Trial Outcomes & Findings for Efficacy Safety Score in Postoperative Management (NCT NCT03438578)
NCT ID: NCT03438578
Last Updated: 2020-09-24
Results Overview
The measured postoperative time when patient can stand and able to walk one or more steps, with or without support
COMPLETED
NA
200 participants
24 hours
2020-09-24
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Efficacy Safety Score Monitoring
Patients monitored with wireless vital signs and Efficacy Safety Score after discharge from the post-anesthesia care unit to an ordinary ward
Efficacy Safety Score monitoring: According to data gathered from ESS and monitoring, the patients will receive needed care.
|
Regular
Patients receiving standard postoperative care after discharge from the post-anesthesia care unit to an ordinary ward
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
100
|
100
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
99
|
96
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
4
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Efficacy Safety Score Monitoring
n=96 Participants
Patients monitored with wireless vital signs and Efficacy Safety Score after discharge from the post-anesthesia care unit to an ordinary ward
Efficacy Safety Score monitoring: According to data gathered from ESS and monitoring, the patients will receive needed care.
|
Regular
n=99 Participants
Patients receiving standard postoperative care after discharge from the post-anesthesia care unit to an ordinary ward
|
Total
n=195 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
61 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.5 • n=96 Participants
|
62 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.3 • n=99 Participants
|
62 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.9 • n=195 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
36 Participants
n=96 Participants
|
37 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
73 Participants
n=195 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
60 Participants
n=96 Participants
|
62 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
122 Participants
n=195 Participants
|
|
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
|
—
|
—
|
0 Participants
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Norway
|
96 Participants
n=96 Participants
|
99 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
195 Participants
n=195 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 hoursThe measured postoperative time when patient can stand and able to walk one or more steps, with or without support
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Efficacy Safety Score Monitoring
n=96 Participants
Patients monitored with wireless vital signs and Efficacy Safety Score after discharge from the post-anesthesia care unit to an ordinary ward
Efficacy Safety Score monitoring: According to data gathered from ESS and monitoring, the patients will receive needed care.
|
Regular
n=99 Participants
Patients receiving standard postoperative care after discharge from the post-anesthesia care unit to an ordinary ward
|
|---|---|---|
|
Time to Mobilization
|
10.1 hours
Interval 8.1 to 12.2
|
14.2 hours
Interval 12.0 to 16.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 hoursReported pain hourly on a 11-digit scale, called Verbal Numeric Rating Scale for pain, 0-10 where 0 is no pain, and 10 is worst thinkable pain. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Efficacy Safety Score Monitoring
n=96 Participants
Patients monitored with wireless vital signs and Efficacy Safety Score after discharge from the post-anesthesia care unit to an ordinary ward
Efficacy Safety Score monitoring: According to data gathered from ESS and monitoring, the patients will receive needed care.
|
Regular
n=99 Participants
Patients receiving standard postoperative care after discharge from the post-anesthesia care unit to an ordinary ward
|
|---|---|---|
|
Pain Measurement, Verbal Numeric Rating Scale
|
2.1 score on a scale
Interval 1.8 to 2.9
|
3.3 score on a scale
Interval 2.9 to 3.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 hoursReported patient satisfaction on a 1-5 scale, (Likert scale), where 1 is Very dissatisfied, and 5 is Very satisfied. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Efficacy Safety Score Monitoring
n=96 Participants
Patients monitored with wireless vital signs and Efficacy Safety Score after discharge from the post-anesthesia care unit to an ordinary ward
Efficacy Safety Score monitoring: According to data gathered from ESS and monitoring, the patients will receive needed care.
|
Regular
n=99 Participants
Patients receiving standard postoperative care after discharge from the post-anesthesia care unit to an ordinary ward
|
|---|---|---|
|
Patient Satisfaction
|
4.9 score on a scale
Interval 4.9 to 5.0
|
4.3 score on a scale
Interval 4.2 to 4.5
|
Adverse Events
Efficacy Safety Score Monitoring
Regular
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Efficacy Safety Score Monitoring
n=96 participants at risk
Patients monitored with wireless vital signs and Efficacy Safety Score after discharge from the post-anesthesia care unit to an ordinary ward
Efficacy Safety Score monitoring: According to data gathered from ESS and monitoring, the patients will receive needed care.
|
Regular
n=99 participants at risk
Patients receiving standard postoperative care after discharge from the post-anesthesia care unit to an ordinary ward
|
|---|---|---|
|
Nervous system disorders
Neurological seizure
|
0.00%
0/96 • 24 hour after surgery
Low blood pressure Arrythmia Need for extra treatment Neurological events
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • 24 hour after surgery
Low blood pressure Arrythmia Need for extra treatment Neurological events
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Stroke
|
0.00%
0/96 • 24 hour after surgery
Low blood pressure Arrythmia Need for extra treatment Neurological events
|
1.0%
1/99 • Number of events 1 • 24 hour after surgery
Low blood pressure Arrythmia Need for extra treatment Neurological events
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Efficacy Safety Score Monitoring
n=96 participants at risk
Patients monitored with wireless vital signs and Efficacy Safety Score after discharge from the post-anesthesia care unit to an ordinary ward
Efficacy Safety Score monitoring: According to data gathered from ESS and monitoring, the patients will receive needed care.
|
Regular
n=99 participants at risk
Patients receiving standard postoperative care after discharge from the post-anesthesia care unit to an ordinary ward
|
|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Hypotension
|
2.1%
2/96 • Number of events 2 • 24 hour after surgery
Low blood pressure Arrythmia Need for extra treatment Neurological events
|
0.00%
0/99 • 24 hour after surgery
Low blood pressure Arrythmia Need for extra treatment Neurological events
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Pain treatment, nerve blocks
|
2.1%
2/96 • Number of events 2 • 24 hour after surgery
Low blood pressure Arrythmia Need for extra treatment Neurological events
|
0.00%
0/99 • 24 hour after surgery
Low blood pressure Arrythmia Need for extra treatment Neurological events
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
1.0%
1/96 • Number of events 1 • 24 hour after surgery
Low blood pressure Arrythmia Need for extra treatment Neurological events
|
0.00%
0/99 • 24 hour after surgery
Low blood pressure Arrythmia Need for extra treatment Neurological events
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place