Trial Outcomes & Findings for Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetic Profiles of MOTREM (LR12) in Healthy Male Subjects (NCT NCT03463044)
NCT ID: NCT03463044
Last Updated: 2025-02-10
Results Overview
The number of subjects experiencing treatment emergent adverse events was collected to assess the safety and tolerability of MOTREM (LR12) in comparison with placebo.
COMPLETED
PHASE1
27 participants
30-44 days
2025-02-10
Participant Flow
The study was conducted in the UK. The first subject first visit was on 01 April 2016 and last subject last visit was on 25 August 2016.
Subjects were screened within 14 days and screening could be performed over multiple days prior to entering the study on Day -1. A total of 27 subjects were randomized and 26 subjects completed the study (1 subject was lost to follow-up and was prematurely withdrawn).
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Placebo
Placebo: Placebo
|
1 mg (Loading Dose) Nangibotide
Part A, Cohort 1: 1 mg (loading dose) over 15 minutes i.v.
|
10 mg (Loading Dose) Nangibotide
Part A, Cohort 2: 10 mg (loading dose) over 15 minutes i.v.
|
0.5 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 0.03 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
Part B, Cohort 3: 0.5 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 0.03 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
1 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 0.1 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
Part B, Cohort 4: 1 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 0.1 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
2 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 0.3 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
Part B, Cohort 5: 2 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 0.3 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
5 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 1 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
Part B, Cohort 6: 5 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 1 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
5 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 3 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
Part B, Cohort 7: 5 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 3 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
5 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 6 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
Part B, Cohort 8: 5 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 6 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
6
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
6
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
2
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Placebo
Placebo: Placebo
|
1 mg (Loading Dose) Nangibotide
Part A, Cohort 1: 1 mg (loading dose) over 15 minutes i.v.
|
10 mg (Loading Dose) Nangibotide
Part A, Cohort 2: 10 mg (loading dose) over 15 minutes i.v.
|
0.5 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 0.03 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
Part B, Cohort 3: 0.5 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 0.03 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
1 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 0.1 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
Part B, Cohort 4: 1 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 0.1 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
2 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 0.3 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
Part B, Cohort 5: 2 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 0.3 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
5 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 1 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
Part B, Cohort 6: 5 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 1 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
5 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 3 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
Part B, Cohort 7: 5 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 3 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
5 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 6 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
Part B, Cohort 8: 5 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 6 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetic Profiles of MOTREM (LR12) in Healthy Male Subjects
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Cohort 1
n=1 Participants
1 mg nangibotide over 15 minutes i.v.
|
Cohort 2
n=2 Participants
10 mg nangibotide over 15 minutes i.v.
|
Cohort 3
n=4 Participants
0.5 mg/kg i.v. and 0.03 mg/kg/h nangibotide i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min or placebo
|
Cohort 4
n=4 Participants
1 mg/kg i.v. and 0.1 mg/kg/h i.v. nangibotide over 7 hours and 45 min or placebo
