Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
967 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-08-15
2022-02-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The primary objective is to implement a hereditary cancer risk assessment program in healthy 18-49 year-olds in primary care settings within a vertically integrated health delivery system (Kaiser Permanente) and a federal qualified health center (Denver Health). The investigators will assess clinical exome sequencing implementation and interpretation, as well as tailored interactions for low health literacy including a contextualized consent process, and a modified approach to results disclosure and genetic counseling. The investigators will also assess the clinical utility (healthcare utilization and adherence to recommended care) and personal utility of primary and additional results from clinical exome sequencing, and evaluate the ethical and policy implications of considering personal utility of genomic information decisions for health care coverage.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
CfDNA in Hereditary And High-risk Malignancies 2
NCT06726642
Exome Analysis (Complexe vs Simple) to Help the Therapeutic Decision for the Precision Medicine
NCT04614480
EXOME Analysis Position in the Strategy of Genetic Predisposition Factors Identification in Early-onset Cancer
NCT04141462
Using a Geriatric Oncology Assessment to Link With Services
NCT02906592
Genetic Evaluation of Renal Cell Carcinoma; Predicting Biomarkers for Renal Cell Carcinoma
NCT03414827
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Aim 1A. Identify and recruit 880 adult participants at-risk of a hereditary cancer syndrome.
Aim 1B: Generate medical exome sequence data and interpret variants. Aim 1C: Disclose findings from medical exome sequencing, incorporate results into the electronic medical record (EMR), and facilitate downstream patient management and coordination of care with the provider.
Aim 1D. Engage stakeholders to tailor and optimize the program in diverse populations.
Aim 2. Evaluate and tailor for diverse populations the critical interactions in the program, including the consent process, choices for reporting additional findings, and the response to results disclosure.
Aim 2A. Design, implement, and assess a contextualized consent process to support informed decision-making about participation in research about medical exome sequencing.
Aim 2B. Design, implement, and compare a novel decision aid in the second half of the study for selecting the optional categories of additional findings with the approach we developed in CSER1 that offered a category checklist.
Aim 2C. Design, implement, and compare a modified (communication-focused) approach to results disclosure, genetic counseling, and decision making with a standard (information-focused) approach.
Aim 3. Evaluate the clinical utility (including personal utility) of using exome sequencing to diagnose individuals with hereditary cancer syndromes and provide additional findings.
Aim 3A: Measure the yield of reportable findings for hereditary cancer syndromes and additional findings.
Aim 3B: Evaluate subsequent healthcare utilization for all study participants and adherence to recommended care among individuals who are identified with a hereditary cancer syndrome in diverse settings.
Aim 3C. Assess the personal utility of exome sequencing, including primary and additional findings.
Aim 4. Address pragmatic and ethical challenges to the integration of genomic medicine into clinical and health systems decision-making.
Aim 4A: Develop and pilot a system that integrates genomic, clinical, and healthcare utilization data to inform clinicians and patients acting on genomic information and to reduce care gaps in patient management.
Aim 4B: Advance the analysis of the ethical and policy implications of incorporating personal utility of genomic information into the decision framework for healthcare coverage.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SCREENING
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Traditional genetic counseling
This will be typical genetic counseling that a patient would receive in a traditional genetic counseling setting.
Traditional genetic counseling
After participants at high risk for a hereditary cancer syndrome receive exome sequencing, they will receive traditional genetic counseling to help them understand the results.
Modified genetic counseling
This will be genetic counseling that is modified for a lower literacy patient and will include fewer technical terms and less complicated genetic information.
Modified genetic counseling
After participants at high risk for a hereditary cancer syndrome receive exome sequencing, they will receive modified genetic counseling to help them understand the results.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Modified genetic counseling
After participants at high risk for a hereditary cancer syndrome receive exome sequencing, they will receive modified genetic counseling to help them understand the results.
Traditional genetic counseling
After participants at high risk for a hereditary cancer syndrome receive exome sequencing, they will receive traditional genetic counseling to help them understand the results.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Screens as high risk for a hereditary cancer syndrome via the risk assessment tool algorithms OR have unknown family history on either their mother or father's side of the family (or both)
* No known prior testing for familial mutations predisposing them to Lynch syndrome or hereditary breast and ovarian cancer
* English or Spanish speaker
Exclusion Criteria
* Not an English or Spanish speaker
* Unable to provide informed consent
* Don't want results placed in their medical record
18 Years
49 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI)
NIH
University of Washington
OTHER
Seattle Children's Hospital
OTHER
University of California, San Francisco
OTHER
Denver Health and Hospital Authority
OTHER
Emory University
OTHER
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
OTHER
Columbia University
OTHER
Kaiser Permanente
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Michael Leo, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest
Benjamin S Wilfond, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Seattle Children's Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Denver Health
Denver, Colorado, United States
Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research
Portland, Oregon, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Okuyama S, White LL, Anderson KP, Medina E, Deutsch S, Ransom C, Jackson P, Kauffman TL, Mittendorf KF, Leo MC, Bulkley JE, Wilfond BS, Goddard KA, Feigelson HS. Evaluating cancer genetic services in a safety net system: overcoming barriers for a lasting impact beyond the CHARM research project. J Community Genet. 2023 Jun;14(3):329-336. doi: 10.1007/s12687-023-00647-x. Epub 2023 May 1.
Mittendorf KF, Lewis HS, Duenas DM, Eubanks DJ, Gilmore MJ, Goddard KAB, Joseph G, Kauffman TL, Kraft SA, Lindberg NM, Reyes AA, Shuster E, Syngal S, Ukaegbu C, Zepp JM, Wilfond BS, Porter KM. Literacy-adapted, electronic family history assessment for genetics referral in primary care: patient user insights from qualitative interviews. Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2022 Jun 10;20(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s13053-022-00231-3.
Mittendorf KF, Kauffman TL, Amendola LM, Anderson KP, Biesecker BB, Dorschner MO, Duenas DM, Eubanks DJ, Feigelson HS, Gilmore MJ, Hunter JE, Joseph G, Kraft SA, Lee SSJ, Leo MC, Liles EG, Lindberg NM, Muessig KR, Okuyama S, Porter KM, Riddle LS, Rolf BA, Rope AF, Zepp JM, Jarvik GP, Wilfond BS, Goddard KAB; CHARM study team. Cancer Health Assessments Reaching Many (CHARM): A clinical trial assessing a multimodal cancer genetics services delivery program and its impact on diverse populations. Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 Jul;106:106432. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106432. Epub 2021 May 11.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.