Reliability of a Diabetic Foot Ulcer Risk Stratification and Referral Algorithm
NCT ID: NCT03370237
Last Updated: 2017-12-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
51 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2017-07-01
2017-09-22
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
There are more than 2.4 million Canadians living with diabetes, of which 1.2 million of them live in Ontario (MHLTC). Diabetes is the leading cause of non-traumatic lower limb amputation in Canadian adults, associated with approximately 70% of amputations performed in hospital. Compared to the general population, Canadian adults with diabetes are over 20 times more likely to undergo non-traumatic lower limb amputations, 85% of which are preceded by a foot ulcer (PHAC, 2011 and Singh et al.,2005). According to a recent report (CDA, 2016) commissioned by the Canadian Diabetes Association (CDA), of the 1.53 million people with diabetes in Ontario, between 16,600 and 27,600 were expected to have a diabetes foot ulcer in 2015. Of these, nearly 2,000 were expected to need to have a lower limb amputated as a result of their condition and those amputations are associated with almost 800 premature deaths. In Ontario, diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) currently impose direct health-care costs of between $320-400 million and indirect costs of between $35-60 million (Hopkins et al.,2015).
Strong evidence shows that up to 85% of diabetic foot amputations can be prevented, supporting the benefits of early recognition of diabetes-related foot complications (CDA, 2013). Furthermore, timely assessment, referral, and provision of evidence-informed foot care are cost saving for the healthcare system. Use of a standardized diabetic foot assessment tool is required to ensure consistent approach to risk recognition and provide a framework for care. In response to the need for a tool that facilitates a consistent and standard screening procedure, the Primary Care Diabetes Support Program (PCDSP) at St. Joseph's Health Care, London, Ontario developed an evidence based, multi-disciplinary foot ulcer assessment tool. The SJHC harmonized foot ulcer assessment tool was developed to aid in the early detection of diabetic foot problems and to ensure prompt referral to the right foot care provider for appropriate treatment, thereby improving outcomes of the diabetic foot.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Care providers including family doctors, nurse practitioners, nurses and residents who provider diabetes care was including as care provider participants
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
St. Joseph's Healthcare Foundation
OTHER
London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Elisabeth Harvey
Adjunct Associate Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Betty Harvey
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Western University and St Joseph's Health Care London
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
SJHC Primary Care Diabetes Support Program SJHC Family Medical and Dental Centre
London, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Buse JB, Polonsky KS, Burant CF. Type 2 diabetes mellitus. In: Kronenberg HM, Melmed S, Polonsky KS, Larsen PR. Williams Textbook of Endocrinology. 12th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders Elsevier; 2011
Stratton IM, Adler AI, Neil HA, Matthews DR, Manley SE, Cull CA, Hadden D, Turner RC, Holman RR. Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study. BMJ. 2000 Aug 12;321(7258):405-12. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7258.405.
Public Health Agency of Canada. Diabetes in Canada: Facts and Figures from a Public Health Perspective. Ottawa; 2011.
Ministry of Health and Long Term Care. Diabetes Management Strategy. Chapter 3 Section 3.03
Singh N, Armstrong DG, Lipsky BA. Preventing foot ulcers in patients with diabetes. JAMA. 2005 Jan 12;293(2):217-28. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.2.217.
Canadian Diabetes Association : Impact of offloading devices on the cost of diabetic foot ulcers in Ontario, http://www.diabetes.ca/publications-newsletters/advocacy-reports/impact-of-offloading-devices Accessed on Sep 11 2016
Hopkins RB, Burke N, Harlock J, Jegathisawaran J, Goeree R. Economic burden of illness associated with diabetic foot ulcers in Canada. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Jan 22;15:13. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0687-5.
Canadian Diabetes Association Clinical Practice Guidelines Expert Committee; Booth G, Cheng AY. Canadian Diabetes Association 2013 clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and management of diabetes in Canada. Methods. Can J Diabetes. 2013 Apr;37 Suppl 1:S4-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2013.01.010. Epub 2013 Mar 26. No abstract available.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
30
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id