Trial Outcomes & Findings for An International Study to Evaluate Diagnostic Efficacy of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection PET MPI in the Detection of Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) (NCT NCT03354273)
NCT ID: NCT03354273
Last Updated: 2023-07-12
Results Overview
Sensitivity was defined as true positives (TP)/(TP+false negatives \[FN\]). TP was participants with abnormal PET MPI and disease positive by truth standard and FN was participants with normal PET MPI and disease positive by truth standard. Specificity defined as true negatives (TN)/(TN+ false positives \[FP\]). TN was participants with normal PET MPI and disease negative by truth standard and FP was participants with abnormal PET MPI and disease negative by truth standard. Truth standard was presence of CAD as evidenced by presence of stenosis of \>=50 percent (%) in \>=1 coronary artery or major branch of a coronary artery as determined by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) analysis. Participants were considered to have CAD if QCA revealed \>=50% stenosis of \>=1 major coronary artery or major branch. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for 3 readers and majority rule using each participant judgement (positive or negative) by at least 2 of 3 readers.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
730 participants
Up to 60 days
2023-07-12
Participant Flow
This study was conducted at 48 centers in Finland, France, Germany, Netherlands, United States and Canada from 05 June 2018 to 05 May 2022.
A total 730 participants signed informed consent and were enrolled, of these, 604 participants received greater than or equal to (\>=) 1 dose of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection in this study.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Flurpiridaz (18F): All Participants
Participants received 2 intravenous (IV) boluses of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection in a large peripheral vein: 1 at rest then 1 during stress on the same day within 60 days prior to the invasive coronary angiography (ICA). Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection administered at rest and during stress conditions were not to exceed a total of 14 millicurie (mCi) (520 megabecquerel \[MBq\]) for an individual participant. Flurpiridaz was administered on Study Day 1.
Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) agents 99mTc-based myocardial tracers, example \[99mTc\]tetrofosmin or \[99mTc\]sestamibi were administered as per American Society of Nuclear Cardiology or European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging standards corresponding to study site location. For each participant, the same stress type (pharmacologic or exercise) was used for the SPECT and Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection positron emission tomography (PET) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). Also, if pharmacological stress was used, the same agent and the same dose of pharmacological stress agent was used for both types of imaging for the same participant.
Pharmacological stress agents were administered according to the respective Package Insert (as applicable) or American Society of Nuclear Cardiology or European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging standards corresponding to study site location.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
730
|
|
Overall Study
Safety Population (Treated)
|
604
|
|
Overall Study
Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population
|
578
|
|
Overall Study
Secondary Modified Intent-to-Treat (SMITT) Population
|
578
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
578
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
152
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Flurpiridaz (18F): All Participants
Participants received 2 intravenous (IV) boluses of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection in a large peripheral vein: 1 at rest then 1 during stress on the same day within 60 days prior to the invasive coronary angiography (ICA). Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection administered at rest and during stress conditions were not to exceed a total of 14 millicurie (mCi) (520 megabecquerel \[MBq\]) for an individual participant. Flurpiridaz was administered on Study Day 1.
Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) agents 99mTc-based myocardial tracers, example \[99mTc\]tetrofosmin or \[99mTc\]sestamibi were administered as per American Society of Nuclear Cardiology or European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging standards corresponding to study site location. For each participant, the same stress type (pharmacologic or exercise) was used for the SPECT and Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection positron emission tomography (PET) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). Also, if pharmacological stress was used, the same agent and the same dose of pharmacological stress agent was used for both types of imaging for the same participant.
Pharmacological stress agents were administered according to the respective Package Insert (as applicable) or American Society of Nuclear Cardiology or European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging standards corresponding to study site location.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
5
|
|
Overall Study
Screen Failure
|
21
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
34
|
|
Overall Study
Technical Problems
|
30
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
4
|
|
Overall Study
Investigator Decision
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP) Supply Issues
|
21
|
|
Overall Study
Issues With Performing Invasive Coronary Angiography (ICA)
|
20
|
|
Overall Study
COVID-19 Restrictions
|
9
|
|
Overall Study
Other
|
5
|
Baseline Characteristics
An International Study to Evaluate Diagnostic Efficacy of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection PET MPI in the Detection of Coronary Artery Disease (CAD)
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Flurpiridaz (18F): All Participants
n=730 Participants
Participants received 2 IV boluses of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection in a large peripheral vein: 1 at rest then 1 during stress on the same day within 60 days prior to the ICA. Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection administered at rest and during stress conditions were not to exceed a total of 14 mCi (520 MBq) for an individual participant. Flurpiridaz was administered on Study Day 1.
