Trial Outcomes & Findings for Providers Against Cavities in Children's Teeth (NCT NCT03385629)
NCT ID: NCT03385629
Last Updated: 2025-04-17
Results Overview
Receipt of any dental care (preventive and/or restorative) at approximately 24 months from baseline to the exit visit. Any dental care was defined as yes or no visit.
COMPLETED
NA
2108 participants
Data will be abstracted from Clinical Exams and Medicaid Claims data at baseline and the exit visit at the 24 month follow-up visit.
2025-04-17
Participant Flow
This study included 18 primary care practices in northeast Ohio randomized into 1 of 2 arms using a restricted randomization scheme with 9 practices assigned to each arm. Providers and parent-child dyads were participants assigned to groups based on affiliated practice. 63 Providers and 1024 parent-child dyads were recruited between 11/2017 and 8/2019. 1 provider, 1 parent-child dyad were late exclusions, leaving 2108 individuals enrolled (62 providers, 1023 parent/caregivers \& 1023 children).
Unit of analysis: Practices
Participant milestones
| Measure |
CSM Theory-based Arm
1. CSM theory-based didactic education and skills training for providers
CSM theory-based didactic education and practical skills training: Common-Sense Model of Self-Regulation (CSM) theory-based education and skills training for the provider to teach him/her to communicate core oral health facts to parents, provide a prescription to take their child to the dentist together with a list of Medicaid-accepting dentists in the area, and how to document the oral health encounter in EMR.
2. Practice EMR changes w/oral health questions
Practice EMR changes: Enhancements to the EMR system to include oral health documentation (four questions) which will be implemented prior to enrolling any parent/caregiver and child participants into the study.
|
AAP-based Arm
AAP-based didactic education (without theory-based training, skills training or EMR changes)
AAP-based didactic education: American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) based oral health education and follow the usual care for oral health assessment recommended by AAP guidelines.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Baseline Well Child Visit 1
STARTED
|
1061 9
|
1047 9
|
|
Baseline Well Child Visit 1
COMPLETED
|
1061 9
|
1047 9
|
|
Baseline Well Child Visit 1
NOT COMPLETED
|
0 0
|
0 0
|
|
Follow-up Well Child Visit 2
STARTED
|
1035 9
|
1023 9
|
|
Follow-up Well Child Visit 2
COMPLETED
|
815 9
|
860 9
|
|
Follow-up Well Child Visit 2
NOT COMPLETED
|
220 0
|
163 0
|
|
Follow-up Well Child Visit 3
STARTED
|
1019 9
|
1006 9
|
|
Follow-up Well Child Visit 3
COMPLETED
|
753 9
|
820 9
|
|
Follow-up Well Child Visit 3
NOT COMPLETED
|
266 0
|
186 0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
CSM Theory-based Arm
1. CSM theory-based didactic education and skills training for providers
CSM theory-based didactic education and practical skills training: Common-Sense Model of Self-Regulation (CSM) theory-based education and skills training for the provider to teach him/her to communicate core oral health facts to parents, provide a prescription to take their child to the dentist together with a list of Medicaid-accepting dentists in the area, and how to document the oral health encounter in EMR.
2. Practice EMR changes w/oral health questions
Practice EMR changes: Enhancements to the EMR system to include oral health documentation (four questions) which will be implemented prior to enrolling any parent/caregiver and child participants into the study.
|
AAP-based Arm
AAP-based didactic education (without theory-based training, skills training or EMR changes)
AAP-based didactic education: American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) based oral health education and follow the usual care for oral health assessment recommended by AAP guidelines.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Follow-up Well Child Visit 2
Lost to Follow-up
|
214
|
160
|
|
Follow-up Well Child Visit 2
Withdrawal by Subject
|
6
|
3
|
|
Follow-up Well Child Visit 3
Lost to Follow-up
|
266
|
186
|
Baseline Characteristics
Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
CSM Theory-based Arm
n=1061 Participants
1. CSM theory-based didactic education and skills training for providers
CSM theory-based didactic education and practical skills training: Common-Sense Model of Self-Regulation (CSM) theory-based education and skills training for the provider to teach him/her to communicate core oral health facts to parents, provide a prescription to take their child to the dentist together with a list of Medicaid-accepting dentists in the area, and how to document the oral health encounter in EMR.
