Trial Outcomes & Findings for Remote Ischemic Conditioning in Patients With Acute Stroke (RESIST) (NCT NCT03481777)
NCT ID: NCT03481777
Last Updated: 2025-01-27
Results Overview
Clinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale) at 3 months in acute stroke patients (target diagnosis) (generalized ordinal logistic regression). The assessment will performed by two independent telephone or face-to-face assessors. the mRS range from 0 to 6, with higher scores representing worse outcome (mRS 0, no symptoms; mRS 6, death) If disagreement occurs the patient will be contacted by a third assessor (face-to-face or telephone) who is blinded to the intervention who will assess the level of dependency. * If disagreement occurs between two telephone assessments - a third, and final, telephone or face-to-face assessment will be made. * If disagreement occurs between one face-to-face assessment and one telephone assessment * the face-to-face will be considered the final assessment * If disagreement occurs between two face-to-face assessments - a third, and final, telephone or face-to-face assessment will be made.
COMPLETED
NA
1500 participants
3 months
2025-01-27
Participant Flow
The RESIST trial is a prehospital stroke trial. Patients are randomzied to remote ischemic conditioning or sham in the ambualnce before their final diagnosis. Patients who have a stroke (ischemic stroke or intracerebral hemorrhage, n= 902) are the target population and treated further according to randomization and outcome assessed as 3 months modified Rankin Scale . Patients with a non stroke diagnosis (n=531) are not treated further and not followed beyond hospital discharge.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Remote Ischemic Condtioning (RIC)
Patients with a prehospital stroke suspicion were randomized and treated with either RIC or sham RIC in the ambulance and continued at the stroke center. Patients with a in-hospital diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke or intracerebral hemorrhage were the target group and study population for the primary endpoint (modified Intention to Treat)
|
Sham Remote Ischemic Conditioning
Patients with a prehospital stroke suspicion were randomized and treated with either RIC or sham RIC in the ambulance and continued at the stroke center. Patients with a in-hospital diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke or intracerebral hemorrhage were the target group and study population for the primary endpoint (modified Intention to Treat)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
749
|
751
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
436
|
466
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
313
|
285
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Remote Ischemic Condtioning (RIC)
Patients with a prehospital stroke suspicion were randomized and treated with either RIC or sham RIC in the ambulance and continued at the stroke center. Patients with a in-hospital diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke or intracerebral hemorrhage were the target group and study population for the primary endpoint (modified Intention to Treat)
|
Sham Remote Ischemic Conditioning
Patients with a prehospital stroke suspicion were randomized and treated with either RIC or sham RIC in the ambulance and continued at the stroke center. Patients with a in-hospital diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke or intracerebral hemorrhage were the target group and study population for the primary endpoint (modified Intention to Treat)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
36
|
31
|
|
Overall Study
Non stroke = non target population
|
277
|
254
|
Baseline Characteristics
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Remote Ischemic Conditioning
n=436 Participants
Remote Ischemic Conditioning (Active)
|
Sham
n=466 Participants
Remote Ischemic Conditioning (Sham)
|
Total
n=902 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
72 years
n=436 Participants
|
73 years
n=466 Participants
|
73 years
n=902 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
165 Participants
n=436 Participants
|
170 Participants
n=466 Participants
|
335 Participants
n=902 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
271 Participants
n=436 Participants
|
296 Participants
n=466 Participants
|
567 Participants
n=902 Participants
|
|
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
|
—
|
—
|
0 Participants
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Denmark
|
436 participants
n=436 Participants
|
466 participants
n=466 Participants
|
902 participants
n=902 Participants
|
|
National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS)
|
5 points on NIHSS
n=436 Participants
|
5 points on NIHSS
n=466 Participants
|
5 points on NIHSS
n=902 Participants
|
|
Diagnosis
Acute ischemic stroke
|
349 Participants
n=436 Participants
|
388 Participants
n=466 Participants
|
737 Participants
n=902 Participants
|
|
Diagnosis
Intracerebral hemorrhage
|
87 Participants
n=436 Participants
|
78 Participants
n=466 Participants
|
165 Participants
n=902 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 monthsClinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale) at 3 months in acute stroke patients (target diagnosis) (generalized ordinal logistic regression). The assessment will performed by two independent telephone or face-to-face assessors. the mRS range from 0 to 6, with higher scores representing worse outcome (mRS 0, no symptoms; mRS 6, death) If disagreement occurs the patient will be contacted by a third assessor (face-to-face or telephone) who is blinded to the intervention who will assess the level of dependency. * If disagreement occurs between two telephone assessments - a third, and final, telephone or face-to-face assessment will be made. * If disagreement occurs between one face-to-face assessment and one telephone assessment * the face-to-face will be considered the final assessment * If disagreement occurs between two face-to-face assessments - a third, and final, telephone or face-to-face assessment will be made.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Remote Ischemic Conditioning (RIC)