SPECT agents 99mTc-based myocardial tracers, example \[99mTc\]tetrofosmin or \[99mTc\]sestamibi were administered as per American Society of Nuclear Cardiology or European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging standards corresponding to study site location. For each participant, the same stress type (pharmacologic or exercise) was used for the SPECT and Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection PET MPI. Also, if pharmacological stress was used, the same agent and the same dose of pharmacological stress agent was used for both types of imaging for the same participant.
Pharmacological stress agents were administered according to the respective Package Insert (as applicable) or American Society of Nuclear Cardiology or European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging standards corresponding to study site location.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
63.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.26 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
235 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
495 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
98 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
512 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
120 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
55 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
579 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
82 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Canada
|
129 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
412 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Finland
|
36 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
France
|
71 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Germany
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
|
79 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 60 daysPopulation: The MITT population included all participants who completed the rest and stress Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection PET MPI procedures and who had evaluable truth standard data. Here, "overall number of participants analyzed" signifies participants who were analyzed for a specific reader (combined sensitivity or specificity) and "number analyzed" signifies participants who were evaluable for specified categories.
Sensitivity was defined as true positives (TP)/(TP+false negatives \[FN\]). TP was participants with abnormal PET MPI and disease positive by truth standard and FN was participants with normal PET MPI and disease positive by truth standard. Specificity defined as true negatives (TN)/(TN+ false positives \[FP\]). TN was participants with normal PET MPI and disease negative by truth standard and FP was participants with abnormal PET MPI and disease negative by truth standard. Truth standard was presence of CAD as evidenced by presence of stenosis of \>=50 percent (%) in \>=1 coronary artery or major branch of a coronary artery as determined by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) analysis. Participants were considered to have CAD if QCA revealed \>=50% stenosis of \>=1 major coronary artery or major branch. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for 3 readers and majority rule using each participant judgement (positive or negative) by at least 2 of 3 readers.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Flurpiridaz (18F)
n=578 Participants
Participants received 2 IV boluses of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection in a large peripheral vein: 1 at rest then 1 during stress on the same day within 60 days prior to the ICA. Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection administered at rest and during stress conditions were not to exceed a total of 14 mCi (520 MBq) for an individual participant. Flurpiridaz was administered on Study Day 1.
SPECT agents 99mTc-based myocardial tracers, example \[99mTc\]tetrofosmin or \[99mTc\]sestamibi were administered as per American Society of Nuclear Cardiology or European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging standards corresponding to study site location. For each participant, the same stress type (pharmacologic or exercise) was used for the SPECT and Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection PET MPI. Also, if pharmacological stress was used, the same agent and the same dose of pharmacological stress agent was used for both types of imaging for the same participant.
Pharmacological stress agents were administered according to the respective Package Insert (as applicable) or American Society of Nuclear Cardiology or European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging standards corresponding to study site location.
|
SPECT MPI
SPECT agents 99mTc-based myocardial tracers, example \[99mTc\]tetrofosmin or \[99mTc\]sestamibi were administered as per American Society of Nuclear Cardiology or European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging standards corresponding to study site location. For each participant, the same stress type (pharmacologic or exercise) was used for the SPECT and Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection PET MPI. Also, if pharmacological stress was used, the same agent and the same dose of pharmacological stress agent was used for both types of imaging for the same participant.
Pharmacological stress agents were administered according to the respective Package Insert (as applicable) or American Society of Nuclear Cardiology or European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging standards corresponding to study site location.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Sensitivity and Specificity of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (MPI) in the Detection of Significant Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) as Defined by Cardiac Catheterization
Reader 1: Sensitivity
|
77.1 percent
Interval 71.9 to 82.3
|
—
|
|
Sensitivity and Specificity of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (MPI) in the Detection of Significant Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) as Defined by Cardiac Catheterization
Reader 1: Specificity
|
65.7 percent
Interval 60.5 to 70.8
|
—
|
|
Sensitivity and Specificity of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (MPI) in the Detection of Significant Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) as Defined by Cardiac Catheterization
Reader 2: Sensitivity
|
73.5 percent
Interval 68.0 to 79.0
|
—
|
|
Sensitivity and Specificity of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (MPI) in the Detection of Significant Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) as Defined by Cardiac Catheterization
Reader 2: Specificity
|
69.6 percent
Interval 64.6 to 74.6
|
—
|
|
Sensitivity and Specificity of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (MPI) in the Detection of Significant Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) as Defined by Cardiac Catheterization
Reader 3: Sensitivity
|
88.8 percent
Interval 84.8 to 92.7
|
—
|
|
Sensitivity and Specificity of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (MPI) in the Detection of Significant Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) as Defined by Cardiac Catheterization
Reader 3: Specificity
|
52.6 percent
Interval 47.2 to 58.0
|
—
|
|
Sensitivity and Specificity of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (MPI) in the Detection of Significant Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) as Defined by Cardiac Catheterization
Majority Rule: Sensitivity
|
80.3 percent
Interval 75.4 to 85.3
|
—
|
|
Sensitivity and Specificity of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (MPI) in the Detection of Significant Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) as Defined by Cardiac Catheterization
Majority Rule: Specificity
|
63.8 percent
Interval 58.6 to 69.0
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 60 daysPopulation: The SMITT population included the participants who completed the rest and stress SPECT MPI (if the participant's SPECT MPI was "off-study," that SPECT MPI had to meet minimal quality standards, as specified by the imaging core lab). Here, "overall number of participants analyzed" signifies participants who were analyzed for a specific reader (combined sensitivity or specificity) and "number analyzed" signifies participants who were evaluable for specified categories.
Sensitivity:TP/(TP+FN). TP:participants with abnormal PET MPI and disease positive by truth standard and FN:participants with normal PET MPI and disease positive by truth standard. Specificity:TN/(TN+ FP). TN:participants with normal PET MPI and disease negative by truth standard and FP:participants with abnormal PET MPI and disease negative by truth standard. Truth standard was presence of CAD as evidenced by presence of stenosis of \>=50% in \>=1 coronary artery or major branch of coronary artery as determined by QCA analysis. Participants considered to have CAD if QCA revealed \>=50% stenosis of \>=1 major coronary artery or major branch. Sensitivity, specificity was calculated for 3 readers and majority rule using each participant judgement (positive or negative) by at least 2 of 3 readers. Sensitivity, specificity of Flurpiridaz (18F) PET MPI compared to SPECT MPI with QCA as standard of truth at \>=50% stenosis threshold for all participants was reported by reader and majority rule.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Flurpiridaz (18F)
n=578 Participants
Participants received 2 IV boluses of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection in a large peripheral vein: 1 at rest then 1 during stress on the same day within 60 days prior to the ICA. Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection administered at rest and during stress conditions were not to exceed a total of 14 mCi (520 MBq) for an individual participant. Flurpiridaz was administered on Study Day 1.
SPECT agents 99mTc-based myocardial tracers, example \[99mTc\]tetrofosmin or \[99mTc\]sestamibi were administered as per American Society of Nuclear Cardiology or European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging standards corresponding to study site location. For each participant, the same stress type (pharmacologic or exercise) was used for the SPECT and Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection PET MPI. Also, if pharmacological stress was used, the same agent and the same dose of pharmacological stress agent was used for both types of imaging for the same participant.
Pharmacological stress agents were administered according to the respective Package Insert (as applicable) or American Society of Nuclear Cardiology or European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging standards corresponding to study site location.
|
SPECT MPI
n=578 Participants
SPECT agents 99mTc-based myocardial tracers, example \[99mTc\]tetrofosmin or \[99mTc\]sestamibi were administered as per American Society of Nuclear Cardiology or European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging standards corresponding to study site location. For each participant, the same stress type (pharmacologic or exercise) was used for the SPECT and Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection PET MPI. Also, if pharmacological stress was used, the same agent and the same dose of pharmacological stress agent was used for both types of imaging for the same participant.
Pharmacological stress agents were administered according to the respective Package Insert (as applicable) or American Society of Nuclear Cardiology or European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging standards corresponding to study site location.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Sensitivity and Specificity of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection PET MPI Compared SPECT MPI for All Participants When the Diagnosis of CAD by ICA Was the Standard of Truth
Reader 1: Sensitivity
|
77.1 percent
Interval 71.9 to 82.3
|
62.7 percent
Interval 56.6 to 68.7
|
|
Sensitivity and Specificity of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection PET MPI Compared SPECT MPI for All Participants When the Diagnosis of CAD by ICA Was the Standard of Truth
Reader 1: Specificity
|
65.7 percent
Interval 60.5 to 70.8
|
63.2 percent
Interval 58.0 to 68.4
|
|
Sensitivity and Specificity of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection PET MPI Compared SPECT MPI for All Participants When the Diagnosis of CAD by ICA Was the Standard of Truth
Reader 2: Sensitivity
|
73.5 percent
Interval 68.0 to 79.0
|
60.6 percent
Interval 54.6 to 66.7
|
|
Sensitivity and Specificity of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection PET MPI Compared SPECT MPI for All Participants When the Diagnosis of CAD by ICA Was the Standard of Truth
Reader 2: Specificity
|
69.6 percent
Interval 64.6 to 74.6
|
64.7 percent
Interval 59.6 to 69.9
|
|
Sensitivity and Specificity of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection PET MPI Compared SPECT MPI for All Participants When the Diagnosis of CAD by ICA Was the Standard of Truth
Reader 3: Sensitivity
|
88.8 percent
Interval 84.8 to 92.7
|
75.5 percent
Interval 70.2 to 80.8
|
|
Sensitivity and Specificity of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection PET MPI Compared SPECT MPI for All Participants When the Diagnosis of CAD by ICA Was the Standard of Truth
Reader 3: Specificity
|
52.6 percent
Interval 47.2 to 58.0
|
51.4 percent
Interval 46.0 to 56.8
|
|
Sensitivity and Specificity of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection PET MPI Compared SPECT MPI for All Participants When the Diagnosis of CAD by ICA Was the Standard of Truth
Majority Rule: Sensitivity
|
80.3 percent
Interval 75.4 to 85.3
|
68.7 percent
Interval 62.9 to 74.4
|
|
Sensitivity and Specificity of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection PET MPI Compared SPECT MPI for All Participants When the Diagnosis of CAD by ICA Was the Standard of Truth
Majority Rule: Specificity
|
63.8 percent
Interval 58.6 to 69.0
|
61.7 percent
Interval 56.4 to 67.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 60 daysPopulation: The SMITT population included the participants who completed the rest and stress SPECT MPI (if the participant's SPECT MPI was "off-study," that SPECT MPI had to meet minimal quality standards, as specified by the imaging core lab). Here, "overall number of participants analyzed" signifies participants who were analyzed for a specific reader (combined sensitivity or specificity) and "number analyzed" signifies participants who were evaluable for specified categories.
