Trial Outcomes & Findings for Tangible Hydra-PEG: A Promising Solution for Scleral Lens Wearers With Dry Eye (NCT NCT03417505)
NCT ID: NCT03417505
Last Updated: 2020-01-18
Results Overview
Tear breakup time of the ocular surface after wearing lenses
COMPLETED
NA
21 participants
30 days
2020-01-18
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Hydra-PEG Treated Lenses Followed by Untreated Lenses
Hydra-PEG treated lenses were worn for 30 days, followed a one-week washout period and then 30 days wearing untreated lenses
|
Untreated Lenses Followed by Hydra-PEG Treated Lenses
Untreated lenses were worn for 30 days, followed a one-week washout period and then 30 days wearing Hydra-PEG treated lenses
|
|---|---|---|
|
First Lens Type (30 Days)
STARTED
|
9
|
12
|
|
First Lens Type (30 Days)
COMPLETED
|
8
|
11
|
|
First Lens Type (30 Days)
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
1
|
|
Washout Period (7 Days)
STARTED
|
8
|
11
|
|
Washout Period (7 Days)
COMPLETED
|
8
|
11
|
|
Washout Period (7 Days)
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
|
Second Lens Type (30 Days)
STARTED
|
8
|
11
|
|
Second Lens Type (30 Days)
COMPLETED
|
8
|
11
|
|
Second Lens Type (30 Days)
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Hydra-PEG Treated Lenses Followed by Untreated Lenses
Hydra-PEG treated lenses were worn for 30 days, followed a one-week washout period and then 30 days wearing untreated lenses
|
Untreated Lenses Followed by Hydra-PEG Treated Lenses
Untreated lenses were worn for 30 days, followed a one-week washout period and then 30 days wearing Hydra-PEG treated lenses
|
|---|---|---|
|
First Lens Type (30 Days)
Lost to Follow-up
|
1
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Participants
n=19 Participants
As this was a crossover study, all participants work both the Hydra-PEG treated and untreated lenses. Therefore, the baseline characteristics were the same for both groups.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
51.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8 • n=19 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
16 Participants
n=19 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
3 Participants
n=19 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 30 daysTear breakup time of the ocular surface after wearing lenses
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Hydra-PEG Treated Lens Wearers
n=19 Participants
Patients wearing the Hydra-PEG treated lenses
|
Untreated Lens Wearers
n=19 Participants
Patients wearing lenses without the Hydra-PEG treatment
|
|---|---|---|
|
Ocular Surface Tear Breakup Time
|
3.81 seconds
Standard Deviation 2.63
|
2.91 seconds
Standard Deviation 2.14
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 30 daysPopulation: All participants
Fluorescein staining followed by assessment using the Oxford grading scale (0-5, where 5 indicates the most staining and therefore the most damage to the ocular surface) of the ocular surface after wearing Hydra-PEG treated lenses compared to control lenses
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Hydra-PEG Treated Lens Wearers
n=19 Participants
Patients wearing the Hydra-PEG treated lenses
|
Untreated Lens Wearers
n=19 Participants
Patients wearing lenses without the Hydra-PEG treatment
|
|---|---|---|
|
Corneal Fluorescein Staining
|
0.92 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.79
|
1.40 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.05
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 30 daysPopulation: all participants
Dry eye questionnaire to assess symptoms after wearing Hydra-PEG treated lenses compared to control lenses. Patients will be scored from 0 (no dry eye disease) to 100 (severe dry eye disease).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Hydra-PEG Treated Lens Wearers
n=19 Participants
Patients wearing the Hydra-PEG treated lenses
|
Untreated Lens Wearers
n=19 Participants
Patients wearing lenses without the Hydra-PEG treatment
|
|---|---|---|
|
Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Questionnaire
|
28.24 OSDI score
Standard Deviation 12.90
|
35.10 OSDI score
Standard Deviation 17.60
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 30 daysPopulation: all participants
Validated dry eye questionnaire to assess symptoms after wearing Hydra-PEG treated lenses compared to control lenses. Scale is from 1 to 37, with higher scores indicating more dry eye symptoms.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Hydra-PEG Treated Lens Wearers
n=19 Participants
Patients wearing the Hydra-PEG treated lenses
|
Untreated Lens Wearers
n=19 Participants
Patients wearing lenses without the Hydra-PEG treatment
|
|---|---|---|
|
Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire-8 (CLDEQ-8)
|
11.89 CLDEQ-8 score
Standard Deviation 5.26
|
17.30 CLDEQ-8 score
Standard Deviation 6.50
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 30 daysPopulation: all participants
Tear breakup time over the surface of the Hydra-PEG treated scleral lens compared to the control lens
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Hydra-PEG Treated Lens Wearers
n=19 Participants
Patients wearing the Hydra-PEG treated lenses
|
Untreated Lens Wearers
n=19 Participants
Patients wearing lenses without the Hydra-PEG treatment
|
|---|---|---|
|
Tear Breakup Time Over the Surface of the Scleral Lens
|
5.88 seconds
Standard Deviation 5.17
|
4.75 seconds
Standard Deviation 2.82
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 30 daysPopulation: all participants analyzed with each lens type
Fluorescein and lissamine staining to assess lid wiper epitheliopathy using a grading scale to see if there is a change in the height and width of the staining of the lid wiper area with Hydra-PEG treated lenses compared to untreated control lenses. The lid wiper area is the portion of the marginal conjunctival epithelium of the upper eyelid that wipes the ocular surface or lens during blinking. Epitheliopathy is scored on a scale from 0 (best patient outcome) to 3 (worst patient outcome, more staining) on the basis of the horizontal and vertical extent of lid margin staining.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Hydra-PEG Treated Lens Wearers
n=19 Participants
Patients wearing the Hydra-PEG treated lenses
|
Untreated Lens Wearers
n=19 Participants
Patients wearing lenses without the Hydra-PEG treatment
|
|---|---|---|
|
Lid Wiper Epitheliopathy
|
0.89 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.76
|
1.41 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.62
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 30 daysPopulation: all participants were analyzed in each lens type
Visual inspection for contact lens-related papillary conjunctivitis with scoring by the Efron grading scale for papillary conjunctivitis \[0 (normal) to 4 (severe)\] to assess changes after wear of Hydra-PEG treated lenses compared to control lenses.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Hydra-PEG Treated Lens Wearers
n=19 Participants
Patients wearing the Hydra-PEG treated lenses
|
Untreated Lens Wearers
n=19 Participants
Patients wearing lenses without the Hydra-PEG treatment
|
|---|---|---|
|
Contact Lens-related Papillary Conjunctivitis
|
0.89 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.66
|
1.45 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.51
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 30 daysPopulation: all participants analyzed in both lens types
Temporal conjunctival lissamine green staining scored 0 (no staining) to 4 (most staining).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Hydra-PEG Treated Lens Wearers
n=19 Participants
Patients wearing the Hydra-PEG treated lenses
|
Untreated Lens Wearers
n=19 Participants
Patients wearing lenses without the Hydra-PEG treatment
|
|---|---|---|
|
Temporal Conjunctival Lissamine Green Staining
|
0.95 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.79
|
1.23 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.03
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 30 daysPopulation: all participants were analyzed in both lens types
Nasal conjunctival lissamine green staining scored from 0 (no staining) to 4 (most staining).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Hydra-PEG Treated Lens Wearers
n=19 Participants
Patients wearing the Hydra-PEG treated lenses
|
Untreated Lens Wearers
n=19 Participants
Patients wearing lenses without the Hydra-PEG treatment
|
|---|---|---|
|
Nasal Conjunctival Lissamine Green Staining
|
0.79 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.71
|
1.03 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.98
|
Adverse Events
Hydra-PEG Treated Lenses Followed by Untreated Lenses
Untreated Lenses Followed by Hydra-PEG Treated Lenses
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The PI has the right to publish results from the study. The Sponsor has 30 days to review communications prior to publication with respect to the disclosure of confidential information (study results would not qualify as confidential information).
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER