Comparative Evaluation of Minimally Invasive "tibial Tuberoplasty" Surgical Technique Versus Conventional Open Surgery for Tibial Plateau Fractures
NCT ID: NCT03444779
Last Updated: 2024-12-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
137 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-10-26
2024-11-14
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The clinical outcome of these patients depends mainly on the primary stability provided by the surgical treatment, after the greatest anatomical reduction possible. Indeed, Giannoudis and al. have demonstrated that under simple X-rays, the smaller the detected step-off, the better the outcome.The aim is to allow for recovery of good joint mobility to promote rapid resumption of activity and to limit the onset of early osteoarthritis.
The classical technique used for reduction and osteosynthesis of tibial plateau fractures (open surgical technique using a bone tamp) has several pitfalls : devascularization of the bone and skin, risks of infection and functional rehabilitation difficulties with delayed recovery of weight bearing. Moreover, this technique does not allow for the simultaneous diagnosis and treatment of other possible lesions, such as meniscal injuries in particular.
Since 2011, Poitiers University Hospital is offering to its patients a new minimally invasive technique for the reduction and stabilization of tibial plateau fractures, baptized "Tibial Tuberoplasty". The concept derives from the divergent use of vertebral kyphoplasty, initially dedicated for spinal injuries and transposed here to the tibial plateau. This technique involves expansion of the tibial plateau through inflation of a kyphoplasty balloon, filling of the created cavity with cement (PMMA, calcium phosphate) and percutaneous screw fixation.
Orthopaedic surgeons of Poitiers University Hospital performed the first tibial tuberoplasties through a feasibility study on 36 cadaveric subjects and then transposed the technique to human. Surgeons identified major advantages such as minimal skin damage, possible treatment of posterior and multi-fragmented compressions (lifting in a single block by the balloon), reinforcement of the stability of the assembly using cement, possible use of combined arthroscopy (for concomitant meniscal injuries treatment).
This technique allows for optimization of the fracture reduction by elevating the posterior fragments with the inflatable bone tamp through an anterior approach. The reduction is made possible thanks to the specificity of the inflatable bone tamp which inflates and reduces the area of least resistance.
The aim of this innovative technique is focused on the anatomical reduction in order to restore the convexity of the tibial plateau which is similar to the balloon convexity.
The results from the first 40 patients operated since 2011 are promising and show a proportion of 70% presenting less than 5 mm step-off reduction. A larger scale multicenter randomized controlled trial is now requested to further demonstrate the superiority of the "Tibial Tuberoplasty" to the standard treatment.
The coordinator investigator designed this study to evaluate the quality of tibial fracture reduction offered by percutaneous "Tibial Tuberoplasty" versus conventional open surgery for tibial plateau fracture but also its impact on clinical outcome.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control group
The patients will be treated with an open technique: cutaneous incision with submeniscal arthrotomy under guidance of a fluoroscope. The reduction will be performed using a spatula, a bone tamp or open reduction internal fixation. The osteosynthesis and filling of the cavity will be performed by the same surgical access.
Open technique
Cutaneous incision with submeniscal arthrotomy under guidance of a fluoroscope.
Experimental group
The patients will be treated with the "Tibial Tuberoplasty" technique under fluoroscopic guidance with or without arthroscopy. The reduction will be performed by an anterior approach using a kyphoplasty balloon. The combined osteosynthesis including cannulated screws and cementoplasty will both be performed by a percutaneous technique.
Tibial Tuberoplasty
Kyphoplasty ballon
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Tibial Tuberoplasty
Kyphoplasty ballon
Open technique
Cutaneous incision with submeniscal arthrotomy under guidance of a fluoroscope.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patients with a Schatzker type 2 or 3 tibial plateau fracture (compression with or without split) demonstrated on CT-scan and located in the lateral or medial condyle of tibia.
3. Patients with fractures caused by trauma.
4. Patients with fractures 10 days old maximum.
5. Understand and accept the constraints of the study.
6. Be a beneficiary or affiliated member of a Health Insurance plan.
7. Give written consent for the study after having received clear information.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patients with fractures resulting from osteolysis.
3. Patients with open fractures.
4. Patients with fractures more than 10 days old.
5. Patients with concomitant fracture(s) or condition(s) during the trauma reducing the range of motion.
6. Patients unable to walk before the injury.
7. History of sepsis in the injured knee.
8. Contraindications to anesthesia, contrast agent, medical devices or cement.
9. History of hypersensitivity reactions to contrast media, bone filler or metal.
10. Patients with a degenerative joint disease (polyarthritis, etc.).
11. Absence of signature of the informed consent form.
12. Patients not covered by French national health insurance.
13. Subjects requiring closer protection, i.e. minors, pregnant women, nursing mothers, subjects deprived of their freedom by a court or administrative decision, subjects admitted to a health or social welfare establishment, major subjects under legal protection, and finally patients in an emergency setting.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Poitiers University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Tanguy VENDEUVRE, Dr
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Poitiers Hospital University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CHU d'Amiens
Amiens, , France
CHU Angers
Angers, , France
AP-HP / Hopital Ambroise Paré
Boulogne-Billancourt, , France
CHU de Brest
Brest, , France
CHU Dijon
Dijon, , France
CHU de Nantes
Nantes, , France
CHU de Poitiers
Poitiers, , France
CHU de Rennes
Rennes, , France
CHU Rouen
Rouen, , France
CHRU Tours
Tours, , France
CH Versailles
Versailles, , France
CHU de Martinique
Fort-de-France, , Martinique
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Vendeuvre T, Monlezun O, Brandet C, Ingrand P, Durand-Zaleski I, Gayet LE, Germaneau A, Khiami F, Roulaud M, Herpe G, Rigoard P. Comparative evaluation of minimally invasive 'tibial tuberoplasty' surgical technique versus conventional open surgery for Schatzker II-III tibial plateau fractures: design of a multicentre, randomised, controlled and blinded trial (TUBERIMPACT study). BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 3;9(8):e026962. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026962.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2018-A01027-48
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id