Sensitivity:TP/(TP+FN). TP:participants with abnormal PET MPI and disease positive by truth standard and FN:participants with normal PET MPI and disease positive by truth standard. Specificity:TN/(TN+ FP). TN:participants with normal PET MPI and disease negative by truth standard and FP:participants with abnormal PET MPI and disease negative by truth standard. Truth standard was presence of CAD as evidenced by presence of stenosis of \>=50% in \>=1 coronary artery or major branch of a coronary artery as determined by QCA analysis. Participants considered to have CAD if QCA revealed \>=50% stenosis of \>=1 major coronary artery or major branch. Sensitivity, specificity calculated for 3 readers and majority rule using each participant judgement (positive or negative) by at least 2 of 3 readers. Sensitivity, specificity of Flurpiridaz (18F) PET MPI compared to SPECT MPI with QCA as standard of truth at \>=50% stenosis threshold for female participants was reported by reader and majority rule.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Flurpiridaz (18F)
n=188 Participants
Participants received 2 IV boluses of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection in a large peripheral vein: 1 at rest then 1 during stress on the same day within 60 days prior to the ICA. Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection administered at rest and during stress conditions were not to exceed a total of 14 mCi (520 MBq) for an individual participant. Flurpiridaz was administered on Study Day 1.
SPECT agents 99mTc-based myocardial tracers, example \[99mTc\]tetrofosmin or \[99mTc\]sestamibi were administered as per American Society of Nuclear Cardiology or European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging standards corresponding to study site location. For each participant, the same stress type (pharmacologic or exercise) was used for the SPECT and Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection PET MPI. Also, if pharmacological stress was used, the same agent and the same dose of pharmacological stress agent was used for both types of imaging for the same participant.
Pharmacological stress agents were administered according to the respective Package Insert (as applicable) or American Society of Nuclear Cardiology or European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging standards corresponding to study site location.
|
SPECT MPI
n=188 Participants
SPECT agents 99mTc-based myocardial tracers, example \[99mTc\]tetrofosmin or \[99mTc\]sestamibi were administered as per American Society of Nuclear Cardiology or European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging standards corresponding to study site location. For each participant, the same stress type (pharmacologic or exercise) was used for the SPECT and Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection PET MPI. Also, if pharmacological stress was used, the same agent and the same dose of pharmacological stress agent was used for both types of imaging for the same participant.
