Trial Outcomes & Findings for Clinical Comparison of 4 Daily Disposable Soft Contact Lenses (NCT NCT03349632)
NCT ID: NCT03349632
Last Updated: 2019-02-22
Results Overview
Overall quality of vision was collected binocularly and rated on a 10-point scale with 1 = poor to 10 = excellent. Subjects were asked "Thinking back over the last week, please rate our study lenses. Rate eyes together." No formal hypotheses was conducted; hence no inferential testing was performed.
COMPLETED
NA
68 participants
Day 8, each product
2019-02-22
Participant Flow
Subjects were recruited from 3 investigational sites located in the United States.
Of the 68 enrolled, 2 subjects exited as screen failures prior to randomization. This reporting group includes all randomized subjects (66).
Participant milestones
| Measure |
DD T2/Oasys 1-Day (Sequence 1)
Verofilcon A contact lenses worn in Period 1, followed by senofilcon A contact lenses worn in Period 2. Each product worn bilaterally (in both eyes) for 1 week on a daily wear basis, as randomized
|
Oasys 1-Day/DD T2 (Sequence 2)
Senofilcon A contact lenses worn in Period 1, followed by verofilcon A contact lenses worn in Period 2. Each product worn bilaterally for 1 week on a daily wear basis, as randomized
|
DD T2/MyDay (Sequence 3)
Verofilcon A contact lenses worn in Period 1, followed by stenfilcon A contact lenses worn in Period 2. Each product worn bilaterally for 1 week on a daily wear basis, as randomized
|
MyDay/DD T2 (Sequence 4)
Stenfilcon A contact lenses worn in Period 1, followed by verofilcon A contact lenses worn in Period 2. Each product worn bilaterally for 1 week on a daily wear basis, as randomized
|
DD T2/Moist (Sequence 5)
Verofilcon A contact lenses worn in Period 1, followed by etafilcon A contact lenses worn in Period 2. Each product worn bilaterally for 1 week on a daily wear basis, as randomized
|
Moist/DD T2 (Sequence 6)
Etafilcon A contact lenses worn in Period 1, followed by verofilcon A contact lenses worn in Period 2. Each product worn bilaterally for 1 week on a daily wear basis, as randomized
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Period 1, First Week of Wear
STARTED
|
11
|
11
|
11
|
11
|
11
|
11
|
|
Period 1, First Week of Wear
COMPLETED
|
11
|
11
|
11
|
11
|
11
|
11
|
|
Period 1, First Week of Wear
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Period 2, Second Week of Wear
STARTED
|
11
|
11
|
11
|
11
|
11
|
11
|
|
Period 2, Second Week of Wear
COMPLETED
|
11
|
11
|
11
|
11
|
11
|
11
|
|
Period 2, Second Week of Wear
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Clinical Comparison of 4 Daily Disposable Soft Contact Lenses
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Overall
n=66 Participants
Verofilcon A contact lenses with corresponding control product (senofilcon A, stenfilcon A, or etafilcon) worn during Period 1 and Period 2 in a crossover assignment, as randomized.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
32.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.1 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
46 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
|
56 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 8, each productPopulation: Safety Analysis Set
Overall quality of vision was collected binocularly and rated on a 10-point scale with 1 = poor to 10 = excellent. Subjects were asked "Thinking back over the last week, please rate our study lenses. Rate eyes together." No formal hypotheses was conducted; hence no inferential testing was performed.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
DD T2 (Sequence 1 and 2)
n=22 Participants
Verofilcon A contact lenses worn in Period 1 or Period 2 for 1 week
|
Oasys 1-Day (Sequence 1 and 2)
n=22 Participants
Senofilcon A contact lenses worn in Period 1 or Period 2 for 1 week
|
DD T2 (Sequence 3 and 4)
n=22 Participants
Verofilcon A contact lenses worn in Period 1 or Period 2 for 1 week
|
MyDay (Sequence 3 and 4)
n=22 Participants
Stenfilcon A contact lenses worn in Period 1 or Period 2 for 1 week
|
DD T2 (Sequence 5 and 6)
n=22 Participants
Verofilcon A contact lenses worn in Period 1 or Period 2 for 1 week
|
Moist (Sequence 5 and 6)
n=22 Participants
Etafilcon A contact lenses worn in Period 1 or Period 2 for 1 week
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Quality of Vision
|
8.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.4
|
9.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.3
|
8.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.8
|
9.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.8
|
9.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.1
|
8.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.7
|
Adverse Events
DD T2 (Sequence 1 and 2)
Oasys 1- Day (Sequence 1 and 2)
DD T2 (Sequence 3 and 4)
MyDay (Sequence 3 and 4)
DD T2 (Sequence 5 and 6)
Moist (Sequence 5 and 6)
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Senior Clinical Project Lead, GCRA - Vision Care
Alcon, A Novartis Division
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Sponsor reserves the right of prior review of any publication or presentation of information related to the study.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER