluable serum samples within required time frames).
To describe the kinetics of induction of anti-CHIKV neutralizing antibody geometric mean titers by different formulations and schedules for Groups 2-8.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 1: 20 mcg/Unadjuvant (Day 1 & 29)
n=47 Participants
20 mcg CHIKV VLP/unadjuvanted (Day 1) // Placebo (Day 15) // 20 mcg CHIKV VLP/unadjuvanted (Day 29)
CHIKV VLP/unadjuvanted: Vaccine consists of virus-like particles of chikungunya virus antigens
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 2: 6 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 1 & 29)
n=44 Participants
6 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 1) // Placebo (Day 15) // 6 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29)
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 3: 10 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 1 & 29)
n=44 Participants
10 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 1) // Placebo (Day 15) // 10 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29)
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 4: 20mcg/Adjuvant(Day 1 & 29);40mcg/Adjuvant (Day 547)
n=45 Participants
20 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 1) // Placebo (Day 15) // 20 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29) // 40 mcg CHIKV (Day 547)
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 5: 6 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 15 & 29)
n=48 Participants
Placebo (Day 1) // 6 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 15) // 6 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29)
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 6: 10 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 15 & 29)
n=48 Participants
Placebo (Day 1) // 10 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 15) // 10 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29)
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 7: 20 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 15 & 29)
n=47 Participants
Placebo (Day 1) // 20 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 15) // 20 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29)
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 8: 40 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 29)
n=50 Participants
Placebo (Day 1) // Placebo (Day 15) // 40 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29)
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kinetics of Anti-chikungunya Virus (CHIKV) Neutralizing Antibody Geometric Mean Titer for Groups 2-8.
Day 8
|
70.6 titer
Interval 53.2 to 93.7
|
34.3 titer
Interval 25.6 to 46.1
|
72.6 titer
Interval 54.2 to 97.2
|
117.6 titer
Interval 87.8 to 157.4
|
8.4 titer
Interval 6.3 to 11.1
|
7.5 titer
Interval 5.7 to 10.0
|
7.5 titer
Interval 5.7 to 10.0
|
7.5 titer
Interval 5.7 to 9.9
|
|
Kinetics of Anti-chikungunya Virus (CHIKV) Neutralizing Antibody Geometric Mean Titer for Groups 2-8.
Day 15
|
419.3 titer
Interval 323.6 to 543.4
|
189.4 titer
Interval 144.9 to 247.6
|
530.2 titer
Interval 405.6 to 693.0
|
912.7 titer
Interval 700.4 to 1189.5
|
7.7 titer
Interval 6.0 to 10.0
|
7.5 titer
Interval 5.8 to 9.7
|
7.7 titer
Interval 5.9 to 9.9
|
7.5 titer
Interval 5.8 to 9.6
|
|
Kinetics of Anti-chikungunya Virus (CHIKV) Neutralizing Antibody Geometric Mean Titer for Groups 2-8.
Day 22
|
691.5 titer
Interval 499.2 to 957.9
|
351.3 titer
Interval 250.9 to 492.0
|
1400.2 titer
Interval 999.9 to 1960.8
|
2198.1 titer
Interval 1575.6 to 3066.5
|
46.4 titer
Interval 33.6 to 64.1
|
63.1 titer
Interval 45.7 to 87.1
|
119.0 titer
Interval 85.9 to 164.9
|
7.5 titer
Interval 5.5 to 10.3
|
|
Kinetics of Anti-chikungunya Virus (CHIKV) Neutralizing Antibody Geometric Mean Titer for Groups 2-8.
Day 29
|
417.2 titer
Interval 305.4 to 570.0
|
277.3 titer
Interval 200.9 to 382.8
|
890.5 titer
Interval 645.1 to 1229.2
|
1238.1 titer
Interval 900.2 to 1702.9
|
258.0 titer
Interval 189.5 to 351.3
|
328.8 titer
Interval 241.5 to 447.6
|
886.2 titer
Interval 648.7 to 1210.5
|
8.2 titer
Interval 6.0 to 11.0
|
|
Kinetics of Anti-chikungunya Virus (CHIKV) Neutralizing Antibody Geometric Mean Titer for Groups 2-8.
Day 36
|
3442.8 titer
Interval 2533.9 to 4677.8
|
1675.8 titer
Interval 1220.9 to 2300.2
|
2772.4 titer
Interval 2019.8 to 3805.4
|
3435.0 titer
Interval 2511.4 to 4698.1
|
1327.7 titer
Interval 980.4 to 1797.9
|
2155.4 titer
Interval 1591.6 to 2919.0
|
3609.0 titer
Interval 2647.7 to 4919.3
|
157.9 titer
Interval 117.3 to 212.6
|
|
Kinetics of Anti-chikungunya Virus (CHIKV) Neutralizing Antibody Geometric Mean Titer for Groups 2-8.
Day 57
|
2057.0 titer
Interval 1584.8 to 2670.0
|
1116.2 titer
Interval 852.5 to 1461.4
|
1465.3 titer
Interval 1119.1 to 1918.4
|
2023.8 titer
Interval 1550.5 to 2641.7
|
920.1 titer
Interval 710.9 to 1190.9
|
1206.9 titer
Interval 932.4 to 1562.2
|
1562.8 titer
Interval 1204.1 to 2028.3
|
1712.5 titer
Interval 1330.0 to 2205.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Days 182, 365, 547, and 760.Population: Immunogenicity-evaluable: Exposed participants as treated per protocol (no major protocol deviation or exclusion reason prior to unblinding, all doses received, no prohibited medication, and evaluable serum samples within required time frames).
To assess differences in persistence of neutralizing antibody geometric mean titers induced by different formulations and schedules, as measured up to 731 days after the last injection (Day 760) relative to earlier time points for Groups 2-8.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 1: 20 mcg/Unadjuvant (Day 1 & 29)
n=47 Participants
20 mcg CHIKV VLP/unadjuvanted (Day 1) // Placebo (Day 15) // 20 mcg CHIKV VLP/unadjuvanted (Day 29)
CHIKV VLP/unadjuvanted: Vaccine consists of virus-like particles of chikungunya virus antigens
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 2: 6 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 1 & 29)
n=44 Participants
6 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 1) // Placebo (Day 15) // 6 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29)
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 3: 10 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 1 & 29)
n=44 Participants
10 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 1) // Placebo (Day 15) // 10 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29)
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 4: 20mcg/Adjuvant(Day 1 & 29);40mcg/Adjuvant (Day 547)
n=45 Participants
20 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 1) // Placebo (Day 15) // 20 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29) // 40 mcg CHIKV (Day 547)
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 5: 6 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 15 & 29)
n=48 Participants
Placebo (Day 1) // 6 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 15) // 6 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29)
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 6: 10 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 15 & 29)
n=48 Participants
Placebo (Day 1) // 10 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 15) // 10 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29)
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 7: 20 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 15 & 29)
n=47 Participants
Placebo (Day 1) // 20 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 15) // 20 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29)
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 8: 40 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 29)
n=50 Participants
Placebo (Day 1) // Placebo (Day 15) // 40 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29)
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Differences in Persistence of Neutralizing Antibody Geometric Mean Titer for Groups 2-8.
Day 182
|
345.1 titer
Interval 258.1 to 461.3
|
209.0 titer
Interval 153.1 to 285.2
|
358.4 titer
Interval 261.6 to 491.2
|
486.6 titer
Interval 360.5 to 656.9
|
253.4 titer
Interval 188.4 to 340.9
|
303 titer
Interval 226.7 to 405.0
|
388.1 titer
Interval 291.3 to 517.1
|
505.7 titer
Interval 380.7 to 671.8
|
|
Differences in Persistence of Neutralizing Antibody Geometric Mean Titer for Groups 2-8.