Pharmacological stress agents were administered according to the respective Package Insert (as applicable) or American Society of Nuclear Cardiology or European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging standards corresponding to study site location.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Sensitivity and Specificity of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection PET MPI Compared SPECT MPI for Female Participants When the Diagnosis of CAD by ICA Was the Standard of Truth
Reader 1: Sensitivity
|
82.9 percent
Interval 71.4 to 94.4
|
58.5 percent
Interval 43.5 to 73.6
|
|
Sensitivity and Specificity of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection PET MPI Compared SPECT MPI for Female Participants When the Diagnosis of CAD by ICA Was the Standard of Truth
Reader 1: Specificity
|
72.8 percent
Interval 65.6 to 80.0
|
63.3 percent
Interval 55.5 to 71.1
|
|
Sensitivity and Specificity of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection PET MPI Compared SPECT MPI for Female Participants When the Diagnosis of CAD by ICA Was the Standard of Truth
Reader 2: Sensitivity
|
78.0 percent
Interval 65.4 to 90.7
|
56.1 percent
Interval 40.9 to 71.3
|
|
Sensitivity and Specificity of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection PET MPI Compared SPECT MPI for Female Participants When the Diagnosis of CAD by ICA Was the Standard of Truth
Reader 2: Specificity
|
75.5 percent
Interval 68.6 to 82.5
|
68.7 percent
Interval 61.2 to 76.2
|
|
Sensitivity and Specificity of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection PET MPI Compared SPECT MPI for Female Participants When the Diagnosis of CAD by ICA Was the Standard of Truth
Reader 3: Sensitivity
|
92.7 percent
Interval 84.7 to 100.0
|
75.6 percent
Interval 62.5 to 88.8
|
|
Sensitivity and Specificity of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection PET MPI Compared SPECT MPI for Female Participants When the Diagnosis of CAD by ICA Was the Standard of Truth
Reader 3: Specificity
|
59.2 percent
Interval 51.2 to 67.1
|
58.5 percent
Interval 50.5 to 66.5
|
|
Sensitivity and Specificity of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection PET MPI Compared SPECT MPI for Female Participants When the Diagnosis of CAD by ICA Was the Standard of Truth
Majority Rule: Sensitivity
|
82.9 percent
Interval 71.4 to 94.4
|
65.9 percent
Interval 51.3 to 80.4
|
|
Sensitivity and Specificity of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection PET MPI Compared SPECT MPI for Female Participants When the Diagnosis of CAD by ICA Was the Standard of Truth
Majority Rule: Specificity
|
72.8 percent
Interval 65.6 to 80.0
|
66.0 percent
Interval 58.3 to 73.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 60 daysPopulation: The SMITT population included the participants who completed the rest and stress SPECT MPI (if the participant's SPECT MPI was "off-study," that SPECT MPI had to meet minimal quality standards, as specified by the imaging core lab). Here, "overall number of participants analyzed" signifies participants who were analyzed for a specific reader (combined sensitivity or specificity) and "number analyzed" signifies participants who were evaluable for specified categories.
Sensitivity:TP/(TP+FN). TP:participants with abnormal PET MPI and disease positive by truth standard and FN:participants with normal PET MPI and disease positive by truth standard. Specificity:TN/(TN+ FP). TN:participants with normal PET MPI and disease negative by truth standard and FP:participants with abnormal PET MPI and disease negative by truth standard. Truth standard was presence of CAD as evidenced by presence of stenosis of \>=50% in \>=1 coronary artery or major branch of coronary artery determined by QCA analysis. Participants considered to have CAD if QCA revealed \>=50% stenosis of \>=1 major coronary artery or major branch. Sensitivity, specificity calculated for 3 readers and majority rule using each participant judgement (positive or negative) by at least 2 of 3 readers. Sensitivity, specificity of Flurpiridaz (18F) PET MPI compared to SPECT MPI with QCA as standard of truth at \>=50% stenosis threshold for participants(BMI\>=30 kg/m\^2) reported by reader and majority rule.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Flurpiridaz (18F)
n=298 Participants
Participants received 2 IV boluses of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection in a large peripheral vein: 1 at rest then 1 during stress on the same day within 60 days prior to the ICA. Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection administered at rest and during stress conditions were not to exceed a total of 14 mCi (520 MBq) for an individual participant. Flurpiridaz was administered on Study Day 1.
SPECT agents 99mTc-based myocardial tracers, example \[99mTc\]tetrofosmin or \[99mTc\]sestamibi were administered as per American Society of Nuclear Cardiology or European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging standards corresponding to study site location. For each participant, the same stress type (pharmacologic or exercise) was used for the SPECT and Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection PET MPI. Also, if pharmacological stress was used, the same agent and the same dose of pharmacological stress agent was used for both types of imaging for the same participant.
Pharmacological stress agents were administered according to the respective Package Insert (as applicable) or American Society of Nuclear Cardiology or European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging standards corresponding to study site location.
|
SPECT MPI
n=298 Participants
SPECT agents 99mTc-based myocardial tracers, example \[99mTc\]tetrofosmin or \[99mTc\]sestamibi were administered as per American Society of Nuclear Cardiology or European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging standards corresponding to study site location. For each participant, the same stress type (pharmacologic or exercise) was used for the SPECT and Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection PET MPI. Also, if pharmacological stress was used, the same agent and the same dose of pharmacological stress agent was used for both types of imaging for the same participant.
