Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
180 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-05-01
2018-03-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The National Council on Aging study team will train six program leads from the City of Los Angeles Department of Aging and Los Angeles Area on Aging to implement Aging Mastery Program® (AMP). The intervention will consist of a 10-week series held once-a-week for an hour and half (90 minutes). It will be group-based and led by trained facilitators and designated expert speakers in a community-based setting (senior centers). The program reviews 10 central areas of aging (1) navigating longer lives, (2) physical activity, (3) sleep, (4) healthy eating and hydration, (5) financial security, (6) medication management, (7) advance care planning, (8) healthy relationships, (9) falls prevention, and (10) community engagement. The intervention is based in social cognitive theory and attribution retraining and incorporates elements such as verbal persuasion, goal setting, problem solving, and attribution retraining techniques that encourage students to adopt controllable and unstable explanations.
Study Participants (N=200 or n=40/site) will be recruited from 5 study sites to participate in the Aging Mastery Program. UCLA study personnel will be on-site to consent older adults to participate in the evaluation of intervention and take part of baseline and post-intervention assessments. Upon signing the consent, study staff will collect self-administered baseline data (measures and measurement tools --i.e. Patient Information Survey, PROMIS and Patient Activation Survey (PAM) from all participants (n=200). After baseline data has been collected, participants will be randomized and assigned to either the immediate intervention groups (n=100 intervention) or the wait-list control (n=100). At each site, forty participants will be in the intervention group and 40 will be in wait-list control. Following the 10-week Aging Mastery Program®, post-intervention assessment (measures and measurement tools --i.e. Patient Information Survey, Patient Satisfaction, PROMIS and PAM) will be administered. During the data collection sessions, study staff will go to community sites and collect post-treatment self-reported assessment
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention Group
Immediate exposure to the 10-week Aging Mastery Program (AMP)
Intervention
Participants receive the AMP 10-week program immediately
Wait-list Group
Class to start 3 months after the Intervention Group
Control
Participants will not received the AMP 10-week program immediately, rather will wait 3-months
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Intervention
Participants receive the AMP 10-week program immediately
Control
Participants will not received the AMP 10-week program immediately, rather will wait 3-months
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Available to speak and understand English
3. Plans to be living in the region during the next 6 months
4. Has cognitive ability to provide informed consent to participate
Exclusion Criteria
2. Unavailable to attend the baseline data collection session and subsequent weekly intervention sessions
3. Plans to move away from the region during the next 6 months
4. Lacks cognitive ability to provide informed consent to participate
50 Years
100 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The National Council on Aging
UNKNOWN
City of Los Angeles Department of Aging
UNKNOWN
Los Angeles County Area Agency on Aging
UNKNOWN
University of California, Los Angeles
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Catherine A. Sarkisian
Principal Investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Antelope Valley Senior Center
Lancaster, California, United States
Freda Mohr Multipurpose Center
Los Angeles, California, United States
Potrero Heights Community Center
Montebello, California, United States
San Pedro Service Center
San Pedro, California, United States
Sherman Oaks East Valley Adult Center
Sherman Oaks, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Guerrero LR, Menkin JA, Carrillo CA, Reyes CE, Trejo L, Banks C, Sarkisian CA. Community-Partnered Evaluation of the Aging Mastery Program in Los Angeles Area Senior Centers. Health Educ Behav. 2020 Feb;47(1):57-66. doi: 10.1177/1090198119882992. Epub 2019 Oct 19.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRB #17-000137
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id