Trial Outcomes & Findings for Clinical Evaluation of Etafilcon A With Ketotifen (NCT NCT03388138)
NCT ID: NCT03388138
Last Updated: 2022-03-17
Results Overview
Monocular contact lens-corrected distance visual acuity was assessed using a logMAR visual acuity scale. This was evaluated for each eye, under high luminance and high contrast conditions at 4 meters from ETDRS charts. Distance visual acuity was reported by lens type and visit.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
143 participants
Baseline (Visit 1) and 1-week follow up (Visit 2)
2022-03-17
Participant Flow
A total of 143 subjects were enrolled into this study. Of those enrolled, 141 were dispensed a study lens and 2 subjects were enrolled but not dispensed. Of the dispensed subjects 140 completed the study and 1 discontinued from the study.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Etafilcon A With Ketotifen
Subjects that were randomized to the etafilcon A with ketotifen contact lens throughout the entire duration of the study.
|
Etafilcon A
Subjects that were randomized to the etafilcon A contact lens throughout the entire duration of the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
94
|
47
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
93
|
47
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Etafilcon A With Ketotifen
Subjects that were randomized to the etafilcon A with ketotifen contact lens throughout the entire duration of the study.
|
Etafilcon A
Subjects that were randomized to the etafilcon A contact lens throughout the entire duration of the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
1
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Clinical Evaluation of Etafilcon A With Ketotifen
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Etafilcon A With Ketotifen
n=94 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to the etafilcon A with ketotifen contact lens throughout the entire duration of the study.
|
Etafilcon A
n=47 Participants
Subjects that were randomized to the etafilcon A contact lens throughout the entire duration of the study.
|
Total
n=141 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
30.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.98 • n=5 Participants
|
29.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.56 • n=7 Participants
|
30.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.84 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
59 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
31 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
90 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
35 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
51 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
|
83 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
43 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
126 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
94 participants
n=5 Participants
|
47 participants
n=7 Participants
|
141 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Visit 1) and 1-week follow up (Visit 2)Population: Per-protocol (PP) population which consists of all subjects who completed the study without a major protocol deviation.
Monocular contact lens-corrected distance visual acuity was assessed using a logMAR visual acuity scale. This was evaluated for each eye, under high luminance and high contrast conditions at 4 meters from ETDRS charts. Distance visual acuity was reported by lens type and visit.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etafilcon A With Ketotifen
n=186 eyes
Subjects that wore the etafilcon A with ketotifen contact lens throughout the entire duration of the study.
|
Etafilcon A
n=92 eyes
Subjects that wore the etafilcon A contact lens throughout the entire duration of the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Monocular Contact Lens-corrected Distance Visual Acuity (Per-Protocol Population)
Visit 1 (Baseline)
|
-0.111 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.0702
|
-0.109 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.0809
|
|
Monocular Contact Lens-corrected Distance Visual Acuity (Per-Protocol Population)
Visit 2 (1-week follow up)
|
-0.115 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.0717
|
-0.118 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.0814
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Visit 1) and 1-week follow up (Visit 2)Population: Modified intent-to-treat (MITT) which consists of all the subjects who were administered either study lens excluding subjects who drop out prior to administering any study article.
Monocular contact lens-corrected distance visual acuity was assessed using a logMAR visual acuity scale. This was evaluated for each eye, under high luminance and high contrast conditions at 4 meters from ETDRS charts. Distance visual acuity was reported by lens type and visit.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etafilcon A With Ketotifen
n=188 eyes
Subjects that wore the etafilcon A with ketotifen contact lens throughout the entire duration of the study.
|
Etafilcon A
n=94 eyes
Subjects that wore the etafilcon A contact lens throughout the entire duration of the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Monocular Contact Lens-corrected Distance Visual Acuity (Modified Intent-to-Treat Population)
Visit 1 (Baseline)
|
-0.109 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.0740
|
-0.110 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.0806
|
|
Monocular Contact Lens-corrected Distance Visual Acuity (Modified Intent-to-Treat Population)
Visit 2 (1-week follow up)
|
-0.115 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.0717
|
-0.117 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.0815
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 1-Week Follow-upPopulation: Modified intent-to-treat (MITT) which consists of all the subjects who were administered either study lens excluding subjects who drop out prior to administering any study article. MITT is identical to safety population.
Slit lamp findings were assessed using a biomicroscope for each subject eye at all scheduled and unscheduled visits. Clinical significant slit lamp findings are defined as Grade 3 or Grade 4. (Grade 0=None, Grade 1=Trace, Grade 2=Mild, Grade 3=Moderate and Grade 4= Severe). The data was dichotomized as 1=Grade 3 or Grade 4 and 0, otherwise. The number of eyes with clinically significant slit lamp findings for each lens type was reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etafilcon A With Ketotifen
n=188 eyes
Subjects that wore the etafilcon A with ketotifen contact lens throughout the entire duration of the study.
|
Etafilcon A
n=94 eyes
Subjects that wore the etafilcon A contact lens throughout the entire duration of the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
The Number of Eyes With Clinically Significant Slit Lamp Findings
|
0 Number of Eyes
|
0 Number of Eyes
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 1-Week Follow-upPopulation: Modified intent-to-treat (MITT) which consists of all the subjects who were administered either study lens excluding subjects who drop out prior to administering any study article. MITT is identical to safety population.
Lens fit was assessed for each subject and eye using a biomicroscope. Unacceptable lens fit was assessed at all scheduled and unscheduled visits. A subject was deemed to have an unacceptable lens fitting if they met any of the following criteria: (1) Limbal exposure at primary gaze with extreme eye movement, (2) edge lift, (3) excessive movement in primary up gaze, (4) insufficient movement in all three of the following conditions: primary gaze, up gaze and push up test. The number of eyes with unacceptable lens fitting was reported for each lens type.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etafilcon A With Ketotifen
n=188 Number of Eyes
Subjects that wore the etafilcon A with ketotifen contact lens throughout the entire duration of the study.
|
Etafilcon A
n=94 Number of Eyes
Subjects that wore the etafilcon A contact lens throughout the entire duration of the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
The Number of Eyes With Unacceptable Lens Fitting
|
0 eyes
|
1 eyes
|
Adverse Events
Etafilcon A With Ketotifen
Etafilcon A
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Brian Pall O.D, MS, FAAO
Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: GT60