|
Cohort 5
n=4 Participants
2 mg/kg i.v. and 0.3 mg/kg/h i.v. nangibotide over 7 hours and 45 min or placebo
|
Cohort 6
n=4 Participants
5 mg/kg i.v. and 1 mg/kg/h i.v. nangibotide over 7 hours and 45 min or placebo
|
Cohort 7
n=4 Participants
5 mg/kg i.v. and 3 mg/kg/h i.v. nangibotide over 7 hours and 45 min or placebo
|
Cohort 8
n=4 Participants
5 mg/kg i.v. and 6 mg/kg/h i.v. nangibotide over 7 hours and 45 min or placebo
|
Total
n=27 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
27 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
27 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 participants
n=4 Participants
|
4 participants
n=21 Participants
|
4 participants
n=8 Participants
|
4 participants
n=8 Participants
|
4 participants
n=24 Participants
|
27 participants
n=42 Participants
|
|
Weight
|
81.2 kg
n=5 Participants
|
68.6 kg
n=7 Participants
|
71.7 kg
n=5 Participants
|
77.1 kg
n=4 Participants
|
73.1 kg
n=21 Participants
|
74.4 kg
n=8 Participants
|
77.1 kg
n=8 Participants
|
76.7 kg
n=24 Participants
|
75.7 kg
n=42 Participants
|
|
Height
|
189.0 cm
n=5 Participants
|
169.5 cm
n=7 Participants
|
178.0 cm
n=5 Participants
|
180.0 cm
n=4 Participants
|
183.0 cm
n=21 Participants
|
178.0 cm
n=8 Participants
|
179.5 cm
n=8 Participants
|
182.0 cm
n=24 Participants
|
180.0 cm
n=42 Participants
|
|
BMI
|
22.7 kg/m²
n=5 Participants
|
23.7 kg/m²
n=7 Participants
|
22.3 kg/m²
n=5 Participants
|
24.2 kg/m²
n=4 Participants
|
21.9 kg/m²
n=21 Participants
|
23.5 kg/m²
n=8 Participants
|
24.1 kg/m²
n=8 Participants
|
23.1 kg/m²
n=24 Participants
|
23.4 kg/m²
n=42 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 30-44 daysThe number of subjects experiencing treatment emergent adverse events was collected to assess the safety and tolerability of MOTREM (LR12) in comparison with placebo.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=6 Participants
Placebo: Placebo
|
1 mg (Loading Dose) Nangibotide
n=1 Participants
Part A, Cohort 1: 1 mg (loading dose) over 15 minutes i.v.
|
10 mg (Loading Dose) Nangibotide
n=2 Participants
Part A, Cohort 2: 10 mg (loading dose) over 15 minutes i.v.
|
0.5 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 0.03 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
n=3 Participants
Part B, Cohort 3: 0.5 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 0.03 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
1 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 0.1 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
n=3 Participants
Part B, Cohort 4: 1 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 0.1 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
2 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 0.3 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
n=3 Participants
Part B, Cohort 5: 2 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 0.3 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
5 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 1 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
n=3 Participants
Part B, Cohort 6: 5 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 1 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
5 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 3 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
n=3 Participants
Part B, Cohort 7: 5 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 3 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
5 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 6 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose)
n=3 Participants
Part B, Cohort 8: 5 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 6 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Safety and Tolerability: the Number of Subjects Experiencing Treatment Emergent Adverse Events
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) was assessed only for Groups 3-8 who received loading dose over 15 min and maintenance dose over 7 h and 45 min. Cmax is determined over a period of time starting from predose to 10h after start of the loading dose.Population: In cohort 1 and cohort 2, there was 1 subject per cohort and the subjects received only a loading dose. LR12 plasma concentrations were quantifiable only at 15 min post-start of the infusion. For this reason, no PK analysis was performed for these two cohorts and for this reason results were not presented.
Plasma concentrations of LR12 were measured by a validated liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) assay and analyzed using noncompartmental methods to obtain estimates of the pharmacokinetic parameter of Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=3 Participants
Placebo: Placebo
|
1 mg (Loading Dose) Nangibotide
n=3 Participants
Part A, Cohort 1: 1 mg (loading dose) over 15 minutes i.v.
|
10 mg (Loading Dose) Nangibotide
n=3 Participants
Part A, Cohort 2: 10 mg (loading dose) over 15 minutes i.v.