Day 365
|
243.4 titer
Interval 176.8 to 334.9
|
137.5 titer
Interval 98.3 to 192.3
|
226.7 titer
Interval 160.6 to 320.0
|
336.6 titer
Interval 244.6 to 463.2
|
195.2 titer
Interval 141.3 to 269.6
|
246.9 titer
Interval 180.1 to 338.4
|
302.0 titer
Interval 220.3 to 414.0
|
491.7 titer
Interval 362.5 to 667.0
|
|
Differences in Persistence of Neutralizing Antibody Geometric Mean Titer for Groups 2-8.
Day 547
|
169.2 titer
Interval 126.2 to 226.8
|
NA titer
Follow-up to Day 365 in this group.
|
NA titer
Follow-up to Day 365 in this group.
|
215.7 titer
Interval 160.9 to 289.1
|
NA titer
Follow-up to Day 365 in this group.
|
NA titer
Follow-up to Day 365 in this group.
|
NA titer
Follow-up to Day 365 in this group.
|
297.9 titer
Interval 221.4 to 400.8
|
|
Differences in Persistence of Neutralizing Antibody Geometric Mean Titer for Groups 2-8.
Day 760
|
169.8 titer
Interval 122.4 to 235.5
|
NA titer
Follow-up to Day 365 in this group.
|
NA titer
Follow-up to Day 365 in this group.
|
5365.1 titer
Interval 3853.2 to 7470.1
|
NA titer
Follow-up to Day 365 in this group.
|
NA titer
Follow-up to Day 365 in this group.
|
NA titer
Follow-up to Day 365 in this group.
|
279.7 titer
Interval 200.1 to 391.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Antibody levels will be measured at Day 547 prior to the booster dose and again 28 days later on Day 575 and then at Day 760.Population: Immunogenicity-evaluable: Exposed participants as treated per protocol (no major protocol deviation or exclusion reason prior to unblinding, all doses received, no prohibited medication, and evaluable serum samples within required time frames).
To assess the effect of a booster dose of PXVX0317 on neutralizing antibody geometric mean titers when given at Day 547 for Group 4 only. Antibody levels will be measured at Day 547 prior to the booster dose and again 28 days later on Day 575 and then at Day 760.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 1: 20 mcg/Unadjuvant (Day 1 & 29)
n=47 Participants
20 mcg CHIKV VLP/unadjuvanted (Day 1) // Placebo (Day 15) // 20 mcg CHIKV VLP/unadjuvanted (Day 29)
CHIKV VLP/unadjuvanted: Vaccine consists of virus-like particles of chikungunya virus antigens
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 2: 6 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 1 & 29)
6 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 1) // Placebo (Day 15) // 6 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29)
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 3: 10 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 1 & 29)
10 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 1) // Placebo (Day 15) // 10 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29)
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 4: 20mcg/Adjuvant(Day 1 & 29);40mcg/Adjuvant (Day 547)
20 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 1) // Placebo (Day 15) // 20 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29) // 40 mcg CHIKV (Day 547)
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 5: 6 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 15 & 29)
Placebo (Day 1) // 6 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 15) // 6 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29)
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 6: 10 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 15 & 29)
Placebo (Day 1) // 10 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 15) // 10 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29)
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 7: 20 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 15 & 29)
Placebo (Day 1) // 20 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 15) // 20 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29)
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 8: 40 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 29)
Placebo (Day 1) // Placebo (Day 15) // 40 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29)
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Boosting of Vaccine-induced Neutralizing Antibody Geometric Mean Titer by a Booster Dose of PXVX0317 for Group 4 Only.
Day 547 (pre-boost)
|
223.6 titer
Interval 166.7 to 299.9
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Boosting of Vaccine-induced Neutralizing Antibody Geometric Mean Titer by a Booster Dose of PXVX0317 for Group 4 Only.
Day 575 (post-boost)
|
12325.8 titer
Interval 8951.4 to 16972.4
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Boosting of Vaccine-induced Neutralizing Antibody Geometric Mean Titer by a Booster Dose of PXVX0317 for Group 4 Only.