Pharmacological stress agents were administered according to the respective Package Insert (as applicable) or American Society of Nuclear Cardiology or European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging standards corresponding to study site location.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Sensitivity and Specificity of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection PET MPI Compared SPECT MPI for Participants With Body-mass Index (BMI) >=30 Kilograms Per Square Meter (kg/m^2) When the Diagnosis of CAD by ICA Was the Standard of Truth
Reader 1: Sensitivity
|
72.6 percent
Interval 64.6 to 80.7
|
60.7 percent
Interval 51.8 to 69.5
|
|
Sensitivity and Specificity of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection PET MPI Compared SPECT MPI for Participants With Body-mass Index (BMI) >=30 Kilograms Per Square Meter (kg/m^2) When the Diagnosis of CAD by ICA Was the Standard of Truth
Reader 1: Specificity
|
68.0 percent
Interval 61.2 to 74.8
|
61.3 percent
Interval 54.2 to 68.4
|
|
Sensitivity and Specificity of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection PET MPI Compared SPECT MPI for Participants With Body-mass Index (BMI) >=30 Kilograms Per Square Meter (kg/m^2) When the Diagnosis of CAD by ICA Was the Standard of Truth
Reader 2: Sensitivity
|
70.1 percent
Interval 61.8 to 78.4
|
63.2 percent
Interval 54.5 to 72.0
|
|
Sensitivity and Specificity of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection PET MPI Compared SPECT MPI for Participants With Body-mass Index (BMI) >=30 Kilograms Per Square Meter (kg/m^2) When the Diagnosis of CAD by ICA Was the Standard of Truth
Reader 2: Specificity
|
74.0 percent
Interval 67.6 to 80.4
|
62.4 percent
Interval 55.4 to 69.5
|
|
Sensitivity and Specificity of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection PET MPI Compared SPECT MPI for Participants With Body-mass Index (BMI) >=30 Kilograms Per Square Meter (kg/m^2) When the Diagnosis of CAD by ICA Was the Standard of Truth
Reader 3: Sensitivity
|
88.0 percent
Interval 82.2 to 93.9
|
74.4 percent
Interval 66.4 to 82.3
|
|
Sensitivity and Specificity of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection PET MPI Compared SPECT MPI for Participants With Body-mass Index (BMI) >=30 Kilograms Per Square Meter (kg/m^2) When the Diagnosis of CAD by ICA Was the Standard of Truth
Reader 3: Specificity
|
53.6 percent
Interval 46.3 to 60.9
|
50.8 percent
Interval 43.5 to 58.1
|
|
Sensitivity and Specificity of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection PET MPI Compared SPECT MPI for Participants With Body-mass Index (BMI) >=30 Kilograms Per Square Meter (kg/m^2) When the Diagnosis of CAD by ICA Was the Standard of Truth
Majority Rule: Sensitivity
|
76.9 percent
Interval 69.3 to 84.6
|
69.2 percent
Interval 60.9 to 77.6
|
|
Sensitivity and Specificity of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection PET MPI Compared SPECT MPI for Participants With Body-mass Index (BMI) >=30 Kilograms Per Square Meter (kg/m^2) When the Diagnosis of CAD by ICA Was the Standard of Truth
Majority Rule: Specificity
|
66.9 percent
Interval 60.0 to 73.7
|
61.9 percent
Interval 54.8 to 69.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 60 daysPopulation: The SMITT population included the participants who completed the rest and stress SPECT MPI (if the participant's SPECT MPI was "off-study," that SPECT MPI had to meet minimal quality standards, as specified by the imaging core lab). Here, "overall number of participants analyzed" signifies participants who were analyzed for a specific reader (combined sensitivity or specificity) and "number analyzed" signifies participants who were evaluable for specified categories.
Sensitivity:TP/(TP+FN). TP:participants with abnormal PET MPI and disease positive by truth standard and FN:participants with normal PET MPI and disease positive by truth standard. Specificity:TN/(TN+ FP). TN:participants with normal PET MPI and disease negative by truth standard and FP:participants with abnormal PET MPI and disease negative by truth standard. Truth standard was presence of CAD as evidenced by presence of stenosis of \>=50% in \>=1 coronary artery or major branch of coronary artery determined by QCA analysis. Participants considered to have CAD if QCA revealed \>=50% stenosis of \>=1 major coronary artery or major branch. Sensitivity and specificity calculated for 3 readers and majority rule using each participant judgement (positive or negative) by at least 2 of 3 readers. Sensitivity, specificity of Flurpiridaz (18F) PET MPI compared to SPECT MPI with QCA as standard of truth at \>=50% stenosis threshold for diabetic participants was reported by reader and majority rule.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Flurpiridaz (18F)
n=194 Participants
Participants received 2 IV boluses of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection in a large peripheral vein: 1 at rest then 1 during stress on the same day within 60 days prior to the ICA. Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection administered at rest and during stress conditions were not to exceed a total of 14 mCi (520 MBq) for an individual participant. Flurpiridaz was administered on Study Day 1.
