DEPLETHINK - LymphoDEPLEtion and THerapeutic Immunotherapy With NKR-2
NCT ID: NCT03466320
Last Updated: 2021-05-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE1/PHASE2
21 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-09-18
2021-02-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This Phase I study will contain two different sequential segments. The first segment will determine the recommended investigational treatment option (schedule of preconditioning and NKR-2 dose) and the second segment will expand to a larger number of r/r AML/MDS patients.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Blinatumomab in Subjects With Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Aggressive B-Cell NHL
NCT02910063
SynKIR-310 for Relapsed/Refractory B-NHL
NCT06544265
Novel Combination Therapy in the Treatment of Relapsed and Refractory Aggressive B-Cell Lymphoma
NCT02436707
Nivolumab With or Without Varlilumab in Treating Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Aggressive B-cell Lymphomas
NCT03038672
Navitoclax in Relapsed or Refractory High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome
NCT05564650
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The Phase I part of the study will contain two different sequential segments. The first segment (dose escalation segment) will determine the recommended investigational treatment option (schedule of preconditioning and NKR-2 dose) and the second segment (extension segment) will expand to a larger number of r/r AML/MDS patients.
The Phase II part of the study will also contain two sequential segments, assessing the clinical activity of the NKR-2 treatment administrated as per the recommended investigational treatment option (schedule of preconditioning and NKR-2 dose).
The Phase I dose escalation segment will evaluate the preconditioning regimen consisting in cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m² and fludarabine 30 mg/m² daily (CYFLU) administrated 3 consecutive days at a specific interval prior to the NKR 2 administration. This segment is divided into four sequential cohorts to evaluate respectively:
* Two different intervals between the preconditioning regimen and the NKR-2 administration i.e. NKR-2 administered 3 days (T3) or 7 days (T7) after the end of the preconditioning regimen,
* Three different NKR-2 dose-levels i.e. dose-level 1 (1x108 NKR 2/injection), dose-level 2 (3x108 NKR-2/injection) and dose-level 3 (1x109 NKR-2/injection).
The Phase I extension segment will enroll more r/r AML/MDS patients (to reach 9 evaluable patients in total) to further evaluate the recommended NKR-2 dose (1x108, 3x108 or 1x109 NKR-2/injection) administered at the recommended interval (T3 or T7) after the CYFLU preconditioning.
The Phase II will enroll more r/r AML/MDS patients (13 patients in total in the segment 1 and 30 new patients in the segment 2) to further evaluate the recommended NKR-2 dose (1x108, 3x108 or 1x109 NKR-2/injection) administered at the recommended interval (T3 or T7) after the CYFLU preconditioning to assess the clinical activity.
Each patient will receive a single administration of NKR-2 following the preconditioning regimen. Depending on the clinical response as evaluated at the first tumor assessment, scheduled three weeks after NKR-2 administration, three situations may arise:
* If the patient is presenting a complete remission, partial remission, or stable disease, and meets all criteria for a consolidation cycle, then three new injections of NKR-2 at the recommended dose defined in the ongoing THINK study (THINK RecD), without prior preconditioning, will be administered with a two weeks interval,
* If the patient is in PD, or does not meet all criteria for the consolidation cycle he/she will not receive any other NKR-2 injection but will follow other visits as scheduled.
For each patient who received at least one NKR-2 administration, the overall study duration will be 15 years after first NKR-2 administration.
The duration of the administration phase and treatment follow-up will be 24 months.
Patients will be asked to complete a total of maximum 20 visits during the treatment administration phase, and maximum 6 visits during the treatment follow-up phase. During the long-term safety follow-up, yearly visits will be scheduled (up to Y15).
Rationale for the study:
NKR-2 has the potential to treat many distinct tumor-types because of a broad expression and important prevalence of the NKG2D ligands expression in various tumor types including in r/r AML/MDS. This Phase I study will explore the hypothesis that the administration of modified T-cells targeting NKG2D-ligands expressed by AML/MDS cells, after a prior nonmyeloablative preconditioning treatment, in patients refractory to and/or relapsing after prior therapies, is safe and, considering the poor outcomes and lack of therapeutic strategies for this patient population, may have a strategic advantage over current approaches and provide potential clinical benefit.
Objectives of the study:
Primary
To document and characterize:
* The safety of the NKR-2 treatment administration in r/r AML/MDS patients after a non-myeloablative preconditioning. (Phase I part)
* The objective response rate (ORR) post the first NKR-2 administration. (Phase II part)
Secondary
To document and characterize:
* The NKR-2 peripheral blood kinetics post-administration,
* Indicators of clinical activity,
* Additional indicators of safety.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
SEQUENTIAL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Phase I Dose Escalation Segment 1 - T7-DL1
Preconditioning (consisting in cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m² and fludarabine 30 mg/m² daily {CYFLU}) at days -9, -8 and -7.
Dose 1: 1x108 NKR-2 (adjusted at 1.5x106 NKR-2/kg for patients with body weight ≤ 65 kg) administered at 7 days (T7) after the end of the preconditioning regimen
NKR-2
This Phase I study will explore the hypothesis that the administration of modified T-cells targeting NKG2D-ligands expressed by AML/MDS cells, after a prior nonmyeloablative preconditioning treatment, in patients refractory to and/or relapsing after prior therapies, is safe and, considering the poor outcomes and lack of therapeutic strategies for this patient population, may have a strategic advantage over current approaches and provide potential clinical benefit.
Phase I Dose Escalation Segment 1 - T3-DL1
Preconditioning (consisting in cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m² and fludarabine 30 mg/m² daily {CYFLU}) at days -5, -4 and -3.
Dose 1: 1x108 NKR-2 (adjusted at 1.5x106 NKR-2/kg for patients with body weight ≤ 65 kg) administered at 3 days (T3) after the end of the preconditioning regimen
NKR-2
This Phase I study will explore the hypothesis that the administration of modified T-cells targeting NKG2D-ligands expressed by AML/MDS cells, after a prior nonmyeloablative preconditioning treatment, in patients refractory to and/or relapsing after prior therapies, is safe and, considering the poor outcomes and lack of therapeutic strategies for this patient population, may have a strategic advantage over current approaches and provide potential clinical benefit.
Phase I Dose Escalation Segment 1 - T3-DL2
Preconditioning (consisting in cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m² and fludarabine 30 mg/m² daily {CYFLU}) at days -5, -4 and -3.
Dose 2: 3x108 NKR-2 (adjusted at 4.6x106 NKR-2/kg for patients with body weight ≤ 65 kg) administered at 3 days (T3) after the end of the preconditioning regimen
NKR-2
This Phase I study will explore the hypothesis that the administration of modified T-cells targeting NKG2D-ligands expressed by AML/MDS cells, after a prior nonmyeloablative preconditioning treatment, in patients refractory to and/or relapsing after prior therapies, is safe and, considering the poor outcomes and lack of therapeutic strategies for this patient population, may have a strategic advantage over current approaches and provide potential clinical benefit.
Phase I Dose Escalation Segment 1 - T3-DL3
Preconditioning (consisting in cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m² and fludarabine 30 mg/m² daily {CYFLU}) at days -5, -4 and -3.
Dose 3: 1x109 NKR-2 (adjusted at 1.5x107 NKR-2/kg for patients with body weight ≤ 65 kg) administered at 3 days (T3) after the end of the preconditioning regimen
NKR-2
This Phase I study will explore the hypothesis that the administration of modified T-cells targeting NKG2D-ligands expressed by AML/MDS cells, after a prior nonmyeloablative preconditioning treatment, in patients refractory to and/or relapsing after prior therapies, is safe and, considering the poor outcomes and lack of therapeutic strategies for this patient population, may have a strategic advantage over current approaches and provide potential clinical benefit.
Phase I Dose Escalation - extension
This extension segment will enroll more patients (to reach 9 evaluable patients in total) to further evaluate the selected treatment regimen, i.e., the recommended NKR-2 dose (1x108 or 3x108 or 1x109NKR-2/injection) with the CYFLU preconditioning treatment administered at the recommended interval (T3 or T7) prior to NKR-2 administration.
NKR-2
This Phase I study will explore the hypothesis that the administration of modified T-cells targeting NKG2D-ligands expressed by AML/MDS cells, after a prior nonmyeloablative preconditioning treatment, in patients refractory to and/or relapsing after prior therapies, is safe and, considering the poor outcomes and lack of therapeutic strategies for this patient population, may have a strategic advantage over current approaches and provide potential clinical benefit.
Phase II Segment 1
This extension segment will enroll more patients (to reach 13 evaluable patients in total) to further evaluate the selected treatment regimen, i.e., the recommended NKR-2 dose (1x108 or 3x108 or 1x109NKR-2/injection) with the CYFLU preconditioning treatment administered at the recommended interval (T3 or T7) prior to NKR-2 administration.
NKR-2
This Phase I study will explore the hypothesis that the administration of modified T-cells targeting NKG2D-ligands expressed by AML/MDS cells, after a prior nonmyeloablative preconditioning treatment, in patients refractory to and/or relapsing after prior therapies, is safe and, considering the poor outcomes and lack of therapeutic strategies for this patient population, may have a strategic advantage over current approaches and provide potential clinical benefit.
Phase II Segment 2
Enrollment in the Phase II part of the study will be divided in 2 consecutive segments, with 13 patients in total in the segment 1 and 30 new patients in segment 2 (43 patients in total) if the study is not terminated due to futility, according a Simon's two-stage optimal design
NKR-2
This Phase I study will explore the hypothesis that the administration of modified T-cells targeting NKG2D-ligands expressed by AML/MDS cells, after a prior nonmyeloablative preconditioning treatment, in patients refractory to and/or relapsing after prior therapies, is safe and, considering the poor outcomes and lack of therapeutic strategies for this patient population, may have a strategic advantage over current approaches and provide potential clinical benefit.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
NKR-2
This Phase I study will explore the hypothesis that the administration of modified T-cells targeting NKG2D-ligands expressed by AML/MDS cells, after a prior nonmyeloablative preconditioning treatment, in patients refractory to and/or relapsing after prior therapies, is safe and, considering the poor outcomes and lack of therapeutic strategies for this patient population, may have a strategic advantage over current approaches and provide potential clinical benefit.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Both men and women of all races and ethnic groups are eligible.
3. The patient must be ≥ 18 and ≤ 75 years old at the time of signing the ICF.
4. The patient must not be eligible for standard of care therapy and have one of the following hematological malignancy:
4.a. A confirmed relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (i.e. ≥ 5% blasts in bone marrow or in peripheral blood) after at least one prior therapy defined as either
* Recurrence of disease after a first complete remission (CR1) and not eligible for a second course of induction therapy, or
* Recurrence of disease after a second complete remission (CR2), or
* Failure to achieve CR after induction chemotherapy. Note: Patient with AML M3 are excluded. 4.b. A confirmed myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) with:
* Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (R-IPSS) criteria for Intermediate, High-risk or Very High-risk disease or refractory anemia with excess blasts by WHO (i.e. ≥ 5% blasts in bone marrow or ≥ 2% blasts in peripheral blood) or MDS with TP53 mutation as detected by next-generation sequencing (NGS).
* Failure of prior treatment with at least 4 cycles of azacitidine or decitabine defined as no response to treatment, loss of response at any time point, or progressive disease/intolerance to therapy.
5\. The absolute peripheral blast count should be \< 15,000/L. 6. The patient must have evaluable disease defined by:
* Revised Recommendations of the International Working Group for Diagnosis, Standardization of Response Criteria, for AML patients,
* IWG 2006 Uniform Response Criteria for patients with Higher-Risk MDS. 7. The patient must have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status below or equal to 2.
8\. The patient must have adequate hepatic and renal functions as assessed by standard laboratory criteria 9. The patient must have a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of more than or equal to 40%, as determined by echocardiography or a multigated acquisition (MUGA) scan.
10\. The patient must have a good pulmonary function with a Forced Expiratory Volume in the first second (FEV-1)/Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) more than or equal to 0.7 with FEV-1 more than or equal to 50% predicted (GOLD 1 or 2 severity) as determined by the spirometry performed at baseline , unless related to the AML/MDS disease as judged by the Investigator.
11\. Women of child-bearing potential and men must agree to use effective contraception before, during and for at least 2 months after the last study treatment administration.
12\. The patient must, in the opinion of the Investigator, be able to adhere with the study visit schedule and all study procedures described in this protocol.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patients who have received any cancer therapy (investigational agent or not), including but not limited to chemotherapy, small molecules, monoclonal antibodies (e.g., immune checkpoint blockade therapies), or radiotherapy within 2 weeks before the planned day for the apheresis (Day -21)
3. Patients who are planned to receive, concurrently receiving or have received any investigational agent within 3 weeks before the planned day for the first NKR-2 administration (Day 1).
4. Patient is under systemic immunosuppressive drugs, unless specific cases authorized per protocol.
5. Patients who have received prior allogeneic stem cell transplantation or chimeric antigen receptor therapy.
6. Patients who are presenting persistent toxicities greater than or equal to CTCAE grade 2 caused by previous cancer therapy (except for clinically non-significant toxicities, such as alopecia).
7. Presence of any indwelling catheter or drain (e.g., percutaneous nephrostomy tube, indwelling foley catheter, biliary drain, or pleural/peritoneal/pericardial catheter) may be permissible unless they have a catheter-associated infection that cannot be cleared with antibiotics. Ommaya reservoirs and dedicated central venous access catheters such as a Port-a-Cath, peripherally inserted central catheter, or Hickman catheter are permitted.
8. Patients who underwent major surgery within 4 weeks before the planned day for the first NKR-2 administration (Day 1).
9. Patients who have received a live vaccine ≤ 6 weeks prior to each NKR 2 administration.
10. Patients with uncontrolled intercurrent illness or serious uncontrolled medical disorder including, but not limited to evidence of active pneumonitis on screening chest imaging, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia history (or evidenced after the electrocardiogram planned at screening) and/or pronounced disturbances of the electrical conduction system of the heart, or significant thromboembolic events.
11. Patients with significant disorder of coagulation or receiving treatment with warfarin derivatives or heparin.
12. Patients who have active infections including, but not limited to viral, bacterial or fungal infections necessitating use of antibiotics/antivirals/antifungal treatment (prophylaxis is acceptable).
13. Patients who are known to be positive or screened positive for hepatitis B (HBsAg positive) or C (anti-HCV positive).
14. Patients who are known to be positive or screened positive for the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).
15. Patients with a family history of congenital or hereditary immunodeficiency.
16. Patients with a history of allergic reactions or hypersensitivity attributed to Human serum albumin or Plasma-lyte A.
17. Patient with history of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, organizing pneumonia, drug-induced pneumonitis, idiopathic pneumonitis and/or active or acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
18. Patients on supplemental home oxygen.
19. Patients with history of any autoimmune disease including, but not limited to inflammatory bowel disease (including ulcerative colitis and Crohn's Disease), systemic progressive sclerosis (scleroderma), systemic lupus erythematosus, autoimmune vasculitis (e.g., Wegener's granulomatosis), CNS or motor neuropathy considered of autoimmune origin (e.g., Guillain-Barre syndrome and myasthenia gravis, multiple sclerosis). Patients with Graves disease and vitiligo will be allowed.
20. Patients with a history of a malignancy other than the one evaluated in this study enrollment, with exception of the following circumstances:
* Patients with a history of malignancy who have been adequately treated and have been disease-free for at least 1 year, and
* Patients with adequately treated active non-invasive cancers (such as non-melanomatous skin cancer or in-situ bladder, cervical and breast cancers).
21. Patients with psychiatric/social situations or addictive disorders that may compromise the ability of the patients to give informed consent or to comply with the study procedures.
22. Female patients who are pregnant or lactating.
18 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
IQVIA Biotech
INDUSTRY
Celyad Oncology SA
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Frederic Lehmann, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Celyad Oncology SA
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Colorado
Aurora, Colorado, United States
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute Hospital, Inc.,
Tampa, Florida, United States
Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
New York School of Medicine
New York, New York, United States
Universitair Ziekenhuis Antwerpen
Antwerp, , Belgium
Institute Jules Bordet
Brussels, , Belgium
UZ Gent
Ghent, , Belgium
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CYAD-N2T-005
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.