Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes - Raising the Issue of Weight Management in Primary Care
NCT ID: NCT03360058
Last Updated: 2018-11-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-10-07
2018-11-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Specific aims of the whole project:
1. To improve GP/ primary care staff knowledge of the evidence base for the management of diabetes when there is co-existing obesity and local care pathways
2. To increase GP/ primary care staff knowledge of and confidence in their role in raising the issue of weight management,
3. To improve primary care referral rates of appropriate patients who are overweight or obese and have type 2 diabetes, and are "ready to change" to NHS funded weight management services
4. To improve patient uptake of and attendance at NHS funded weight management services NB This is a service evaluation of a training programme being delivered by NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde Health Improvement. Full ethical approvals are being sought due to the randomised design and so that results can be generalised and published.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Outreach Methods to Encourage Enrollment in Diabetes Prevention and Weight Management Programs
NCT03200535
Adaptation of the Diabetes Prevention Program for Primary Care
NCT01220089
Primary Care Community Partnerships to Prevent Diabetes
NCT00656682
Obesity and Diabetes Prevention Through Science Enrichment
NCT00541879
Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes Amongst South Asians With Central Obesity and Prediabetes
NCT02949739
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Similarly, Brook et al described initial uptake and engagement of a small weight management programme of 502 patients. In addition to completing an extensive questionnaire, patients were requested to call to make an appointment with the service personally. Of those referred to the programme, 46% did not opt in.
Engaging patients in a weight management programme is especially difficult, even when the intervention is provided via the primary care route. For example, The Counterweight Project, a weight management programme delivered via the GP surgery, has been taken up by a number of surgeries in Scotland, however after 2 years, one fifth of enlisted practices failed to enrol patients onto the programme.
Even when GP's do address matters of weight related behaviour, there is often disagreement from the patient that the topic has been raised. In a sample of 456 patients, 39% of patients disagreed with GP reporting about the content of the discussion during consultations regarding weight, diet and physical activity. In particular, GP's reported more occasions of discussing weight than patients in 12.5% of consultations. Patients' likeliness to engage in a weight management programme is also influenced by practice endorsement and opinion of the GP of the intervention available in addition to other factors: clear understanding of the programme, clear understanding of the programme goals, structured pro-active follow-up and perception of positive outcomes.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Immediate access to STBD training
Immediate access to training materials and print pieces to support implementation
Small Talk Big Difference Immediate access training
Immediate access to 1 hour online training and supporting print materials for implementation in primary care practice
Delayed access to STBD training
Delayed access to training materials and print pieces
Small Talk Big Difference delayed access training
Delayed access (by 4 months) to 1 hour online training and supporting print materials for implementation in primary care practice
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Small Talk Big Difference Immediate access training
Immediate access to 1 hour online training and supporting print materials for implementation in primary care practice
Small Talk Big Difference delayed access training
Delayed access (by 4 months) to 1 hour online training and supporting print materials for implementation in primary care practice
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Have a contract for local enhanced services for long term conditions (Diabetes)
* Have a unique clinical database (i.e. not shared with another practice)
Exclusion Criteria
* Those practices with a database shared with another practice (8 practices in area)
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Glasgow
OTHER
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jennifer Logue, MBChB PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Glasgow University and NHS GGC
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre
Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Brooksbank K, O'Donnell J, Corbett V, Shield S, Ainsworth R, Shearer R, Montgomery S, Gallagher A, Duncan H, Hamilton L, Laszlo V, Noone R, Baxendale A, Blane D, Logue J. Discussing Weight Management With Type 2 Diabetes Patients in Primary Care Using the Small Talk Big Difference Intervention: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Feb 15;8(2):e12162. doi: 10.2196/12162.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
GN17DI319
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.