Comparing Measurements Made in an Incremental Shuttle Walk Test and a Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test in Patients With IPF
NCT ID: NCT03360032
Last Updated: 2019-09-27
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
43 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2018-01-10
2020-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
An incremental shuttle walk test is simpler, cheaper, more widely available and anecdotally preferable to CPET. The investigators will compare the measurements made in an ISWT and a CPET in patients with IPF . We aim to determine whether sufficient information can be gathered in an ISWT to negate the need to undertake CPET.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
CPET in Evaluation of PH in COPD Patients
NCT04035148
Iron and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exercise Trial
NCT03050424
Shuttle Walk Test Performed on a Treadmill Versus a Corridor in Patients With COPD
NCT02348151
Three-min Step Test and Exercise Desaturation Detection in Chronic Respiratory Insufficiency Patients
NCT04911764
Effect of Short-term Oxygen During CPET in ILD
NCT04897048
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
An accurate prognosis can help determine the most appropriate individual treatment option and allow patients and their families to make suitable plans. Currently, measurements from resting lung function tests are used to predict prognosis. However, measurement made during CPET are more sensitive survival predictors and CPET is the gold standard test to assess prognosis in IPF. A CPET test is relatively time-consuming and requires specialist equipment that is not universally available. CPET is not routinely used in clinical practice for the assessment of IPF.
The incremental shuttle walk test (ISWT) is quicker, cheaper and more widely available than CPET. This study builds on previous research done by the Respiratory team which showed a linear relationship between the distance walked in an ISWT and peak oxygen consumption during a CPET, a useful prognostic predictor, in patients with interstitial lung disease. 40-50 patients with IPF will be recruited and will undertake both ISWT and CPET at University Hospital, Coventry. The investigators will compare the results in the current cohort to those of the previous study.
Additionally, the research team will compare oxygen pressure in capillary blood at the end of an ISWT and a CPET. The investigators will also compare patient experience of the two tests using questionnaires. This study paves the way for a simple, standardised test to more accurately predict prognosis in IPF.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
All participants
All patients will be asked to undertake an incremental shuttle walk test and a cardiopulmonary exercise test and the results will be compared.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Aged 16 or over
* Able to give informed consent to take part
* Able to undertake both a cycle ergometry test and an incremental shuttle walk test without needing walking aids
Exclusion Criteria
* Taking part in a research project with a potentially research-modifying intervention
* Currently pregnant.
* Currently breastfeeding.
* Unable to perform an incremental shuttle walk test.
* Unable to perform an incremental cycle ergometry test.
* Unable to walk without an aid such as a stick or frame.
16 Years
90 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
David Parr
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Hospital
Coventry, Warwickshire, United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
222072
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.