|
0.5 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 0.03 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
n=3 Participants
Part B, Cohort 3: 0.5 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 0.03 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
1 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 0.1 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
n=3 Participants
Part B, Cohort 4: 1 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 0.1 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
2 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 0.3 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
n=3 Participants
Part B, Cohort 5: 2 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 0.3 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
5 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 1 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
Part B, Cohort 6: 5 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 1 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
5 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 3 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
Part B, Cohort 7: 5 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 3 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
5 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 6 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose)
Part B, Cohort 8: 5 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 6 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Pharmacokinetics (Maximum Plasma Concentration)
|
256.20 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 39
|
638.04 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 25
|
1643.25 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 22
|
3818.94 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 1
|
4185.47 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 66
|
4200.05 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 21
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cavg30-465 was assessed only for Groups 3-8 who received loading dose over 15 min and maintenance dose over 7 h and 45 min. Cavg30-465 is determined over a period of time starting from predose to 10h after start of the loading dose.Population: In cohort 1 and cohort 2, there was 1 subject per cohort and the subjects received only a loading dose. LR12 plasma concentrations were quantifiable only at 15 min post-start of the infusion. For this reason, no PK analysis was performed for these two cohorts. For Cohort 3 values for Cavg30-465 were non-calculable. Hence, the results for Cohorts 1,2 and 3 are not presented.
Plasma concentrations of LR12 were measured by a validated LC-MS/MS assay and analyzed using noncompartmental methods to obtain estimates of the PK parameter of steady state concentration during the maintenance infusion (Cavg30-465).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=3 Participants
Placebo: Placebo
|
1 mg (Loading Dose) Nangibotide
n=3 Participants
Part A, Cohort 1: 1 mg (loading dose) over 15 minutes i.v.
|
10 mg (Loading Dose) Nangibotide
n=3 Participants
Part A, Cohort 2: 10 mg (loading dose) over 15 minutes i.v.
|
0.5 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 0.03 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
n=3 Participants
Part B, Cohort 3: 0.5 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 0.03 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
1 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 0.1 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
n=3 Participants
Part B, Cohort 4: 1 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 0.1 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
2 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 0.3 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
n=3 Participants
Part B, Cohort 5: 2 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 0.3 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
5 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 1 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
Part B, Cohort 6: 5 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 1 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
5 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 3 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
Part B, Cohort 7: 5 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 3 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
5 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 6 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose)
Part B, Cohort 8: 5 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 6 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Statistical Analysis of LR12 PK Parameters: Steady State Concentration During the Maintenance Infusion (Cavg30-465)
|
NA ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
For Cohort 3 values for Cavg30-465 were non-calculable because of missing values for some of the 3 patients because below the level of detection
|
13.46 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 18
|
36.61 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 14
|
152.41 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 12
|
418.05 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 22
|
983.19 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 20
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: t1/2 was assessed only for Groups 3-8 who received loading dose over 15 min and maintenance dose over 7 h and 45 min. t1/2 is determined over a period of time starting from 7 h and 45 min to 10h after start of the loading dose (decaying period).Population: Up to cohort 5, due to paucity of the data, t1/2 could not be determined, hence the results for these cohorts are not presented.
Plasma concentrations of LR12 were measured by a validated LC-MS/MS assay and analyzed using noncompartmental methods to obtain estimates of the PK parameter of terminal half-life (t1/2). Of note, apparent increase in half-life at increasing doses is explained by the detection of a slow elimination phase, which was below limit of quantification for the lower doses.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=3 Participants
Placebo: Placebo
|
1 mg (Loading Dose) Nangibotide
n=3 Participants
Part A, Cohort 1: 1 mg (loading dose) over 15 minutes i.v.
|
10 mg (Loading Dose) Nangibotide
n=3 Participants
Part A, Cohort 2: 10 mg (loading dose) over 15 minutes i.v.
|
0.5 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 0.03 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
n=3 Participants
Part B, Cohort 3: 0.5 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 0.03 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
1 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 0.1 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
n=3 Participants
Part B, Cohort 4: 1 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 0.1 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
2 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 0.3 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
n=3 Participants
Part B, Cohort 5: 2 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 0.3 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
5 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 1 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
Part B, Cohort 6: 5 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 1 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
5 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 3 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
Part B, Cohort 7: 5 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 3 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
5 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 6 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose)
Part B, Cohort 8: 5 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 6 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Statistical Analysis of LR12 PK Parameters: t1/2
|
NA minute
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Up to cohort 5, due to paucity of the data (below the level of detection), t1/2 could not be determined
|
NA minute
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Up to cohort 5, due to paucity of the data (below the level of detection), t1/2 could not be determined.
|
NA minute
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
Up to cohort 5, due to paucity of the data (below the level of detection), t1/2 could not be determined.
|
1.63 minute
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 20
|
17.87 minute
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 23
|
40.70 minute
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 76
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: AUC0-t was assessed only for Groups 3-8 who received loading dose over 15 min and maintenance dose over 7 h and 45 min. AUC0-t is determined over a period of time starting time zero (predose) to the time of last observed concentration (t).Population: There was 1 subject per cohort in cohort 1 and cohort 2 and the subjects received only a loading dose. LR12 (nangibotide) plasma concentrations were quantifiable only at 15 min post-start of the infusion. For this reason, no PK analysis was planned for these two cohorts and no results were presented.
Plasma concentrations of LR12 were measured by a validated LC-MS/MS assay and analyzed using noncompartmental methods to obtain estimates of the PK parameter of the area under the plasma concentration curve (h.ng/mL) from time zero (predose) to the time of last observed concentration (t) measured (which can go up to 10h post loading dose start) using a linear trapezoidal method (AUC0-t).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=3 Participants
Placebo: Placebo
|
1 mg (Loading Dose) Nangibotide
n=3 Participants
Part A, Cohort 1: 1 mg (loading dose) over 15 minutes i.v.
|
10 mg (Loading Dose) Nangibotide
n=3 Participants
Part A, Cohort 2: 10 mg (loading dose) over 15 minutes i.v.
|
0.5 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 0.03 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
n=3 Participants
Part B, Cohort 3: 0.5 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 0.03 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
1 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 0.1 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
n=3 Participants
Part B, Cohort 4: 1 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 0.1 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
2 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 0.3 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
n=3 Participants
Part B, Cohort 5: 2 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 0.3 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
5 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 1 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
Part B, Cohort 6: 5 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 1 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
5 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 3 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
Part B, Cohort 7: 5 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 3 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
5 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 6 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose)
Part B, Cohort 8: 5 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 6 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Statistical Analysis of LR12 PK Parameters: AUC0-t
|
101.98 h.ng/ml
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 11
|
244.38 h.ng/ml
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 14
|
661.60 h.ng/ml
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 23
|
2153.14 h.ng/ml
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 11
|
4208.65 h.ng/ml
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 29
|
8556.69 h.ng/ml
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 17
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: AUC0-∞ was assessed only for Groups 3-8 who received loading dose over 15 min and maintenance dose over 7 h and 45 min. AUC0-∞ is determined over a period of time starting time zero (predose) to infinity (cf. extrapolation formula in the above section).Population: The percentage of extrapolation of AUC0-∞ was below 1% in subjects up to cohort 5, and due to this it was not determined for these subjects. For this reason, results were not presented for cohorts 1-5.
Plasma concentrations of LR12 were measured by a validated LC-MS/MS assay and analyzed using noncompartmental methods to obtain estimates of the PK parameter of AUC0-∞. AUC0-∞ represents the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (h.ng/mL) from time 0 to infinity (AUC0- ∞= AUC0-t + \[Ct/ke\], where Ct = the observed concentration of drug for the last sample on the PK profile in which drug was detected, and ke represents the terminal rate constant). The percentage of extrapolation of AUC0-∞ should not exceed 20%.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=3 Participants
Placebo: Placebo
|
1 mg (Loading Dose) Nangibotide
n=3 Participants
Part A, Cohort 1: 1 mg (loading dose) over 15 minutes i.v.
|
10 mg (Loading Dose) Nangibotide
n=3 Participants
Part A, Cohort 2: 10 mg (loading dose) over 15 minutes i.v.
|
0.5 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 0.03 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
n=3 Participants
Part B, Cohort 3: 0.5 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 0.03 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
1 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 0.1 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
n=3 Participants
Part B, Cohort 4: 1 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 0.1 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
2 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 0.3 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
n=3 Participants
Part B, Cohort 5: 2 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 0.3 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
5 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 1 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
Part B, Cohort 6: 5 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 1 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
5 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 3 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
Part B, Cohort 7: 5 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 3 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
5 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 6 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose)
Part B, Cohort 8: 5 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 6 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Statistical Analysis of LR12 PK Parameters: AUC0-∞
|
NA h.ng/ml
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
The percentage of extrapolation of AUC0-∞ was below the level of detection of 1% in subjects up to cohort 5, and due to this it was not determined for these subjects.
|
NA h.ng/ml
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
The percentage of extrapolation of AUC0-∞ was below the level of detection of 1% in subjects up to cohort 5, and due to this it was not determined for these subjects.
|
NA h.ng/ml
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
The percentage of extrapolation of AUC0-∞ was below the level of detection of 1% in subjects up to cohort 5, and due to this it was not determined for these subjects.
|
2153.38 h.ng/ml
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 11
|
4211.90 h.ng/ml
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 29
|
8565.30 h.ng/ml
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 17
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: CL was assessed only for Groups 3-8 who received loading dose over 15 min and maintenance dose over 7 h and 45 min (465 min). CL is calculated based on the perfusion rate (ng/kg/h) and the concentration at the end of perfusion (7h45min = 465min).Population: There was 1 subject per cohort and the subjects received only a loading dose in cohort 1 and cohort 2. LR12 (nangibotide) plasma concentrations were quantifiable only at 15 min post-start of the infusion. No PK analysis was planned for these two cohorts. Also, CL values for cohort 3 were non-calculable. For this reason, results for cohorts 1-3 are not presented.
Plasma concentrations of LR12 were measured by a validated LC-MS/MS assay and analyzed using noncompartmental methods to obtain estimates of the PK parameter of systemic clearance (CL). The systemic clearance was estimated using the formula: CL = K0/ Css where K0 is the perfusion rate (ng/kg/h) and Css is the concentration at the end of perfusion (C at 465 min). Of note, this narrow range of the clearance values indicates that the apparent increases in t1/2 and volume of distribution as a function of doses are not due to a non-linearity in the pharmacokinetics, but to the limit of quantification of the bioanalytical assay.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=3 Participants
Placebo: Placebo
|
1 mg (Loading Dose) Nangibotide
n=3 Participants
Part A, Cohort 1: 1 mg (loading dose) over 15 minutes i.v.
|
10 mg (Loading Dose) Nangibotide
n=3 Participants
Part A, Cohort 2: 10 mg (loading dose) over 15 minutes i.v.
|
0.5 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 0.03 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
n=3 Participants
Part B, Cohort 3: 0.5 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 0.03 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
1 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 0.1 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
n=3 Participants
Part B, Cohort 4: 1 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 0.1 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
2 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 0.3 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
n=3 Participants
Part B, Cohort 5: 2 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 0.3 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
5 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 1 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
Part B, Cohort 6: 5 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 1 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
5 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 3 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
Part B, Cohort 7: 5 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 3 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
5 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 6 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose)
Part B, Cohort 8: 5 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 6 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Statistical Analysis of LR12 PK Parameters: CL
|
NA L/kg/h
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
CL values for cohort 3 were non-calculable due to very low LR12 concentration at 7h45min post maintenance dose (below the level of detection)
|
9.47 L/kg/h
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 9
|
6.79 L/kg/h
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 17
|
6.73 L/kg/h
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 25
|
5.66 L/kg/h
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 22
|
7.50 L/kg/h
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 20
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: V was assessed only for Groups 3-8 who received loading dose over 15 min and maintenance dose over 7 h and 45 min. V is derived from both CL and ke which are calculated from the LR12 concentration time curve from predose to 10h after loading dose start.Population: There was 1 subject per cohort In cohort 1 and cohort 2 and the subjects received only a loading dose. LR12 plasma concentrations were quantifiable only at 15 min post-start of the infusion. No PK analysis was planned for these two cohorts. Also, V values for cohort 3, 4 and 5 were non-calculable. For this reason, no results were presented for cohorts 1-6.
The volume of distribution was estimated according to the following equation: V= CL x MRT (mean residence time). However, regarding administration procedures, MRT could not be calculated precisely. Furthermore, in some cases MRT could not be estimated. Thus, the following formula was used V = CL / ke. The terminal rate constant (ke) was estimated by log-linear regression analysis on data points visually assessed to be on the terminal log-linear phase. Of note, it can be said that this apparent increase in V is also explained by the detection of a slow elimination phase, which was below limit of quantification for the lower doses.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=3 Participants
Placebo: Placebo
|
1 mg (Loading Dose) Nangibotide
n=3 Participants
Part A, Cohort 1: 1 mg (loading dose) over 15 minutes i.v.
|
10 mg (Loading Dose) Nangibotide
n=3 Participants
Part A, Cohort 2: 10 mg (loading dose) over 15 minutes i.v.
|
0.5 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 0.03 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
n=3 Participants
Part B, Cohort 3: 0.5 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 0.03 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
1 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 0.1 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
n=3 Participants
Part B, Cohort 4: 1 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 0.1 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
2 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 0.3 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
n=3 Participants
Part B, Cohort 5: 2 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 0.3 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
5 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 1 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
Part B, Cohort 6: 5 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 1 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
5 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 3 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
Part B, Cohort 7: 5 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 3 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
5 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 6 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose)
Part B, Cohort 8: 5 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 6 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Statistical Analysis of LR12 PK Parameters: Volume of Distribution (V)
|
NA L/kg
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
V values for cohort 3, 4 and 5 were non-calculable (below the level of detection).
|
NA L/kg
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
V values for cohort 3, 4 and 5 were non-calculable (below the level of detection).
|
NA L/kg
Geometric Coefficient of Variation NA
V values for cohort 3, 4 and 5 were non-calculable (below the level of detection).
|
0.26 L/kg
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 46
|
2.43 L/kg
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 30
|
7.34 L/kg
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 62
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: tmax was assessed only for Groups 3-8 who received loading dose over 15 min and maintenance dose over 7 h and 45 min. tmax is determined over a period of time starting from predose to 10h after start of the loading dose.Population: There was 1 subject per cohort in cohort 1 and 2 and the subjects received only a loading dose. LR12 plasma concentrations were quantifiable only at 15 min post-start of the infusion. No PK analysis was planned for these two cohorts. For this reason, results for cohort 1 and 2 were not presented.
Plasma concentrations of LR12 were measured by a validated LC-MS/MS assay and analysed using noncompartmental methods to obtain estimates of the PK parameter of the time at which Cmax is apparent, identified by inspection of the plasma drug concentration vs.time data by WinNonlin (tmax).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=3 Participants
Placebo: Placebo
|
1 mg (Loading Dose) Nangibotide
n=3 Participants
Part A, Cohort 1: 1 mg (loading dose) over 15 minutes i.v.
|
10 mg (Loading Dose) Nangibotide
n=3 Participants
Part A, Cohort 2: 10 mg (loading dose) over 15 minutes i.v.
|
0.5 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 0.03 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
n=3 Participants
Part B, Cohort 3: 0.5 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 0.03 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
1 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 0.1 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
n=3 Participants
Part B, Cohort 4: 1 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 0.1 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
2 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 0.3 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
n=3 Participants
Part B, Cohort 5: 2 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 0.3 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
5 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 1 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
Part B, Cohort 6: 5 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 1 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
5 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 3 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
Part B, Cohort 7: 5 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 3 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
5 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 6 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose)
Part B, Cohort 8: 5 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 6 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Statistical Analysis of LR12 PK Parameters: Tmax
|
15 minute
Interval 15.0 to 15.0
|
15 minute
Interval 15.0 to 15.0
|
15 minute
Interval 15.0 to 15.0
|
15 minute
Interval 15.0 to 15.0
|
5 minute
Interval 5.0 to 15.0
|
5 minute
Interval 5.0 to 15.0
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: t last was assessed only for Groups 3-8 who received loading dose over 15 min and maintenance dose over 7 h and 45 min. t last is determined as the time of last observed concentration which can go up to 10h after loading dose start.Population: There was 1 subject per cohort in cohort 1 and 2 and the subjects received only a loading dose. LR12 plasma concentrations were quantifiable only at 15 min post-start of the infusion. No PK analysis was planned for these two cohorts. For this reason, results for cohort 1 and 2 were not presented.
This PK parameter was calculated from measured plasma concentrations of LR12 and it represents the time of last observed concentration.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=3 Participants
Placebo: Placebo
|
1 mg (Loading Dose) Nangibotide
n=3 Participants
Part A, Cohort 1: 1 mg (loading dose) over 15 minutes i.v.
|
10 mg (Loading Dose) Nangibotide
n=3 Participants
Part A, Cohort 2: 10 mg (loading dose) over 15 minutes i.v.
|
0.5 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 0.03 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
n=3 Participants
Part B, Cohort 3: 0.5 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 0.03 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
1 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 0.1 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
n=3 Participants
Part B, Cohort 4: 1 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 0.1 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
2 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 0.3 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
n=3 Participants
Part B, Cohort 5: 2 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 0.3 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
5 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 1 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
Part B, Cohort 6: 5 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 1 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
5 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 3 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
Part B, Cohort 7: 5 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 3 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
5 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 6 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose)
Part B, Cohort 8: 5 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 6 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Statistical Analysis of LR12 PK Parameters: t Last
|
465 minute
Interval 360.0 to 484.0
|
484 minute
Interval 484.0 to 493.0
|
484 minute
Interval 484.0 to 484.0
|
487 minute
Interval 487.0 to 487.0
|
510 minute
Interval 510.0 to 511.0
|
600 minute
Interval 510.0 to 601.0
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
Adverse Events
Placebo
1 mg (Loading Dose) Nangibotide
10 mg (Loading Dose) Nangibotide
0.5 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 0.03 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
1 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 0.1 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
2 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 0.3 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
5 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 1 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
5 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 3 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
5 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 6 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=6 participants at risk
Placebo: Placebo
|
1 mg (Loading Dose) Nangibotide
n=1 participants at risk
Part A, Cohort 1: 1 mg (loading dose) over 15 minutes i.v.
|
10 mg (Loading Dose) Nangibotide
n=2 participants at risk
Part A, Cohort 2: 10 mg (loading dose) over 15 minutes i.v.
|
0.5 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 0.03 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
n=3 participants at risk
Part B, Cohort 3: 0.5 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 0.03 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
1 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 0.1 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
n=3 participants at risk
Part B, Cohort 4: 1 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 0.1 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
2 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 0.3 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
n=3 participants at risk
Part B, Cohort 5: 2 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 0.3 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
5 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 1 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
n=3 participants at risk
Part B, Cohort 6: 5 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 1 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
5 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 3 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
n=3 participants at risk
Part B, Cohort 7: 5 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 3 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
5 mg/kg (Loading Dose) and 6 mg/kg/h (Maintenance Dose) Nangibotide
n=3 participants at risk
Part B, Cohort 8: 5 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 6 mg/kg/h maintenance dose i.v. over 7 hours and 45 min
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Cerumen removal
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/1 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Haemangioma
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/1 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
50.0%
1/2 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Viral Pharyngitis
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/1 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/1 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
50.0%
1/2 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/1 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
50.0%
1/2 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
|
General disorders
Infusion site reaction
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/1 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
|
General disorders
Administration site rash
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/1 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
|
General disorders
Administration site pain
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/1 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/1 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Tooth development disorder
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/1 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/1 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
50.0%
1/2 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were monitored until day 28 (end of study visit).
All TEAEs were mild in severity, and considered unrelated to the study drug. There was no SAE and no TEAE leading to treatment stop.
|
Additional Information
Executive VP Research and Medical Sciences, INOTREM SA
INOTREM SA
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place