n=436 Participants
Patients with acute ischemic stroke or intracerbreral hemorrhage treated with Remote Ischemic Conditioning
|
Sham
n=466 Participants
Patients with acute ischemic stroke or intracerbreral hemorrhage treated with Sham
|
|---|---|---|
|
Modified Rankin Scale at 3 Months in Acute Stroke (AIS and ICH)
|
2 units on a scale
Interval 1.0 to 3.0
|
1 units on a scale
Interval 1.0 to 3.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 hoursPopulation: 24-hour difference in prehospital stroke score
Neurological deficits are documented using Prehospital Stroke Score (PreSS). Prehospital Stroke Score is assessed in the the ambulance and at 24-hour or at discharge (if discharge occurs before 24 hours). The PreSS score consists of the Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale (CPSS) with an additional opportunity to report other neurological symptoms (e.g. ataxia, sensory disturbances and visual field loss), and PASS (Prehospital Acute Stroke Severity Scale). The PreSS score range from 0-6, with 6 representing the most severe neurological deficits.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Remote Ischemic Conditioning (RIC)
n=436 Participants
Patients with acute ischemic stroke or intracerbreral hemorrhage treated with Remote Ischemic Conditioning
|
Sham
n=466 Participants
Patients with acute ischemic stroke or intracerbreral hemorrhage treated with Sham
|
|---|---|---|
|
Difference Neurological Impairment During the First 24 Hours
|
-1 units on a scale
Interval -2.0 to 0.0
|
-2 units on a scale
Interval -2.0 to 0.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 monthsPopulation: Acute ischemic stroke patients
Clinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale) at 3 months in acute stroke patients (target diagnosis) (generalized ordinal logistic regression). TThe assessment will performed by two independent telephone or face-to-face assessors. the mRS range from 0 to 6, with higher scores representing worse outcome (mRS 0, no symptoms; mRS 6, death) If disagreement occurs the patient will be contacted by a third assessor (face-to-face or telephone) who is blinded to the intervention who will assess the level of dependency. If disagreement occurs between two telephone assessments - a third, and final, telephone or face-to-face assessment will be made. If disagreement occurs between one face-to-face assessment and one telephone assessment the face-to-face will be considered the final assessment If disagreement occurs between two face-to-face assessments - a third, and final, telephone or face-to-face assessment will be made.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Remote Ischemic Conditioning (RIC)
n=349 Participants
Patients with acute ischemic stroke or intracerbreral hemorrhage treated with Remote Ischemic Conditioning
|
Sham
n=388 Participants
Patients with acute ischemic stroke or intracerbreral hemorrhage treated with Sham
|
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical Outcome (Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 3 Months in Acute Ischemic Stroke
|
1 units on a scale
Interval 1.0 to 2.0
|
1 units on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 3.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 monthsPopulation: Patients with acute ischemic stroke who were treated with reperfusion therapies (intravenous thrombolysis and/or trombectomy)
Clinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale) at 3 months inacute ischemic stroke receiving reperfusion therapy (generalized ordinal logistic regression). The assessment will performed by two independent telephone or face-to-face assessors. the mRS range from 0 to 6, with higher scores representing worse outcome (mRS 0, no symptoms; mRS 6, death) If disagreement occurs the patient will be contacted by a third assessor (face-to-face or telephone) who is blinded to the intervention who will assess the level of dependency. If disagreement occurs between two telephone assessments - a third, and final, telephone or face-to-face assessment will be made. If disagreement occurs between one face-to-face assessment and one telephone assessment the face-to-face will be considered the final assessment If disagreement occurs between two face-to-face assessments - a third, and final, telephone or face-to-face assessment will be made.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Remote Ischemic Conditioning (RIC)
n=247 Participants
Patients with acute ischemic stroke or intracerbreral hemorrhage treated with Remote Ischemic Conditioning
|
Sham
n=274 Participants
Patients with acute ischemic stroke or intracerbreral hemorrhage treated with Sham
|
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical Outcome (Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 3 Months in Acute Ischemic Stroke Receiving Reperfusion Therapy
|
1 units on a scale
Interval 1.0 to 3.0
|
1 units on a scale
Interval 1.0 to 3.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 monthsPopulation: Patients diagnosed with intracerebral hemorrhage
Clinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale) at 3 months in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) (generalized ordinal logistic regression). The assessment will performed by two independent telephone or face-to-face assessors. the mRS range from 0 to 6, with higher scores representing worse outcome (mRS 0, no symptoms; mRS 6, death) If disagreement occurs the patient will be contacted by a third assessor (face-to-face or telephone) who is blinded to the intervention who will assess the level of dependency. If disagreement occurs between two telephone assessments - a third, and final, telephone or face-to-face assessment will be made. If disagreement occurs between one face-to-face assessment and one telephone assessment the face-to-face will be considered the final assessment If disagreement occurs between two face-to-face assessments - a third, and final, telephone or face-to-face assessment will be made.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Remote Ischemic Conditioning (RIC)
n=87 Participants
Patients with acute ischemic stroke or intracerbreral hemorrhage treated with Remote Ischemic Conditioning
|
Sham
n=78 Participants
Patients with acute ischemic stroke or intracerbreral hemorrhage treated with Sham
|
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical Outcome (Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 3 Months in Patients With Intracerebral Hemorrhage (ICH)
|
3 units on a scale
Interval 2.0 to 5.0
|
3 units on a scale
Interval 2.0 to 5.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 monthsDifference in proportion of patients with complete remission of symptoms within 24 hours (TIA; both with and without DWI) Diagnosis of TIA is documented in the electronic case report form
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Remote Ischemic Conditioning (RIC)
n=515 Participants
Patients with acute ischemic stroke or intracerbreral hemorrhage treated with Remote Ischemic Conditioning
|
Sham
n=536 Participants
Patients with acute ischemic stroke or intracerbreral hemorrhage treated with Sham
|
|---|---|---|
|
Difference in Proportion of Patients With Complete Remission of Symptoms Within 24 Hours (TIA; Both With and Without DWI)
|
96 Participants
|
90 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 monthsMACCE is defined as: Cardiovascular events (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, acute ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke) Cardiovascular death: Death from known cardiovascular cause or sudden death from unknown cause (no identified cause of death in medical history and/or autopsy) Acute myocardial infarction: Admission with a discharge diagnosis of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and unstable angina pectoris (UAP) Stroke: Admission with a discharge diagnosis of acute ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke. Evaluation is performed using the Danish National Patient Register (LPR) and the DSR at two time points (6 and 15 months after the inclusion of the last patient). Diagnosis of AIS/TIA, ICH and MI (STEMI, NSTEMI, and UAP) are made according to national clinical practice guidelines.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Remote Ischemic Conditioning (RIC)
n=436 Participants
Patients with acute ischemic stroke or intracerbreral hemorrhage treated with Remote Ischemic Conditioning
|
Sham
n=466 Participants
Patients with acute ischemic stroke or intracerbreral hemorrhage treated with Sham
|
|---|---|---|
|
Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebral Events (MACCE)
|
57 Participants
|
62 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 hoursPopulation: Target population with acute stroke
Reduction in National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) ≥ 4 (baseline versus 24-Hour NIHSS). NIHSS range from 0 to 42, with higher scores representing worse neurological function.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Remote Ischemic Conditioning (RIC)
n=425 Participants
Patients with acute ischemic stroke or intracerbreral hemorrhage treated with Remote Ischemic Conditioning
|
Sham
n=451 Participants
Patients with acute ischemic stroke or intracerbreral hemorrhage treated with Sham
|
|---|---|---|
|
Early Neurological Improvement in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients (AIS)
|
108 Participants
|
131 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 hoursReduction in National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) ≥ 4 (baseline versus 24-Hour NIHSS). NIHSS range from 0 to 42, with higher scores representing worse neurological function.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 monthsQuality of life (WHO-5 Well-Being Index) measures in AIS and ICH patients at 3 months
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 monthsBed-day use, measured at 3 months, in AIS and ICH patients
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 and 12 monthsAll-cause mortality is assessed and subdivided into cardiovascular mortality versus non-cardiovascular mortality
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 3 monthsClinical outcome \[modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 3 months in ischemic stroke patients and the extended remote ischemic postconditioning protocol Ordinal logistic regression analysis will be performed.The assessment will performed by two independent telephone or face-to-face assessors. the mRS range from 0 to 6, with higher scores representing worse outcome (mRS 0, no symptoms; mRS 6, death) If disagreement occurs the patient will be contacted by a third assessor (face-to-face or telephone) who is blinded to the intervention who will assess the level of dependency. If disagreement occurs between two telephone assessments - a third, and final, telephone or face-to-face assessment will be made. If disagreement occurs between one face-to-face assessment and one telephone assessment the face-to-face will be considered the final assessment If disagreement occurs between two face-to-face assessments - a third, and final, telephone or face-to-face assessment will be made.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 3 monthsClinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 3 months in intracerebral hemorrhage patients and the extended remote ischemic postconditioning protocol The assessment will performed by two independent telephone or face-to-face assessors. the mRS range from 0 to 6, with higher scores representing worse outcome (mRS 0, no symptoms; mRS 6, death) If disagreement occurs the patient will be contacted by a third assessor (face-to-face or telephone) who is blinded to the intervention who will assess the level of dependency. If disagreement occurs between two telephone assessments - a third, and final, telephone or face-to-face assessment will be made. If disagreement occurs between one face-to-face assessment and one telephone assessment the face-to-face will be considered the final assessment If disagreement occurs between two face-to-face assessments - a third, and final, telephone or face-to-face assessment will be made.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 6 hoursProportion of RIC treated AIS patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) eligible to EVT treatment compared to standard treatment, adjusted for prehospital stroke severity (PreSS) and symptom duration * Severe Stroke (NIHSS ≥ 10) * Groin puncture feasible within 6 hours from stroke onset * MRI-time-of-flight (TOF) documented internal carotid artery (ICA), Intracranial ICA (ICA-T) and first and second stem of the middle cerebral artery (M1 and M2, respectively) * No contraindications to MRI (pacemaker, vomiting, respiratory insufficiency, obesity) * MRI-Diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) lesion volume ≤ 70 mL
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 24 hour24-hour infarct growth on DWI-MRI (Difference in lesion volume between acute and 24-hour DWI-MRI) (Substudy at Aarhus University Hospital)
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 24 hour24-hour hematoma growth (Difference in hematoma volume between acute and 24-hour CT/MRI) (Substudy at Aarhus University Hospital)
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 7 days7-day hematoma reduction (Difference in hematoma volume between acute and 7-day (day 5 to 9) CT ) (Substudy at Aarhus University Hospital)
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsEktacytometry for Erythrocytic Deformability and Analytical Flow Cytometry (FC) for eryNOS3 phosphorylation (pNOS3Ser1177) and s-nitrosylation (-SNO) in RBC
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsMicroRNA and extracellular vesicle characterization of a possible RIC treatment profile (substudy at Aarhus University Hospital)
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsDiagnostic abilities of a prehospital microRNA and extracellular vesicles blood samples profile combined with prehospital stroke severity on the differentiation of hemorrhagic from ischemic stroke and to grade ischemic stroke severity
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsPredictive abilities of Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP) in prehospital obtained blood samples combined with prehospital stroke severity to differentiate hemorrhagic from ischemic stroke and to grade ischemic stroke severity
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsFunctional and immunologic plasma assays will be employed to analyze proteins and pathways in coagulation and fibrinolysis (substudy at Aarhus University Hospital)
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
Adverse Events
Remote Ischemic Conditioning (RIC)
Sham
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Remote Ischemic Conditioning (RIC)
n=713 participants at risk
Patients with acute ischemic stroke or intracerbreral hemorrhage treated with Remote Ischemic Conditioning
|
Sham
n=720 participants at risk
Patients with acute ischemic stroke or intracerbreral hemorrhage treated with Sham
|
|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
SAE
|
47.0%
335/713 • Number of events 335 • 90 days
Adverse events and adverse device events are defined according to ISO 14155:2011 and European Commission guideline on medical devices (MEDDEV 2.7/3 revision 3).
|
45.1%
325/720 • Number of events 325 • 90 days
Adverse events and adverse device events are defined according to ISO 14155:2011 and European Commission guideline on medical devices (MEDDEV 2.7/3 revision 3).
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Remote Ischemic Conditioning (RIC)
n=713 participants at risk
Patients with acute ischemic stroke or intracerbreral hemorrhage treated with Remote Ischemic Conditioning
|
Sham
n=720 participants at risk
Patients with acute ischemic stroke or intracerbreral hemorrhage treated with Sham
|
|---|---|---|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Upper extremity pain during treatment and/or skin petechia
|
7.6%
54/713 • Number of events 54 • 90 days
Adverse events and adverse device events are defined according to ISO 14155:2011 and European Commission guideline on medical devices (MEDDEV 2.7/3 revision 3).
|
1.5%
11/720 • Number of events 11 • 90 days
Adverse events and adverse device events are defined according to ISO 14155:2011 and European Commission guideline on medical devices (MEDDEV 2.7/3 revision 3).
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place