2. Practice EMR changes w/oral health questions
Practice EMR changes: Enhancements to the EMR system to include oral health documentation (four questions) which will be implemented prior to enrolling any parent/caregiver and child participants into the study.
|
AAP-based Arm
n=1047 Participants
AAP-based didactic education (without theory-based training, skills training or EMR changes)
AAP-based didactic education: American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) based oral health education and follow the usual care for oral health assessment recommended by AAP guidelines.
|
Total
n=2108 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
Children
|
4.70 children, providers, parents: yrs
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.20 • n=517 Participants • Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
4.65 children, providers, parents: yrs
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.11 • n=506 Participants • Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
4.68 children, providers, parents: yrs
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.17 • n=1023 Participants • Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
|
Age, Continuous
Parents/caregivers
|
31.73 children, providers, parents: yrs
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.89 • n=517 Participants • Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
31.10 children, providers, parents: yrs
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.02 • n=506 Participants • Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
31.42 children, providers, parents: yrs
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.48 • n=1023 Participants • Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
|
Age, Continuous
Providers
|
43.70 children, providers, parents: yrs
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.13 • n=27 Participants • Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
49.43 children, providers, parents: yrs
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.74 • n=35 Participants • Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
46.94 children, providers, parents: yrs
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.35 • n=62 Participants • Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Children · Female
|
228 Participants
n=516 Participants • Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62). The number analyzed differs from the overall number due to some missing data
|
238 Participants
n=505 Participants • Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62). The number analyzed differs from the overall number due to some missing data
|
466 Participants
n=1021 Participants • Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62). The number analyzed differs from the overall number due to some missing data
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Children · Male
|
288 Participants
n=516 Participants • Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62). The number analyzed differs from the overall number due to some missing data
|
267 Participants
n=505 Participants • Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62). The number analyzed differs from the overall number due to some missing data
|
555 Participants
n=1021 Participants • Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62). The number analyzed differs from the overall number due to some missing data
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Parents/caregivers · Female
|
463 Participants
n=515 Participants • Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62). The number analyzed differs from the overall number due to some missing data
|
457 Participants
n=506 Participants • Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62). The number analyzed differs from the overall number due to some missing data
|
920 Participants
n=1021 Participants • Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62). The number analyzed differs from the overall number due to some missing data
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Parents/caregivers · Male
|
52 Participants
n=515 Participants • Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62). The number analyzed differs from the overall number due to some missing data
|
49 Participants
n=506 Participants • Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62). The number analyzed differs from the overall number due to some missing data
|
101 Participants
n=1021 Participants • Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62). The number analyzed differs from the overall number due to some missing data
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Providers · Female
|
22 Participants
n=27 Participants • Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62). The number analyzed differs from the overall number due to some missing data
|
25 Participants
n=35 Participants • Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62). The number analyzed differs from the overall number due to some missing data
|
47 Participants
n=62 Participants • Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62). The number analyzed differs from the overall number due to some missing data
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Providers · Male
|
5 Participants
n=27 Participants • Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62). The number analyzed differs from the overall number due to some missing data
|
10 Participants
n=35 Participants • Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62). The number analyzed differs from the overall number due to some missing data
|
15 Participants
n=62 Participants • Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62). The number analyzed differs from the overall number due to some missing data
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Children · Hispanic or Latino
|
28 Participants
n=517 Participants • Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
48 Participants
n=506 Participants • Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
76 Participants
n=1023 Participants • Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Children · Not Hispanic or Latino
|
457 Participants
n=517 Participants • Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
425 Participants
n=506 Participants • Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
882 Participants
n=1023 Participants • Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Children · Unknown or Not Reported
|
32 Participants
n=517 Participants • Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
33 Participants
n=506 Participants • Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
65 Participants
n=1023 Participants • Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Parents/caregivers · Hispanic or Latino
|
20 Participants
n=517 Participants • Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
31 Participants
n=506 Participants • Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
51 Participants
n=1023 Participants • Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Parents/caregivers · Not Hispanic or Latino
|
466 Participants
n=517 Participants • Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
447 Participants
n=506 Participants • Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
913 Participants
n=1023 Participants • Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Parents/caregivers · Unknown or Not Reported
|
31 Participants
n=517 Participants • Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
28 Participants
n=506 Participants • Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
59 Participants
n=1023 Participants • Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Providers · Hispanic or Latino
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants • Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
0 Participants
n=35 Participants • Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
0 Participants
n=62 Participants • Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Providers · Not Hispanic or Latino
|
23 Participants
n=27 Participants • Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
25 Participants
n=35 Participants • Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
48 Participants
n=62 Participants • Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Providers · Unknown or Not Reported
|
4 Participants
n=27 Participants • Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
10 Participants
n=35 Participants • Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
14 Participants
n=62 Participants • Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Children · American Indian or Alaska Native
|
2 Participants
n=517 Participants • Measure Analysis Population Description: Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
0 Participants
n=506 Participants • Measure Analysis Population Description: Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
2 Participants
n=1023 Participants • Measure Analysis Population Description: Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Children · Asian
|
0 Participants
n=517 Participants • Measure Analysis Population Description: Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
4 Participants
n=506 Participants • Measure Analysis Population Description: Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
4 Participants
n=1023 Participants • Measure Analysis Population Description: Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Children · Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
1 Participants
n=517 Participants • Measure Analysis Population Description: Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
0 Participants
n=506 Participants • Measure Analysis Population Description: Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
1 Participants
n=1023 Participants • Measure Analysis Population Description: Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Children · Black or African American
|
226 Participants
n=517 Participants • Measure Analysis Population Description: Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
225 Participants
n=506 Participants • Measure Analysis Population Description: Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
451 Participants
n=1023 Participants • Measure Analysis Population Description: Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Children · White
|
232 Participants
n=517 Participants • Measure Analysis Population Description: Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
209 Participants
n=506 Participants • Measure Analysis Population Description: Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
441 Participants
n=1023 Participants • Measure Analysis Population Description: Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Children · More than one race
|
41 Participants
n=517 Participants • Measure Analysis Population Description: Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
49 Participants
n=506 Participants • Measure Analysis Population Description: Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
90 Participants
n=1023 Participants • Measure Analysis Population Description: Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Children · Unknown or Not Reported
|
15 Participants
n=517 Participants • Measure Analysis Population Description: Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
19 Participants
n=506 Participants • Measure Analysis Population Description: Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
34 Participants
n=1023 Participants • Measure Analysis Population Description: Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Parents/caregivers · American Indian or Alaska Native
|
2 Participants
n=517 Participants • Measure Analysis Population Description: Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
0 Participants
n=506 Participants • Measure Analysis Population Description: Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
2 Participants
n=1023 Participants • Measure Analysis Population Description: Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Parents/caregivers · Asian
|
1 Participants
n=517 Participants • Measure Analysis Population Description: Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
3 Participants
n=506 Participants • Measure Analysis Population Description: Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
4 Participants
n=1023 Participants • Measure Analysis Population Description: Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Parents/caregivers · Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=517 Participants • Measure Analysis Population Description: Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
0 Participants
n=506 Participants • Measure Analysis Population Description: Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
0 Participants
n=1023 Participants • Measure Analysis Population Description: Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Parents/caregivers · Black or African American
|
223 Participants
n=517 Participants • Measure Analysis Population Description: Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
215 Participants
n=506 Participants • Measure Analysis Population Description: Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
438 Participants
n=1023 Participants • Measure Analysis Population Description: Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Parents/caregivers · White
|
256 Participants
n=517 Participants • Measure Analysis Population Description: Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
241 Participants
n=506 Participants • Measure Analysis Population Description: Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
497 Participants
n=1023 Participants • Measure Analysis Population Description: Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Parents/caregivers · More than one race
|
17 Participants
n=517 Participants • Measure Analysis Population Description: Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
28 Participants
n=506 Participants • Measure Analysis Population Description: Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
45 Participants
n=1023 Participants • Measure Analysis Population Description: Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Parents/caregivers · Unknown or Not Reported
|
18 Participants
n=517 Participants • Measure Analysis Population Description: Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
19 Participants
n=506 Participants • Measure Analysis Population Description: Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
37 Participants
n=1023 Participants • Measure Analysis Population Description: Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Providers · American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants • Measure Analysis Population Description: Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
0 Participants
n=35 Participants • Measure Analysis Population Description: Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
0 Participants
n=62 Participants • Measure Analysis Population Description: Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Providers · Asian
|
2 Participants
n=27 Participants • Measure Analysis Population Description: Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
3 Participants
n=35 Participants • Measure Analysis Population Description: Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
5 Participants
n=62 Participants • Measure Analysis Population Description: Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Providers · Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants • Measure Analysis Population Description: Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
1 Participants
n=35 Participants • Measure Analysis Population Description: Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
1 Participants
n=62 Participants • Measure Analysis Population Description: Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Providers · Black or African American
|
2 Participants
n=27 Participants • Measure Analysis Population Description: Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
2 Participants
n=35 Participants • Measure Analysis Population Description: Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
4 Participants
n=62 Participants • Measure Analysis Population Description: Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Providers · White
|
22 Participants
n=27 Participants • Measure Analysis Population Description: Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
26 Participants
n=35 Participants • Measure Analysis Population Description: Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
48 Participants
n=62 Participants • Measure Analysis Population Description: Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Providers · More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants • Measure Analysis Population Description: Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
3 Participants
n=35 Participants • Measure Analysis Population Description: Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
3 Participants
n=62 Participants • Measure Analysis Population Description: Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Providers · Unknown or Not Reported
|
1 Participants
n=27 Participants • Measure Analysis Population Description: Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
0 Participants
n=35 Participants • Measure Analysis Population Description: Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
1 Participants
n=62 Participants • Measure Analysis Population Description: Analysis was completed separately for each group: Parents/Caregivers (1023), Children (1023), and Providers (62)
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
1061 participants
n=1061 Participants
|
1047 participants
n=1047 Participants
|
2108 participants
n=2108 Participants
|
|
dft
|
1.44 decayed and filled teeth
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.45 • n=516 Participants • Analysis population is children examined. Two children could not be examined due to behavioral issues.
|
1.27 decayed and filled teeth
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.33 • n=505 Participants • Analysis population is children examined. Two children could not be examined due to behavioral issues.
|
1.36 decayed and filled teeth
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.39 • n=1021 Participants • Analysis population is children examined. Two children could not be examined due to behavioral issues.
|
|
Frequency of tooth brushing
|
1.87 number of times per day child brushes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.60 • n=510 Participants • Mean number of times/day children brush. The number analyzed differs from the overall number due to some missing data
|
1.77 number of times per day child brushes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.62 • n=501 Participants • Mean number of times/day children brush. The number analyzed differs from the overall number due to some missing data
|
1.82 number of times per day child brushes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.61 • n=1011 Participants • Mean number of times/day children brush. The number analyzed differs from the overall number due to some missing data
|
|
Frequency of intake of sweet drinks
|
0.44 Number of sugar-sweetened beverages/day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.78 • n=508 Participants • The number analyzed differs from overall number due to some missing data.
|
0.51 Number of sugar-sweetened beverages/day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.78 • n=498 Participants • The number analyzed differs from overall number due to some missing data.
|
0.47 Number of sugar-sweetened beverages/day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.78 • n=1006 Participants • The number analyzed differs from overall number due to some missing data.
|
|
The Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale (ECOHIS)
|
1.42 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.91 • n=507 Participants • The number analyzed differs from the overall number due to some missing data
|
1.45 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.90 • n=502 Participants • The number analyzed differs from the overall number due to some missing data
|
1.43 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.90 • n=1009 Participants • The number analyzed differs from the overall number due to some missing data
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Data will be abstracted from Clinical Exams and Medicaid Claims data at baseline and the exit visit at the 24 month follow-up visit.Population: Any child dental visits through WCV3. The number of children with Medicaid claims data was 865. The number of children with clinical examinations was 675.
Receipt of any dental care (preventive and/or restorative) at approximately 24 months from baseline to the exit visit. Any dental care was defined as yes or no visit.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CSM Theory-based Arm
n=448 Participants
CSM theory-based didactic education and skills training Practice EMR changes
CSM theory-based didactic education and skills training: Common-Sense Model of Self-Regulation (CSM) theory-based education and skills training for the provider to teach him/her to communicate core oral health facts to parents, provide a prescription to take their child to the dentist together with a list of Medicaid-accepting dentists in the area, and document the oral health encounter in EMR.
Practice EMR changes: Enhancements to the EMR system to include oral health documentation (four questions) which will be implemented prior to enrolling any parent/caregiver and child participants into the study.
|
AAP-based Arm
n=417 Participants
AAP-based didactic education
AAP-based didactic education: American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) based oral health education and follow the usual care for oral health assessment recommended by AAP guidelines.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Dental Attendance
Medicaid Claims Data
|
330 Participants
|
332 Participants
|
|
Dental Attendance
Clinical Examination Data
|
170 Participants
|
150 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Dental exams will assess change in dft between baseline well-child visit (WCV#1) and 24 month follow-up exit visit (well-child visit: WCV#3)Population: The number analyzed is lower than the number enrolled at WCV1 (baseline) due to not all children having an exam at WCV3
dft: number of decayed, missing and filled teeth (dft) at WCV#3 minus the number at WCV#1.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CSM Theory-based Arm
n=301 Participants
CSM theory-based didactic education and skills training Practice EMR changes
CSM theory-based didactic education and skills training: Common-Sense Model of Self-Regulation (CSM) theory-based education and skills training for the provider to teach him/her to communicate core oral health facts to parents, provide a prescription to take their child to the dentist together with a list of Medicaid-accepting dentists in the area, and document the oral health encounter in EMR.
Practice EMR changes: Enhancements to the EMR system to include oral health documentation (four questions) which will be implemented prior to enrolling any parent/caregiver and child participants into the study.
|
AAP-based Arm
n=331 Participants
AAP-based didactic education
AAP-based didactic education: American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) based oral health education and follow the usual care for oral health assessment recommended by AAP guidelines.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Primary Decayed and Filled Teeth
|
1.14 teeth
Standard Deviation 2.45
|
1.16 teeth
Standard Deviation 2.34
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Assessed as change between baseline well-child visit (WCV #1) and 24 month follow-up exit visit (well-child visit: WCV#3)Population: The number analyzed is lower than the number enrolled at WCV1 (baseline) due to some missing data or the study visit not being completed for WCV3
Change in mean number of times per day a child in the study brushed.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CSM Theory-based Arm
n=359 Participants
CSM theory-based didactic education and skills training Practice EMR changes
CSM theory-based didactic education and skills training: Common-Sense Model of Self-Regulation (CSM) theory-based education and skills training for the provider to teach him/her to communicate core oral health facts to parents, provide a prescription to take their child to the dentist together with a list of Medicaid-accepting dentists in the area, and document the oral health encounter in EMR.
Practice EMR changes: Enhancements to the EMR system to include oral health documentation (four questions) which will be implemented prior to enrolling any parent/caregiver and child participants into the study.
|
AAP-based Arm
n=375 Participants
AAP-based didactic education
AAP-based didactic education: American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) based oral health education and follow the usual care for oral health assessment recommended by AAP guidelines.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Oral Hygiene-brushing
|
-0.01 mean number of times/day child brushes
Standard Deviation 0.63
|
-0.04 mean number of times/day child brushes
Standard Deviation 0.62
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Assessed as change between baseline well-child visit (WCV #1) and 24 month follow-up exit visit (well-child visit:WCV#3)Population: The number analyzed is lower than the number enrolled at WCV1 (baseline) due to some missing data or the study visit not being completed for WCV3
Number of sugar-sweetened drinks consumed per day
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CSM Theory-based Arm
n=357 Participants
CSM theory-based didactic education and skills training Practice EMR changes
CSM theory-based didactic education and skills training: Common-Sense Model of Self-Regulation (CSM) theory-based education and skills training for the provider to teach him/her to communicate core oral health facts to parents, provide a prescription to take their child to the dentist together with a list of Medicaid-accepting dentists in the area, and document the oral health encounter in EMR.
Practice EMR changes: Enhancements to the EMR system to include oral health documentation (four questions) which will be implemented prior to enrolling any parent/caregiver and child participants into the study.
|
AAP-based Arm
n=365 Participants
AAP-based didactic education
AAP-based didactic education: American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) based oral health education and follow the usual care for oral health assessment recommended by AAP guidelines.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Diet
|
0.01 Number of Sugar Sweetened Beverages/Day
Standard Deviation 0.88
|
0.04 Number of Sugar Sweetened Beverages/Day
Standard Deviation 0.94
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Assessed as change between baseline well-child visit (WCV #1) and 24 month follow-up exit visit (well-child visit: WCV#3)Population: The number analyzed is lower than the number enrolled at WCV1 (baseline) due to some missing data or the study visit not being completed for WCV3
Overall score on Early Childhood Oral Health Impact (ECOHIS) Scale with 13 items. Each item is on a Likert scale from 0 through 4. The overall score ranges from 0 to 52. An overall score was calculated for each child, and then a mean calculated for each arm of the study. Lower scores indicate a better oral health quality of life.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CSM Theory-based Arm
n=357 Participants
CSM theory-based didactic education and skills training Practice EMR changes
CSM theory-based didactic education and skills training: Common-Sense Model of Self-Regulation (CSM) theory-based education and skills training for the provider to teach him/her to communicate core oral health facts to parents, provide a prescription to take their child to the dentist together with a list of Medicaid-accepting dentists in the area, and document the oral health encounter in EMR.
Practice EMR changes: Enhancements to the EMR system to include oral health documentation (four questions) which will be implemented prior to enrolling any parent/caregiver and child participants into the study.
|
AAP-based Arm
n=380 Participants
AAP-based didactic education
AAP-based didactic education: American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) based oral health education and follow the usual care for oral health assessment recommended by AAP guidelines.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Oral Health-related Quality of Life for Child
|
0.56 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.38
|
0.50 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.42
|
Adverse Events
CSM Theory-based Arm Children
CSM Theory-based Arm Parents/Caregivers
CSM Theory-based Arm Providers
AAP-based Arm Children
AAP-based Arm Parents/Caregivers
AAP-based Arm Providers
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
CSM Theory-based Arm Children
n=517 participants at risk
Children enrolled in the CSM theory-based didactic education and skills training Practice EMR changes arm
CSM theory-based didactic education and skills training: Common-Sense Model of Self-Regulation (CSM) theory-based education and skills training for the provider to teach him/her to communicate core oral health facts to parents, provide a prescription to take their child to the dentist together with a list of Medicaid-accepting dentists in the area, and document the oral health encounter in EMR.
Practice EMR changes: Enhancements to the EMR system to include oral health documentation (four questions) which will be implemented prior to enrolling any parent/caregiver and child participants into the study.
|
CSM Theory-based Arm Parents/Caregivers
n=517 participants at risk
Parents/Caregivers enrolled in the CSM theory-based didactic education and skills training Practice EMR changes
CSM theory-based didactic education and skills training: Common-Sense Model of Self-Regulation (CSM) theory-based education and skills training for the provider to teach him/her to communicate core oral health facts to parents, provide a prescription to take their child to the dentist together with a list of Medicaid-accepting dentists in the area, and document the oral health encounter in EMR.
Practice EMR changes: Enhancements to the EMR system to include oral health documentation (four questions) which will be implemented prior to enrolling any parent/caregiver and child participants into the study.
|
CSM Theory-based Arm Providers
n=27 participants at risk
Providers enrolled in the CSM theory-based didactic education and skills training Practice EMR changes
CSM theory-based didactic education and skills training: Common-Sense Model of Self-Regulation (CSM) theory-based education and skills training for the provider to teach him/her to communicate core oral health facts to parents, provide a prescription to take their child to the dentist together with a list of Medicaid-accepting dentists in the area, and document the oral health encounter in EMR.
Practice EMR changes: Enhancements to the EMR system to include oral health documentation (four questions) which will be implemented prior to enrolling any parent/caregiver and child participants into the study.
|
AAP-based Arm Children
n=506 participants at risk
Children enrolled in the AAP-based didactic education
AAP-based didactic education: American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) based oral health education and follow the usual care for oral health assessment recommended by AAP guidelines.
|
AAP-based Arm Parents/Caregivers
n=506 participants at risk
Parents/Caregivers enrolled in the AAP-based didactic education
AAP-based didactic education: American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) based oral health education and follow the usual care for oral health assessment recommended by AAP guidelines.
|
AAP-based Arm Providers
n=35 participants at risk
Providers enrolled in the AAP-based didactic education
AAP-based didactic education: American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) based oral health education and follow the usual care for oral health assessment recommended by AAP guidelines.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
General disorders
Death
|
0.00%
0/517 • Adverse event data was collected from baseline (WCV1) through the exit visit (WCV3).
Adverse event information was collected for children, parent/caregivers and providers through communication with participants or family members when contact was made during study visits or during follow-up phone calls for data collection or retention purposes. Adverse events reported were unrelated to the study intervention. Adverse events were monitored after informed consent was received through study completion.
|
0.39%
2/517 • Number of events 2 • Adverse event data was collected from baseline (WCV1) through the exit visit (WCV3).
Adverse event information was collected for children, parent/caregivers and providers through communication with participants or family members when contact was made during study visits or during follow-up phone calls for data collection or retention purposes. Adverse events reported were unrelated to the study intervention. Adverse events were monitored after informed consent was received through study completion.
|
0.00%
0/27 • Adverse event data was collected from baseline (WCV1) through the exit visit (WCV3).
Adverse event information was collected for children, parent/caregivers and providers through communication with participants or family members when contact was made during study visits or during follow-up phone calls for data collection or retention purposes. Adverse events reported were unrelated to the study intervention. Adverse events were monitored after informed consent was received through study completion.
|
0.00%
0/506 • Adverse event data was collected from baseline (WCV1) through the exit visit (WCV3).
Adverse event information was collected for children, parent/caregivers and providers through communication with participants or family members when contact was made during study visits or during follow-up phone calls for data collection or retention purposes. Adverse events reported were unrelated to the study intervention. Adverse events were monitored after informed consent was received through study completion.
|
0.00%
0/506 • Adverse event data was collected from baseline (WCV1) through the exit visit (WCV3).
Adverse event information was collected for children, parent/caregivers and providers through communication with participants or family members when contact was made during study visits or during follow-up phone calls for data collection or retention purposes. Adverse events reported were unrelated to the study intervention. Adverse events were monitored after informed consent was received through study completion.
|
0.00%
0/35 • Adverse event data was collected from baseline (WCV1) through the exit visit (WCV3).
Adverse event information was collected for children, parent/caregivers and providers through communication with participants or family members when contact was made during study visits or during follow-up phone calls for data collection or retention purposes. Adverse events reported were unrelated to the study intervention. Adverse events were monitored after informed consent was received through study completion.
|
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place