Day 760 (post-boost)
|
5874.2 titer
Interval 4269.4 to 8082.3
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 57 (from Day 1 vaccination), 28 days after the last injection.Population: Immunogenicity-evaluable: Exposed participants as treated per protocol (no major protocol deviation or exclusion reason prior to unblinding, all doses received, no prohibited medication, and evaluable serum samples within required time frames).
Percentage of participants with an anti-CHIKV neutralizing antibody titer exceeding the following cutoff values: ≥15, 40, 160, 640, and 4-fold rise over baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 1: 20 mcg/Unadjuvant (Day 1 & 29)
n=47 Participants
20 mcg CHIKV VLP/unadjuvanted (Day 1) // Placebo (Day 15) // 20 mcg CHIKV VLP/unadjuvanted (Day 29)
CHIKV VLP/unadjuvanted: Vaccine consists of virus-like particles of chikungunya virus antigens
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 2: 6 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 1 & 29)
n=44 Participants
6 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 1) // Placebo (Day 15) // 6 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29)
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 3: 10 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 1 & 29)
n=44 Participants
10 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 1) // Placebo (Day 15) // 10 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29)
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 4: 20mcg/Adjuvant(Day 1 & 29);40mcg/Adjuvant (Day 547)
n=45 Participants
20 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 1) // Placebo (Day 15) // 20 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29) // 40 mcg CHIKV (Day 547)
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 5: 6 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 15 & 29)
n=48 Participants
Placebo (Day 1) // 6 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 15) // 6 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29)
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 6: 10 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 15 & 29)
n=48 Participants
Placebo (Day 1) // 10 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 15) // 10 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29)
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 7: 20 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 15 & 29)
n=47 Participants
Placebo (Day 1) // 20 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 15) // 20 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29)
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 8: 40 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 29)
n=50 Participants
Placebo (Day 1) // Placebo (Day 15) // 40 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29)
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With an Anti-CHIKV Neutralizing Antibody Titer Exceeding the Following Cutoff Values: ≥15, 40, 160, 640, and 4-fold Rise Over Baseline.
Titer at or above 15
|
47 Participants
|
44 Participants
|
44 Participants
|
45 Participants
|
48 Participants
|
48 Participants
|
47 Participants
|
50 Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With an Anti-CHIKV Neutralizing Antibody Titer Exceeding the Following Cutoff Values: ≥15, 40, 160, 640, and 4-fold Rise Over Baseline.
Titer at or above 40
|
47 Participants
|
44 Participants
|
43 Participants
|
45 Participants
|
48 Participants
|
48 Participants
|
47 Participants
|
50 Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With an Anti-CHIKV Neutralizing Antibody Titer Exceeding the Following Cutoff Values: ≥15, 40, 160, 640, and 4-fold Rise Over Baseline.
Titer at or above 160
|
47 Participants
|
42 Participants
|
43 Participants
|
45 Participants
|
47 Participants
|
48 Participants
|
46 Participants
|
50 Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With an Anti-CHIKV Neutralizing Antibody Titer Exceeding the Following Cutoff Values: ≥15, 40, 160, 640, and 4-fold Rise Over Baseline.
Titer at or above 640
|
43 Participants
|
32 Participants
|
41 Participants
|
43 Participants
|
29 Participants
|
40 Participants
|
41 Participants
|
44 Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With an Anti-CHIKV Neutralizing Antibody Titer Exceeding the Following Cutoff Values: ≥15, 40, 160, 640, and 4-fold Rise Over Baseline.
