Comparison of Direct Anterior and Posterior Surgical Approaches in Regards to the Patient' Physical Characteristics
NCT ID: NCT03472755
Last Updated: 2020-12-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
NA
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-03-23
2020-01-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
* Abstract : Some earlier studies report differences between surgery types in self- reported mobility, functional recovery and residual hip pain. The direct anterior approach to the hip has been suggested to have several advantages compared to previously popular approaches through its use of an intra-muscular and intra-nervous interval between the tensor fasciae latae and sartorius muscles. However, patients' physical fitness, postural response and perceptual walking skill relation was not taking account. 80 patients will be tested, one before and at various times after hip surgery. In randomized conditions, our patients will be divided in two groups, according the surgery approaches and their physical fitness. All patients performed a Performance-Oriented Mobility Assessment Walking test with and without step and the PMA, Harris, Oxford 12 and Womac scores will be evaluated before, 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months and 1 year after the surgery. During the Performance-Oriented Mobility Assessment Walking test, self-reported walking capacity, rating of exertion perception and walking parameters will be measured.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
The posterolateral approach
The posterolateral approach was used for implantation among patients in lateral position. This approach goes through the gluteus maximus, the piriformis and superior gemeli muscles are detached and later reattached to bone
The posterolateral approach
The posterolateral approach was used for implantation among patients in lateral position. This approach goes through the gluteus maximus, the piriformis and superior gemeli muscles are detached and later reattached to bone
Direct anterior techniques.
. In the direct anterior technique, patients were fixed in a supine position, a small entry incision was made in the vessel free interval between the tensor fasciae latae and the sartorius muscles and the prosthesis socket were put in place. Via a second dorsal incision, after releasing the external rotators, the prosthesis stem and ball were implanted and the two parts of the prosthesis were attached.
Direct anterior technique
patients were fixed in a supine position, a small entry incision was made in the vessel free interval between the tensor fasciae latae and the sartorius muscles and the prosthesis socket were put in place. Via a second dorsal incision, after releasing the external rotators, the prosthesis stem and ball were implanted and the two parts of the prosthesis were attached
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
The posterolateral approach
The posterolateral approach was used for implantation among patients in lateral position. This approach goes through the gluteus maximus, the piriformis and superior gemeli muscles are detached and later reattached to bone
Direct anterior technique
patients were fixed in a supine position, a small entry incision was made in the vessel free interval between the tensor fasciae latae and the sartorius muscles and the prosthesis socket were put in place. Via a second dorsal incision, after releasing the external rotators, the prosthesis stem and ball were implanted and the two parts of the prosthesis were attached
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Body mass index \< 35
* Scheduled hip arthroplasty surgery
Exclusion Criteria
* Age \> 85 years
* Body mass index ≥ 35
* Cognitive impairment (score Mini Mental Statue \< 24)
* Any other osteo-articular diseases than the operated hip, any muscular or neurological diseases that could penalize the walk
50 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Amiens
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PI2017_843_0023
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id