Sleeve Versus Bypass in Older Patients: a Randomized Controlled Trial

NCT ID: NCT03339791

Last Updated: 2020-12-02

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: COMPLETED
• Clinical Phase: NA
• Total Enrollment: 36 participants
• Study Classification: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2017-09-23
• Study Completion Date: 2019-07-16

Brief Summary

The aim of the study is to compare two different bariatric procedures performed in patients with 65 years or more: gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy. Primary outcomes will be weight loss, control of comorbidities and morbidity of the operation. Secondary outcomes are related to functionality, that will be evaluated with specific tests.

Detailed Description

Introduction: Surgical treatment of obesity in patients over 65 years of age is controversial. For patients in this age group, there is a prevailing concept that the risk / benefit ratio of the procedure should be evaluated for each individual patient, without determining objective criteria or outcomes that characterize this benefit. Increased surgical risk in patients older than 65 years is undoubtedly a limiting factor for the broader indication of bariatric surgery in this population. The two most applied surgical techniques are Sleeve Gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass. Most of the studies that evaluated the two techniques in elderly patients are retrospective, prospective non-randomized, or contemplated only one technique. Recent, studies concluded that in the elderly the weight loss with Gastric Bypass was higher, but the surgical morbidity with the Sleeve was lower and there was no difference in the resolution of comorbidities between the two techniques. In evaluating the benefits of surgery, most studies address outcomes such as weight loss and control of metabolic and cardiovascular comorbidities. Outcomes that are specific to the treatment of obesity in the elderly, such as improvement of functionality, decreased fragility and improvement of the quality of life have not been studied yet. In this field, there is concern that excessive weight loss, accompanied by loss of muscle mass may compromise the mentioned parameters, especially in individuals who already have loss of bone and muscle mass before surgery. For this reason, the assessment of bone mass and body composition in the preoperative period of these individuals is fundamental. In order to identify the benefits of weight loss promoted by surgery and life expectancy, the elderly patients in preparation for operation at the Bariatric Surgery Unit of the Hospital das Clinicas University of São Paulo School of Medicine are submitted to a geriatric evaluation, which includes the analysis of their functional dependency profile, Important prognostic factor in this population. Objectives: The primary objective of the study will be to evaluate surgical morbidity and short-term (weight loss, comorbid control) outcomes of surgical treatment of obesity in patients over 65 years of age, comparing two techniques: Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG) and Gastric Bypass (GB). The secondary objective will be to evaluate the body composition of the individuals, before and after the surgery, comparing the two techniques. Patients and methods: This is a prospective study, in which 40 consecutive patients, aged 65 years and over, will be admitted to the Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery Unit of the Discipline of Digestive System Surgery of Hospital das Clinicas University of São Paulo School of Medicine with indication criteria for bariatric surgery. Patients will be randomized into two groups according to the surgical technique to be used: SG or GB. Data related to surgical morbidity, weight loss, control of comorbidities, nutritional deficiencies, changes in body composition and functionality will be evaluated and compared after a follow-up of at least 12 months.

Conditions

Obesity, Morbid; Surgery; Elderly

Study Design

• Allocation Method: RANDOMIZED
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Primary Study Purpose: TREATMENT
• Blinding Strategy: NONE

Study Groups

Sleeve

Morbid obese patients, 65 years old or more, submitted to Sleeve Gastrectomy

Group Type: ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Sleeve Gastrectomy

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy. Technique: complete mobilization of the greater curvature and gastric fundus up to the angle of Hiss; stapling beginning at 3 to 4 cm away from the pylorus; bougie size 32 French; oversuture of the staple line; hiatoplasty in selected cases; routine drainage of the abdominal cavity

Bypass

Morbid obese patients, 65 years old or more, submitted to Gastric Bypass

Group Type: ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Gastric Bypass

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass. Technique: Pouch size 30 to 40 ml, biliopancreatic limb 70 to 100 cm, alimentary limb 100 to 120 cm, antecolic, routine closure of the mesenterial defects, routine drainage of the abdominal cavity

Interventions

Sleeve Gastrectomy

Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy. Technique: complete mobilization of the greater curvature and gastric fundus up to the angle of Hiss; stapling beginning at 3 to 4 cm away from the pylorus; bougie size 32 French; oversuture of the staple line; hiatoplasty in selected cases; routine drainage of the abdominal cavity

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

Gastric Bypass

Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass. Technique: Pouch size 30 to 40 ml, biliopancreatic limb 70 to 100 cm, alimentary limb 100 to 120 cm, antecolic, routine closure of the mesenterial defects, routine drainage of the abdominal cavity

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Vertical gastrectomy; Roux-en_y Gastric Bypass

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• BMI over 40 Kg/m2 for at least 5 years with failure of obesity medical treatments
• BMI over 35 Kg/m2 with at least 2 comorbidities and failure of medical treatments

Exclusion Criteria

• prior bariatric surgery
• clinical or psychological conditions that contraindicate bariatric surgery

• Minimum Eligible Age: 65 Years
• Maximum Eligible Age: 80 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Sponsors

University of Sao Paulo General Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Denis Pajecki

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Denis Pajecki

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospital das Clinicas - Faculdade de Medicina da USP

Locations

Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina da USP

São Paulo, , Brazil

Countries

Brazil

References

Maghrabi AH, Wolski K, Abood B, Licata A, Pothier C, Bhatt DL, Nissen S, Brethauer SA, Kirwan JP, Schauer PR, Kashyap SR. Two-year outcomes on bone density and fracture incidence in patients with T2DM randomized to bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2015 Dec;23(12):2344-8. doi: 10.1002/oby.21150. Epub 2015 Jul 20.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 26193177 (View on PubMed)

Abbas M, Cumella L, Zhang Y, Choi J, Vemulapalli P, Melvin WS, Camacho D. Outcomes of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in Patients Older than 60. Obes Surg. 2015 Dec;25(12):2251-6. doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1712-9.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 26001882 (View on PubMed)

Pajecki D, Santo MA, Kanagi AL, Riccioppo D, de Cleva R, Cecconello I. Functional assessment of older obese patients candidates for bariatric surgery. Arq Gastroenterol. 2014 Jan-Mar;51(1):25-8. doi: 10.1590/s0004-28032014000100006.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 24760060 (View on PubMed)

Strain GW, Gagner M, Pomp A, Dakin G, Inabnet WB, Saif T. Comparison of fat-free mass in super obesity (BMI >/= 50 kg/m2) and morbid obesity (BMI <50 kg/m2) in response to different weight loss surgeries. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012 May-Jun;8(3):255-9. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2011.09.028. Epub 2011 Oct 20.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 22118843 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

68401117.4.0000.0068

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id