To Compare the Efficacy of Surgery Followed by Sunitinib With Surgery Followed by Imatinib in GIST Patients With Progression on Imatinib.
NCT ID: NCT03424876
Last Updated: 2018-03-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
60 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2017-06-02
2018-08-08
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Safety And Effectiveness Of Daily Dosing With Sunitinib Or Imatinib In Patients With Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors
NCT00372567
Study Evaluating IPI-504 in Patients With Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST) Following Failure of at Least Imatinib and Sunitinib
NCT00688766
Masitinib in Patients With Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumour After Progression With Imatinib
NCT01694277
Imatinib Mesylate and Sunitinib in Treating Patients With Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors
NCT00573404
Rechallenge of Imatinib in GIST Having no Effective Treatment: RIGHT
NCT01151852
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Statistics:All the statistical analysis is performed using SPSS version 20.0 (IBM corporation, United States). Pearson's chi-squared test was used to compare categorical variables. PFS and OS analyses were estimated with Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test and multivariable analyses were performed to assess survival difference. A two sided p-value of \<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Arm A
Imatinib 400 mg/day or 600mg/day, and within 6 weeks after surgery, continuous treatment was not tolerated until tumor progression, recurrence or adverse reactions were not tolerated.
Imatinib 400mg
exposure 400 mg/day or 600mg/day,
Arm B
Sunitinib 37.5 mg/day, continuous taking, or 50 mg/day (4/2), began within 6 weeks after surgery, and was continuously administered until tumor progression, recurrence or adverse reactions were not tolerated
Sunitinib 37.5Mg Oral Capsule
exposure 37.5 mg/day, continuous taking, or 50 mg/day (4/2)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Imatinib 400mg
exposure 400 mg/day or 600mg/day,
Sunitinib 37.5Mg Oral Capsule
exposure 37.5 mg/day, continuous taking, or 50 mg/day (4/2)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. . After the treatment of imatinib, imatinib 400mg/day after treatment, the tumor generalized.
3. . Patients with generalized progress were satisfied with tumor reduction after imatinib resistance for various reasons.
4. at least 1 month after surgery for imatinib treatment or sunitinib treatment.
5. at least one imaging assessment was received after surgery.
6. . Complete clinical data and follow-up data.
Exclusion Criteria
2. . Patients receiving tumor reduction were not satisfied with the standard of the reduction of tumor.
3. . The treatment of imatinib or sunitinib after surgery was less than 1 month.
4. . Incomplete clinical data or follow-up data.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Peking University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Shen Lin
Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Beijing Cancer Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Jian Li, MD
Role: primary
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Abrams TJ, Lee LB, Murray LJ, Pryer NK, Cherrington JM. SU11248 inhibits KIT and platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta in preclinical models of human small cell lung cancer. Mol Cancer Ther. 2003 May;2(5):471-8.
Rubin BP, Singer S, Tsao C, Duensing A, Lux ML, Ruiz R, Hibbard MK, Chen CJ, Xiao S, Tuveson DA, Demetri GD, Fletcher CD, Fletcher JA. KIT activation is a ubiquitous feature of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Cancer Res. 2001 Nov 15;61(22):8118-21.
Li J, Gao J, Hong J, Shen L. Efficacy and safety of sunitinib in Chinese patients with imatinib-resistant or -intolerant gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Future Oncol. 2012 May;8(5):617-24. doi: 10.2217/fon.12.29.
Fletcher CD, Berman JJ, Corless C, Gorstein F, Lasota J, Longley BJ, Miettinen M, O'Leary TJ, Remotti H, Rubin BP, Shmookler B, Sobin LH, Weiss SW. Diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A consensus approach. Hum Pathol. 2002 May;33(5):459-65. doi: 10.1053/hupa.2002.123545.
Blackstein ME, Blay JY, Corless C, Driman DK, Riddell R, Soulieres D, Swallow CJ, Verma S; Canadian Advisory Committee on GIST. Gastrointestinal stromal tumours: consensus statement on diagnosis and treatment. Can J Gastroenterol. 2006 Mar;20(3):157-63. doi: 10.1155/2006/434761.
Goettsch WG, Bos SD, Breekveldt-Postma N, Casparie M, Herings RM, Hogendoorn PC. Incidence of gastrointestinal stromal tumours is underestimated: results of a nation-wide study. Eur J Cancer. 2005 Dec;41(18):2868-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.09.009. Epub 2005 Nov 15.
DeMatteo RP, Lewis JJ, Leung D, Mudan SS, Woodruff JM, Brennan MF. Two hundred gastrointestinal stromal tumors: recurrence patterns and prognostic factors for survival. Ann Surg. 2000 Jan;231(1):51-8. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200001000-00008.
Graadt van Roggen JF, van Velthuysen ML, Hogendoorn PC. The histopathological differential diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumours. J Clin Pathol. 2001 Feb;54(2):96-102. doi: 10.1136/jcp.54.2.96.
Mendel DB, Laird AD, Xin X, Louie SG, Christensen JG, Li G, Schreck RE, Abrams TJ, Ngai TJ, Lee LB, Murray LJ, Carver J, Chan E, Moss KG, Haznedar JO, Sukbuntherng J, Blake RA, Sun L, Tang C, Miller T, Shirazian S, McMahon G, Cherrington JM. In vivo antitumor activity of SU11248, a novel tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting vascular endothelial growth factor and platelet-derived growth factor receptors: determination of a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationship. Clin Cancer Res. 2003 Jan;9(1):327-37.
O'Farrell AM, Abrams TJ, Yuen HA, Ngai TJ, Louie SG, Yee KW, Wong LM, Hong W, Lee LB, Town A, Smolich BD, Manning WC, Murray LJ, Heinrich MC, Cherrington JM. SU11248 is a novel FLT3 tyrosine kinase inhibitor with potent activity in vitro and in vivo. Blood. 2003 May 1;101(9):3597-605. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-07-2307. Epub 2003 Jan 16.
Schlessinger J. Cell signaling by receptor tyrosine kinases. Cell. 2000 Oct 13;103(2):211-25. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)00114-8. No abstract available.
Bello C. B. Houk, L. Sherman, et al. Effect of rifampin on the pharmacokinetics of SU11248 in healthy volunteers. Proc.ASCO abstr#3078, 2005.
Blanke CD, Rankin C, Demetri GD, Ryan CW, von Mehren M, Benjamin RS, Raymond AK, Bramwell VH, Baker LH, Maki RG, Tanaka M, Hecht JR, Heinrich MC, Fletcher CD, Crowley JJ, Borden EC. Phase III randomized, intergroup trial assessing imatinib mesylate at two dose levels in patients with unresectable or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors expressing the kit receptor tyrosine kinase: S0033. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Feb 1;26(4):626-32. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.4452.
Zalcberg JR, Verweij J, Casali PG, Le Cesne A, Reichardt P, Blay JY, Schlemmer M, Van Glabbeke M, Brown M, Judson IR; EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group, the Italian Sarcoma Group; Australasian Gastrointestinal Trials Group. Outcome of patients with advanced gastro-intestinal stromal tumours crossing over to a daily imatinib dose of 800 mg after progression on 400 mg. Eur J Cancer. 2005 Aug;41(12):1751-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.04.034.
Demetri GD, van Oosterom AT, Garrett CR, Blackstein ME, Shah MH, Verweij J, McArthur G, Judson IR, Heinrich MC, Morgan JA, Desai J, Fletcher CD, George S, Bello CL, Huang X, Baum CM, Casali PG. Efficacy and safety of sunitinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumour after failure of imatinib: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2006 Oct 14;368(9544):1329-38. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69446-4.
Demetri GD, Garrett CR, Schoffski P, Shah MH, Verweij J, Leyvraz S, Hurwitz HI, Pousa AL, Le Cesne A, Goldstein D, Paz-Ares L, Blay JY, McArthur GA, Xu QC, Huang X, Harmon CS, Tassell V, Cohen DP, Casali PG. Complete longitudinal analyses of the randomized, placebo-controlled, phase III trial of sunitinib in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor following imatinib failure. Clin Cancer Res. 2012 Jun 1;18(11):3170-9. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-3005.
Vincenzi B, Nannini M, Fumagalli E, Bronte G, Frezza AM, De Lisi D, Spalato Ceruso M, Santini D, Badalamenti G, Pantaleo MA, Russo A, Dei Tos AP, Casali P, Tonini G. Imatinib dose escalation versus sunitinib as a second line treatment in KIT exon 11 mutated GIST: a retrospective analysis. Oncotarget. 2016 Oct 25;7(43):69412-69419. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.5136.
Hsu CC, Wu CE, Chen JS, Tseng JH, Chiang KC, Liu YY, Tsai CY, Cheng CT, Chen TW, Jan YY, Yeh TS, Chen YY, Yeh CN. Imatinib escalation or sunitinib treatment after first-line imatinib in metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor patients. Anticancer Res. 2014 Sep;34(9):5029-36.
Fairweather M, Balachandran VP, Li GZ, Bertagnolli MM, Antonescu C, Tap W, Singer S, DeMatteo RP, Raut CP. Cytoreductive Surgery for Metastatic Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Treated With Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: A 2-institutional Analysis. Ann Surg. 2018 Aug;268(2):296-302. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002281.
Raut CP, Posner M, Desai J, Morgan JA, George S, Zahrieh D, Fletcher CD, Demetri GD, Bertagnolli MM. Surgical management of advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors after treatment with targeted systemic therapy using kinase inhibitors. J Clin Oncol. 2006 May 20;24(15):2325-31. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.3439.
DeMatteo RP, Maki RG, Singer S, Gonen M, Brennan MF, Antonescu CR. Results of tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy followed by surgical resection for metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Ann Surg. 2007 Mar;245(3):347-52. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000236630.93587.59.
Gronchi A, Fiore M, Miselli F, Lagonigro MS, Coco P, Messina A, Pilotti S, Casali PG. Surgery of residual disease following molecular-targeted therapy with imatinib mesylate in advanced/metastatic GIST. Ann Surg. 2007 Mar;245(3):341-6. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000242710.36384.1b.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
G0602
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.