SPECT agents 99mTc-based myocardial tracers, example \[99mTc\]tetrofosmin or \[99mTc\]sestamibi were administered as per American Society of Nuclear Cardiology or European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging standards corresponding to study site location. For each participant, the same stress type (pharmacologic or exercise) was used for the SPECT and Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection PET MPI. Also, if pharmacological stress was used, the same agent and the same dose of pharmacological stress agent was used for both types of imaging for the same participant.
Pharmacological stress agents were administered according to the respective Package Insert (as applicable) or American Society of Nuclear Cardiology or European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging standards corresponding to study site location.
|
SPECT MPI
n=194 Participants
SPECT agents 99mTc-based myocardial tracers, example \[99mTc\]tetrofosmin or \[99mTc\]sestamibi were administered as per American Society of Nuclear Cardiology or European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging standards corresponding to study site location. For each participant, the same stress type (pharmacologic or exercise) was used for the SPECT and Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection PET MPI. Also, if pharmacological stress was used, the same agent and the same dose of pharmacological stress agent was used for both types of imaging for the same participant.
Pharmacological stress agents were administered according to the respective Package Insert (as applicable) or American Society of Nuclear Cardiology or European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging standards corresponding to study site location.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Sensitivity and Specificity of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection PET MPI Compared SPECT MPI for Diabetic Participants When the Diagnosis of CAD by ICA Was the Standard of Truth
Reader 1: Sensitivity
|
72.5 percent
Interval 63.4 to 81.7
|
61.5 percent
Interval 51.5 to 71.5
|
|
Sensitivity and Specificity of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection PET MPI Compared SPECT MPI for Diabetic Participants When the Diagnosis of CAD by ICA Was the Standard of Truth
Reader 1: Specificity
|
60.2 percent
Interval 50.7 to 69.6
|
56.3 percent
Interval 46.7 to 65.9
|
|
Sensitivity and Specificity of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection PET MPI Compared SPECT MPI for Diabetic Participants When the Diagnosis of CAD by ICA Was the Standard of Truth
Reader 2: Sensitivity
|
69.2 percent
Interval 59.7 to 78.7
|
62.6 percent
Interval 52.7 to 72.6
|
|
Sensitivity and Specificity of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection PET MPI Compared SPECT MPI for Diabetic Participants When the Diagnosis of CAD by ICA Was the Standard of Truth
Reader 2: Specificity
|
69.9 percent
Interval 61.0 to 78.8
|
58.3 percent
Interval 48.7 to 67.8
|
|
Sensitivity and Specificity of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection PET MPI Compared SPECT MPI for Diabetic Participants When the Diagnosis of CAD by ICA Was the Standard of Truth
Reader 3: Sensitivity
|
90.1 percent
Interval 84.0 to 96.2
|
81.3 percent
Interval 73.3 to 89.3
|
|
Sensitivity and Specificity of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection PET MPI Compared SPECT MPI for Diabetic Participants When the Diagnosis of CAD by ICA Was the Standard of Truth
Reader 3: Specificity
|
47.6 percent
Interval 37.9 to 57.2
|
39.8 percent
Interval 30.4 to 49.3
|
|
Sensitivity and Specificity of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection PET MPI Compared SPECT MPI for Diabetic Participants When the Diagnosis of CAD by ICA Was the Standard of Truth
Majority Rule: Sensitivity
|
75.8 percent
Interval 67.0 to 84.6
|
71.4 percent
Interval 62.1 to 80.7
|
|
Sensitivity and Specificity of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection PET MPI Compared SPECT MPI for Diabetic Participants When the Diagnosis of CAD by ICA Was the Standard of Truth
Majority Rule: Specificity
|
61.2 percent
Interval 51.8 to 70.6
|
51.5 percent
Interval 41.8 to 61.1
|
Adverse Events
Flurpiridaz (18F): Safety Population
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Flurpiridaz (18F): Safety Population
n=604 participants at risk
Participants received 2 IV boluses of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection in a large peripheral vein: 1 at rest then 1 during stress on the same day within 60 days prior to the ICA. Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection administered at rest and during stress conditions were not to exceed a total of 14 mCi (520 MBq) for an individual participant. Flurpiridaz was administered on Study Day 1.
SPECT agents 99mTc-based myocardial tracers, example \[99mTc\]tetrofosmin or \[99mTc\]sestamibi were administered as per American Society of Nuclear Cardiology or European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging standards corresponding to study site location. For each participant, the same stress type (pharmacologic or exercise) was used for the SPECT and Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection PET MPI. Also, if pharmacological stress was used, the same agent and the same dose of pharmacological stress agent was used for both types of imaging for the same participant.