Titer at or above 4-fold rise over baseline
|
47 Participants
|
44 Participants
|
43 Participants
|
45 Participants
|
48 Participants
|
48 Participants
|
47 Participants
|
50 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Group 1: 20 mcg/Unadjuvant (Day 1 & 29)
Group 2: 6 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 1 & 29)
Group 3: 10 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 1 & 29)
Group 4: 20mcg/Adjuvant(Day 1 & 29);40mcg/Adjuvant (Day 547)
Group 5: 6 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 15 & 29)
Group 6: 10 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 15 & 29)
Group 7: 20 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 15 & 29)
Group 8: 40 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 29)
Group 9: 20 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 1 & 29)
Group 10: 40 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 1)
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Group 1: 20 mcg/Unadjuvant (Day 1 & 29)
n=53 participants at risk
20 mcg CHIKV VLP/unadjuvanted (Day 1) // Placebo (Day 15) // 20 mcg CHIKV VLP/unadjuvanted (Day 29)
CHIKV VLP/unadjuvanted: Vaccine consists of virus-like particles of chikungunya virus antigens
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 2: 6 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 1 & 29)
n=52 participants at risk
6 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 1) // Placebo (Day 15) // 6 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29)
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 3: 10 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 1 & 29)
n=50 participants at risk
10 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 1) // Placebo (Day 15) // 10 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29)
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 4: 20mcg/Adjuvant(Day 1 & 29);40mcg/Adjuvant (Day 547)
n=51 participants at risk
20 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 1) // Placebo (Day 15) // 20 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29) // 40 mcg CHIKV (Day 547)
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 5: 6 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 15 & 29)
n=53 participants at risk
Placebo (Day 1) // 6 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 15) // 6 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29)
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 6: 10 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 15 & 29)
n=53 participants at risk
Placebo (Day 1) // 10 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 15) // 10 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29)
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 7: 20 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 15 & 29)
n=51 participants at risk
Placebo (Day 1) // 20 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 15) // 20 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29)
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 8: 40 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 29)
n=52 participants at risk
Placebo (Day 1) // Placebo (Day 15) // 40 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29)
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 9: 20 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 1 & 29)
n=20 participants at risk
20 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 1) // 20 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29). This group will also have plasmapheresis performed on Day 57 and Leukapheresis on Day 182
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
|
Group 10: 40 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 1)
n=10 participants at risk
40 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 1). This group will also have plasmapheresis performed on Day 22.
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Biliary dyskinesia
|
0.00%
0/53 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/52 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/51 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/53 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/53 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/51 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
1.9%
1/52 • Number of events 1 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/10 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Anaphylactic reaction
|
0.00%
0/53 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/52 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Number of events 1 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/51 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/53 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/53 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/51 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/52 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/10 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Appendicitis
|
0.00%
0/53 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/52 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/51 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/53 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/53 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/51 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
1.9%
1/52 • Number of events 1 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/10 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
0.00%
0/53 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/52 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/51 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/53 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/53 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
2.0%
1/51 • Number of events 1 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/52 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/10 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.00%
0/53 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/52 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/51 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/53 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/53 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/51 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
1.9%
1/52 • Number of events 1 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/10 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Induced abortion haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/53 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
1.9%
1/52 • Number of events 1 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/51 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/53 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/53 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/51 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/52 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/10 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Laryngeal injury
|
0.00%
0/53 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/52 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
2.0%
1/51 • Number of events 1 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/53 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/53 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/51 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/52 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/10 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Road traffic accident
|
0.00%
0/53 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/52 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Number of events 1 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/51 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/53 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/53 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/51 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/52 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/10 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
|
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
Hyperemesis gravidarum
|
0.00%
0/53 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/52 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/51 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/53 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/53 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
2.0%
1/51 • Number of events 1 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/52 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/10 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
|
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
Premature separation of placenta
|
0.00%
0/53 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/52 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/51 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/53 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/53 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
2.0%
1/51 • Number of events 1 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/52 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/10 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
|
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
Threatened labour
|
0.00%
0/53 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/52 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/51 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/53 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/53 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
2.0%
1/51 • Number of events 1 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/52 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/10 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Vaginal haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/53 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/52 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/51 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/53 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/53 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
2.0%
1/51 • Number of events 1 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/52 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/10 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Group 1: 20 mcg/Unadjuvant (Day 1 & 29)
n=53 participants at risk
20 mcg CHIKV VLP/unadjuvanted (Day 1) // Placebo (Day 15) // 20 mcg CHIKV VLP/unadjuvanted (Day 29)
CHIKV VLP/unadjuvanted: Vaccine consists of virus-like particles of chikungunya virus antigens
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 2: 6 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 1 & 29)
n=52 participants at risk
6 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 1) // Placebo (Day 15) // 6 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29)
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 3: 10 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 1 & 29)
n=50 participants at risk
10 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 1) // Placebo (Day 15) // 10 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29)
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 4: 20mcg/Adjuvant(Day 1 & 29);40mcg/Adjuvant (Day 547)
n=51 participants at risk
20 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 1) // Placebo (Day 15) // 20 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29) // 40 mcg CHIKV (Day 547)
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 5: 6 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 15 & 29)
n=53 participants at risk
Placebo (Day 1) // 6 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 15) // 6 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29)
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 6: 10 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 15 & 29)
n=53 participants at risk
Placebo (Day 1) // 10 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 15) // 10 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29)
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 7: 20 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 15 & 29)
n=51 participants at risk
Placebo (Day 1) // 20 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 15) // 20 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29)
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 8: 40 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 29)
n=52 participants at risk
Placebo (Day 1) // Placebo (Day 15) // 40 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29)
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
Placebo: Placebo is vaccine diluent alone
|
Group 9: 20 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 1 & 29)
n=20 participants at risk
20 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 1) // 20 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 29). This group will also have plasmapheresis performed on Day 57 and Leukapheresis on Day 182
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
|
Group 10: 40 mcg/Adjuvant (Day 1)
n=10 participants at risk
40 mcg CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted (Day 1). This group will also have plasmapheresis performed on Day 22.
CHIKV VLP/adjuvanted: Adjuvanted formulation includes Alhydrogel
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
7.5%
4/53 • Number of events 4 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
3.8%
2/52 • Number of events 2 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Number of events 1 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
3.9%
2/51 • Number of events 3 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/53 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
7.5%
4/53 • Number of events 4 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
3.9%
2/51 • Number of events 2 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
7.7%
4/52 • Number of events 4 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
5.0%
1/20 • Number of events 1 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/10 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
0.00%
0/53 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
1.9%
1/52 • Number of events 1 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Number of events 1 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/51 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/53 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/53 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
7.8%
4/51 • Number of events 4 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
1.9%
1/52 • Number of events 1 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/10 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Toothache
|
0.00%
0/53 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/52 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
2.0%
1/51 • Number of events 1 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
2.0%
1/51 • Number of events 1 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/52 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
5.0%
1/20 • Number of events 1 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/10 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
|
General disorders
Hangover
|
0.00%
0/53 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/52 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/51 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/53 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/53 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/51 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/52 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
5.0%
1/20 • Number of events 1 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/10 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
|
0.00%
0/53 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/52 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
3.9%
2/51 • Number of events 2 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/53 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/53 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/51 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/52 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Presyncope
|
0.00%
0/53 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/52 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/51 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/53 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/53 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/51 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/52 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
5.0%
1/20 • Number of events 1 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/10 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea, solicited
