Implementing Hypertension Screening Guidelines in Primary Care
NCT ID: NCT03480217
Last Updated: 2025-06-13
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
1186 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-04-01
2022-10-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Implementing a Home Blood Pressure Monitoring Program in Primary Care
NCT05885997
Retail Outlet Health Kiosk Hypertension Trial
NCT03515681
Team-based Care to Improve Hypertension
NCT05413252
Addressing Antihypertensive Medication Adherence Through EHR-enabled Teamlets in Primary Care
NCT05349422
Cornell Translational Behavioral Science Research Consortium: Hypertension Qualitative Study
NCT00227175
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
There are challenges to measuring BP in clinical settings that make inappropriate diagnosis common. A systematic review conducted by the USPSTF in 2014 found that 5%-65% of patients with elevated office BP do not have high out-of-office BP readings according to ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) or home BP monitoring (HBPM). This is commonly referred to as white-coat hypertension. In contrast to patients with sustained hypertension (elevated BP in office and out-of-office settings), patients with white-coat hypertension do not appear to be at increased cardiovascular risk nor to benefit from antihypertensive treatment. Based primarily on these observations, in 2015, the USPSTF updated their hypertension screening guidelines to recommend that patients with elevated office BP undergo out-of-office BP testing (ABPM or HBPM) to rule-out white-coat hypertension prior to a new diagnosis of hypertension. While ABPM is recommended as the first-line out-of-office screening test, HBPM is cited as a reasonable alternative if ABPM is unavailable.
Despite the USPSTF guideline recommendation, ABPM and HBPM are currently infrequently utilized in the US, particularly as part of hypertension diagnosis. Accordingly, the investigators conducted focus groups with primary care providers, patients, and other key stakeholders (medical directors, nurse supervisors, medical assistants, nurse practitioners, front desk staff) to identify the major barriers to implementation of the new hypertension screening guidelines. The investigators then applied the Behavior Change Wheel, a trans-theoretical intervention development framework, to categorize barriers and select theory-informed intervention components that would address these barriers. The investigators arrived at a theory-informed implementation strategy for improving out-of-office BP testing, which included educational activities for providers (i.e., presentations at grand rounds or other venues at which physicians are present); training registered nurses to be capable of assisting with teaching patients to conduct HBPM; disseminating information on how to order ABPM and HBPM to clinicians, nurses, and front desk staff via huddles, emails, and other electronic communications; creating a computerized electronic health record (EHR)-embedded clinical decision support tool that prompts recall of the USPSTF hypertension guidelines and facilitates ordering of HBPM and ABPM for eligible patients; creating and disseminating patient information materials on ABPM and HBPM; providing periodic feedback about clinic-level success with adhering to the guideline, and developing an easily accessible, culturally-adapted and locally tailored ABPM service.
The investigators now aim to test this multifaceted implementation strategy to increase the uptake of the USPSTF hypertension recommendations in the ambulatory care network (ACN) of New York-Presbyterian Hospital (NYP), a network of primary care clinics serving 120,000 patients from underserved communities in New York City. Specifically, the investigators are conducting a 2-year cluster randomized trial (Phase II of the project) following a 6-month implementation phase in which we randomize matched pairs of 8 ACN clinics (1:1) to either receive the multicomponent guideline implementation strategy (N = 4 clinics) or a wait-list control (N = 4 clinics). The investigators aim to assess the effectiveness of this intervention on the completion of out-of-office BP testing (ABPM or HBPM) prior to hypertension diagnosis (primary outcome) as well as the effect on out-of-office test ordering, irrespective of test completion (secondary outcome).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention Clinics, Pre-Implementation
Usual care
Usual care
Primary care clinicians diagnose hypertension according to usual care
Intervention Clinics, Post-Implementation
Patients will be screened for hypertension by primary care clinicians, registered nurses, medical assistants, and front desk staff from clinics randomized to receive the Multifaceted Implementation Strategy.
Multifaceted Implementation Strategy
Key components include:
* educational presentations to primary care providers at grand rounds
* patient information materials on ABPM and HBPM
* training registered nurses to assist providers with teaching patients to conduct HBPM
* information on how to order ABPM and HBPM to clinicians, nurses and front desk staff via huddles, emails, and other electronic communications
* a computerized EHR-embedded clinical decision support tool that prompts providers to recall the USPSTF hypertension guidelines and facilitates ordering of HBPM and ABPM for guideline-eligible patients
* periodic feedback to primary care providers about clinic-level success with appropriately ordering ABPM and HBPM for eligible patients
* an accessible, culturally-adapted and locally tailored ABPM service
Control Clinics, Pre-Implementation
Usual care
Usual care
Primary care clinicians diagnose hypertension according to usual care
Control Clinics, Post-Implementation
Usual care
Usual care
Primary care clinicians diagnose hypertension according to usual care
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Multifaceted Implementation Strategy
Key components include:
* educational presentations to primary care providers at grand rounds
* patient information materials on ABPM and HBPM
* training registered nurses to assist providers with teaching patients to conduct HBPM
* information on how to order ABPM and HBPM to clinicians, nurses and front desk staff via huddles, emails, and other electronic communications
* a computerized EHR-embedded clinical decision support tool that prompts providers to recall the USPSTF hypertension guidelines and facilitates ordering of HBPM and ABPM for guideline-eligible patients
* periodic feedback to primary care providers about clinic-level success with appropriately ordering ABPM and HBPM for eligible patients
* an accessible, culturally-adapted and locally tailored ABPM service
Usual care
Primary care clinicians diagnose hypertension according to usual care
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Primary care clinics that are part of the New York-Presbyterian Hospital Ambulatory Care Network and were not part of implementation development
Exclusion Criteria
* Prior diagnosis of white-coat hypertension
* Prior evaluation for white-coat hypertension by 24-hr ABPM or HBPM
* Prescribed antihypertensive medication
* Manual office BP \<140/90 mmHg
* Severely elevated BP (systolic BP\>=180 mmHg or diastolic BP\>=110 mmHg)
* Evidence of target-organ damage (chronic kidney disease, cardiovascular disease)
* Medical director of clinic declines to participate in cluster randomized trial
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
FED
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
OTHER
Columbia University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ian Kronish
Florence Irving Associate Professor of Medicine
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ian Kronish, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Columbia University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Center for Behavioral Cardiovascular Health
New York, New York, United States
Weill Cornell Medical Center
New York, New York, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Siu AL; U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for high blood pressure in adults: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2015 Nov 17;163(10):778-86. doi: 10.7326/M15-2223. Epub 2015 Oct 13.
Kronish IM, Kent S, Moise N, Shimbo D, Safford MM, Kynerd RE, O'Beirne R, Sullivan A, Muntner P. Barriers to conducting ambulatory and home blood pressure monitoring during hypertension screening in the United States. J Am Soc Hypertens. 2017 Sep;11(9):573-580. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2017.06.012. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
Piper MA, Evans CV, Burda BU, Margolis KL, O'Connor E, Whitlock EP. Diagnostic and predictive accuracy of blood pressure screening methods with consideration of rescreening intervals: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2015 Feb 3;162(3):192-204. doi: 10.7326/M14-1539.
Moise N, Phillips E, Carter E, Alcantara C, Julian J, Thanataveerat A, Schwartz JE, Ye S, Duran A, Shimbo D, Kronish IM. Design and study protocol for a cluster randomized trial of a multi-faceted implementation strategy to increase the uptake of the USPSTF hypertension screening recommendations: the EMBRACE study. Implement Sci. 2020 Aug 8;15(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-01017-8.
Carter EJ, Moise N, Alcantara C, Sullivan AM, Kronish IM. Patient Barriers and Facilitators to Ambulatory and Home Blood Pressure Monitoring: A Qualitative Study. Am J Hypertens. 2018 Jul 16;31(8):919-927. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpy062.
Kronish IM, Phillips E, Alcantara C, Carter E, Schwartz JE, Shimbo D, Serafini M, Boyd R, Chang M, Wang X, Razon D, Patel A, Moise N. A Multifaceted Implementation Strategy to Increase Out-of-Office Blood Pressure Monitoring: The EMBRACE Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Sep 5;6(9):e2334646. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.34646.
Kronish IM, Carter E, Phillips E, Alcantara C, Serafini M, Schwartz JE, Moise N. Impact of a Theory-Informed Implementation Strategy on Clinician Attitudes Toward Out-of-Office Blood Pressure Monitoring for Hypertension Screening. J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Oct 14. doi: 10.1007/s11606-025-09840-9. Online ahead of print.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
AAAQ1062
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.