Pharmacological stress agents were administered according to the respective Package Insert (as applicable) or American Society of Nuclear Cardiology or European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging standards corresponding to study site location.
|
|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Acute myocardial infarction
|
0.33%
2/604 • From the time of informed consent to end of follow up (up to 77 days)
The Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants who received \>=1 dose of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection in the study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Angina pectoris
|
0.33%
2/604 • From the time of informed consent to end of follow up (up to 77 days)
The Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants who received \>=1 dose of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection in the study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Angina unstable
|
0.17%
1/604 • From the time of informed consent to end of follow up (up to 77 days)
The Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants who received \>=1 dose of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection in the study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
0.17%
1/604 • From the time of informed consent to end of follow up (up to 77 days)
The Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants who received \>=1 dose of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection in the study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Bradycardia
|
0.17%
1/604 • From the time of informed consent to end of follow up (up to 77 days)
The Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants who received \>=1 dose of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection in the study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery perforation
|
0.17%
1/604 • From the time of informed consent to end of follow up (up to 77 days)
The Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants who received \>=1 dose of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection in the study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Left ventricular dysfunction
|
0.17%
1/604 • From the time of informed consent to end of follow up (up to 77 days)
The Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants who received \>=1 dose of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection in the study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Ventricular fibrillation
|
0.17%
1/604 • From the time of informed consent to end of follow up (up to 77 days)
The Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants who received \>=1 dose of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection in the study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Ventricular tachycardia
|
0.17%
1/604 • From the time of informed consent to end of follow up (up to 77 days)
The Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants who received \>=1 dose of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection in the study.
|
|
General disorders
Chest pain
|
0.17%
1/604 • From the time of informed consent to end of follow up (up to 77 days)
The Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants who received \>=1 dose of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection in the study.
|
|
General disorders
Vascular stent thrombosis
|
0.17%
1/604 • From the time of informed consent to end of follow up (up to 77 days)
The Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants who received \>=1 dose of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection in the study.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Anaphylactic shock
|
0.17%
1/604 • From the time of informed consent to end of follow up (up to 77 days)
The Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants who received \>=1 dose of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection in the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Post procedural fever
|
0.17%
1/604 • From the time of informed consent to end of follow up (up to 77 days)
The Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants who received \>=1 dose of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection in the study.
|
|
Investigations
Electrocardiogram abnormal
|
0.17%
1/604 • From the time of informed consent to end of follow up (up to 77 days)
The Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants who received \>=1 dose of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection in the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Asthma
|
0.17%
1/604 • From the time of informed consent to end of follow up (up to 77 days)
The Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants who received \>=1 dose of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection in the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Bronchospasm
|
0.17%
1/604 • From the time of informed consent to end of follow up (up to 77 days)
The Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants who received \>=1 dose of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection in the study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Urticaria chronic
|
0.17%
1/604 • From the time of informed consent to end of follow up (up to 77 days)
The Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants who received \>=1 dose of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection in the study.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertensive crisis
|
0.17%
1/604 • From the time of informed consent to end of follow up (up to 77 days)
The Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants who received \>=1 dose of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection in the study.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Flurpiridaz (18F): Safety Population
n=604 participants at risk
Participants received 2 IV boluses of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection in a large peripheral vein: 1 at rest then 1 during stress on the same day within 60 days prior to the ICA. Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection administered at rest and during stress conditions were not to exceed a total of 14 mCi (520 MBq) for an individual participant. Flurpiridaz was administered on Study Day 1.
SPECT agents 99mTc-based myocardial tracers, example \[99mTc\]tetrofosmin or \[99mTc\]sestamibi were administered as per American Society of Nuclear Cardiology or European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging standards corresponding to study site location. For each participant, the same stress type (pharmacologic or exercise) was used for the SPECT and Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection PET MPI. Also, if pharmacological stress was used, the same agent and the same dose of pharmacological stress agent was used for both types of imaging for the same participant.
Pharmacological stress agents were administered according to the respective Package Insert (as applicable) or American Society of Nuclear Cardiology or European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging standards corresponding to study site location.
|
|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Angina pectoris
|
5.3%
32/604 • From the time of informed consent to end of follow up (up to 77 days)
The Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants who received \>=1 dose of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection in the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
13.2%
80/604 • From the time of informed consent to end of follow up (up to 77 days)
The Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants who received \>=1 dose of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection in the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
11.3%
68/604 • From the time of informed consent to end of follow up (up to 77 days)
The Safety population consisted of all enrolled participants who received \>=1 dose of Flurpiridaz (18F) Injection in the study.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The only disclosure restriction on the PI and/or institution is that the Sponsor can review results communications prior to public release and can restrict communications regarding trial results for a period that is more than 30 days (publications/abstracts) but not to exceed 90 days (patent related issues) from the time submitted to the Sponsor to review. The PI may be asked to remove any Sponsor confidential information and/or delay publication to protect any proprietary information.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER