Comparison of the Proximal Approach and Distal Approach of Axillary Vein Catheterization Under Ultrasound Guidance

NCT ID: NCT03395691

Last Updated: 2019-09-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

198 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-02-11

Study Completion Date

2019-09-17

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Ultrasound-guided axillary vein catheterization can be performed via the proximal or distal approach of the axillary vein. The aim of our study is to compare the first puncture success rate and safety between the two approaches of ultrasound-guided axillary vein catheterization in cardiac surgical patients with risk of bleeding.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

For patients after cardiac surgery, antiplatelet drugs or anticoagulants are usually used for preventing thrombosis. Use of those drugs is associated with increased risk of bleeding. Any invasive procedures may put those patients at additional risk of bleeding. Ultrasound (US) has become widely accepted to guide safe and accurate central venous catheterization.The axillary vein in the infraclavicular area is an alternative choice for subclavian vein. Ultrasound images of the infraclavicular axillary vein differ according to its position. Proximal infraclavicular axillary vein is a direct continuation of the subclavian vein. The associated anatomy is simple and the vein is straight and thick in longitudinal axis view, which are in favor of successful puncture. Meanwhile, distal axillary vein also has anatomical advantages for safe and successful cannulations. Distal axillary vein lies further away from the artery and chest wall, and the overlap between distal axillary vein and artery gets greater on moving laterally. It is still unknow that one of the puncture approaches is superior to the other. Until now, there are no studies comparing two puncture approaches in high bleeding risk patients. The aim of the study is to compare the success rate of first puncture and safety of US-guided proximal and distal axillary venous catheterization in cardiac surgery patients with risk of bleeding.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Central Venous Catheterization

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
Patients were randomized to the Proximal Approach (PA) or Distal Approach (DA) group in a 1:1 ratio using a computerized system. The allocation process was intensively managed by an allocation group using sequentially numbered containers and the allocation result was concealed until it was implemented. When a patient was eligible, the investigator informed allocation group to get intervention group allocated to the patient: PA or DA group. Because of feasibility issues, operators were not blinded to the assignment.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

The distal approach

The first two attempts via the distal approach will be performed . If the first two attempts failed, the subsequent attempts of venipuncture were performed using the proximal approach.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

The distal approach

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The first two attempts via the distal approach will be performed . If the first two attempts failed, the subsequent attempts of venipuncture were performed using the proximal approach

The proximal approach

The first two attempts via the proximal approach will be performed . If the first two attempts failed, the subsequent attempts of venipuncture were performed using the distal approach.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

The proximal approach

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The first two attempts via the proximal approach will be performed . If the first two attempts failed, the subsequent attempts of venipuncture were performed using the distal approach.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

The distal approach

The first two attempts via the distal approach will be performed . If the first two attempts failed, the subsequent attempts of venipuncture were performed using the proximal approach

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The proximal approach

The first two attempts via the proximal approach will be performed . If the first two attempts failed, the subsequent attempts of venipuncture were performed using the distal approach.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Cardiac surgical patients in Cardiac Surgery Intensive Care Unit
* Axillary vein catheterization is needed according to the clinical practice
* receiving oral antiplatelet or anticoagulants at least three days

Exclusion Criteria

* fracture of the ipsilateral clavicle or anterior proximal ribs
* subclavian and/or axillary vein thrombosis
* local infection of the puncture area
* subclavian and/or axillary veins which are not clearly visualized using ultrasound
* already presence of subclavian or axillary vein catheter
* requiring an emergency axillary vein catheterization
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Guo-wei Tu, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Fudan University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital

Shanghai, , China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Buzancais G, Roger C, Bastide S, Jeannes P, Lefrant JY, Muller L. Comparison of two ultrasound guided approaches for axillary vein catheterization: a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial. Br J Anaesth. 2016 Feb;116(2):215-22. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev458.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26787790 (View on PubMed)

Vezzani A, Manca T, Brusasco C, Santori G, Cantadori L, Ramelli A, Gonzi G, Nicolini F, Gherli T, Corradi F. A randomized clinical trial of ultrasound-guided infra-clavicular cannulation of the subclavian vein in cardiac surgical patients: short-axis versus long-axis approach. Intensive Care Med. 2017 Nov;43(11):1594-1601. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4756-6. Epub 2017 Mar 13.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28289815 (View on PubMed)

Su Y, Hou JY, Ma GG, Hao GW, Luo JC, Yu SJ, Liu K, Zheng JL, Xue Y, Luo Z, Tu GW. Comparison of the proximal and distal approaches for axillary vein catheterization under ultrasound guidance (PANDA) in cardiac surgery patients susceptible to bleeding: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Intensive Care. 2020 Jul 8;10(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s13613-020-00703-6.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32643012 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PANDA

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.