Trial Outcomes & Findings for Feasibility of a Mobile Application to Support Reflection and Dialog About Strengths in People With Chronic Illness (NCT NCT03437863)
NCT ID: NCT03437863
Last Updated: 2021-11-16
Results Overview
Study-specific questions on perceived usefulness of the application
Recruitment status
COMPLETED
Study phase
NA
Target enrollment
12 participants
Primary outcome timeframe
Within an hour after using the application
Results posted on
2021-11-16
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Mobile Application
Participants recruited from a self-management course are asked to use (single time) a mobile application to support reflection of personal strengths. The participant borrows an Ipad and uses the application to 1) reflect and identify their strengths by reviewing a list of examples, 2) define personal goals, and 3) link strengths to goals.
Mobile application: Use of a mobile application (on a borrowed device) with following features: 1) strengths reflection and identification, 2) summary of registered strengths, 3) defining goals, and 4) linking strengths to goals.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
12
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
12
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Mobile Application
n=12 Participants
Participants recruited from a self-management course are asked to use (single time) a mobile application to support reflection of personal strengths. The participant borrows an Ipad and uses the application to 1) reflect and identify their strengths by reviewing a list of examples, 2) define personal goals, and 3) link strengths to goals.
Mobile application: Use of a mobile application (on a borrowed device) with following features: 1) strengths reflection and identification, 2) summary of registered strengths, 3) defining goals, and 4) linking strengths to goals.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
50.0 years
n=12 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
11 Participants
n=12 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
1 Participants
n=12 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Within an hour after using the applicationStudy-specific questions on perceived usefulness of the application
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mobile Application
n=12 Participants
Participants recruited from a self-management course are asked to use (single time) a mobile application to support reflection of personal strengths. The participant borrows an Ipad and uses the application to 1) reflect and identify their strengths by reviewing a list of examples, 2) define personal goals, and 3) link strengths to goals.
Mobile application: Use of a mobile application (on a borrowed device) with following features: 1) strengths reflection and identification, 2) summary of registered strengths, 3) defining goals, and 4) linking strengths to goals.
|
|---|---|
|
Perceived Usefulness of the Application
I would recommend the app to others in my situation · Mssing
|
0 Participants
|
|
Perceived Usefulness of the Application
It was meaningful and relevant to use the app · Agree or strongly agree
|
12 Participants
|
|
Perceived Usefulness of the Application
It was meaningful and relevant to use the app · Disagree or strongly disagree
|
0 Participants
|
|
Perceived Usefulness of the Application
It was meaningful and relevant to use the app · Neutral
|
0 Participants
|
|
Perceived Usefulness of the Application
It was meaningful and relevant to use the app · Mssing
|
0 Participants
|
|
Perceived Usefulness of the Application
I became more aware of my own strengths by using the app · Agree or strongly agree
|
9 Participants
|
|
Perceived Usefulness of the Application
I became more aware of my own strengths by using the app · Disagree or strongly disagree
|
1 Participants
|
|
Perceived Usefulness of the Application
I became more aware of my own strengths by using the app · Neutral
|
2 Participants
|
|
Perceived Usefulness of the Application
I became more aware of my own strengths by using the app · Mssing
|
0 Participants
|
|
Perceived Usefulness of the Application
It was useful for me to see an overview of my own strengths · Agree or strongly agree
|
10 Participants
|
|
Perceived Usefulness of the Application
It was useful for me to see an overview of my own strengths · Disagree or strongly disagree
|
0 Participants
|
|
Perceived Usefulness of the Application
It was useful for me to see an overview of my own strengths · Neutral
|
2 Participants
|
|
Perceived Usefulness of the Application
It was useful for me to see an overview of my own strengths · Mssing
|
0 Participants
|
|
Perceived Usefulness of the Application
It was useful for me to be able to register a goal · Agree or strongly agree
|
5 Participants
|
|
Perceived Usefulness of the Application
It was useful for me to be able to register a goal · Disagree or strongly disagree
|
2 Participants
|
|
Perceived Usefulness of the Application
It was useful for me to be able to register a goal · Neutral
|
4 Participants
|
|
Perceived Usefulness of the Application
It was useful for me to be able to register a goal · Mssing
|
1 Participants
|
|
Perceived Usefulness of the Application
It was useful for me to be able to link the strengths to concrete goals · Agree or strongly agree
|
6 Participants
|
|
Perceived Usefulness of the Application
It was useful for me to be able to link the strengths to concrete goals · Disagree or strongly disagree
|
0 Participants
|
|
Perceived Usefulness of the Application
It was useful for me to be able to link the strengths to concrete goals · Neutral
|
5 Participants
|
|
Perceived Usefulness of the Application
It was useful for me to be able to link the strengths to concrete goals · Mssing
|
1 Participants
|
|
Perceived Usefulness of the Application
I liked the possibility to register my own notes · Agree or strongly agree
|
7 Participants
|
|
Perceived Usefulness of the Application
I liked the possibility to register my own notes · Disagree or strongly disagree
|
0 Participants
|
|
Perceived Usefulness of the Application
I liked the possibility to register my own notes · Neutral
|
4 Participants
|
|
Perceived Usefulness of the Application
I liked the possibility to register my own notes · Mssing
|
1 Participants
|
|
Perceived Usefulness of the Application
For me it would be relevant to share the overview of my strengths with my healthcare provider · Agree or strongly agree
|
8 Participants
|
|
Perceived Usefulness of the Application
For me it would be relevant to share the overview of my strengths with my healthcare provider · Disagree or strongly disagree
|
0 Participants
|
|
Perceived Usefulness of the Application
For me it would be relevant to share the overview of my strengths with my healthcare provider · Neutral
|
4 Participants
|
|
Perceived Usefulness of the Application
For me it would be relevant to share the overview of my strengths with my healthcare provider · Mssing
|
0 Participants
|
|
Perceived Usefulness of the Application
It was boring to use the app · Agree or strongly agree
|
2 Participants
|
|
Perceived Usefulness of the Application
It was boring to use the app · Disagree or strongly disagree
|
9 Participants
|
|
Perceived Usefulness of the Application
It was boring to use the app · Neutral
|
1 Participants
|
|
Perceived Usefulness of the Application
It was boring to use the app · Mssing
|
0 Participants
|
|
Perceived Usefulness of the Application
It was demanding for me to use the app · Agree or strongly agree
|
1 Participants
|
|
Perceived Usefulness of the Application
It was demanding for me to use the app · Disagree or strongly disagree
|
11 Participants
|
|
Perceived Usefulness of the Application
It was demanding for me to use the app · Neutral
|
0 Participants
|
|
Perceived Usefulness of the Application
It was demanding for me to use the app · Mssing
|
0 Participants
|
|
Perceived Usefulness of the Application
I would like to have the app on my own mobile devise · Agree or strongly agree
|
7 Participants
|
|
Perceived Usefulness of the Application
I would like to have the app on my own mobile devise · Disagree or strongly disagree
|
2 Participants
|
|
Perceived Usefulness of the Application
I would like to have the app on my own mobile devise · Neutral
|
3 Participants
|
|
Perceived Usefulness of the Application
I would like to have the app on my own mobile devise · Mssing
|
0 Participants
|
|
Perceived Usefulness of the Application
I would recommend the app to others in my situation · Agree or strongly agree
|
9 Participants
|
|
Perceived Usefulness of the Application
I would recommend the app to others in my situation · Disagree or strongly disagree
|
0 Participants
|
|
Perceived Usefulness of the Application
I would recommend the app to others in my situation · Neutral
|
3 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Within an hour after using the applicationThis 10 item questionnaire measures usability. Each item has 5 response options with total score ranging from 0 to 100. Higher values represent a better outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mobile Application
n=12 Participants
Participants recruited from a self-management course are asked to use (single time) a mobile application to support reflection of personal strengths. The participant borrows an Ipad and uses the application to 1) reflect and identify their strengths by reviewing a list of examples, 2) define personal goals, and 3) link strengths to goals.
Mobile application: Use of a mobile application (on a borrowed device) with following features: 1) strengths reflection and identification, 2) summary of registered strengths, 3) defining goals, and 4) linking strengths to goals.
|
|---|---|
|
The System Usability Scale
|
86.3 score on a scale
Interval 70.0 to 100.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-intervention and post-intervention, within an hour after using the applicationThis scale measures positive and negative affect with two subscales (positive affect and negative affect). Positive affect subscale scores can range from 10-50, with higher scores representing higher levels of positive affect. Negative affect subscale scores can range from 10-50, with lower scores representing lower levels of negative affect.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mobile Application
n=12 Participants
Participants recruited from a self-management course are asked to use (single time) a mobile application to support reflection of personal strengths. The participant borrows an Ipad and uses the application to 1) reflect and identify their strengths by reviewing a list of examples, 2) define personal goals, and 3) link strengths to goals.
Mobile application: Use of a mobile application (on a borrowed device) with following features: 1) strengths reflection and identification, 2) summary of registered strengths, 3) defining goals, and 4) linking strengths to goals.
|
|---|---|
|
The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule.
Positive emotion sub scale (pre-intervention)
|
34.0 score on a scale
Interval 31.0 to 46.0
|
|
The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule.
Positive emotion sub scale (post-intervention)
|
35.0 score on a scale
Interval 28.0 to 45.0
|
|
The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule.
Negative emotion subscale (pre-intervention)
|
12.0 score on a scale
Interval 10.0 to 23.0
|
|
The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule.
Negative emotion (post-intervention)
|
11.0 score on a scale
Interval 10.0 to 16.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-intervention and post-intervention, within an hour after using the applicationThis scale measures self-efficacy with two subscales with 5 response options. The "pain" subscale has 5 items and a score range from 0 to 20. The "other symptoms" subscale has 6 items and a score range from 0 to 24. Higher scores equal higher levels of self-efficacy.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mobile Application
n=12 Participants
Participants recruited from a self-management course are asked to use (single time) a mobile application to support reflection of personal strengths. The participant borrows an Ipad and uses the application to 1) reflect and identify their strengths by reviewing a list of examples, 2) define personal goals, and 3) link strengths to goals.
Mobile application: Use of a mobile application (on a borrowed device) with following features: 1) strengths reflection and identification, 2) summary of registered strengths, 3) defining goals, and 4) linking strengths to goals.
|
|---|---|
|
The Arthritis Self-efficacy Scale
Pain sub scale (pre-intervention)
|
12.0 score on a scale
Interval 5.0 to 16.0
|
|
The Arthritis Self-efficacy Scale
Pain sub scale (post-intervention)
|
14.0 score on a scale
Interval 6.0 to 17.0
|
|
The Arthritis Self-efficacy Scale
Other symptoms sub scale (pre-intervention)
|
16.0 score on a scale
Interval 8.0 to 22.0
|
|
The Arthritis Self-efficacy Scale
Other symptoms subscale (post-intervention)
|
17.0 score on a scale
Interval 10.0 to 22.0
|
Adverse Events
Mobile Application
Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Head of Research and Development
Department of Digital Health Research (previously Center for Shared Decision Making and Collaborative Care Research)
Phone: +47 23 03 31 67
Email: [email protected]
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place