Study of Radiation Fractionation on Patient Outcomes After Breast REConstruction (FABREC) for Invasive Breast Carcinoma
NCT ID: NCT03422003
Last Updated: 2024-11-01
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
400 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-04-01
2030-04-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Hypofractionated Radiotherapy Post-Lumpectomy in Women With Node Negative Breast Cancer
NCT00156052
Partial Breast Irradiation Using Accelerated Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy
NCT00581529
Preoperative Single-Fraction Radiotherapy in Early Stage Breast Cancer
NCT02482376
Breast MRI for Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer:Impact on Re-excision Lumpectomy
NCT01568346
Partial Breast Irradiation (PBI) for Selected Patients With Early Invasive or Non-Invasive Breast Cancer
NCT00694577
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Hypofractionation enhances patient convenience and decreases treatment burden. This regimen has been shown in randomized trials largely in the breast-conservation setting to reduce acute radiation therapy side-effects, decrease fatigue at six months and improve cosmetic results (21, 22). Despite these results, adoption of hypofractionation has been slow among women with breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery (24, 25) likely due to familiarity and experience of conventional long-course radiation therapy.
While hypofractionation is used commonly in the UK for patients with mastectomy, there are no randomized studies particularly studying outcomes following shorter course radiation therapy in women who undergo mastectomy with breast reconstruction. Therefore, there is an even greater barrier to the use of hypofractionation in this setting in the US. With improved cosmetic results found with hypofractionation, this shorter regimen may have the potential to improve reconstruction success rates which are unfortunately modest overall, for patients who require post-mastectomy radiation. Especially in contrast to financial disincentives to reduce number of radiation treatments, Level I randomized evidence is needed in this population to change practice patterns regarding radiation regimen.
Our study of radiation fractionation regimens has the potential to increase use of hypofractionation among women treated with mastectomy, thereby decreasing treatment burden. Our team of patient stakeholders ensures that our outcomes measures encompass all domains of survivorship after breast cancer (physical and mental health as well as satisfaction with the decision-making process). Despite the large numbers of breast cancer survivors who undergo mastectomy, reconstruction and radiation therapy, little is known about which domains of quality of life are affected and their importance to these patients. This study uses previously validated tools for measuring patient outcomes, and have added questions for areas which are important to patients that may not have been captured adequately by previous tools. In concert with the increasing awareness of the importance of survivorship care to cancer care, identifying a comprehensive set of outcomes measurement tools following treatment with radiation therapy, mastectomy, and reconstruction is an important asset for future treatment evaluation in these women.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Arm 1: Hypofractionation
16 fractions of radiation therapy (daily, Monday through Friday) to the chest wall with or without internal mammary nodes, and 15 fractions to the supraclavicular (with or without axillary) lymph nodes.
Radiation Therapy
For the conventional fractionation arm: Each fraction will consist of 200 cGy per day. Total dose = 5000 cGy to the chest wall and 4600-5000 cGy to the lymph nodes.
For the hypofractionation arm: Each fraction consists of 266 cGy per day. Total dose = 4256 cGy to the chest wall and 3990 cGy to the lymph nodes.
Arm 2: Conventional Radiation Therapy
25 fractions of radiation therapy (daily, Monday through Friday) to the chest wall with or without internal mammary nodes, and 23-25 fractions to the supraclavicular (with or without axillary) lymph nodes.
Radiation Therapy
For the conventional fractionation arm: Each fraction will consist of 200 cGy per day. Total dose = 5000 cGy to the chest wall and 4600-5000 cGy to the lymph nodes.
For the hypofractionation arm: Each fraction consists of 266 cGy per day. Total dose = 4256 cGy to the chest wall and 3990 cGy to the lymph nodes.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Radiation Therapy
For the conventional fractionation arm: Each fraction will consist of 200 cGy per day. Total dose = 5000 cGy to the chest wall and 4600-5000 cGy to the lymph nodes.
For the hypofractionation arm: Each fraction consists of 266 cGy per day. Total dose = 4256 cGy to the chest wall and 3990 cGy to the lymph nodes.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Has been treated with mastectomy
3. Has undergone immediate reconstructive surgery with placement of a tissue expander or permanent implant at time of mastectomy
4. Is a candidate for unilateral post-mastectomy radiation therapy as per National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines (post-mastectomy radiation therapy is indicated for most patients with positive lymph nodes at time of surgery and infrequently for selected node-negative patients)
5. Use of bolus is permitted, but not required
6. Age ≥18
Exclusion Criteria
2. Recurrent breast cancer or history of prior breast radiation therapy
3. Uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to, ongoing or active infection, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, and/or mental health illness that the consenting investigator feels would affect patient's ability to participate in this study
4. Pregnant or nursing
5. History of a different malignancy except for the following circumstances:
* Disease-free for at least five years and deemed by the investigator to be at low risk for recurrence of that malignancy (\<5 %).
* Cervical cancer in situ and basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin
6. Breast cancer requiring bilateral breast/chest wall radiation therapy.
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
OTHER
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Rinaa Punglia, MD, MPH
Prinicipal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Rinaa Punglia, MD MPH
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Julia Wong, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of California, San Francisco
San Francisco, California, United States
Stanford University Medical Center
Stanford, California, United States
Vail Health
Edwards, Colorado, United States
Yale Cancer Center
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
Johns Hopkins Medicine
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
Eastern Maine Medical Center
Brewer, Maine, United States
Maine Medical Center
Scarborough, Maine, United States
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Dana Farber Cancer Institute
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Massachusetts General Hospital/North Shore Center for Outpatient Care
Danvers, Massachusetts, United States
Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center (DF/BWCC) at Milford Regional Medical Center
Milford, Massachusetts, United States
Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center in clinical affiliation with South Shore Hospital
South Weymouth, Massachusetts, United States
Lifespan/Rhode Island Hospital
Providence, Rhode Island, United States
University of Washington
Seattle, Washington, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
EBCTCG (Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group); McGale P, Taylor C, Correa C, Cutter D, Duane F, Ewertz M, Gray R, Mannu G, Peto R, Whelan T, Wang Y, Wang Z, Darby S. Effect of radiotherapy after mastectomy and axillary surgery on 10-year recurrence and 20-year breast cancer mortality: meta-analysis of individual patient data for 8135 women in 22 randomised trials. Lancet. 2014 Jun 21;383(9935):2127-35. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60488-8. Epub 2014 Mar 19.
Duxbury PJ, Gandhi A, Kirwan CC, Jain Y, Harvey JR. Current attitudes to breast reconstruction surgery for women at risk of post-mastectomy radiotherapy: A survey of UK breast surgeons. Breast. 2015 Aug;24(4):502-12. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2015.05.002. Epub 2015 May 26.
START Trialists' Group; Bentzen SM, Agrawal RK, Aird EG, Barrett JM, Barrett-Lee PJ, Bliss JM, Brown J, Dewar JA, Dobbs HJ, Haviland JS, Hoskin PJ, Hopwood P, Lawton PA, Magee BJ, Mills J, Morgan DA, Owen JR, Simmons S, Sumo G, Sydenham MA, Venables K, Yarnold JR. The UK Standardisation of Breast Radiotherapy (START) Trial A of radiotherapy hypofractionation for treatment of early breast cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2008 Apr;9(4):331-41. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70077-9. Epub 2008 Mar 19.
Shaitelman SF, Schlembach PJ, Arzu I, Ballo M, Bloom ES, Buchholz D, Chronowski GM, Dvorak T, Grade E, Hoffman KE, Kelly P, Ludwig M, Perkins GH, Reed V, Shah S, Stauder MC, Strom EA, Tereffe W, Woodward WA, Ensor J, Baumann D, Thompson AM, Amaya D, Davis T, Guerra W, Hamblin L, Hortobagyi G, Hunt KK, Buchholz TA, Smith BD. Acute and Short-term Toxic Effects of Conventionally Fractionated vs Hypofractionated Whole-Breast Irradiation: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2015 Oct;1(7):931-41. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.2666.
Bekelman JE, Sylwestrzak G, Barron J, Liu J, Epstein AJ, Freedman G, Malin J, Emanuel EJ. Uptake and costs of hypofractionated vs conventional whole breast irradiation after breast conserving surgery in the United States, 2008-2013. JAMA. 2014 Dec 17;312(23):2542-50. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.16616.
Jagsi R, Falchook AD, Hendrix LH, Curry H, Chen RC. Adoption of hypofractionated radiation therapy for breast cancer after publication of randomized trials. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Dec 1;90(5):1001-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.09.032.
Wong JS, Uno H, Tramontano AC, Fisher L, Pellegrini CV, Abel GA, Burstein HJ, Chun YS, King TA, Schrag D, Winer E, Bellon JR, Cheney MD, Hardenbergh P, Ho A, Horst KC, Kim JN, Leonard KL, Moran MS, Park CC, Recht A, Soto DE, Shiloh RY, Stinson SF, Snyder KM, Taghian AG, Warren LE, Wright JL, Punglia RS. Hypofractionated vs Conventionally Fractionated Postmastectomy Radiation After Implant-Based Reconstruction: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2024 Oct 1;10(10):1370-1378. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.2652.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
16-304
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.