|
15.1%
8/53 • Number of events 9 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
11.5%
6/52 • Number of events 10 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
16.0%
8/50 • Number of events 8 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
27.5%
14/51 • Number of events 17 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
7.5%
4/53 • Number of events 4 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
9.4%
5/53 • Number of events 7 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
11.8%
6/51 • Number of events 6 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
11.5%
6/52 • Number of events 8 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
5.0%
1/20 • Number of events 1 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/10 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site pain, solicited
|
35.8%
19/53 • Number of events 25 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
51.9%
27/52 • Number of events 41 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
46.0%
23/50 • Number of events 35 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
56.9%
29/51 • Number of events 63 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
34.0%
18/53 • Number of events 25 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
34.0%
18/53 • Number of events 27 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
35.3%
18/51 • Number of events 30 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
50.0%
26/52 • Number of events 32 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
50.0%
10/20 • Number of events 16 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
20.0%
2/10 • Number of events 2 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue, solicited
|
20.8%
11/53 • Number of events 16 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
23.1%
12/52 • Number of events 18 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
24.0%
12/50 • Number of events 14 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
37.3%
19/51 • Number of events 27 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
13.2%
7/53 • Number of events 7 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
13.2%
7/53 • Number of events 10 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
21.6%
11/51 • Number of events 17 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
19.2%
10/52 • Number of events 15 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
10.0%
2/20 • Number of events 2 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
20.0%
2/10 • Number of events 2 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
|
General disorders
Malaise, solicited
|
13.2%
7/53 • Number of events 8 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
13.5%
7/52 • Number of events 10 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
12.0%
6/50 • Number of events 7 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
27.5%
14/51 • Number of events 15 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
7.5%
4/53 • Number of events 4 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
13.2%
7/53 • Number of events 10 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
19.6%
10/51 • Number of events 13 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
17.3%
9/52 • Number of events 11 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
10.0%
2/20 • Number of events 2 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
|
General disorders
Chills, solicited
|
1.9%
1/53 • Number of events 1 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
5.8%
3/52 • Number of events 3 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
10.0%
5/50 • Number of events 5 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
15.7%
8/51 • Number of events 9 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
5.7%
3/53 • Number of events 3 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
7.5%
4/53 • Number of events 6 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
7.8%
4/51 • Number of events 5 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
5.8%
3/52 • Number of events 3 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/10 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia, solicited
|
20.8%
11/53 • Number of events 12 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
23.1%
12/52 • Number of events 15 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
24.0%
12/50 • Number of events 18 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
41.2%
21/51 • Number of events 35 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
20.8%
11/53 • Number of events 14 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
18.9%
10/53 • Number of events 18 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
21.6%
11/51 • Number of events 19 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
21.2%
11/52 • Number of events 11 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
20.0%
2/10 • Number of events 2 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia, solicited
|
5.7%
3/53 • Number of events 4 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
17.3%
9/52 • Number of events 11 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
8.0%
4/50 • Number of events 6 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
23.5%
12/51 • Number of events 16 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
5.7%
3/53 • Number of events 4 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
7.5%
4/53 • Number of events 7 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
7.8%
4/51 • Number of events 8 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
11.5%
6/52 • Number of events 6 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
5.0%
1/20 • Number of events 1 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache, solicited
|
20.8%
11/53 • Number of events 14 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
26.9%
14/52 • Number of events 23 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
36.0%
18/50 • Number of events 21 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
39.2%
20/51 • Number of events 31 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
20.8%
11/53 • Number of events 12 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
20.8%
11/53 • Number of events 17 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
27.5%
14/51 • Number of events 19 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
36.5%
19/52 • Number of events 26 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
15.0%
3/20 • Number of events 4 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia, solicited
|
0.00%
0/53 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
3.8%
2/52 • Number of events 2 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
4.0%
2/50 • Number of events 2 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
7.8%
4/51 • Number of events 4 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/53 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/53 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/51 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/52 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
0.00%
0/10 • Unsolicited adverse events were monitored through Day 760 (Groups 1, 4, and 8), Day 365 (Groups 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7), Day 182 (Group 9), and Day 29 (Group 10), but only unsolicited adverse events occurring through Day 57 (end of treatment and observation period, 28 days after last dose for Groups 1-8) are reported.
One subject was randomized to Group 3 but treated in Group 4 due to a dispensing error. This participant was counted in Group 3 in the Participant Flow Number Started but was counted in Group 4 for the safety population for all safety analyses.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee PI may publish or release study data after the earlier of (a) the date of publication of a multi-center publication coordinated by Sponsor on the study data, or (b) the date of submission of the study data by Sponsor to regulatory authorities for regulatory approval; provided that PI furnishes Sponsor with a copy of any proposed publication or release at least ninety days in advance of the proposed submission or presentation date for review. PI must acknowledge Sponsor on any publication.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER