Trial Outcomes & Findings for Quality of Life in Premenopausal Women With Heavy Menstrual Bleeding (NCT NCT03368898)
NCT ID: NCT03368898
Last Updated: 2020-09-24
Results Overview
Hot flush rating scale (HFRS) is a 5 items subjective tool. The first and second items of this scale are for Hot Flush Frequency Score. Women were asked to provide ratings of the frequency of hot flushes and night sweats in the first and second items. The number of the frequency in the first and second item is summed and this score is the total hot flush frequency score. The minimum Hot Flush Frequency Score is 0 and there is no maximum score to provide. However, the higher scores represent worse outcome. In this study, the Hot Flush Frequency Score is measured and recorded at initial of the treatment and six months of treatment. The change between the initial and six months score is our first primer outcome.
COMPLETED
104 participants
change from initial hot flush frequency score at 6 months
2020-09-24
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Estradiol Valerate
Women who were treated with Estradiol valerate for Heavy Menstrual Bleeding for 3 months.
|
LNG-IUD
Women who were treated with Levonorgestrel Intrauterine Device (LNG-IUD) for Heavy Menstrual Bleeding for 4 years.
|
Micronized Progesterone
Women who were treated with Micronized Progesterone for Heavy Menstrual Bleeding for 3 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
37
|
33
|
34
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
37
|
33
|
34
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Estradiol Valerate
n=37 Participants
Women who were treated with Estradiol valerate for Heavy Menstrual Bleeding for 3 months.
|
LNG-IUD
n=33 Participants
Women who were treated with Levonorgestrel Intrauterine Device LNG-IUD for Heavy Menstrual Bleeding for 4 years.
|
Micronized Progesterone
n=34 Participants
Women who were treated with Micronized Progesterone for Heavy Menstrual Bleeding for 3 months.
|
Total
n=104 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
44.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.7 • n=37 Participants
|
45 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.6 • n=33 Participants
|
45.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.7 • n=34 Participants
|
45 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.6 • n=104 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
37 Participants
n=37 Participants
|
33 Participants
n=33 Participants
|
34 Participants
n=34 Participants
|
104 Participants
n=104 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
0 Participants
n=37 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=33 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=34 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=104 Participants
|
|
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
0 Participants
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: change from initial hot flush frequency score at 6 monthsHot flush rating scale (HFRS) is a 5 items subjective tool. The first and second items of this scale are for Hot Flush Frequency Score. Women were asked to provide ratings of the frequency of hot flushes and night sweats in the first and second items. The number of the frequency in the first and second item is summed and this score is the total hot flush frequency score. The minimum Hot Flush Frequency Score is 0 and there is no maximum score to provide. However, the higher scores represent worse outcome. In this study, the Hot Flush Frequency Score is measured and recorded at initial of the treatment and six months of treatment. The change between the initial and six months score is our first primer outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Estradiol Valerate
n=37 Participants
Women who were treated with Estradiol valerate for Heavy Menstrual Bleeding for 3 months.
|
LNG-IUD
n=33 Participants
Women who were treated with Levonorgestrel Intrauterine Device (LNG-IUD) for Heavy Menstrual Bleeding for 4 years.
|
Micronized Progesterone
n=34 Participants
Women who were treated with Micronized Progesterone for Heavy Menstrual Bleeding for 3 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Hot Flush Frequency Total Score (HFRS) Change
|
9.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.4
|
8.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.5
|
12.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 30.3
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: change from initial menopause rating scale score at 6 monthsMenopause Rating Scale (MRS) is a questionnaire that assesses the presence and intensity of 11 menopausal symptoms. These are grouped into three subscales: the somatic subscale, the psychological subscale and the urogenital subscale. Each of the 11 items can be rated by the participant from 0 (not present) to 4 (very severe). The scores obtained for each individual item are summed to provide the corresponding total subscale score. The sum of subscales scores provide the total MRS score. Higher scores are indicative of more severe symptoms. Minimum total MRS score is 0 and maximum total MRS score is 44.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Estradiol Valerate
n=37 Participants
Women who were treated with Estradiol valerate for Heavy Menstrual Bleeding for 3 months.
|
LNG-IUD
n=33 Participants
Women who were treated with Levonorgestrel Intrauterine Device (LNG-IUD) for Heavy Menstrual Bleeding for 4 years.
|
Micronized Progesterone
n=34 Participants
Women who were treated with Micronized Progesterone for Heavy Menstrual Bleeding for 3 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) Score Change
|
-0.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.5
|
-2.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.4
|
-1.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: change from initial menopause multi-attribute score at 6 monthsThis is measured by menorrhagia multi-attribute scale; which is designed to measure the effect of menorrhagia on six domains of daily life (practical difficulties, social life, psychological health, physical health, work and daily routine, and family life and relationships). Scores range from 0 (severely affected) to 100 (not affected). Higher scores represent a better outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Estradiol Valerate
n=37 Participants
Women who were treated with Estradiol valerate for Heavy Menstrual Bleeding for 3 months.
|
LNG-IUD
n=33 Participants
Women who were treated with Levonorgestrel Intrauterine Device (LNG-IUD) for Heavy Menstrual Bleeding for 4 years.
|
Micronized Progesterone
n=34 Participants
Women who were treated with Micronized Progesterone for Heavy Menstrual Bleeding for 3 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Menopause Multi-Attribute Score Change on Menopause Multi-Attribute Scale.
|
25.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 31.1
|
31.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.7
|
22.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: change from initial Pictorial bleeding assessment score at 6 monthsThe pictorial blood assessment chart (PBAC) consists of a series of diagrams representing lightly, moderately, and heavily soiled towels and tampons. The numbers at the top of the chart represent the day of menstruation. The women are instructed to insert a mark in the appropriate box at the time each towel and/or tampon is discarded. After completion, the woman returns the chart during her next appointment to the clinic. The chart is scored using the scoring system. A baseline score is established and then at six months of treatment, the score is assessed again. Change from the initial score at 6 months of treatment is recorded as a secondary outcome. Decreasing values are considered to be a better outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Estradiol Valerate
n=37 Participants
Women who were treated with Estradiol valerate for Heavy Menstrual Bleeding for 3 months.
|
LNG-IUD
n=33 Participants
Women who were treated with Levonorgestrel Intrauterine Device (LNG-IUD) for Heavy Menstrual Bleeding for 4 years.
|
Micronized Progesterone
n=34 Participants
Women who were treated with Micronized Progesterone for Heavy Menstrual Bleeding for 3 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Pictorial Bleeding Assessment Score Change
|
-113 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 61.6
|
-120.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 51.2
|
-112.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 54.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: change from initial hemoglobin values at 6 monthsBlood sample analysis for hemoglobin values is performed before the treatment and at six months of treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Estradiol Valerate
n=37 Participants
Women who were treated with Estradiol valerate for Heavy Menstrual Bleeding for 3 months.
|
LNG-IUD
n=33 Participants
Women who were treated with Levonorgestrel Intrauterine Device (LNG-IUD) for Heavy Menstrual Bleeding for 4 years.
|
Micronized Progesterone
n=34 Participants
Women who were treated with Micronized Progesterone for Heavy Menstrual Bleeding for 3 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Hemoglobin Value Change
|
0.5 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 1.2
|
0.09 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 1.4
|
0.03 mg/dL
Standard Deviation 1.4
|
Adverse Events
Estradiol Valerate
LNG-IUD
Micronized Progesterone
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
İsmail Alay
bakirkoy dr sadi konuk training and research hospital
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place