The Effects of FES in a Variety of Walking Conditions in People With MS

NCT ID: NCT03410498

Last Updated: 2023-11-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-08-01

Study Completion Date

2024-12-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study is to measure the difference in the walking performance when functional electrical stimulation (FES) is on and off in people with MS that present foot drop under different 'real life' conditions, i.e. walking while doing another task that requires your attention and after been physically tired

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

People with Multiple Sclerosis (pwMS) often experience foot drop, which means that the foot is not adequately lifted from the ground when walking. Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) is applied to the shin muscles to aid lifting the foot of the ground and reduces the risk of trips and falls. PwMS that are users of functional electrical stimulation (FES) report that one of the benefits is that it reduces the mental effort of walking and that as a result less concentration is needed when they walk. Motor fatigability, which is the reduced ability of the muscles to produce force or power, also negatively affects the walking performance of pwMS. There have been several studies showing the benefits of FES to the walking of pwMS, but not while performing two tasks at the same time and experiencing fatigability resembling more daily life conditions. The proposed study aims to investigate the direct orthotic effect of FES (FES on vs off) in three different conditions, which include just walking, walking while performing an attention-demanding task and walking with an attention-demanding task after having completed a fatiguing task. The study design of this research allows the quantification of benefits of the use of FES which have until now only be reported subjectively.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Multiple Sclerosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

MS group

This group will perform walking trials in various conditions, i.e. normal walking, walking whilst performing an attention demanding task and walking while being physically tired.

Group Type OTHER

Incremental shuttle walk test

Intervention Type OTHER

In the incremental shuttle walk test, participants will have to walk between two cones (10m distance) several times. The time they will have to cover the distance between the two cones (signified by 'bleeps') will become increasingly shorter, until they cannot get to the next cone before the next 'bleep'. This test will last a maximum of 20 minutes.

In the Stroop test, the words of four colours, but written with a different colour, will be projected on the wall in front of participants and they will need to identify the colour of the text and ignore the word itself.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Incremental shuttle walk test

In the incremental shuttle walk test, participants will have to walk between two cones (10m distance) several times. The time they will have to cover the distance between the two cones (signified by 'bleeps') will become increasingly shorter, until they cannot get to the next cone before the next 'bleep'. This test will last a maximum of 20 minutes.

In the Stroop test, the words of four colours, but written with a different colour, will be projected on the wall in front of participants and they will need to identify the colour of the text and ignore the word itself.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Stroop test

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

For people with MS:

* Clinically definite multiple sclerosis according to the revised McDonald criteria.
* People with EDSS ≤ 5.0.
* People with MS who experience foot drop.
* Able to walk at least 200 meters unassisted, i.e without walking aids.

For healthy participants:

* Not been diagnosed with any neurological disease or have any other condition or injury which will affect walking ability.

Exclusion Criteria

For people with MS:

* Clinically diagnosed relapse within the last month.
* Any musculoskeletal impairment that can affect walking ability.
* Cognitive impairments; with a score in the Multiple Sclerosis Neuropsychological Screening Questionnaire (MSNQ) ≤ 75.
* Depression and anxiety; with a score in Hospital Anxiety \& Depression Scale (HADS) \> 10.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Queen Margaret University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Georgia Andreopoulou

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Thomas H Mercer, Prof.

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Queen Margaret University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Queen Margeret University

Musselburgh, , United Kingdom

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Georgia Andreopoulou, Msc

Role: CONTACT

07873854432

Marietta van der Linden, PhD

Role: CONTACT

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Georgia Andreopoulou, Msc

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

QueenMU 12.1.2018

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

AB Gait Estim Neurophysiology
NCT06430164 RECRUITING NA
Patient Self-managed BCI-FES
NCT03257982 COMPLETED NA