Study of Radiation Fractionation on Patient Outcomes After Breast REConstruction (FABREC) for Invasive Breast Carcinoma

NCT ID: NCT03422003

Last Updated: 2024-11-01

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

400 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-04-01

Study Completion Date

2030-04-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is a randomized trial of hypofractionation (short-course) radiation therapy versus conventional radiation therapy in women who have undergone mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction. The investigators will assess cosmetic and reconstruction outcomes, lymphedema, cancer status, side effects, and oncologic outcomes.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Over 180,000 diagnoses of invasive breast cancer are made in the US each year. Over one-third of women with early stage and over half with late-stage breast cancer are treated with mastectomy (removal of the entire breast) due to tumor size, multiple cancers within the breast, genetic cancer predisposition, and/or patient preference. Following treatment with mastectomy, women who receive breast reconstructive surgery may experience better quality of life as they do not have to leave surgery with a bare chest wall. However, large randomized trials of post-mastectomy radiation therapy reveal a survival benefit with the addition of radiation after mastectomy in women who have cancer present in the axillary lymph nodes (6). The delivery of radiation therapy in the presence of a breast reconstruction is challenging and often leads to undesirable consequences including reconstruction loss, need for major surgical revision, or poor cosmetic outcomes. Therefore, oncologists and patients are forced to decide between the potential for improved oncologic outcomes with radiation therapy versus increased likelihood of complications and suboptimal cosmetic results. Because of this, some patients may be foregoing reconstruction if radiation therapy after mastectomy is needed; or foregoing radiation therapy if they have had breast reconstructive surgery (28).

Hypofractionation enhances patient convenience and decreases treatment burden. This regimen has been shown in randomized trials largely in the breast-conservation setting to reduce acute radiation therapy side-effects, decrease fatigue at six months and improve cosmetic results (21, 22). Despite these results, adoption of hypofractionation has been slow among women with breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery (24, 25) likely due to familiarity and experience of conventional long-course radiation therapy.

While hypofractionation is used commonly in the UK for patients with mastectomy, there are no randomized studies particularly studying outcomes following shorter course radiation therapy in women who undergo mastectomy with breast reconstruction. Therefore, there is an even greater barrier to the use of hypofractionation in this setting in the US. With improved cosmetic results found with hypofractionation, this shorter regimen may have the potential to improve reconstruction success rates which are unfortunately modest overall, for patients who require post-mastectomy radiation. Especially in contrast to financial disincentives to reduce number of radiation treatments, Level I randomized evidence is needed in this population to change practice patterns regarding radiation regimen.

Our study of radiation fractionation regimens has the potential to increase use of hypofractionation among women treated with mastectomy, thereby decreasing treatment burden. Our team of patient stakeholders ensures that our outcomes measures encompass all domains of survivorship after breast cancer (physical and mental health as well as satisfaction with the decision-making process). Despite the large numbers of breast cancer survivors who undergo mastectomy, reconstruction and radiation therapy, little is known about which domains of quality of life are affected and their importance to these patients. This study uses previously validated tools for measuring patient outcomes, and have added questions for areas which are important to patients that may not have been captured adequately by previous tools. In concert with the increasing awareness of the importance of survivorship care to cancer care, identifying a comprehensive set of outcomes measurement tools following treatment with radiation therapy, mastectomy, and reconstruction is an important asset for future treatment evaluation in these women.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Breast Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm 1: Hypofractionation

16 fractions of radiation therapy (daily, Monday through Friday) to the chest wall with or without internal mammary nodes, and 15 fractions to the supraclavicular (with or without axillary) lymph nodes.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Radiation Therapy

Intervention Type RADIATION

For the conventional fractionation arm: Each fraction will consist of 200 cGy per day. Total dose = 5000 cGy to the chest wall and 4600-5000 cGy to the lymph nodes.

For the hypofractionation arm: Each fraction consists of 266 cGy per day. Total dose = 4256 cGy to the chest wall and 3990 cGy to the lymph nodes.

Arm 2: Conventional Radiation Therapy

25 fractions of radiation therapy (daily, Monday through Friday) to the chest wall with or without internal mammary nodes, and 23-25 fractions to the supraclavicular (with or without axillary) lymph nodes.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Radiation Therapy

Intervention Type RADIATION

For the conventional fractionation arm: Each fraction will consist of 200 cGy per day. Total dose = 5000 cGy to the chest wall and 4600-5000 cGy to the lymph nodes.

For the hypofractionation arm: Each fraction consists of 266 cGy per day. Total dose = 4256 cGy to the chest wall and 3990 cGy to the lymph nodes.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Radiation Therapy

For the conventional fractionation arm: Each fraction will consist of 200 cGy per day. Total dose = 5000 cGy to the chest wall and 4600-5000 cGy to the lymph nodes.

For the hypofractionation arm: Each fraction consists of 266 cGy per day. Total dose = 4256 cGy to the chest wall and 3990 cGy to the lymph nodes.

Intervention Type RADIATION

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Diagnosed with clinical or pathologic stage I-III invasive breast cancer with TX-T3 tumor
2. Has been treated with mastectomy
3. Has undergone immediate reconstructive surgery with placement of a tissue expander or permanent implant at time of mastectomy
4. Is a candidate for unilateral post-mastectomy radiation therapy as per National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines (post-mastectomy radiation therapy is indicated for most patients with positive lymph nodes at time of surgery and infrequently for selected node-negative patients)
5. Use of bolus is permitted, but not required
6. Age ≥18

Exclusion Criteria

1. T4 cancer
2. Recurrent breast cancer or history of prior breast radiation therapy
3. Uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to, ongoing or active infection, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, and/or mental health illness that the consenting investigator feels would affect patient's ability to participate in this study
4. Pregnant or nursing
5. History of a different malignancy except for the following circumstances:

* Disease-free for at least five years and deemed by the investigator to be at low risk for recurrence of that malignancy (\<5 %).
* Cervical cancer in situ and basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin
6. Breast cancer requiring bilateral breast/chest wall radiation therapy.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Rinaa Punglia, MD, MPH

Prinicipal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Rinaa Punglia, MD MPH

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

Julia Wong, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of California, San Francisco

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Stanford University Medical Center

Stanford, California, United States

Site Status

Vail Health

Edwards, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Yale Cancer Center

New Haven, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Johns Hopkins Medicine

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Eastern Maine Medical Center

Brewer, Maine, United States

Site Status

Maine Medical Center

Scarborough, Maine, United States

Site Status

Massachusetts General Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Dana Farber Cancer Institute

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Massachusetts General Hospital/North Shore Center for Outpatient Care

Danvers, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center (DF/BWCC) at Milford Regional Medical Center

Milford, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center in clinical affiliation with South Shore Hospital

South Weymouth, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Lifespan/Rhode Island Hospital

Providence, Rhode Island, United States

Site Status

University of Washington

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

EBCTCG (Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group); McGale P, Taylor C, Correa C, Cutter D, Duane F, Ewertz M, Gray R, Mannu G, Peto R, Whelan T, Wang Y, Wang Z, Darby S. Effect of radiotherapy after mastectomy and axillary surgery on 10-year recurrence and 20-year breast cancer mortality: meta-analysis of individual patient data for 8135 women in 22 randomised trials. Lancet. 2014 Jun 21;383(9935):2127-35. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60488-8. Epub 2014 Mar 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24656685 (View on PubMed)

Duxbury PJ, Gandhi A, Kirwan CC, Jain Y, Harvey JR. Current attitudes to breast reconstruction surgery for women at risk of post-mastectomy radiotherapy: A survey of UK breast surgeons. Breast. 2015 Aug;24(4):502-12. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2015.05.002. Epub 2015 May 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26021276 (View on PubMed)

START Trialists' Group; Bentzen SM, Agrawal RK, Aird EG, Barrett JM, Barrett-Lee PJ, Bliss JM, Brown J, Dewar JA, Dobbs HJ, Haviland JS, Hoskin PJ, Hopwood P, Lawton PA, Magee BJ, Mills J, Morgan DA, Owen JR, Simmons S, Sumo G, Sydenham MA, Venables K, Yarnold JR. The UK Standardisation of Breast Radiotherapy (START) Trial A of radiotherapy hypofractionation for treatment of early breast cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2008 Apr;9(4):331-41. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70077-9. Epub 2008 Mar 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18356109 (View on PubMed)

Shaitelman SF, Schlembach PJ, Arzu I, Ballo M, Bloom ES, Buchholz D, Chronowski GM, Dvorak T, Grade E, Hoffman KE, Kelly P, Ludwig M, Perkins GH, Reed V, Shah S, Stauder MC, Strom EA, Tereffe W, Woodward WA, Ensor J, Baumann D, Thompson AM, Amaya D, Davis T, Guerra W, Hamblin L, Hortobagyi G, Hunt KK, Buchholz TA, Smith BD. Acute and Short-term Toxic Effects of Conventionally Fractionated vs Hypofractionated Whole-Breast Irradiation: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2015 Oct;1(7):931-41. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.2666.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26247543 (View on PubMed)

Bekelman JE, Sylwestrzak G, Barron J, Liu J, Epstein AJ, Freedman G, Malin J, Emanuel EJ. Uptake and costs of hypofractionated vs conventional whole breast irradiation after breast conserving surgery in the United States, 2008-2013. JAMA. 2014 Dec 17;312(23):2542-50. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.16616.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25494006 (View on PubMed)

Jagsi R, Falchook AD, Hendrix LH, Curry H, Chen RC. Adoption of hypofractionated radiation therapy for breast cancer after publication of randomized trials. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Dec 1;90(5):1001-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.09.032.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25539365 (View on PubMed)

Wong JS, Uno H, Tramontano AC, Fisher L, Pellegrini CV, Abel GA, Burstein HJ, Chun YS, King TA, Schrag D, Winer E, Bellon JR, Cheney MD, Hardenbergh P, Ho A, Horst KC, Kim JN, Leonard KL, Moran MS, Park CC, Recht A, Soto DE, Shiloh RY, Stinson SF, Snyder KM, Taghian AG, Warren LE, Wright JL, Punglia RS. Hypofractionated vs Conventionally Fractionated Postmastectomy Radiation After Implant-Based Reconstruction: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2024 Oct 1;10(10):1370-1378. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.2652.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39115975 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

16-304

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Preoperative Breast Irradiation
NCT02941835 TERMINATED NA
Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation Study
NCT03437395 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA